• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    HSE OPEN FEE FOR INTERVENTION CONSULTATION

    hselogo1Regulator proposal for revised FFI disputes process

    Following initiation of Judicial Review HSE has now decided to “move to a fully independent process for considering disputes in relation to the Fee For Intervention (FFI)” and the regulator is now consulting on the details of how the process should operate.

    HSE recognise the need to ensure that the process is accessible to all types and sizes of business and is proportionate to the issues involved and amount of the fees. It is also recognised that businesses need to be able to understand why HSE considers that they are in material breach of the law and why the fees have been reasonably incurred.

    Consideration of disputes

    HSE proposes that future disputes will be considered by a panel independent of HSE consisting of a lawyer as chair together with two other members with practical experience of health and safety management. The details and justification for the revised process are as follows:

    1. Panel will be provided with the written information and/or a summary provided by HSE and the written representations and information provided by the duty holder;
    2. Disputes will usually be decided on paper. However, the panel will have the discretion to convene a meeting with the duty holder and HSE to address the issues where it is considered necessary and desirable to do so. This is not a “hearing” and there will be no opportunity for witnesses to be called or questioned;
    3. Panel will make recommendations in relation to the determination of the dispute, giving written reasons for its decision, which ordinarily HSE will accept unless it considers the recommendation to be clearly wrong;
    4. Fees which remain disputed can only be recovered by HSE taking civil action to recover the debt. It is obviously open to the dutyholder to defend those proceedings if they still consider that the fees were not payable or the costs were not reasonably incurred;
    5. Introducing a lawyer as chair of the panel could be seen by some as making the process too legalistic and quasi-judicial. HSE do not want to make the process inaccessible to small businesses. However, many disputes centre on whether there has been a material breach of the law and therefore the skills of a lawyer will be valuable in considering this. Panel will need to give its reasons and a lawyer is well placed to ensure this is done appropriately. The other panel members will provide important practical experience of health and safety management.
    6. In the event that a dispute is not upheld the duty holder will have to pay the costs reasonably incurred by HSE in handling the dispute. This will include a fee for the lawyer and travelling expenses for the other panel members. HSE do not anticipate that the costs incurred by HSE in dealing with disputes under the revised system will be materially different from the current system.
    7. Where the fees being disputed under FFI are small, it is possible that the costs of the dispute could be more than the original fees. HSE seek views on whether there should be a different process where the amount of the fees are small and/or there is no dispute about whether there is a material breach and, if so what that process might be.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 16th MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    SPARE POWER INTERLOCK KEY CAUSED DEATH

    Dangerous machinery safety precautions defeated for maintenance tasks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th May 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 9th MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th May 2018

    COLLAPSED CAR PARK WAS UNDER REPAIR

    Rusted steel supports triggered collapse of fascia and floor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    DUMPER OVERTURN CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Precautions during spoil heap creation were inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    HARDWOOD DUST CONTROL NOT MAINTAINED

    Manufacturer failed to examine and test local extraction system

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    SCAFFOLD CONTRACTOR OVERLOOKED MAJOR HAZARD

    Well-known risk unidentified during scaffold erection project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    THREE FIRMS FINED £1/2M FOR FRAGILE RISK FAILURES

    Fall through rooflight hazard poorly planned and managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    CONTRACTORS IGNORED ASBESTOS RISK

    Asbestos pipe lagging worked on without licence and proper precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 2nd MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    SOFT LANDING BAGS TRIGGERED A FALL!

    Fall arrest bag thrown from scaffold took workman with bag

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    FAILURE TO NOTIFY HSE PREVENTED INVESTIGATION

    Regulator prosecutes over RIDDOR non-compliance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR TOGETHER IN COURT

    Fragile roof fall exposes client failure to manage project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    UNTRAINED DUMPER DRIVER SURVIVES OVERTURN

    Inadequate barriers plus lack of operator and manager training

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    PROJECT CLIENT PROSECUTED UNDER CDM 2015

    Building demolished without suitable precautions to prevent danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    LORRY RUNAWAY CLAIMED LIFE OF DRIVER

    Workman died after being drawn under trailer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th April 2018

    PETROL VAPOUR DANGER LEFT UNCONTROLLED

    Workman suffered severe burns during refuelling equipment

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th April 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 25th APRIL 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th April 2018

    ROPE ACCESS WORKER FELL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOF

    Prison sentence imposed on owner of rope access firm

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2018

    FIRMS FINED £2M OVER FALLING PIPE FATALITY

    Incorrect stacking of pipes triggered fall and crushing of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th April 2018

    DOMESTIC PROJECT PC HANDED JAIL TERM

    Workman fell from unprotected roof edge on dormer extension

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th April 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR ERRED ON FRAGILE ROOF RISK

    Firms fine £965,000 after painter fell through waiting room roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th April 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data