METHOD STATEMENTS: TIME FOR CHANGE IN 2016?
Not required? Not followed? and Not necessary?
The written Method Statement (MS) has been part of the construction project H&S scene since the early 1980’s and the subsequent legal requirement regarding Risk Assessment (RA) led to the acronym RAMS – Risk Assessment and Method Statement.
HSE explain that risk assessment is a careful examination of what, in your work, could cause harm to people, so that you can weigh up whether you have enough precautions or whether you should do more.
You MUST carry out a risk assessment but you only need to record the “significant findings” if you employ five or more people. By contrast, HSE explains that a safety method statement is “NOT required by law” and that whether safety method statements are used or not, it is essential to make sure that risks are controlled.
Are method statements helping to control risk?
Despite the near universal use of method statements we frequently hear comment t that “nobody reads the method statement” or that the MS is far too long and prepared without reference to those carrying out the work.
The MS is viewed by many as the “paperwork” required and designed to satisfy clients or regulators with little relevance to how risk and precautions are communicated on the project.
Checking that the MS is being followed is often secondary to having the statement signed by those likely to be injured and safely filed away.
The revelation that the MS is not, or cannot be followed, often comes to light after an accident, or a visit by the regulator.
Is it therefore time to rethink the role of Method Statements on construction projects? Questions we should ask in 2016 include:
- Not Required? – why do line managers and H&S advisers spend so much time on something which is NOT a legal requirement and held in contempt by many?
- Risk Assessment? – would it be better to invest that time and energy on implementing the risk assessment which already identifies the hazards and required controls?
- Focus on checking? – would this allow more time for checking that the sensible controls required are being followed rather than preparing and shuffling around an additional document which is not required by law?
- Greater involvement? – would such change result in greater involvement of those carrying out the work and improve their understanding of the risks and commitment to maintaining the control measures required?
We would not want to throw the baby out with the bath water and many may conclude that their current MS system remains fit for purpose. However, our experience suggests that the construction project Method Statement is not in “good health” and in need of thorough review by all as we move into 2016.
Some Relevant Posts
HSE PLEA FOR FOCUS ON CONTROL NOT ‘PAPERWORK’
Paperwork makes H&S risk assessments a “bugbear”
ANNUAL RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEWS NOT REQUIRED
HSE Myth Buster panel holds forth on risk assessments
MODEL RISK ASSESSMENTS ENDORSED IN HSE GUIDE
New guidance on risk assessment requirement simplified and updated
Latest Construction Health and Safety News
CHILD INJURED BY WALL COLLAPSE INCIDENT
Council failed to carry out “intelligence led” condition inspections
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th February 2019BOTTLE JACK SUPPORT FAILED TO PREVENT DEATH
Director sentenced alongside company over death of engineer
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th February 2019TEMPORARY WORKS FAILURES CAUSED FATAL FALL
Platform not designed and system for installation and inspection inadequate
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th February 2019SOLVENT IGNITED DURING FLOOR CLEANING WORKS
Flammable solvent fire fought with water spreading fire further
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 13th February 2019INEVITABLE COLLAPSE OF SCAFFOLD ON TO SCHOOL
Scaffold not designed or installed to withstand foreseeable loads
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 13th February 2019HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 13th FEB 2019
Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 13th February 2019OIL DRUM EXPLODED DURING HOT CUTTING WORK
Firm fined £400k after drum lid ejected causing loss of leg
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 12th February 2019ROOFLIGHT FALL ON NUCLEAR POWER SITE
Energy generating company and maintenance contractor fined
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 12th February 2019DIRECTOR PROSECUTED AFTER 6METRE ROOF FALL
Untrained worker fell through rooflight in fragile asbestos roof
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 12th February 2019HSE ALERT: MILD STEEL WELDING CANCER RISK
HSE announces enforcement action change based on new cancer evidence
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 11th February 2019LORRY MOUNTED LIFTING OPERATION PROVED FATAL
Steel staircase toppled from vehicle after sling snagged
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 7th February 2019DIRECTOR AND BUSINESS IN COURT OVER DEATH
Scaffold not priced for on domestic roof-line refurbishment work
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 6th February 2019FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT HAZARD PROTECTION MISSING
Two businesses prosecuted after a worker fell through a fragile rooflight
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 5th February 2019STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER
CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 4th February 2019FINGERS CRUSHED BY METAL FOLDING MACHINE
Steel cladding firm fined £600k over failure guard access to danger
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 4th February 2019ASBESTOS ILLEGALLY REMOVED AFTER SURVEY
Surveyor pricing asbestos work found contractor jumped the gun
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 4th February 2019SITE DUMPER PRECAUTIONS FAILED TO PREVENT DEATH
Contractor fined £600k for poor management of vehicle/people interface
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 4th February 2019BUILDER EXPOSED RESIDENTS TO POISONING HAZARD
Prison term for builder who put three at risk from carbon monoxide
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 4th February 2019POOR SEPARATION OF VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS
Logistics company fined £150,000 after driver suffers serious injuries
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 4th February 2019£1MILLION FINE OVER VEHICLE RISK MANAGEMENT
Death of workman exposed uncontrolled vehicle manoeuvring
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 25th January 2019ACCREDITATION IS ONLY ONE WAY TO CONFIDENCE
HSE publishes guidance on demonstrating CDM 2015 competence
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 24th January 2019PRECAUTIONS ON PAPER LACKING IN PRACTICE
Fatal fall through opening in concrete slab during work with breaker
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 24th January 2019HSE TARGETS HEALTH ON LONDON PROJECTS
Regulator starts inspection ‘blitz’ on construction sites
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 23rd January 2019WORKMAN FELL FROM UNSECURED LADDER
Industrial cladding company failed to assess and control WAH
Read the rest of this article »
Posted on 18th January 2019