• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CDM REGULATIONS DELIVER SUCCESS ON LONDON 2012 PROJECT

    How the Olympics project secured health and safety revealed in research report

    HSE has published the findings of a research project which examined the extent to which CDM Regulations 2007 helped or hindered the construction of London 2012 by reviewing how CDM duties were put into practice.

    The researchers found that CDM 2007 had been extended and implemented successfully. In particular:

    • client (ODA/CLM) had a significant impact on health and safety;
    • early and ongoing planning, coordination and contractor involvement were crucial;
    • principal contractors shared ideas and lessons learned.
    • worker engagement helped to motivate the workforce and get key messages across.
    • when compared with the wider construction industry, London 2012 scored significantly higher in 27 of the 39 Influence Network factors.

    The research was based on interviews with ODA Sponsors, Designers, CDM Coordinators, Tier 1 Contractors and CLM Project Managers on nine projects. In addition, a structured workshop was held with a range of dutyholders from a range of projects.

    Key conclusions

    The report was commissioned by the Olympic Delivery Authority and funded by HSE and the Institution of Civil Engineers and concluded that:

    “millions of hours of work can be undertaken and a project delivered in a tight timescale without compromising health and safety. This was demonstrated across the board, but was most evident in the Athletes’ Village; the large quantity of construction work undertaken within the Athletes’ Village in the timescale demonstrates to the construction industry what the possibilities are.

    At the Organisational (site) level, the results from both London 2012 and the wider construction industry indicated that the same five factors had the most influence, namely: Management, Supervision, Training, Planning/Risk Assessment and Communication of Information / Advice”

    The primary factors that characterised how health and safety was addressed on London 2012 were:

    • Impact of ODA on health and safety – setting the tone for health and safety, and then reinforcing this on a daily basis; ODA’s actions tied in with their words giving credibility to the health and safety message;
    • Value of integrated teams – contractors provided valuable input to the design stage; neither Contractors nor Designers could have come up with the final solutions on their own. Building integrated teams can help in applying CDM 2007 – engineers within teams were more familiar with the requirements of CDM 2007 than those involved in security and landscaping, and introduced the concepts to other team members;
    • Value of CDM Coordinators – they provided a challenge function and asked searching questions of designers; continuity of the same CDM Coordinator from Design through to Construction Phase was useful;
    • CDM Integrator on the Olympic Park – this provided consistency in the standard and ways of working of the CDM Coordinators;
    • CDM Coordinators reporting key information monthly – this provided CLM and ODA with consistent information on highlights, escalation, lessons learned, Health and Safety File progress reporting and a scorecard for key performance indicators;
    • Sharing ideas and lessons – tier1 contractors who are competitors outside of London 2012 share ideas on how to solve problems; near-miss information is shared, giving other Principal Contractors advanced warning of potential problems. Principal Contractors were bringing lessons into London 2012 from their wider businesses, sharing them with other Principal Contractors who then disseminated the lessons out to their wider businesses;
    • Carrot and stick approach – excellent health facilities were provided, there were numerous briefings, lessons were shared and the staff were engaged with; in addition, both workers and managerial staff were removed from the Park for inappropriate behaviour; the two together reinforced the importance of health and safety;
    • Interface management – the Logistics and Structures, bridges & highways Principal Contractors required access to sites ‘occupied’ by other PCs; the interfaces were managed via co-ordinated Land Areas and handovers;
    • Management systems compatible with CDM 2007 – this makes compliance with CDM 2007 more likely as CDM 2007 fits into these organisations natural way of operating;
    • Designer early cooperation – designers for some of the bridge structures consulted with steel fabricators at a very early stage to ascertain what the best solutions were; when it came to fabricate and construct these bridge designs, they had already incorporated buildability enhancements so saving time in fabrication and construction and reducing exposure to fabrication and construction risks;
    • Culture of ‘only build things once’ – the amount of re-work was fairly low; most clashes are picked up at the design stage or when the Principal Contractors obtain the designs; this minimises the time and cost of construction as well as minimising the time workers are spent exposed to risks;
    • Culture of challenge to all significant decisions – this meant that organisations were constantly asking questions such as ‘Is this the best way to do it?’ and ‘Can we do it a better way?’; this was found to be an effective form of risk management, and introduced an appropriate culture to organisations; the discussions were also relevant for achieving construction to time and budget;
    • Worker engagement – it was pointed out that engagement incurs little cost, but helps to motivate the workforce and get key messages across;
    • Behavioural health and safety initiatives – to make people responsible for their own safety and the safety of others;
    • Positive health and safety culture – people are motivated, there is a high level of team working, people discuss health and safety issues, workers receive task briefings every day, there was regular feedback to site workers, and managers and supervisors set a good example;
    • Procurement and contracting strategies – used to influence health and safety performance. Health and safety was considered explicitly in both the procurement process and the contracts between ODA and its suppliers;
    • High corporate standards – organisations had their own standards and management systems and roles were well defined; in addition organisational processes were supplemented by the requirements of CLM;
    • HSE involvement – HSE had dedicated teams for London 2012, and provided advice on both design and construction

