• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: PRINCIPAL DESIGNER ROLE

    Principal Designers to be placed at the heart of project safety

    The (almost) definitive version of the CDM Regulations 2015 plus the associated legal and industry guidance has now been published and HSE expects the regulations will come into force on 6 April 2015, subject to final parliamentary scrutiny.

    Interested parties will be considering the implications for their business and the impact the changes might have on injury and ill-health arising from construction projects.

    Three new Russian Dolls

    There will be three new sets of ‘rules’ namely:

    See also our useful Summary of Regulations

    The Statutory Instrument (CDM Regulations 2015) is at the heart of the ‘Russian Dolls’ and is the best starting point for deciding on the actions required to achieve compliance.

    A failure to comply with the CDM Regulations 2015 will represent a ‘material breach’ and create an offence which may result in a prosecution and/or payment of HSE Fees for Intervention.

    On this principle we have set out below a brief summary of what the Regulations will require of the appointed project Principal Designer (PD). Who can the client appoint as PD? When must the PD be appointed? and What actions must the PD take?

    WHO CAN THE CLIENT APPOINT AS THE PD?

    The change to appointment of a PD rather than a CDM-C is regarded by HSE as one of the most significant elements of the CDM Regulations 2015. The change is intended to place the PD (and client) at the heart of construction project safety.

    PD must be a ‘designer’

    The PD is the designer appointed by the client to ensure that the project is carried out without risks to health or safety by undertaking the actions outlined below.

    The PD can be any person who prepares or modifies a design; arranges for, or instructs, any person under their control to do so in the course or furtherance of a business. The ‘person’ can be an individual or a corporate body.

    PD must have the necessary skills and capabilities etc.

    The PD appointed to work on the project must have the skills, knowledge and experience and, if they are an organisation, the organisational capability, necessary to fulfil the role in a manner that secures the health and safety of any person affected by the project.

    PD skills and capabilities etc. must be checked by client

    The project client must take steps to satisfy themselves that the PD fulfils the conditions regarding skills and capabilities etc. and the PD must not accept an appointment as project PD unless they fulfil these conditions.

    WHEN MUST THE CLIENT APPOINT THE PD?

    The client must appoint the PD “as early as possible in the design process”. The requirement under CDM 2015 (early as possible) is more decisive that the current CDM 2007 requirement to appoint the CDM-C “as soon as is practicable after initial design work or other preparation for construction work has begun”.

    The current RIBA Plan of Work 2013 requires early appointment of the CDM-C by declaring that it is “essential the (project) team is properly assembled” by Stage 1 – Preparation and Brief.

    WHAT ACTIONS MUST BE TAKEN BY THE PD?

    The overarching duty of the PD is to ensure that the project is carried out without risks to health or safety. This must be achieved by actions to:

    • Plan, manage and monitor – the pre-construction phase; and
    • Coordinate – matters relating to health and safety during the pre-construction phase.

    In fulfilling these overarching duties the PD must also:

    • General Principles – take into account the general principles of prevention and the content of any construction phase plan and health and safety file;
    • Risk Elimination and Control – identify and eliminate or control foreseeable risks to the health or safety of any person carrying out or affected by construction work; maintaining or cleaning a structure; or using a structure as a place of work;
    • Designer Checks – ensure all designers comply with their duties to eliminate, reduce and control risk through provision of information;
    • Cooperation – ensure that all persons working in relation to the pre-construction phase cooperate with the client, PD and each other; and
    • H&S File – prepare a file containing H&S information likely to be needed during any subsequent project and ensure file is reviewed, updated etc. from time to time and passed to the client at the end of the project.

    The PD is also required to comply with two other duties:

    • Pre-Construction Information – assist the client in the provision of the pre-construction information required and provide this information, promptly and in a convenient form, to every designer and contractor appointed, or being considered for appointment, to the project.
    • Construction Phase Liaison – liaise with the PC and share with the PC information relevant to the planning, management and monitoring of the construction phase and the coordination of health and safety matters during the construction phase.
    Comment

    The Principal Designer responsibilities are demanding and exceed those currently held by the CDM Coordinator.

