CDM REGULATIONS 2015: PD PAID TO BE IN CONTROL?
Risk of serious non-compliance by CDM 2015 project clients
The requirement for a client appointed Principal Designer (PD) under CDM 2015 is causing head scratching amongst clients, designers and contractors with some interesting variations in how the requirement is interpreted.
In some cases clients are retaining a detached third-party as PD (on the lines of the former CDM-C) rather than appointing a party engaged in design on the project in hand. This despite the HSE declared intention to “embed” the PD duty holder within the project design team.
So what are the implications?
Effective PD control is essential
A key defining characteristic of the PD appointment is that the person (usually a corporate body) appointed must be “a designer with control over the pre-construction phase (PCP)”.
The CDM 2015 definitions of “design” and “designer” are sufficiently broad to include most parties involved in construction projects. However, the requirement for PD “control” is more problematical and begs a number of questions, for example:
- What is PD control?
- How far does PD control extend?
- What if others resist control by the PD?
- What power does the PD have to secure the required control?
In the absence of further guidance from HSE project clients and others must apply common sense. We offer some initial thoughts below.
Client is the source of resources and authority
Control over the PCP implies power and the typical dictionary definition of control is “The power to influence or direct people’s behaviour”. However, the regulations do not provide explicit powers to the PD and hence the only possible source of authority is the client who appointed the PD.
The client will therefore need to be sure that the PD is given sufficient powers within the terms of their PD appointment. The client will also need to make clear what the PD can and should do in the event of a serious dispute over the extent of PD control.
One thing is sure. The PD responsibilities go well beyond those of the former CDM-C role by involving “control” over the PCP plus the planning, managing and monitoring of the PCP.
Appointments must be backed by sufficient fees
Some potential PDs have experienced reluctance by clients to match the PD appointment with commensurate fees. This is dangerous territory for the client when lawyers advise that:
“… there should be a reference to payment for these extra (PD) services. Unless the principal designer is paid, a client will not be able to satisfy its obligation to “make suitable arrangements for managing a project, including the allocation of sufficient time and other resources” (Regulation 4(1)). Equally, it would be impossible for a principal designer to carry out the obligations of that role properly without spending time and effort on them”
Construction project clients risk serious non-compliance if the above issues are not considered and clarified at the outset. The client will need to address these issues at the time of PD appointment and take steps throughout the project to check that the PD is exercising effective control over the PCP.
Organisations formerly offering CDM-C services might quite legitimately be appointed as a project PD. However, HSE may be concerned if the actions exhibited by the PD are those of the stereotypical CDM-C with no evidence of behaviour that could be described as properly resourced “control” of the PCP.
This situation would leave both client and the appointed PD at risk of enforcement action and/or HSE Fee for Intervention charges.
The HSE Legal Guidance and CITB/HSE Industry Guidance provide some clarity as to what actions might comprise adequate control by the PD.
CDM 2015 Information and Templates
See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.
We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.
Latest Construction Health and Safety News
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY NEWS – END OF NEW CONTENT
The addition of content on this website ceased on 17th April 2020.
Material posted before this date can be found by clicking on our SEARCH NEWS DATABASE function.
CDM REGULATIONS 2015: GUIDES AND TEMPLATES
Summary of our advice and tools to aid CDM 2015 compliance
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 21st April 2020HSE WARN OF NEED FOR RPE FACE FIT TEST AND CHECK
Incorrectly fitted RPE will not protect the wearer from dangers to health
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 16th April 2020CORONA VIRUS: LATEST SITE OPERATING PROCEDURES
Industry Bodies publish risk management guidance Version 3
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 15th April 2020TOWER CRANE OUT OF SERVICE SAFETY ALERT
Important advice from Construction Plant-hire Association and HSE
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th March 2020HSE PLAN AND CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES 2020/21
Appointed CDM 2015 Principal Designers remain focus of HSE inspections
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th March 2020COVID-19 ADVICE & GUIDANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION
BuildUK support industry with advice, guidance and information
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th March 2020HSE TARGETING WELDING FUME CANCER RISK
Inspections to enforce improved controls required by new risk evidence
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 24th February 2020HSE TO OVERSEE NEW BUILDING SAFETY REGIME
Government to deliver biggest change in building safety for a generation
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 21st January 2020FESTIVE GREETINGS TO ALL OUR READERS
Read the rest of this article »
SELECTED NEWS POSTED RECENTLY ON TWITTER
Links to other construction health and safety related news reports
HSE LOOK TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR CDM SUPPORT
Council Inspectors focus on CDM client duties – asbestos, fragility and RCS
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 14th November 2019HSE WELDING FUME REVISED GUIDANCE PUBLISHED
New research evidence on cancer link prompts revision on welding fume
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 14th November 2019STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER
CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th October 2019HSE RISK REDUCTION THROUGH DESIGN AWARD
Regulator seeks to promote hazard avoidance and risk minimisation
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th October 2019HSE START PROJECT HEALTH RISK INTERVENTIONS
Regulator set to check health risks assessed and controls in place
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th September 2019AIF NATIONAL WORKING AT HEIGHT CONFERENCE
HSE Construction Head to speak at Access Industry Forum conference
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 23rd September 2019NEW HSE HAVS CALCULATOR TO HELP CONTROL RISK
New calculator includes “cautious estimates” for common tools
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 23rd September 2019IMPROVING CDM DESIGNER HAZARD AWARENESS
Research explores power of “multi-media digital tool” for design hazards
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 27th August 2019DEMOLITION FEDERATION ON RECENT INCIDENTS
NFDC ‘statement of awareness’ follows unplanned collapses
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 27th August 2019RAISING COMPETENCE AND MAKING BUILDINGS SAFER
Life-safety-critical disciplines urged to act on Interim Report
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 27th August 2019BUILDING WORKS COMPROMISED GAS SAFETY
Company and director fined after work created risk to residents
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 27th August 2019HSE SPEAK AT ACCESS INDUSTRY CONFERENCE 2019
AIF National Working at Height Conference November 2019
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 6th August 2019STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER
CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 23rd July 2019