• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    TIPS ON PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR ‘DAMAGE LIMITATION’

    How the PC can reduce risk of liability for contractor performance

    Reports of HSE prosecutions published on this website often show that where a contractor has made an error leading to an accident, or poor conditions found by HSE, the project Principal Contractor (PC) will often also be held accountable for the failure.

    At one level this is quite appropriate. The PC takes the plaudits when contractors succeed so should perhaps be prepared to take the brickbats when the contractors they engage fail?

    However, the consequence can be negative on the attitudes of PC staff who often believe the business has put as much effort as possible into managing the project yet a ‘one off’ error by A N Other Contractor lands the PC with an HSE Fee for Intervention, Enforcement Notice or even a Prosecution.

    Project staff may ask – Why should we bother when whatever we do we are blamed for contractor error? What steps can the PC take to reduce the likelihood of ending up in this depressing position?

    We suggest the PC approach should be based on the Four S’s – Selection, Standards, Supervision and Self-Monitoring – which will also help to deliver compliance with key aspects of PC CDM 2015 responsibilities.

    Selection

    Choose contractors on basis of observed standards of prevention. See the contractor working and seek good evidence regarding the H&S standards delivered on live projects.

    CDM 2015 requires the PC to be satisfied that the contractors engaged possess the necessary skills, knowledge, experience and organisational capability (SKEC) to work safely on the specific project.

    Sensible structured and focussed effort at this stage will avoid management problems during the construction phase.  Do not worry unduly about how contractors assess risk or prepare their method statements. Concentrate on the outcomes.

    Standards

    Each contractor needs to know the ‘bottom line’ or ‘big ticket’ H&S standards which the PC will insist on at all times. Too often contractors worry about matters which should be lower down the order of priorities.

    The PC must agree these matters with owners, directors and senior managers of contractors e.g. for a groundwork contractor these matters might be (a) assessment and implementation of excavation support system  (b) sound and maintained plant and (c) properly trained plant operators and (d) communicated systems of work.

    A clear and simple CDM 2015 Construction Phase Plan should set out the PC’s approach and identify the significant risks and precautions on the project which contractors must manage at all times.

    Supervision

    CDM 2015 requires each contractor to plan, manage and monitor the construction work carried out under their control. By contrast the PC must plan, manage and monitor the construction phase.

    The PC must insist that contractors supervise their work effectively at ALL times. HSE has made it clear (CDM 2015 Legal Guidance para 128) that:  “Principal contractors do not have to undertake detailed supervision of contractors’ work”.

    The contractor Risk Assessment and Method Statement (RAMS) will be central to this process and should be the basis on which the contractor supervises their work. Contractor supervisors must be trained to deliver this effective supervision.

    Self-Monitoring

    Contractors must also monitor their own performance (CDM 2015 requires the contractor to plan, manage and monitor). This monitoring should include active and reactive and information.

    By contrast the PC should monitor (a) the results of monitoring undertaken by each contractor and (b) any further intelligence acquired during PC management of the construction phase.

    Any concerns identified by the PC must be acted upon and communicated immediately to the contractor for ongoing action at a senior level.

    The PC must take every opportunity to stress to contractors that effective precautions must be maintained at all times and that “good health and safety”  is about the preventive measures implemented and NOT about the paper outputs produced!

    Conclusion

    Following these Four S’s will not guarantee avoiding accountability for the failures of contractors. It will always be a matter of damage limitation.

    However, these actions should reduce the chance of contractor errors / worker injury and go some way to demonstrating to HSE and others that the PC took all reasonable steps to plan, manage and monitor the project construction phase.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 16th MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    SPARE POWER INTERLOCK KEY CAUSED DEATH

    Dangerous machinery safety precautions defeated for maintenance tasks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th May 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 9th MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th May 2018

    COLLAPSED CAR PARK WAS UNDER REPAIR

    Rusted steel supports triggered collapse of fascia and floor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    DUMPER OVERTURN CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Precautions during spoil heap creation were inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    HARDWOOD DUST CONTROL NOT MAINTAINED

    Manufacturer failed to examine and test local extraction system

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    SCAFFOLD CONTRACTOR OVERLOOKED MAJOR HAZARD

    Well-known risk unidentified during scaffold erection project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    THREE FIRMS FINED £1/2M FOR FRAGILE RISK FAILURES

    Fall through rooflight hazard poorly planned and managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    CONTRACTORS IGNORED ASBESTOS RISK

    Asbestos pipe lagging worked on without licence and proper precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 2nd MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    SOFT LANDING BAGS TRIGGERED A FALL!

    Fall arrest bag thrown from scaffold took workman with bag

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    FAILURE TO NOTIFY HSE PREVENTED INVESTIGATION

    Regulator prosecutes over RIDDOR non-compliance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR TOGETHER IN COURT

    Fragile roof fall exposes client failure to manage project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    UNTRAINED DUMPER DRIVER SURVIVES OVERTURN

    Inadequate barriers plus lack of operator and manager training

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    PROJECT CLIENT PROSECUTED UNDER CDM 2015

    Building demolished without suitable precautions to prevent danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    LORRY RUNAWAY CLAIMED LIFE OF DRIVER

    Workman died after being drawn under trailer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th April 2018

    PETROL VAPOUR DANGER LEFT UNCONTROLLED

    Workman suffered severe burns during refuelling equipment

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th April 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 25th APRIL 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th April 2018

    ROPE ACCESS WORKER FELL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOF

    Prison sentence imposed on owner of rope access firm

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2018

    FIRMS FINED £2M OVER FALLING PIPE FATALITY

    Incorrect stacking of pipes triggered fall and crushing of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th April 2018

    DOMESTIC PROJECT PC HANDED JAIL TERM

    Workman fell from unprotected roof edge on dormer extension

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th April 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR ERRED ON FRAGILE ROOF RISK

    Firms fine £965,000 after painter fell through waiting room roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th April 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data