Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: DESIGNER RISK AVOIDANCE

    What CDM 2015 designers must do when preparing or modifying designs

    On 6th April 2015 the primary duty and objective of designers under the CDM Regulations remains substantively unchanged namely to, eliminate, reduce or control risk through design. However, the duty will become more absolute and demanding in terms of the risk avoidance actions required.

    The CDM Regulation 2007 designer duty is qualified and allows the designer to take “due account of other relevant design considerations”. This critical qualification has been removed from CDM 2015 making it easier for the regulator to allege a ‘material breach’ of statute. This might thereby trigger a prosecution, enforcement notice or a Fee for Intervention invoice in respect of the designer.

    The qualification is partially reinstated in that the HSE CDM 2015 Legal Guidance refers to ‘other factors’ which may influence the design e.g. cost, fitness for purpose, aesthetics and environmental impact.

    However, the qualification, such as it is, is now relegated to Guidance status whereas breaches of law will be determined by reference to the wording of the Regulations and not the Guidance.

    More effort required using same means

    Does this really matter?

    The change may be important in terms of the degree of effort required to meet the objective (risk avoidance) but should have little impact on the means designers adopt to comply and avoid risk through design.

    The CDM 2007 Approved Code (ACOP) set out the actions required of designers. From 6th April 2015 this ACOP is withdrawn and replaced by the HSE Legal Guidance L153.

    The practical guidance for designers is included at paras 75-93 of L153 and the key points are set out below.

    Eliminating, reducing or controlling foreseeable risks through design

    When preparing or modifying designs, a designer must take account of the General Principles of Prevention, and the Pre-Construction Information, with the aim, as far as Reasonably Practicable, of eliminating foreseeable risks.

    Where this is not possible designers must take reasonably practicable steps to reduce the risks or control them through the design process, and provide information about the remaining risks to other dutyholders.

    HSE stress that designing is a process that often continues throughout the project and the following questions should be considered when design is carried out:

    • Can the problem (or hazard) be removed altogether? E.g. air con plant on a roof moved to ground level, so that work at height is not required for either installation or maintenance?;
    • How can risks be reduced or controlled so that harm is unlikely or the potential consequences less serious? E.g. place the air con plant within a building on the roof, or provide a barrier around the entire roof?

    If risks cannot be eliminated the designer should apply the principles below in deciding how to reduce or control the remaining risks – if possible, in the following order:

    1. Risk provide a less risky option e.g. switch to using components which are lighter in weight to reduce musculoskeletal disorders;
    2. Exposure – make provisions so that the work can be organised to reduce exposure to hazards e.g. provision for traffic routes so that barriers can be provided between pedestrians and traffic; and
    3. Information – ensure that those responsible for planning and managing the work are given the information needed to manage remaining risks e.g. information about loads that will be particularly heavy or elements of the building that could become unstable. This can be achieved through providing key information on drawings or within models e.g. Building Information Modelling (BIM).

    The designer is expected to do:

    “as much as is reasonable at the time the design is prepared. Hazards that cannot be addressed at the initial stage of a project may need to be reviewed later on during detailed design. On projects involving more than one contractor, the Principal Designer will lead in managing the review process. “

    General Principles of Prevention (GPP)

    The GPP provide the framework within which designers must consider their designs and any potential risks to health or safety which may affect workers, members of the public, those who may maintain or clean the building or use the building as a workplace.

    Designs prepared for places of work also need to comply with the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 so designs need to take account of factors such as lighting and the layout of traffic routes.

    The HSE Guidance states at paras 83-84:

    “Health and safety risks need to be considered alongside other factors that influence the design such as cost, fitness for purpose, aesthetics and environmental impact. Working with contractors (including principal contractors) involved in the project can assist in identifying the potential risks and ways in which they may be controlled.

