• Total Access Higher Safety
    Turner Access Chipmunk Data

    METHOD STATEMENTS: TIME FOR CHANGE IN 2016?

    Not required? Not followed? and Not necessary?

    The written Method Statement (MS) has been part of the construction project H&S scene since the early 1980’s and the subsequent legal requirement regarding Risk Assessment (RA) led to the acronym RAMS – Risk Assessment and Method Statement.

    HSE explain that risk assessment is a careful examination of what, in your work, could cause harm to people, so that you can weigh up whether you have enough precautions or whether you should do more.

    You MUST carry out a risk assessment but you only need to record the “significant findings” if you employ five or more people. By contrast, HSE explains that a safety method statement is “NOT required by law” and that whether safety method statements are used or not, it is essential to make sure that risks are controlled.

    Are method statements helping to control risk?

    Despite the near universal use of method statements we frequently hear comment t that “nobody reads the method statement” or that the MS is far too long and prepared without reference to those carrying out the work.

    The MS is viewed by many as the “paperwork” required and designed to satisfy clients or regulators with little relevance to how risk and precautions are communicated on the project.

    Checking that the MS is being followed is often secondary to having the statement signed by those likely to be injured and safely filed away.

    The revelation that the MS is not, or cannot be followed, often comes to light after an accident, or a visit by the regulator.

    Is it therefore time to rethink the role of Method Statements on construction projects? Questions we should ask in 2016 include:

    • Not Required? – why do line managers and H&S advisers spend so much time on something which is NOT a legal requirement and held in contempt by many?
    • Risk Assessment? – would it be better to invest that time and energy on implementing the risk assessment which already identifies the hazards and required controls?
    • Focus on checking? – would this allow more time for checking that the sensible controls required are being followed rather than preparing and shuffling around an additional document which is not required by law?
    • Greater involvement? – would such change result in greater involvement of those carrying out the work and improve their understanding of the risks and commitment to maintaining the control measures required?

    We would not want to throw the baby out with the bath water and many may conclude that their current MS system remains fit for purpose. However, our experience suggests that the construction project Method Statement is not in “good health” and in need of thorough review by all as we move into 2016.

    Some Relevant Posts

    HSE PLEA FOR FOCUS ON CONTROL NOT ‘PAPERWORK’
    Paperwork makes H&S risk assessments a “bugbear”
    ANNUAL RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEWS NOT REQUIRED
    HSE Myth Buster panel holds forth on risk assessments
    MODEL RISK ASSESSMENTS ENDORSED IN HSE GUIDE
    New guidance on risk assessment requirement simplified and updated

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 26th APRIL 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th April 2017

    FATALITY: HOMES PROJECT IN SCOTLAND

    Circumstances of construction worker death remain unclear

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    HSE OPEN FEE FOR INTERVENTION CONSULTATION

    hselogo1Regulator proposal for revised FFI disputes process

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    LIFTING OPERATION WITH EXCAVATOR CAUSED DEATH

    Groundworker fatally injured when struck by concrete drainage cover

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    WATER FIRM FINED £1.8M AFTER WORKER DROWNED

    Workman fell through opening into sand filtration tank

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    PC AND CONTRACTOR PAY PRICE FOR UNSAFE WORKING

    Dangerous working practices continued during ‘snowy’ weather

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 19th APRIL 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th April 2017

    TOUGHER COURT PENALTIES UNDER NEW GUIDELINES

    Analysis of health and safety prosecutions reveals rise on most metrics

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th April 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 12th APRIL 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th April 2017

    STOP. MAKE A CHANGE DAY – 18th APRIL 2017

    Infrastructure sector holds first ever ‘National Stand-Down Day’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th April 2017

    ELECTRICIAN FAILED TO PROTECT HIS TRAINEE

    Community service sentence after apprentice fell through ceiling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th April 2017

    CLIENT FINED OVER ABSENT ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment project commenced before survey undertaken

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th April 2017

    GROUNDWORKER LEFT PARALYSED BY FALLING PIPE

    Gas infrastructure business failed to maintain safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th April 2017

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR FAILED ON POWER LINE RISK

    Workman suffers severe burns after post touches 11kV overhead cable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th April 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 6th APRIL 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th April 2017

    LADDER UNSUITABLE FOR IVY CLEARING TASK

    Electricity supplier fined £900,000 after linesman ladder fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd April 2017

    ABSENCE OF ASBESTOS SURVEY PUT FIRMS IN COURT

    Contractor and removal firm jointly responsible for failings

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd April 2017

    WORKING WELL TOGTHER DESIGNER CDM EVENT

    Designer Awareness Day – Preventing Occupational Disease through Design

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd April 2017

    INDUSTRY BODIES STRUCTURE MEWP SAFETY ALERTS

    Strategic Forum Plant Safety Group publishes Safety Alert Protocol

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd April 2017

    ASPHALT MIXER CLAIMS FINGERS OF WORKMAN

    Guarding on mixing machine below the safety standard required

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd April 2017

    FATALITY: SECOND WINDFARM DEATH IN TWO WEEKS

    Workman fell on operational windfarm under maintenance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd April 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 29th MAR 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th March 2017

    UTILITY COMPANY CONVICTED AFTER FALL

    Workman died when fall protection lanyard accidentally severed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th March 2017

    INTENDED SYSTEM UNSAFE … AND NOT FOLLOWED

    Principal contractor and partner failed to protect from roof fall hazard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th March 2017

    DRAMATIC RESCUE FROM HEIGHT CAUGHT ON VIDEO

    Painter in US saved by fall arrest and rescued after platform failure

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th March 2017
    Turner Access Chipmunk Data
    Total Access Higher Safety