Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    HOW ‘REAL’ IS THE CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER?

    Personal appointments may unwittingly expose individuals to liability

    In April 2015 the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 introduced the client appointed Principal Designer (CDM-PD) to replace the Coordinator (CDM-C) role.

    The new CDM-PD has oversight of action to avoid health and safety risk during the design and preparatory phase of a construction project. CDM 2015 Regulation 5 requires that the project client must:

    “appoint in writing a designer with control over the pre-construction phase as principal designer”

    The appointed CDM-PD must plan, manage and monitor the pre-construction phase and coordinate matters relating to health and safety during the pre-construction phase so that the project is carried out without risks to health or safety. These are new and onerous duties.

    The CDM-PD must be a ‘designer’ and is required to possess the necessary skills, knowledge, experience to discharge the CDM-PD responsibilities. Where the CDM-PD is an organisation the regulations state that the PD must also possess the necessary organisational capabilities.

    So who IS the Principal Designer?

    The regulations allow that the CDM-PD can be a ‘real’ person or a corporate body. The identity of the project CDM-PD can be found in either or both of the following documents:

    • Written Appointment – the client must appoint the CDM-PD in writing. This written appointment will show who has been appointed with the associated legal responsibilities and potential exposure to HSE enforcement; and
    • Project Notification – in addition to the written appointment the CDM-PD will be named in the project notification sent to HSE regarding notifiable projects.

    The skills, knowledge, experience and organisational capability (SKEC) required of the CDM-PD do not need to reside in one ‘real’ person or one corporate body. Both types of CDM-PD can bring in any additional SKEC required to discharge the duties on a particular project.

    Liability of individuals

    The above issues have real practical importance.

    It is vital that there clarity regarding the identity of the CDM-PD appointment because the function comes with demanding duties and potential liabilities. In our experience some individuals erroneously believe they are appointed as a person when it is in fact a corporate appointment, and vice-versa

    Individuals (‘real’ people) who accept appointment as CDM-PD must be aware that they are personally responsible for delivery of the CDM-PD responsibilities and potentially liable to HSE enforcement as an individual, including legal proceedings, in the event of non-compliance.

    ‘Real’ people should therefore think carefully before accepting appointment as CDM-PD. Caveat emptor!

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE UPDATE 17th APRIL 2019

    hselogo1Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th April 2019

    TWO BRICKLAYERS INJURED IN FLOOR COLLAPSE

    Joist hangers incorrectly installed and floor overloaded with blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    FIRM FINED £150K AFTER BOY FELL FROM SCAFFOLD

    Ladder guard failed to prevent 12-year old accessing scaffolding

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    SAFETYCAM VEHICLE TRAPS ERRANT DRIVERS

    Safer Highways reports on new approaches to roadworks health and safety

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    NEW PRE-QUAL SYSTEM LAUNCHED BY MAJOR PLAYERS

    Build UK and CECA publish common PQ assessment standard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    REPORT CONFIRMS RISING COST OF OFFENDING

    Considerable increases in fines imposed on larger organisations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    CONCRETE BLOCK MAKER FAILED TO GUARD MACHINE

    Effective safety precautions absent for a number of years

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th April 2019

    HOTEL REFURBISHMENT DISTURBED ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to act on well-founded asbestos concerns expressed by employee

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    CABLE HIT CAUSED BY LACK OF PLANS AND DETECTION

    Excavation for sign erection struck live electrical cable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    HSE AND THE ‘SECRETS’ OF RISK ASSESSMENT

    hselogo1Regulator advice on successful risk assessment comes at a price

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    WORKMAN FELL INTO CAR PARK VENTILATION SHAFT

    Protective grill unsecured and gave way under movement of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    BUILDER GIVEN PRISON TERM OVER WORK AT HEIGHT

    Unsafe working platforms and lack of silica dust control punished severely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    HSE WARNING ON SAFE DEMO AND REFURBISHMENT

    TV programme prompts stability guidance for demo & refurb project teams

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    VIBRATION RISK UNCONTROLLED FOR TEN YEARS

    Company workers used sanders and air-fed cutting equipment

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th March 2019

    BUILDING OCCUPIER FINED £1.8M OVER ROOF FALL

    Two workmen fell 4m through rooflight during leak investigation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th March 2019

    CONSTRUCTION SITE DEATHS SET TO FALL?

    HSE in-year fatality records for 2018/19 suggest significant reduction

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd March 2019

    BRICKLAYER FATALLY INJURED BY FALLING WALL

    Masonry collapsed during concrete back filling operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    BASIC LADDER SAFETY FAILURES FINED £150,000

    Repair and maintenance firm had no excuse for errors causing injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    HSE ISSUES REMINDER ON SAFE SCAFFOLD DESIGN

    Recent incidents and high winds prompt warning from regulator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    LORRY DRIVER DIED IN OVERHEAD POWER STRIKE

    Major company failed to communicate precautions to grab arm operator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    ASSESSMENT SHOWED RISK – PRECAUTIONS NOT TAKEN

    Workman seriously injured when falling into open unguarded stairwell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st March 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FAILED TO IMPLEMENT SAFE SYSTEM

    Procedures for safe plant refuelling failed to prevent death of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    CLIENT PROSECUTED OVER CONTRACTOR FATAL FALL

    Company breached duty to protect contractors as well as employees

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    FOURTEEN YEAR FAILURE TO MANAGE ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to implement asbestos management plan following survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th February 2019

    CHILD INJURED BY WALL COLLAPSE INCIDENT

    Council failed to carry out “intelligence led” condition inspections

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic