• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: PD PAID TO BE IN CONTROL?

    Risk of serious non-compliance by CDM 2015 project clients

    The requirement for a client appointed Principal Designer (PD) under CDM 2015 is causing head scratching amongst clients, designers and contractors with some interesting variations in how the requirement is interpreted.

    In some cases clients are retaining a detached third-party as PD (on the lines of the former CDM-C) rather than appointing a party engaged in design on the project in hand. This despite the HSE declared intention to “embed” the PD duty holder within the project design team.

    So what are the implications?

    Effective PD control is essential

    A key defining characteristic of the PD appointment is that the person (usually a corporate body) appointed must be “a designer with control over the pre-construction phase (PCP)”.

    The CDM 2015 definitions of “design” and “designer” are sufficiently broad to include most parties involved in construction projects. However, the requirement for PD “control” is more problematical and begs a number of questions, for example:

    1. What is PD control?
    2. How far does PD control extend?
    3. What if others resist control by the PD?
    4. What power does the PD have to secure the required control?

    In the absence of further guidance from HSE project clients and others must apply common sense. We offer some initial thoughts below.

    Client is the source of resources and authority

    Control over the PCP implies power and the typical dictionary definition of control is “The power to influence or direct people’s behaviour”. However, the regulations do not provide explicit powers to the PD and hence the only possible source of authority is the client who appointed the PD.

    The client will therefore need to be sure that the PD is given sufficient powers within the terms of their PD appointment. The client will also need to make clear what the PD can and should do in the event of a serious dispute over the extent of PD control.

    One thing is sure. The PD responsibilities go well beyond those of the former CDM-C role by involving “control” over the PCP plus the planning, managing and monitoring of the PCP.

    Appointments must be backed by sufficient fees

    Some potential PDs have experienced reluctance by clients to match the PD appointment with commensurate fees.  This is dangerous territory for the client when lawyers advise that:

    “… there should be a reference to payment for these extra (PD) services. Unless the principal designer is paid, a client will not be able to satisfy its obligation to “make suitable arrangements for managing a project, including the allocation of sufficient time and other resources” (Regulation 4(1)). Equally, it would be impossible for a principal designer to carry out the obligations of that role properly without spending time and effort on them”

    Construction project clients risk serious non-compliance if the above issues are not considered and clarified at the outset. The client will need to address these issues at the time of PD appointment and take steps throughout the project to check that the PD is exercising effective control over the PCP.

    Organisations formerly offering CDM-C services might quite legitimately be appointed as a project PD. However, HSE may be concerned if the actions exhibited by the PD are those of the stereotypical CDM-C with no evidence of behaviour that could be described as properly resourced “control” of the PCP.

    This situation would leave both client and the appointed PD at risk of enforcement action and/or HSE Fee for Intervention charges.

    The HSE Legal Guidance and CITB/HSE Industry Guidance provide some clarity as to what actions might comprise adequate control by the PD.

    CDM 2015 Information and Templates

    See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

    We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    DEATH EXPOSED MINIMAL MEWP MAINTENANCE

    Court told about “almost complete” lack of MEWP maintenance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    CONTRACTOR FAILED TO IDENTIFY ASBESTOS PRESENCE

    ACMs disturbed during works and firm failed to take suitable actions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    FALL THROUGH ROOF ON LOCAL COUNCIL BUILDING

    Fragile rooflight fractured when workman ‘misplaced footing’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    YOUNG WORKER POSED SPECIAL RISK TO CONTROL

    Conviction highlights duty to young persons and the vulnerable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    TOWER DEFECTS AND UNSAFE SYSTEM CAUSED DEATH

    Maintenance supervisor fell to his death through roof opening

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    UK MAJOR FINED £1/2m OVER HAVS RISK FAILURES

    Danger caused by poor management of vibrating hand tool risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 20th JUNE 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th June 2018

    DIRECTOR FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PROHIBITION

    Precautions not taken to prevent excavation collapse and falling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th June 2018

    SCAFFOLD NOT TO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR DESIGN

    Specialist and contractor in court over unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2018

    ROAD WORKER RUN OVER BY ROAD ROLLER

    Reversing alarm not working and warning light not fitted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    CLIENT AND SURVEYOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey proved inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    FATALITY: ROAD WORKER DRAGGED ALONG ROAD

    Night shift worker loses life when struck by road sweeping vehicle

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS AVOID HSE ENFORCEMENT

    Regulator enforcement database reveals few notices involve CDM PDs

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    PROPERTY MANAGERS FINED WITH CONTRACTOR

    Defendants failed to check for asbestos during soffit replacement works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    EXCAVATION CAUSED RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE

    Precautions not taken to secure stability of free-standing wall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    OVERHEAD CABLE STRIKE FIRM FINED £500,000+

    Inadequate system caused risk of harm despite lack of worker injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FINED OVER FIRE RISK

    PD and PC failed to comply with CDM 2015 responsibilities

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

    Lawyer argues guidelines undermine reduction in ‘regulatory burden’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    PANEL STRUCK WORKMAN DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Third party contractor falls victim of poor lift planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    DIRECTOR LED HAZARDOUS WORK AT HEIGHT

    Three occasions when work lacked suitable and sufficient precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RISK ASSESSED BUT CONTROLS FOUND WANTING

    Joiner fell through unprotected opening on roof of new building

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RIBA CRITICAL OF HACKITT REVIEW FINAL REPORT

    High rise residential review dismissed as “major missed opportunity”

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data