Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: LULL BEFORE THE STORM?

    HSE enforcement opportunities enhanced by new regulations

    The CDM Regulations 2015 have been in force for over 9 months and the new framework for construction project management has received a very mixed reception.

    Our CDM 2015 Five Minute Survey revealed a polarisation of experience between those who view CDM 2015 as an improvement and those who believe the regulations are a change for the worse.

    We found a widespread feeling that the Principal Designer role is not working well with a reluctance to accept PD appointments and confusion over what actions the PD is required to take.

    Various discussion forums contain comments suggesting that the new regulations will fail through a lack of HSE enforcement with clients escaping accountability and Principal Designers having even less impact than the former CDM-C.

    The overall negative response can be summed up as “no change” in behaviour.

    More onerous legal duties for all

    Those with responsibilities under CDM 2015 should be wary of any siren voices suggesting that nothing has changed or that the prospects of enforcement have reduced.

    There have been subtle yet critical changes to the legal duties of key players which impose more onerous responsibilities. These are:

    Client

    The key Client duty concerns arrangements for managing the project.

    Under CDM 2007 the client was required to “take reasonable steps” to ensure that the arrangements were suitable. By contrast, CDM 2015 states that the client “must make” suitable arrangements for managing a project. In addition, the client now has legal responsibility for the Pre-Construction Information and notifying projects to HSE.

    Principal Designer

    The CDM-C was required to ensure that “suitable arrangements” were made and implemented for the co-ordination of health and safety measures during the planning and preparation phase.

    By contrast, under CDM 2015 the Principal Designer must “control” the pre-construction phase and “plan, manage and monitor” and coordinate matters relating to health and safety during that phase.

    This is a mirror image of the active control and management duties already placed on the Principal Contractor.

    Designers

    The primary responsibility of Designers under CDM 2007 was to seek to avoid foreseeable risk during design. This duty could be performed so far as is reasonably practicable “taking due account of other relevant design considerations.”

    Under CDM 2015 this qualification is removed from the regulations making the designer duty more absolute and onerous.

    Principal Contractor

    Under CDM 2007 the Principal Contractor was required to plan, manage and monitor the construction phase in a way in which the “construction phase” was carried out without risks to health or safety.

    By contrast, CDM 2015 requires the PC to plan, manage and monitor the construction phase so that the “construction work” is carried out without risks to health or safety. This places the PC even closer to responsibility for front line precautions alongside their sub-contractors.

    Implications for all

    The apparently small changes set out above have significant longer term implications for all dutyholders under CDM 2015.

    HSE resources and priorities are unlikely to result in many proactive enforcement initiatives over the coming months. This could be seen by some as grounds for complacency and under-implementation of the new regulations.

    Such an approach would be unwise. When accidents and incidents occur HSE has made it clear they will follow all lines of enquiry up and down the chain from client to contractor.

    In doing so HSE is now more likely to find, and be able to prove, breaches by all parties where the new duties have not been taken seriously. In this case any current lack of action by HSE may be the lull before an enforcement storm.

    In addition, the existing Fee for Intervention system and the new Sentencing Guidelines could make CDM 2015 complacency a very costly strategy.

    CDM 2015 Information and Templates

    See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

    We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    SEVENTH LONDON CYCLIST DEATH DURING 2018

    Building products vehicle involved in death of Queens doctor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th August 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 15th AUGUST 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th August 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR FAILED TO SUPERVISE LIFT

    Errors whilst lifting pre-cast concrete blocks fined £600,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2018

    FIRM FINED £400,000 OVER VIBRATING TOOLS RISK

    Hand-held orbital sanders, rivet guns, grinders and drills caused harm

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2018

    OVERHEAD POWER AND EARTHING OF SCAFFOLDS

    NASC combines updates advice on scaffold electrical risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2018

    REVERSING VEHICLE CLAIMED LIFE OF ‘BANKSMAN’

    Workman trapped whilst assisting colleague in reversing lorry

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th August 2018

    TWO WORKMEN DIED IN SPRAY BOOTH EXPLOSION

    Flammable vapour ignited by ignition sources present at the scene

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    SOLAR SPECIALIST FAILED TO PLAN FOR SAFETY

    Fragile roof failed under weight of solar installation worker

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    DIRECTOR AND COMPANY FINED FOR SAFETY BREACHES

    Basic work at height risks and welfare requirements ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    REFURB PROJECT REQUIRED ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

    Property management firm fined over lack of asbestos survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    CLIENT FAILED MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS TEST

    Homes developer prosecuted for breaching CDM 2015 client duties

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    JAIL TERM FOR DEVELOPER AFTER BUILDING COLLAPSE

    Inexperienced workers demolished structure without Principal Contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    CDM 2015 DUTYHOLDERS IGNORED HSE ADVICE

    Contractor, client and director convicted after dangerous site conditions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    MASSIVE FINE OVER USE OF UNSAFE GAS FITTINGS

    College gas installation contractor exposed after multiple gas leaks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    TEMP WORKS DESIGNED BY MANAGER AND UNCHECKED

    Collapse of platform highlighted failure in temporary works management

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    RAISING SAFETY STANDARDS FOR CRANE LIFTING OPS

    Major crane seminar seeks to raise standards and share best practice

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    WORKMAN SURVIVES 6m FALL THROUGH ROOFLIGHT

    Unsecured boards provided to cover nearby fragile materials

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    MAJOR FACILITIES FIRM FAILED ON FLAT ROOF SAFETY

    Site specific planning lacking and safety standards not monitored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    HSE ALERT: UNAUTHORISED ACCESS TO SCAFFOLDS

    hselogo1Regulator sets out new guidance to protect children and the public

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    ASSUMING OTHERS WILL ACT IS NO DEFENCE

    Incomplete edge protection caused 8m fall from roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    LEADING ROOFING SPECIALIST FOUND WANTING

    Risk to employees and the public after failure to meet required standard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    SCAFFOLDER DEVELOPMENT EMBRACED BY INDUSTRY

    CPD training attracts over 2500 scaffolders during first year of operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2018

    SECURITY PANELS FELL DESPITE EARLY WARNING

    Firm fined £1/4 million after worker crushed by falling fencing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    VEHICLE STRIKE TRIGGERED FALL OF ROOF TRUSSES

    Manufacturer failed to identify a suitable safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    INCIDENT: CHILD STRUCK BY FALLING OBJECT

    Wood falling from scaffold triggers arrest of two on construction site

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic