Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: LULL BEFORE THE STORM?

    HSE enforcement opportunities enhanced by new regulations

    The CDM Regulations 2015 have been in force for over 9 months and the new framework for construction project management has received a very mixed reception.

    Our CDM 2015 Five Minute Survey revealed a polarisation of experience between those who view CDM 2015 as an improvement and those who believe the regulations are a change for the worse.

    We found a widespread feeling that the Principal Designer role is not working well with a reluctance to accept PD appointments and confusion over what actions the PD is required to take.

    Various discussion forums contain comments suggesting that the new regulations will fail through a lack of HSE enforcement with clients escaping accountability and Principal Designers having even less impact than the former CDM-C.

    The overall negative response can be summed up as “no change” in behaviour.

    More onerous legal duties for all

    Those with responsibilities under CDM 2015 should be wary of any siren voices suggesting that nothing has changed or that the prospects of enforcement have reduced.

    There have been subtle yet critical changes to the legal duties of key players which impose more onerous responsibilities. These are:

    Client

    The key Client duty concerns arrangements for managing the project.

    Under CDM 2007 the client was required to “take reasonable steps” to ensure that the arrangements were suitable. By contrast, CDM 2015 states that the client “must make” suitable arrangements for managing a project. In addition, the client now has legal responsibility for the Pre-Construction Information and notifying projects to HSE.

    Principal Designer

    The CDM-C was required to ensure that “suitable arrangements” were made and implemented for the co-ordination of health and safety measures during the planning and preparation phase.

    By contrast, under CDM 2015 the Principal Designer must “control” the pre-construction phase and “plan, manage and monitor” and coordinate matters relating to health and safety during that phase.

    This is a mirror image of the active control and management duties already placed on the Principal Contractor.

    Designers

    The primary responsibility of Designers under CDM 2007 was to seek to avoid foreseeable risk during design. This duty could be performed so far as is reasonably practicable “taking due account of other relevant design considerations.”

    Under CDM 2015 this qualification is removed from the regulations making the designer duty more absolute and onerous.

    Principal Contractor

    Under CDM 2007 the Principal Contractor was required to plan, manage and monitor the construction phase in a way in which the “construction phase” was carried out without risks to health or safety.

    By contrast, CDM 2015 requires the PC to plan, manage and monitor the construction phase so that the “construction work” is carried out without risks to health or safety. This places the PC even closer to responsibility for front line precautions alongside their sub-contractors.

    Implications for all

    The apparently small changes set out above have significant longer term implications for all dutyholders under CDM 2015.

    HSE resources and priorities are unlikely to result in many proactive enforcement initiatives over the coming months. This could be seen by some as grounds for complacency and under-implementation of the new regulations.

    Such an approach would be unwise. When accidents and incidents occur HSE has made it clear they will follow all lines of enquiry up and down the chain from client to contractor.

    In doing so HSE is now more likely to find, and be able to prove, breaches by all parties where the new duties have not been taken seriously. In this case any current lack of action by HSE may be the lull before an enforcement storm.

    In addition, the existing Fee for Intervention system and the new Sentencing Guidelines could make CDM 2015 complacency a very costly strategy.

    CDM 2015 Information and Templates

    See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

    We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE UPDATE 17th APRIL 2019

    hselogo1Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th April 2019

    TWO BRICKLAYERS INJURED IN FLOOR COLLAPSE

    Joist hangers incorrectly installed and floor overloaded with blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    FIRM FINED £150K AFTER BOY FELL FROM SCAFFOLD

    Ladder guard failed to prevent 12-year old accessing scaffolding

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    SAFETYCAM VEHICLE TRAPS ERRANT DRIVERS

    Safer Highways reports on new approaches to roadworks health and safety

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    NEW PRE-QUAL SYSTEM LAUNCHED BY MAJOR PLAYERS

    Build UK and CECA publish common PQ assessment standard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    REPORT CONFIRMS RISING COST OF OFFENDING

    Considerable increases in fines imposed on larger organisations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    CONCRETE BLOCK MAKER FAILED TO GUARD MACHINE

    Effective safety precautions absent for a number of years

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th April 2019

    HOTEL REFURBISHMENT DISTURBED ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to act on well-founded asbestos concerns expressed by employee

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    CABLE HIT CAUSED BY LACK OF PLANS AND DETECTION

    Excavation for sign erection struck live electrical cable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    HSE AND THE ‘SECRETS’ OF RISK ASSESSMENT

    hselogo1Regulator advice on successful risk assessment comes at a price

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    WORKMAN FELL INTO CAR PARK VENTILATION SHAFT

    Protective grill unsecured and gave way under movement of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    BUILDER GIVEN PRISON TERM OVER WORK AT HEIGHT

    Unsafe working platforms and lack of silica dust control punished severely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    HSE WARNING ON SAFE DEMO AND REFURBISHMENT

    TV programme prompts stability guidance for demo & refurb project teams

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    VIBRATION RISK UNCONTROLLED FOR TEN YEARS

    Company workers used sanders and air-fed cutting equipment

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th March 2019

    BUILDING OCCUPIER FINED £1.8M OVER ROOF FALL

    Two workmen fell 4m through rooflight during leak investigation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th March 2019

    CONSTRUCTION SITE DEATHS SET TO FALL?

    HSE in-year fatality records for 2018/19 suggest significant reduction

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd March 2019

    BRICKLAYER FATALLY INJURED BY FALLING WALL

    Masonry collapsed during concrete back filling operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    BASIC LADDER SAFETY FAILURES FINED £150,000

    Repair and maintenance firm had no excuse for errors causing injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    HSE ISSUES REMINDER ON SAFE SCAFFOLD DESIGN

    Recent incidents and high winds prompt warning from regulator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    LORRY DRIVER DIED IN OVERHEAD POWER STRIKE

    Major company failed to communicate precautions to grab arm operator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    ASSESSMENT SHOWED RISK – PRECAUTIONS NOT TAKEN

    Workman seriously injured when falling into open unguarded stairwell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st March 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FAILED TO IMPLEMENT SAFE SYSTEM

    Procedures for safe plant refuelling failed to prevent death of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    CLIENT PROSECUTED OVER CONTRACTOR FATAL FALL

    Company breached duty to protect contractors as well as employees

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    FOURTEEN YEAR FAILURE TO MANAGE ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to implement asbestos management plan following survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th February 2019

    CHILD INJURED BY WALL COLLAPSE INCIDENT

    Council failed to carry out “intelligence led” condition inspections

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic