• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: DESIGNER RISK AVOIDANCE

    What CDM 2015 designers must do when preparing or modifying designs

    On 6th April 2015 the primary duty and objective of designers under the CDM Regulations remains substantively unchanged namely to, eliminate, reduce or control risk through design. However, the duty will become more absolute and demanding in terms of the risk avoidance actions required.

    The CDM Regulation 2007 designer duty is qualified and allows the designer to take “due account of other relevant design considerations”. This critical qualification has been removed from CDM 2015 making it easier for the regulator to allege a ‘material breach’ of statute. This might thereby trigger a prosecution, enforcement notice or a Fee for Intervention invoice in respect of the designer.

    The qualification is partially reinstated in that the HSE CDM 2015 Legal Guidance refers to ‘other factors’ which may influence the design e.g. cost, fitness for purpose, aesthetics and environmental impact.

    However, the qualification, such as it is, is now relegated to Guidance status whereas breaches of law will be determined by reference to the wording of the Regulations and not the Guidance.

    More effort required using same means

    Does this really matter?

    The change may be important in terms of the degree of effort required to meet the objective (risk avoidance) but should have little impact on the means designers adopt to comply and avoid risk through design.

    The CDM 2007 Approved Code (ACOP) set out the actions required of designers. From 6th April 2015 this ACOP is withdrawn and replaced by the HSE Legal Guidance L153.

    The practical guidance for designers is included at paras 75-93 of L153 and the key points are set out below.

    Eliminating, reducing or controlling foreseeable risks through design

    When preparing or modifying designs, a designer must take account of the General Principles of Prevention, and the Pre-Construction Information, with the aim, as far as Reasonably Practicable, of eliminating foreseeable risks.

    Where this is not possible designers must take reasonably practicable steps to reduce the risks or control them through the design process, and provide information about the remaining risks to other dutyholders.

    HSE stress that designing is a process that often continues throughout the project and the following questions should be considered when design is carried out:

    • Can the problem (or hazard) be removed altogether? E.g. air con plant on a roof moved to ground level, so that work at height is not required for either installation or maintenance?;
    • How can risks be reduced or controlled so that harm is unlikely or the potential consequences less serious? E.g. place the air con plant within a building on the roof, or provide a barrier around the entire roof?

    If risks cannot be eliminated the designer should apply the principles below in deciding how to reduce or control the remaining risks – if possible, in the following order:

    1. Risk provide a less risky option e.g. switch to using components which are lighter in weight to reduce musculoskeletal disorders;
    2. Exposure – make provisions so that the work can be organised to reduce exposure to hazards e.g. provision for traffic routes so that barriers can be provided between pedestrians and traffic; and
    3. Information – ensure that those responsible for planning and managing the work are given the information needed to manage remaining risks e.g. information about loads that will be particularly heavy or elements of the building that could become unstable. This can be achieved through providing key information on drawings or within models e.g. Building Information Modelling (BIM).

    The designer is expected to do:

    “as much as is reasonable at the time the design is prepared. Hazards that cannot be addressed at the initial stage of a project may need to be reviewed later on during detailed design. On projects involving more than one contractor, the Principal Designer will lead in managing the review process. “

    General Principles of Prevention (GPP)

    The GPP provide the framework within which designers must consider their designs and any potential risks to health or safety which may affect workers, members of the public, those who may maintain or clean the building or use the building as a workplace.

    Designs prepared for places of work also need to comply with the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 so designs need to take account of factors such as lighting and the layout of traffic routes.

    The HSE Guidance states at paras 83-84:

    “Health and safety risks need to be considered alongside other factors that influence the design such as cost, fitness for purpose, aesthetics and environmental impact. Working with contractors (including principal contractors) involved in the project can assist in identifying the potential risks and ways in which they may be controlled.

    Once the risks have been considered and taken into account, the level of detail in the information provided to those who need it should be proportionate to the risks remaining. Insignificant risks can usually be ignored, as can those arising from routine construction activities, unless the design worsens or significantly alters these risks”

    Further HSE information on risk avoidance

    The HSE Legal Guidance L153 states that further information on eliminating, reducing or controlling foreseeable risks is available on the HSE construction web pages Are You A Designer

    This section of the website is currently (23 March 2015) based on CDM 2007 and will presumably be update before 6th April 2015.

    The CDM Red, Amber and Green Lists (RAGs) at Annex E of the CITB Guidance are practical aides to designers on what to eliminate/avoid, and what to encourage and are unlikely to change.

    CDM 2015 Information and Templates

    See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

    We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    CONTRACTS MANAGER HANDED TWO YEAR PRISON TERM

    Safety fall arrest netting would have saved life of deceased workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    WORKER FATALLY INJURED BY CONCRETE BEAM

    Lifting operation not properly planned, managed and supervised

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    TREE FELLING OPERATIONS LACKED DEFINED COMMS

    Workman struck by falling tree inside “normal” exclusion zone

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CONTRACTOR ARRESTED OVER WELFARE FAILINGS

    Recalcitrant sole trader failed to attend court hearing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    MAJOR DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR FINED £500,000

    Collapse of concrete slab caused death of worker and excavator fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FALL FROM LADDER WHILST CARRYING BUCKET

    Contractor failed to provide basic safe lifting aids

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH HSE NOTICE PROVES COSTLY

    Director given suspended jail term and company fined £60,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    DEVELOPER FAILED TO PLAN AND CHECK COMPETENCE

    Fall caused by ad-hoc working methods and lack of monitoring

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CYLINDER LEAK TEST CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Corrosion inhibitor triggered failure and shrapnel ejection

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FESTIVE GREETINGS TO ALL OUR READERS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th December 2019

    JAIL TERM FOLLOWS ROUTINE HSE SPOT CHECK

    Director of a roofing firm handed a suspended prison sentence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    TEENAGER FELL 3M DURING BLOCK AND BEAM WORK

    Workers uninstructed and left to devise own safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    PARCEL CARRIER FINED HEAVILY OVER FLT INCIDENT

    Reversing fork lift lacked segregation from pedestrians

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FLOOR OPENING FALL

    Thorough risk assessment and edge protection were both inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    THREE WORKERS “CARRIED ALONG” IN SEWER INCIDENT

    Mentally affected and one man treated for long-term traumatic stress

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2019

    SOLAR FIRM AND DIRECTOR SENTENCED OVER DEATH

    Brother of business owner died in fall during panel installation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    DIRECTOR AND COMPANY FINED FOR ASBESTOS RISK

    HSE refurbishment campaign inspection revealed asbestos offences

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    BULK BAG COLLAPSE CAUSED BY UNSAFE STACKING

    Bulk bag collapsed onto workman when struck by fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    INTERLOCKED GUARD NOT WORKING TO ISOLATE POWER

    Two workmen seriously injured when plant started unexpectedly

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    STREET FURNITURE RISK TO PUBLIC FINED £1.4M

    Council prosecuted following injury to child playing on hinged bollard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    WORKMEN SUFFER SERIOUS BURNS FROM CABLE STRIKE

    Assessment and system of work failed to appreciate electrical risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th November 2019

    LADDERS WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR WORK ON ROOF

    Workman paralysed after falling whilst installing roof ladder

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO MANAGE EXHAUST VENTILATION

    HSE enforcement notices on wood dust and welding fume ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th November 2019

    RECALCITRANT DIRECTOR BARRED FROM OFFICE

    Dangerous telehandler used despite earlier fatality and enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    DIRECTOR HID UNSAFE WORKING PRACTICES FROM HSE

    Workers exposed to sprayed paints containing asthma causing isocyantes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data