Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

CDM REGULATIONS 2015: PD PAID TO BE IN CONTROL?

Risk of serious non-compliance by CDM 2015 project clients

The requirement for a client appointed Principal Designer (PD) under CDM 2015 is causing head scratching amongst clients, designers and contractors with some interesting variations in how the requirement is interpreted.

In some cases clients are retaining a detached third-party as PD (on the lines of the former CDM-C) rather than appointing a party engaged in design on the project in hand. This despite the HSE declared intention to “embed” the PD duty holder within the project design team.

So what are the implications?

Effective PD control is essential

A key defining characteristic of the PD appointment is that the person (usually a corporate body) appointed must be “a designer with control over the pre-construction phase (PCP)”.

The CDM 2015 definitions of “design” and “designer” are sufficiently broad to include most parties involved in construction projects. However, the requirement for PD “control” is more problematical and begs a number of questions, for example:

  1. What is PD control?
  2. How far does PD control extend?
  3. What if others resist control by the PD?
  4. What power does the PD have to secure the required control?

In the absence of further guidance from HSE project clients and others must apply common sense. We offer some initial thoughts below.

Client is the source of resources and authority

Control over the PCP implies power and the typical dictionary definition of control is “The power to influence or direct people’s behaviour”. However, the regulations do not provide explicit powers to the PD and hence the only possible source of authority is the client who appointed the PD.

The client will therefore need to be sure that the PD is given sufficient powers within the terms of their PD appointment. The client will also need to make clear what the PD can and should do in the event of a serious dispute over the extent of PD control.

One thing is sure. The PD responsibilities go well beyond those of the former CDM-C role by involving “control” over the PCP plus the planning, managing and monitoring of the PCP.

Appointments must be backed by sufficient fees

Some potential PDs have experienced reluctance by clients to match the PD appointment with commensurate fees.  This is dangerous territory for the client when lawyers advise that:

“… there should be a reference to payment for these extra (PD) services. Unless the principal designer is paid, a client will not be able to satisfy its obligation to “make suitable arrangements for managing a project, including the allocation of sufficient time and other resources” (Regulation 4(1)). Equally, it would be impossible for a principal designer to carry out the obligations of that role properly without spending time and effort on them”

Construction project clients risk serious non-compliance if the above issues are not considered and clarified at the outset. The client will need to address these issues at the time of PD appointment and take steps throughout the project to check that the PD is exercising effective control over the PCP.

Organisations formerly offering CDM-C services might quite legitimately be appointed as a project PD. However, HSE may be concerned if the actions exhibited by the PD are those of the stereotypical CDM-C with no evidence of behaviour that could be described as properly resourced “control” of the PCP.

This situation would leave both client and the appointed PD at risk of enforcement action and/or HSE Fee for Intervention charges.

The HSE Legal Guidance and CITB/HSE Industry Guidance provide some clarity as to what actions might comprise adequate control by the PD.

CDM 2015 Information and Templates

See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

DOING SAFETY DIFFERENTLY – THE MOVIE…

Reducing compliance bureaucracy and putting trusting in people

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 13th October 2017

WORKMAN FELL FROM EDGE OF UNGUARDED OPENING

Firm fined £95,000 over failure to assess and protect workers at height

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 13th October 2017

FITTERS FINGERS SEVERED BY UNGUARDED TABLE SAW

Compensation order for injured workman takes precedence over fine

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 13th October 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 11th OCT 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 11th October 2017

ROOF WORKER FRACTURED BACK IN FRAGILE FALL

Fragile wood wool slabs failed to support weight of workman

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 11th October 2017

PRODUCTS: ELIMINATING HEALTH RISKS BY DESIGN

Innovative product eliminates key hazards for CDM 2015 designers

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 11th October 2017

DRIVER DIED WHEN CRUSHED BETWEEN VEHICLES

Firm failed to follow industry guidance on coupling and uncoupling

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 10th October 2017

WORKER LOSES HANDS AND FEET IN POWER LINE STRIKE

Director handed prison term over unsafe scaffolding operation

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 6th October 2017

INDUSTRY FORUM CONSIDERS DUMPER HAZARDS

CPA and CECA plan new guidance on Forward Tipping Dumpers

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 6th October 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 4th OCT 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 5th October 2017

INCIDENT: UNDERGROUND CABLE STRIKE

Three treated for burns after power cable struck in London

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 5th October 2017

COUNCIL FAILED TO IMPLEMENT STATED HAVS POLICY

Fined £150k over failure to control and monitor hand-arm vibration hazard

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 5th October 2017

PROJECT MANAGER FINED OVER FAILURE TO MANAGE

Principal Contractor prosecuted alongside responsible manager

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd October 2017

HSE CONSTRUCTION BLITZ GOES LIVE ON HEALTH RISKS

hselogo1Second phase of campaign looks for compliance on dust management

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd October 2017

UPDATE OF ALL HSE ASBESTOS ESSENTIALS GUIDANCE

HSE publish fresh guidance for Non-Licensed work with asbestos

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th September 2017

HSE FINALISES PRIORITIES ON HEALTH AND CDM

Clients and designers need to act on lung disease and other health risks

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th September 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 27th SEPT 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th September 2017

SCAFFOLD INSPECTORS ISSUED FALSIFIED CERTIFICATES

Prosecution for two after workman fell from illegitimately signed off scaffold

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 25th September 2017

REVERSING EXCAVATOR CRUSHED WORKMAN

Lack of management system to segregate pedestrians and vehicles

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st September 2017

CLIENT FINED £2.5 MILLION AFTER CONTRACTOR DEATH

Fatal fall through roof leaves client responsible for massive fine

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st September 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 20th SEPT 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th September 2017

NEW EDGE PROTECTION INSTALLATION TRAINING

Trade body launches CSCS backed edge protection installer qualification

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th September 2017

GOVERNMENT CALLS FOR ACTION ON ILL-HEALTH

Business leaders accept charge of inaction on work-related ill-health

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th September 2017

FIRM FAILED TO ENFORCE FORK LIFT SEAT BELT USE

Operator suffered fatal crush injuries after FLT overturned

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th September 2017

DIRECTOR AND FOREMAN JAILED OVER FATAL FALL

Failure to act on HSE advice ended in gross negligence manslaughter

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th September 2017
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access