    Once the risks have been considered and taken into account, the level of detail in the information provided to those who need it should be proportionate to the risks remaining. Insignificant risks can usually be ignored, as can those arising from routine construction activities, unless the design worsens or significantly alters these risks”

    Further HSE information on risk avoidance

    The HSE Legal Guidance L153 states that further information on eliminating, reducing or controlling foreseeable risks is available on the HSE construction web pages Are You A Designer

    This section of the website is currently (23 March 2015) based on CDM 2007 and will presumably be update before 6th April 2015.

    The CDM Red, Amber and Green Lists (RAGs) at Annex E of the CITB Guidance are practical aides to designers on what to eliminate/avoid, and what to encourage and are unlikely to change.

    CDM 2015 Information and Templates

    See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

    We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    FIRMS FAILED TO MONITOR SAFE SYSTEM OF WORK

    Principal Contractor and specialist fined over fall through roof mesh

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th September 2019

    ASSISTANCE FROM THIRD PARTY PROVES COSTLY

    Contractor fined after non-employee loses fingers crushed by dozer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th September 2019

    CUSTODIAL SENTENCES AFTER CAPTURE ON CAMERA

    Roofing business partner failed to properly plan and supervise roofwork

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th September 2019

    FIRM FINED OVER FALL FROM LORRY BED

    Serious injury after failure to provide suitable and clear instructions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th September 2019

    COUNCIL FINED £100k OVER VIBRATION FAILINGS

    Excessive use of power tools uncontrolled and without health surveillance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th September 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th August 2019

    IMPROVING CDM DESIGNER HAZARD AWARENESS

    Research explores power of “multi-media digital tool” for design hazards

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    DEMOLITION FEDERATION ON RECENT INCIDENTS

    NFDC ‘statement of awareness’ follows unplanned collapses

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    RAISING COMPETENCE AND MAKING BUILDINGS SAFER

    Life-safety-critical disciplines urged to act on Interim Report

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    BUILDING WORKS COMPROMISED GAS SAFETY

    Company and director fined after work created risk to residents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    NON-INJURY PROSECUTION OVER WORK ON THE EDGE

    HSE routine inspection results in £25,000 fine for errant contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    FALL PRECAUTIONS FELL BETWEEN TWO FIRMS

    Contractors fined after workers at risk of falling from roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    SOLAR PANEL FIRM AWARE OF FRAGILE ROOF RISK

    Workman suffered long-term injuries in 4m fall through rooflight

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    HSE PROSECUTE FIRM OVER RISK NOT HARM

    Multiple safety failings land construction company in court

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR FACED COURT TOGETHER

    Firms breached joint duty to plan and carry our work at height safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    £1M FINE OVER DEATH CAUSED BY EXCAVATOR

    Vehicle driver found guilty at trial alongside CDM Principal Contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    CHILD DIED WHILST PLAYING ON POWERED GATE

    Lack of end stop caused gate to fall on 6 year old boy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    HSE SPEAK AT ACCESS INDUSTRY CONFERENCE 2019

    AIF National Working at Height Conference November 2019

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    UK CLIENT FINED OVER UNSAFE OVERSEAS FIRM

    Italian contractor found guilty despite failure to attend court

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    COMPLETE FAILURE TO RECOGNISE HAVS RISK

    Specialist drilling company and director sentenced over HAVS danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    PC AND TWO OTHERS FAILED TO ASSESS WIND EFFECT

    Fall of director from roof caused by ‘Storm Doris’ gust

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th July 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FINED £400k OVER LIFTING OPERATION

    Fitter loses four fingers as load slides and falls to the ground

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th July 2019

    NEW HOMES LEFT IN DANGEROUS CONDITION

    Fined for unsafe gas work causing fires at housing development

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th July 2019

    FIRM FINED £1M OVER EXPLOSION DURING CLEANING

    Tank cleaning operation caused burns as flammable vapours ignited

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th July 2019

    YOUNG BRICKLAYER FELL THROUGH OPEN STAIRWAY

    Firm fined over failure to install fall protection around opening

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th July 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic