![PP Construction Safety logo and link to home page [1]](https://www.ppconstructionsafety.com/wp-content/themes/ppcs960/images/ppcslogo.jpg)
HSE TO INTRODUCE ‘FEE FOR INTERVENTION’ IN OCTOBER 2012
Investigations could result in high five figure invoices for errant businesses
HSE has confirmed that a cost recovery scheme, known as Fee for Intervention (FFI), will start on 1 October 2012 subject to Parliamentary approval. FFI recovers costs from those who break health and safety laws.
The government believe it is right that businesses and organisations in ‘material breach’ of health and safety laws should pay for the time HSE takes in putting matters right, investigating and taking enforcement action.
Law-abiding businesses will not pay a fee
Detailed provisional guidance has been published setting out how the scheme will work including examples of how FFI will be applied. A ‘test run’ of the scheme has been carried out in preparation for start in October 2012.
Gordon MacDonald, HSE’s programme director, said:
“Confirming the date for the start of Fee For Intervention and publishing the guidance will give dutyholders clarity and certainty about the start of the scheme and what they can expect.
We have worked with industry representatives in shaping the final form of the scheme and the published guidance explains how the scheme will work and what businesses can do to comply with the law and avoid incurring a fee.
It is right that those who break the law should pay their fair share of the costs to put things right – and not the public purse. Firms who manage workplace risks properly will not pay.”
Comment
FFI is a major change for HSE and all businesess involved with UK construction projects. Our immediate observations are:
- Cost: fees will be imposed for ‘material breach’ investigations or enforcement action even when the HSE decide to close an investigation and a prosecution is not proposed. The cost of such investigations may be significant with FFI fees reaching tens of thousands of pounds;
- Impact: there is no limit to FFI fees and some firms may be go out of business as a consequence. This contrasts with court prosecution costs which reflect the defendant’s ability to pay;
- Complexity: construction projects involve clients, designers, coordinators, contractors and suppliers where allocation of responsibility for a material breach may be highly complex;
- Avoidance: all organisations should use FFI as a spur to review current H&S arrangements. The examples given in the guidance provide a good starting point and checklist.
- Minimisation: businesses should understand the guidance and consider how costs might be minimised when material breaches are found by HSE.
Latest Construction Health and Safety News
OWNER RESPONSE TO HSE INSPECTION ENDED IN COURT
Police uphold HSE right to inspect without threats, aggression or abuse
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 24th February 2020HSE TARGETING WELDING FUME CANCER RISK
Inspections to enforce improved controls required by new risk evidence
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 24th February 2020CONTRACTOR FAILED TO REPLACE MISSING PROTECTION
Painter and decorator fractured hip in fall from landing
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th February 2020RISK OF DERMATITIS SUFFICIENT FOR PROSECUTION
Company failed to implement controls and surveillance required by COSHH
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th February 2020COSHH FAILINGS CAUSE ASTHMA AND PROVE COSTLY
Uncontrolled exposure to isocyanates during paint spraying operations
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th February 2020POLICE EMPLOYEE SHOCKED BY DATA CABLE WORK
South Wales Force fined over electric shock from ceiling void cable
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th February 2020COLLAPSE OF PUMP SET TRAPPED WORKMAN
Unsafe system of work transferring from pallet to a raised platform
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th February 2020MODIFIED PODIUM STEPS CAUSE FALL FROM HEIGHT
Firm failed to select and correctly assemble with necessary training
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 14th February 2020SCHOOL LACKED SAFE SYSTEM FOR ROOF RETRIEVAL
Workman fell from roof whilst retrieving shoe of pupil
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 11th February 2020ARM OF WORKMAN AMPUTATED IN CONVEYOR
Major construction materials supplier fined heavily over unsafe system
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 11th February 2020CONCRETE BLOCK PLANT GUARDING BREACHED
Sections of machinery perimeter safety fencing missing for months
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 11th February 2020FATAL FUEL TANK EXPLOSION DURING CUTTING
Companies failed to meet known, established and clear standards
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 10th February 2020FIRMS FINED HEAVILY OVER STUDENT FIRE RISK
Senior fire officers found “blatant disregard” for law and resident safety
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 3rd February 2020ROOFER SURVIVED OVER 6M FALL FROM ROOF EDGE
Replacement of asbestos cement roof lacked proper planning
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 3rd February 2020CLIENT & BUILDER ACCOUNT FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS
Asbestos survey identified ACMs which were removed without controls
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th January 2020UNSAFE USE OF SKIP LIFTER CAUSED FATALITY
Fork lift being lifted on to vehicle fell when winch wire failed under load
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th January 2020HSE CONVICTIONS DATABASE LATEST UPDATE
View current online HSE register of prosecution convictions and notices
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th January 2020OVERHEAD CABLE STRUCK BY TIPPER TRUCK
Company failed to report strike to HSE and take action on earlier incident
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th January 2020CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE ASBESTOS BLUNDERS
Survey absent and asbestos awareness training not provided
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 30th January 2020HSE TO OVERSEE NEW BUILDING SAFETY REGIME
Government to deliver biggest change in building safety for a generation
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 21st January 2020CONTRACTS MANAGER HANDED TWO YEAR PRISON TERM
Safety fall arrest netting would have saved life of deceased workman
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 15th January 2020WORKER FATALLY INJURED BY CONCRETE BEAM
Lifting operation not properly planned, managed and supervised
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 15th January 2020TREE FELLING OPERATIONS LACKED DEFINED COMMS
Workman struck by falling tree inside “normal” exclusion zone
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 14th January 2020CONTRACTOR ARRESTED OVER WELFARE FAILINGS
Recalcitrant sole trader failed to attend court hearing
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 14th January 2020MAJOR DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR FINED £500,000
Collapse of concrete slab caused death of worker and excavator fall
Posted on 14th January 2020