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    BULK BAG COLLAPSE CAUSED BY UNSAFE STACKING

    Bulk bag collapsed onto workman when struck by fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    INTERLOCKED GUARD NOT WORKING TO ISOLATE POWER

    Two workmen seriously injured when plant started unexpectedly

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    STREET FURNITURE RISK TO PUBLIC FINED £1.4M

    Council prosecuted following injury to child playing on hinged bollard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    WORKMEN SUFFER SERIOUS BURNS FROM CABLE STRIKE

    Assessment and system of work failed to appreciate electrical risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th November 2019

    LADDERS WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR WORK ON ROOF

    Workman paralysed after falling whilst installing roof ladder

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO MANAGE EXHAUST VENTILATION

    HSE enforcement notices on wood dust and welding fume ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th November 2019

    RECALCITRANT DIRECTOR BARRED FROM OFFICE

    Dangerous telehandler used despite earlier fatality and enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    DIRECTOR HID UNSAFE WORKING PRACTICES FROM HSE

    Workers exposed to sprayed paints containing asthma causing isocyantes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    JAIL TERM FOR CONTRACTOR CAUSING GAS RISK

    Roofer sentenced after work caused carbon monoxide release

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    UNSTABLE STAIRCASE COLLAPSE DURING REFURB WORK

    Workman not informed of staircase hazard suffered serious injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    UNUSED SEAT BELT WAS “COMMON PRACTICE” ON SITE

    Overturning dumper truck caused death of operators at spoil heap

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd November 2019

    SELECTED NEWS POSTED RECENTLY ON TWITTER

    PP Construction Safety logo and link to home page [1]Links to other construction health and safety related news reports

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2019

    HSE LOOK TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR CDM SUPPORT

    Council Inspectors focus on CDM client duties – asbestos, fragility and RCS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    VERBAL WARNING OF DANGER IS NO DEFENCE

    Hand of female worker entangled in modified metal drilling rig

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    UNDERGROUND CABLE STRIKE CAUSES 50% BURNS

    Workman seriously injured using hand-held breaker to excavate post holes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    HSE WELDING FUME REVISED GUIDANCE PUBLISHED

    New research evidence on cancer link prompts revision on welding fume

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    VIBRATION MANAGEMENT FAILINGS FINED £600,000

    Vital health surveillance, tool replacement and management found wanting

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st October 2019

    DEVELOPER AND DIRECTOR PUT PUBLIC AT RISK

    Demolition undertaken without surveys and effective safety precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th October 2019

    BY-PASSING MACHINE INTERLOCK FINED £1.275 MILLION

    Trapped key safety system failed to prevent access to conveyor danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    HSE LOSES PATIENCE WITH ERRANT CONTRACTOR

    Roofing firm fined £30,000 over failure to manage work at height risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    TRUSS ERECTION LACKED INTERNAL FALL PROTECTION

    Carpenter fell and injured whilst falling with roof truss

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    WORKMAN FELL HEAD FIRST THROUGH ROOFLIGHT

    Fragile roof dangers not assessed and properly controlled

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019

    HSE RISK REDUCTION THROUGH DESIGN AWARD

    Regulator seeks to promote hazard avoidance and risk minimisation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data