• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    HOW ‘REAL’ IS THE CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER?

    Personal appointments may unwittingly expose individuals to liability

    In April 2015 the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 introduced the client appointed Principal Designer (CDM-PD) to replace the Coordinator (CDM-C) role.

    The new CDM-PD has oversight of action to avoid health and safety risk during the design and preparatory phase of a construction project. CDM 2015 Regulation 5 requires that the project client must:

    “appoint in writing a designer with control over the pre-construction phase as principal designer”

    The appointed CDM-PD must plan, manage and monitor the pre-construction phase and coordinate matters relating to health and safety during the pre-construction phase so that the project is carried out without risks to health or safety. These are new and onerous duties.

    The CDM-PD must be a ‘designer’ and is required to possess the necessary skills, knowledge, experience to discharge the CDM-PD responsibilities. Where the CDM-PD is an organisation the regulations state that the PD must also possess the necessary organisational capabilities.

    So who IS the Principal Designer?

    The regulations allow that the CDM-PD can be a ‘real’ person or a corporate body. The identity of the project CDM-PD can be found in either or both of the following documents:

    • Written Appointment – the client must appoint the CDM-PD in writing. This written appointment will show who has been appointed with the associated legal responsibilities and potential exposure to HSE enforcement; and
    • Project Notification – in addition to the written appointment the CDM-PD will be named in the project notification sent to HSE regarding notifiable projects.

    The skills, knowledge, experience and organisational capability (SKEC) required of the CDM-PD do not need to reside in one ‘real’ person or one corporate body. Both types of CDM-PD can bring in any additional SKEC required to discharge the duties on a particular project.

    Liability of individuals

    The above issues have real practical importance.

    It is vital that there clarity regarding the identity of the CDM-PD appointment because the function comes with demanding duties and potential liabilities. In our experience some individuals erroneously believe they are appointed as a person when it is in fact a corporate appointment, and vice-versa

    Individuals (‘real’ people) who accept appointment as CDM-PD must be aware that they are personally responsible for delivery of the CDM-PD responsibilities and potentially liable to HSE enforcement as an individual, including legal proceedings, in the event of non-compliance.

    ‘Real’ people should therefore think carefully before accepting appointment as CDM-PD. Caveat emptor!

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    DEATH EXPOSED MINIMAL MEWP MAINTENANCE

    Court told about “almost complete” lack of MEWP maintenance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    CONTRACTOR FAILED TO IDENTIFY ASBESTOS PRESENCE

    ACMs disturbed during works and firm failed to take suitable actions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    FALL THROUGH ROOF ON LOCAL COUNCIL BUILDING

    Fragile rooflight fractured when workman ‘misplaced footing’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    YOUNG WORKER POSED SPECIAL RISK TO CONTROL

    Conviction highlights duty to young persons and the vulnerable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    TOWER DEFECTS AND UNSAFE SYSTEM CAUSED DEATH

    Maintenance supervisor fell to his death through roof opening

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    UK MAJOR FINED £1/2m OVER HAVS RISK FAILURES

    Danger caused by poor management of vibrating hand tool risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 20th JUNE 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th June 2018

    DIRECTOR FAILED COMPLY WITH HSE PROHIBITION

    Precautions not taken to prevent excavation collapse and falling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th June 2018

    SCAFFOLD NOT TO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR DESIGN

    Specialist and contractor in court over unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2018

    ROAD WORKER RUN OVER BY ROAD ROLLER

    Reversing alarm not working and warning light not fitted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    CLIENT AND SURVEYOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey proved inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    FATALITY: ROAD WORKER DRAGGED ALONG ROAD

    Night shift worker loses life when struck by road sweeping vehicle

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS AVOID HSE ENFORCEMENT

    Regulator enforcement database reveals few notices involve CDM PDs

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    PROPERTY MANAGERS FINED WITH CONTRACTOR

    Defendants failed to check for asbestos during soffit replacement works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    EXCAVATION CAUSED RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE

    Precautions not taken to secure stability of free-standing wall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    OVERHEAD CABLE STRIKE FIRM FINED £500,000+

    Inadequate system caused risk of harm despite lack of worker injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FINED OVER FIRE RISK

    PD and PC failed to comply with CDM 2015 responsibilities

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

    Lawyer argues guidelines undermine reduction in ‘regulatory burden’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    PANEL STRUCK WORKMAN DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Third party contractor falls victim of poor lift planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    DIRECTOR LED HAZARDOUS WORK AT HEIGHT

    Three occasions when work lacked suitable and sufficient precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RISK ASSESSED BUT CONTROLS FOUND WANTING

    Joiner fell through unprotected opening on roof of new building

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RIBA CRITICAL OF HACKITT REVIEW FINAL REPORT

    High rise residential review dismissed as “major missed opportunity”

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data