    The Regulations make it more explicit that the client must appoint the PD early in the life of a project and that the client must take steps to be satisfied that the company or person appointed as PD has all the necessary skills and capabilities etc.

    The PD is required to check on compliance by other designers and lead / coordinate the risk identification and elimination processes throughout the pre-construction phase.

    Understanding what the law requires and putting in place the right people and processes should put clients and the appointed PD in a comfortable position and help improve action to secure safety through design.

    Where such positive voluntary actions are not taken the CDM Regulations 2015 and the Fee for Intervention scheme will provide HSE with some powerful tools to secure compliance by both Principal Designers and Designers.

    CDM 2015 Information and Templates

    See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

    We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    BULK BAG COLLAPSE CAUSED BY UNSAFE STACKING

    Bulk bag collapsed onto workman when struck by fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    INTERLOCKED GUARD NOT WORKING TO ISOLATE POWER

    Two workmen seriously injured when plant started unexpectedly

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    STREET FURNITURE RISK TO PUBLIC FINED £1.4M

    Council prosecuted following injury to child playing on hinged bollard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    WORKMEN SUFFER SERIOUS BURNS FROM CABLE STRIKE

    Assessment and system of work failed to appreciate electrical risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th November 2019

    LADDERS WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR WORK ON ROOF

    Workman paralysed after falling whilst installing roof ladder

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO MANAGE EXHAUST VENTILATION

    HSE enforcement notices on wood dust and welding fume ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th November 2019

    RECALCITRANT DIRECTOR BARRED FROM OFFICE

    Dangerous telehandler used despite earlier fatality and enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    DIRECTOR HID UNSAFE WORKING PRACTICES FROM HSE

    Workers exposed to sprayed paints containing asthma causing isocyantes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    JAIL TERM FOR CONTRACTOR CAUSING GAS RISK

    Roofer sentenced after work caused carbon monoxide release

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    UNSTABLE STAIRCASE COLLAPSE DURING REFURB WORK

    Workman not informed of staircase hazard suffered serious injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    UNUSED SEAT BELT WAS “COMMON PRACTICE” ON SITE

    Overturning dumper truck caused death of operators at spoil heap

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    SELECTED NEWS POSTED RECENTLY ON TWITTER

    PP Construction Safety logo and link to home page [1]Links to other construction health and safety related news reports

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2019

    HSE LOOK TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR CDM SUPPORT

    Council Inspectors focus on CDM client duties – asbestos, fragility and RCS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    VERBAL WARNING OF DANGER IS NO DEFENCE

    Hand of female worker entangled in modified metal drilling rig

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    UNDERGROUND CABLE STRIKE CAUSES 50% BURNS

    Workman seriously injured using hand-held breaker to excavate post holes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    HSE WELDING FUME REVISED GUIDANCE PUBLISHED

    New research evidence on cancer link prompts revision on welding fume

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    VIBRATION MANAGEMENT FAILINGS FINED £600,000

    Vital health surveillance, tool replacement and management found wanting

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st October 2019

    DEVELOPER AND DIRECTOR PUT PUBLIC AT RISK

    Demolition undertaken without surveys and effective safety precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th October 2019

    BY-PASSING MACHINE INTERLOCK FINED £1.275 MILLION

    Trapped key safety system failed to prevent access to conveyor danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    HSE LOSES PATIENCE WITH ERRANT CONTRACTOR

    Roofing firm fined £30,000 over failure to manage work at height risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    TRUSS ERECTION LACKED INTERNAL FALL PROTECTION

    Carpenter fell and injured whilst falling with roof truss

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    WORKMAN FELL HEAD FIRST THROUGH ROOFLIGHT

    Fragile roof dangers not assessed and properly controlled

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019

    HSE RISK REDUCTION THROUGH DESIGN AWARD

    Regulator seeks to promote hazard avoidance and risk minimisation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data