Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    CDM 2015: SEEING THE WOOD FOR THE TREES

    End of year reflections on CDM 2015, health, safety and harm

    Greetings to all our readers at the end of 2017 – the first full year in which the CDM Regulations 2015 were in operation.

    It is difficult to assess how well CDM 2015 has been received and implemented by the UK construction industry. HSE has not published the results of any assessment whilst surveys by others are limited and (including our own) now a little dated.

    Anecdotal evidence suggests a ‘mixed reception’ for CDM 2015. Some bemoan abolition of the CDM-C whilst others have accepted the change to Principal Designer and are trying their best to make the new function work effectively.

    We have noticed polarised views expressed by those who find the changes confusing and others who see the new CDM 2015 framework as logical and sensible.

    There is a danger that we may become bogged down in debating the finer points of CDM 2015 rather than focusing on implementing the bigger picture of what the legislation is seeking to achieve.

    Are we missing the CDM 2015 wood for the trees?

    Health and Safety v Harm Minimisation

    IS ZERO HARM THE AIM?

    What are we trying to achieve? The health safety, so far as is reasonably practicable, of those working on or affected by construction projects? Legally correct but what does it mean? Zero harm? Total safety?

    We prefer a description on the lines that “we seek to minimise the harm caused by construction work” rather than securing health and safety. The latter words are now inextricably linked with derogatory term “Elf and Safety” as a shorthand for bureaucracy and a stifling aversion to any degree of risk.

    The harm we seek to minimise comes from traumatic events e.g. falls from height and more long term causes e.g. dust, vibration or work related stress.

    Both sources can cause harm to ‘health’. Should we therefore just talk about Health At Work programmes rather than Health and Safety at Work?

    CDM 2015 made simple

    To mark the end of 2017 we therefore offer our short description of how CDM 2015 is designed to work without once mentioning ‘health and safety’! Here we go……..

     

    Hazards and Harm

    Construction work involves many hazards which present danger to workers and others because of the significant harm that can be caused.

    These hazards include falling from height, the collapse of structures, lifting heavy components, electricity, moving vehicles and the use of dangerous and hazardous substances.

    Design and Management

    There are opportunities to minimise the harm caused by such hazards during both the project pre-construction and construction phases. These two phases overlap.

    The project client appoints a Principal Designer (PD) and a Principal Contractor (PC) to oversee the actions taken to minimise harm during each phase of the project. The client and PD must provide pre-construction information to help everyone in this task.

    The PD and PC control and coordinate the work of designers and contractors during the pre-construction and construction phases respectively. All designers and contractors communicate, cooperate and coordinate work with each other.

    Pre-Construction Phase Action

    The preventive measures taken during pre-construction can be summarised as Hazard Avoidance and Risk Minimisation (H.A.R.M). The PD and other designers work together to eliminate hazards, reduce risk or facilitate the control of the risk throughout the design process.

    Designers provide information to those constructing the design regarding the remaining significant hazards.

    Construction Phase Action 

    The preventive measures taken during the CP can be summarised as Hazard Analysis and Risk Management (H.A.R.M). The PC and other contractors work together to analyse the hazards inherent in the design and manage the remaining risk by reducing the chance of harm occurring and the extent of any harm caused.

    The Principal Contractor prepares a CP Plan which sets out how the project and significant risks will be managed and monitored plus details of the welfare arrangements.

    Skills, knowledge, training and experience

    Workers carrying out the construction work are trained and have the necessary skills, knowledge, and experience to work in a way which minimises harm.

    Future construction work

    During the project the PD prepares a file of information for the client which will assist designers and contractors in minimising harm during future construction work on the structure.”

    There we are ….. CDM 2015 made simple without once mentioning ‘health and safety’. The key actions required are summarised in the flow chart below.

    If we focus on delivering this simple description of CDM 2015 the harm caused by construction work will be kept to the minimum.

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    FESTIVE GREETINGS TO ALL OUR READERS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2018

    POSITIVE STORY ON FRAGILE SURFACE HAZARDS

    Major roofing contractor testifies to working from below roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2018

    LEISURE CENTRE USER FELL ILL AFTER SHOWER USE

    Legionella risk assessment and control measures found wanting

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2018

    STONE CUTTING MACHINE GUARDS FAILED HSE TEST

    Precautions taken following HSE enforcement fell into disuse

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2018

    ROOFWORK CREATED CARBON MONOXIDE RISK

    Falling rubble damaged and blocked home chimney flue

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 12th DEC 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th December 2018

    HSE SAFETY ALERT: TOWER CRANE BRAKES

    Collapse of tower crane jib in high winds prompts HSE warning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2018

    VISITING ENGINEER CRUSHED BY SCAFFOLD TUBES

    Principal contractor “signed off” contractor storage arrangements

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2018

    CONCRETE EJECTED BY PUMPING UNIT CLAIMED LIFE

    Company and director failed to train and supervise pumping operations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th December 2018

    REFRESHED GUIDANCE ON FITNESS TO OPERATE PLANT

    Construction plant medical fitness Good Practice Guide

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th December 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR & LUL USED UNSAFE SYSTEM

    Work method to eliminate moving vehicle hazard not adopted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th December 2018

    OVERTURNING LORRY CAUSED DEATH OF DRIVER

    Groundworks project stockpiling arrangements not properly managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd December 2018

    FORTH BRIDGE LIFTING OPERATION NOT PLANNED

    Major project PC failed to plan, supervise and carry out lift safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd December 2018

    DEVELOPER FAILED ON ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

    HSE inspection revealed refurb works without asbestos survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    POST DRIVER HAMMER CRUSHED HAND OF WORKMAN

    Unsafe system of work for vehicle crash barrier installation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    WORKER FELL FROM LOFT THROUGH CEILING

    Major house builder lacked understanding of loft fragile surfaces risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    NEW SITE DUMPER SAFETY GUIDANCE ISSUED

    Construction plant sector concerns prompts CPA consults on draft

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    CCTV INSTALLER FELL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT

    Contractor failed to properly plan and control the risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    VISITOR DIED FALLING INTO CONCEALED BASEMENT

    Contractor failed to protect basement void on domestic project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    RACKING FALL REVEALED UNSAFE SYSTEM OF WORK

    European firm fined £300,000 after UK sub-contractor employee fell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    FAILURE TO ACT ON VIBRATION AND SILICA HAZARDS

    Worker health put at risk during stripping of furnace lining

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    MAJOR FM FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN BACK-UP POWER

    Power loss at laboratory site created potential risk from biological agents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    IGNORING HSE PROHIBITIONS COST FIRM £250,000

    CDM 2015 and work at height requirements repeatedly breached

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th November 2018

    ROOF COLLAPSED UNDER EXCESS LOADING

    Director and company fined over roof design failures

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th November 2018

    FORK LIFT OVERTURNED IN SCAFFOLDING YARD

    Untrained operator suffered life changing crush injuries

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th November 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic