• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CDM 2015: PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FUNCTION FALTERING

    Survey reveals confusion and non-compliance over PD appointment

    Our CDM 2015 One Year On survey was open between 1st April 2016 and 31st May 2016, The survey asked three substantive questions:

    1. How does CDM 2015 compare to CDM 2007?
    2. How does the Principal Designer (PD) role compare to the CDM Coordinator?
    3. How is the Principal Designer (PD) role working

    A total of 163 completed responses were received and the majority of respondents (50%) report that their principal role involved ‘health and safety’. Many respondents also completed the free text fields.

    Our thanks go to everyone who took part in the survey.

    Large majority believe PD not working well

    The Survey Data is published in full so that readers might draw their own conclusions. We offer the following observations and conclusions based on the replies and free text comment:

    • CDM 2015 v CDM 2007 – respondents are almost equally divided in their overall assessment of CDM 2015 compared to CDM 2007. A significant proportion (37%) report CDM 2015 to be an improvement compared to CDM 2007 whilst a slightly smaller proportion (32%) report that CDM 2015 is worse. In addition, no change was reported by 31% of respondents;
    • Principal Designer v CDM Coordinator – a significant proportion (43%) report that the PD role is worse than the CDM-C whilst a smaller proportion (32%) report that the PD role is an improvement. In addition, no change was reported by 25% of respondents; and
    • Performance of PD role – a large majority (64%) report that the PD role is working poorly or inadequately whilst less than half this percentage (31%) report that the role is working well or adequately. In addition, 5% were unable to say how well the role is working.
    Reluctance, confusion and non-compliance prevail

    We asked further questions regarding compliance, understanding and behaviour of dutyholders. The replies reveal the following findings:

    • Reluctance and Confusion – a large majority (66%) report that design organisations are reluctant to accept PD appointments. In addition, almost three-quarters of respondents (71%) report confusion over what the PD must do to comply with the regulations;
    • Compliance – poor compliance by principal designers, designers and clients is reported by the greatest proportion of respondents. By contrast, good compliance by principal contractors and contractors is reported by the greatest proportion of respondents. At the ends of the spectrum, poor compliance by PDs is reported by 52% of respondents whilst good compliance by PCs is reported by 67% of respondents; and
    • Client PD Appointments – significant proportions of respondents report that project clients are: failing to appoint a PD (37%); appointing an inappropriate organisation (48%); or failing to properly resource the PD function (55%).
    Main conclusions

    We draw the following conclusions from the survey:

    1. The Principal Designer function is faltering twelve months after the new regulations came into operation. A large majority report the PD function is not working well (64%) and confusion (71%) regarding the actions required of the PD. The proportion of respondents holding these views has increased since the first survey of visitors to our website in November 2015;
    2. Despite the function not working well only 36% believe that HSE guidance on the PD function is inadequate. This suggests that even more time is needed for the regulations and guidance to become understood and acted upon by clients and appointed Principal Designers; and
    3. In the short-term the suite of HSE and Industry guidance might be supplemented by further HSE FAQS regarding the PD appointment and delivery of the function. This may help reduce the confusion, uncertainty and non-compliance reported by our respondents.

    We would be glad to receive any observations or comment on the survey.

    Further guidance on Principal Designer function 

    Readers may find our posts regarding the Principal Designer helpful in understanding and delivering on the PD function.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    BULK BAG COLLAPSE CAUSED BY UNSAFE STACKING

    Bulk bag collapsed onto workman when struck by fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    INTERLOCKED GUARD NOT WORKING TO ISOLATE POWER

    Two workmen seriously injured when plant started unexpectedly

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    STREET FURNITURE RISK TO PUBLIC FINED £1.4M

    Council prosecuted following injury to child playing on hinged bollard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    WORKMEN SUFFER SERIOUS BURNS FROM CABLE STRIKE

    Assessment and system of work failed to appreciate electrical risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th November 2019

    LADDERS WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR WORK ON ROOF

    Workman paralysed after falling whilst installing roof ladder

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO MANAGE EXHAUST VENTILATION

    HSE enforcement notices on wood dust and welding fume ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th November 2019

    RECALCITRANT DIRECTOR BARRED FROM OFFICE

    Dangerous telehandler used despite earlier fatality and enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    DIRECTOR HID UNSAFE WORKING PRACTICES FROM HSE

    Workers exposed to sprayed paints containing asthma causing isocyantes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    JAIL TERM FOR CONTRACTOR CAUSING GAS RISK

    Roofer sentenced after work caused carbon monoxide release

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    UNSTABLE STAIRCASE COLLAPSE DURING REFURB WORK

    Workman not informed of staircase hazard suffered serious injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    UNUSED SEAT BELT WAS “COMMON PRACTICE” ON SITE

    Overturning dumper truck caused death of operators at spoil heap

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    SELECTED NEWS POSTED RECENTLY ON TWITTER

    PP Construction Safety logo and link to home page [1]Links to other construction health and safety related news reports

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2019

    HSE LOOK TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR CDM SUPPORT

    Council Inspectors focus on CDM client duties – asbestos, fragility and RCS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    VERBAL WARNING OF DANGER IS NO DEFENCE

    Hand of female worker entangled in modified metal drilling rig

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    UNDERGROUND CABLE STRIKE CAUSES 50% BURNS

    Workman seriously injured using hand-held breaker to excavate post holes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    HSE WELDING FUME REVISED GUIDANCE PUBLISHED

    New research evidence on cancer link prompts revision on welding fume

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    VIBRATION MANAGEMENT FAILINGS FINED £600,000

    Vital health surveillance, tool replacement and management found wanting

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st October 2019

    DEVELOPER AND DIRECTOR PUT PUBLIC AT RISK

    Demolition undertaken without surveys and effective safety precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th October 2019

    BY-PASSING MACHINE INTERLOCK FINED £1.275 MILLION

    Trapped key safety system failed to prevent access to conveyor danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    HSE LOSES PATIENCE WITH ERRANT CONTRACTOR

    Roofing firm fined £30,000 over failure to manage work at height risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    TRUSS ERECTION LACKED INTERNAL FALL PROTECTION

    Carpenter fell and injured whilst falling with roof truss

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    WORKMAN FELL HEAD FIRST THROUGH ROOFLIGHT

    Fragile roof dangers not assessed and properly controlled

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019

    HSE RISK REDUCTION THROUGH DESIGN AWARD

    Regulator seeks to promote hazard avoidance and risk minimisation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data