• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CDM 2015: SEEING THE WOOD FOR THE TREES

    End of year reflections on CDM 2015, health, safety and harm

    Greetings to all our readers at the end of 2017 – the first full year in which the CDM Regulations 2015 were in operation.

    It is difficult to assess how well CDM 2015 has been received and implemented by the UK construction industry. HSE has not published the results of any assessment whilst surveys by others are limited and (including our own) now a little dated.

    Anecdotal evidence suggests a ‘mixed reception’ for CDM 2015. Some bemoan abolition of the CDM-C whilst others have accepted the change to Principal Designer and are trying their best to make the new function work effectively.

    We have noticed polarised views expressed by those who find the changes confusing and others who see the new CDM 2015 framework as logical and sensible.

    There is a danger that we may become bogged down in debating the finer points of CDM 2015 rather than focusing on implementing the bigger picture of what the legislation is seeking to achieve.

    Are we missing the CDM 2015 wood for the trees?

    Health and Safety v Harm Minimisation

    IS ZERO HARM THE AIM?

    What are we trying to achieve? The health safety, so far as is reasonably practicable, of those working on or affected by construction projects? Legally correct but what does it mean? Zero harm? Total safety?

    We prefer a description on the lines that “we seek to minimise the harm caused by construction work” rather than securing health and safety. The latter words are now inextricably linked with derogatory term “Elf and Safety” as a shorthand for bureaucracy and a stifling aversion to any degree of risk.

    The harm we seek to minimise comes from traumatic events e.g. falls from height and more long term causes e.g. dust, vibration or work related stress.

    Both sources can cause harm to ‘health’. Should we therefore just talk about Health At Work programmes rather than Health and Safety at Work?

    CDM 2015 made simple

    To mark the end of 2017 we therefore offer our short description of how CDM 2015 is designed to work without once mentioning ‘health and safety’! Here we go……..

     

    Hazards and Harm

    Construction work involves many hazards which present danger to workers and others because of the significant harm that can be caused.

    These hazards include falling from height, the collapse of structures, lifting heavy components, electricity, moving vehicles and the use of dangerous and hazardous substances.

    Design and Management

    There are opportunities to minimise the harm caused by such hazards during both the project pre-construction and construction phases. These two phases overlap.

    The project client appoints a Principal Designer (PD) and a Principal Contractor (PC) to oversee the actions taken to minimise harm during each phase of the project. The client and PD must provide pre-construction information to help everyone in this task.

    The PD and PC control and coordinate the work of designers and contractors during the pre-construction and construction phases respectively. All designers and contractors communicate, cooperate and coordinate work with each other.

    Pre-Construction Phase Action

    The preventive measures taken during pre-construction can be summarised as Hazard Avoidance and Risk Minimisation (H.A.R.M). The PD and other designers work together to eliminate hazards, reduce risk or facilitate the control of the risk throughout the design process.

    Designers provide information to those constructing the design regarding the remaining significant hazards.

    Construction Phase Action 

    The preventive measures taken during the CP can be summarised as Hazard Analysis and Risk Management (H.A.R.M). The PC and other contractors work together to analyse the hazards inherent in the design and manage the remaining risk by reducing the chance of harm occurring and the extent of any harm caused.

    The Principal Contractor prepares a CP Plan which sets out how the project and significant risks will be managed and monitored plus details of the welfare arrangements.

    Skills, knowledge, training and experience

    Workers carrying out the construction work are trained and have the necessary skills, knowledge, and experience to work in a way which minimises harm.

    Future construction work

    During the project the PD prepares a file of information for the client which will assist designers and contractors in minimising harm during future construction work on the structure.”

    There we are ….. CDM 2015 made simple without once mentioning ‘health and safety’. The key actions required are summarised in the flow chart below.

    If we focus on delivering this simple description of CDM 2015 the harm caused by construction work will be kept to the minimum.

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    DEATH EXPOSED MINIMAL MEWP MAINTENANCE

    Court told about “almost complete” lack of MEWP maintenance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    CONTRACTOR FAILED TO IDENTIFY ASBESTOS PRESENCE

    ACMs disturbed during works and firm failed to take suitable actions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    FALL THROUGH ROOF ON LOCAL COUNCIL BUILDING

    Fragile rooflight fractured when workman ‘misplaced footing’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    YOUNG WORKER POSED SPECIAL RISK TO CONTROL

    Conviction highlights duty to young persons and the vulnerable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    TOWER DEFECTS AND UNSAFE SYSTEM CAUSED DEATH

    Maintenance supervisor fell to his death through roof opening

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    UK MAJOR FINED £1/2m OVER HAVS RISK FAILURES

    Danger caused by poor management of vibrating hand tool risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 20th JUNE 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th June 2018

    DIRECTOR FAILED COMPLY WITH HSE PROHIBITION

    Precautions not taken to prevent excavation collapse and falling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th June 2018

    SCAFFOLD NOT TO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR DESIGN

    Specialist and contractor in court over unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2018

    ROAD WORKER RUN OVER BY ROAD ROLLER

    Reversing alarm not working and warning light not fitted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    CLIENT AND SURVEYOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey proved inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    FATALITY: ROAD WORKER DRAGGED ALONG ROAD

    Night shift worker loses life when struck by road sweeping vehicle

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS AVOID HSE ENFORCEMENT

    Regulator enforcement database reveals few notices involve CDM PDs

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    PROPERTY MANAGERS FINED WITH CONTRACTOR

    Defendants failed to check for asbestos during soffit replacement works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    EXCAVATION CAUSED RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE

    Precautions not taken to secure stability of free-standing wall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    OVERHEAD CABLE STRIKE FIRM FINED £500,000+

    Inadequate system caused risk of harm despite lack of worker injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FINED OVER FIRE RISK

    PD and PC failed to comply with CDM 2015 responsibilities

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

    Lawyer argues guidelines undermine reduction in ‘regulatory burden’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    PANEL STRUCK WORKMAN DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Third party contractor falls victim of poor lift planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    DIRECTOR LED HAZARDOUS WORK AT HEIGHT

    Three occasions when work lacked suitable and sufficient precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RISK ASSESSED BUT CONTROLS FOUND WANTING

    Joiner fell through unprotected opening on roof of new building

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RIBA CRITICAL OF HACKITT REVIEW FINAL REPORT

    High rise residential review dismissed as “major missed opportunity”

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data