Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: DESIGNER RISK AVOIDANCE

    What CDM 2015 designers must do when preparing or modifying designs

    On 6th April 2015 the primary duty and objective of designers under the CDM Regulations remains substantively unchanged namely to, eliminate, reduce or control risk through design. However, the duty will become more absolute and demanding in terms of the risk avoidance actions required.

    The CDM Regulation 2007 designer duty is qualified and allows the designer to take “due account of other relevant design considerations”. This critical qualification has been removed from CDM 2015 making it easier for the regulator to allege a ‘material breach’ of statute. This might thereby trigger a prosecution, enforcement notice or a Fee for Intervention invoice in respect of the designer.

    The qualification is partially reinstated in that the HSE CDM 2015 Legal Guidance refers to ‘other factors’ which may influence the design e.g. cost, fitness for purpose, aesthetics and environmental impact.

    However, the qualification, such as it is, is now relegated to Guidance status whereas breaches of law will be determined by reference to the wording of the Regulations and not the Guidance.

    More effort required using same means

    Does this really matter?

    The change may be important in terms of the degree of effort required to meet the objective (risk avoidance) but should have little impact on the means designers adopt to comply and avoid risk through design.

    The CDM 2007 Approved Code (ACOP) set out the actions required of designers. From 6th April 2015 this ACOP is withdrawn and replaced by the HSE Legal Guidance L153.

    The practical guidance for designers is included at paras 75-93 of L153 and the key points are set out below.

    Eliminating, reducing or controlling foreseeable risks through design

    When preparing or modifying designs, a designer must take account of the General Principles of Prevention, and the Pre-Construction Information, with the aim, as far as Reasonably Practicable, of eliminating foreseeable risks.

    Where this is not possible designers must take reasonably practicable steps to reduce the risks or control them through the design process, and provide information about the remaining risks to other dutyholders.

    HSE stress that designing is a process that often continues throughout the project and the following questions should be considered when design is carried out:

    • Can the problem (or hazard) be removed altogether? E.g. air con plant on a roof moved to ground level, so that work at height is not required for either installation or maintenance?;
    • How can risks be reduced or controlled so that harm is unlikely or the potential consequences less serious? E.g. place the air con plant within a building on the roof, or provide a barrier around the entire roof?

    If risks cannot be eliminated the designer should apply the principles below in deciding how to reduce or control the remaining risks – if possible, in the following order:

    1. Risk provide a less risky option e.g. switch to using components which are lighter in weight to reduce musculoskeletal disorders;
    2. Exposure – make provisions so that the work can be organised to reduce exposure to hazards e.g. provision for traffic routes so that barriers can be provided between pedestrians and traffic; and
    3. Information – ensure that those responsible for planning and managing the work are given the information needed to manage remaining risks e.g. information about loads that will be particularly heavy or elements of the building that could become unstable. This can be achieved through providing key information on drawings or within models e.g. Building Information Modelling (BIM).

    The designer is expected to do:

    “as much as is reasonable at the time the design is prepared. Hazards that cannot be addressed at the initial stage of a project may need to be reviewed later on during detailed design. On projects involving more than one contractor, the Principal Designer will lead in managing the review process. “

    General Principles of Prevention (GPP)

    The GPP provide the framework within which designers must consider their designs and any potential risks to health or safety which may affect workers, members of the public, those who may maintain or clean the building or use the building as a workplace.

    Designs prepared for places of work also need to comply with the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 so designs need to take account of factors such as lighting and the layout of traffic routes.

    The HSE Guidance states at paras 83-84:

    “Health and safety risks need to be considered alongside other factors that influence the design such as cost, fitness for purpose, aesthetics and environmental impact. Working with contractors (including principal contractors) involved in the project can assist in identifying the potential risks and ways in which they may be controlled.

    Once the risks have been considered and taken into account, the level of detail in the information provided to those who need it should be proportionate to the risks remaining. Insignificant risks can usually be ignored, as can those arising from routine construction activities, unless the design worsens or significantly alters these risks”

    Further HSE information on risk avoidance

    The HSE Legal Guidance L153 states that further information on eliminating, reducing or controlling foreseeable risks is available on the HSE construction web pages Are You A Designer

    This section of the website is currently (23 March 2015) based on CDM 2007 and will presumably be update before 6th April 2015.

    The CDM Red, Amber and Green Lists (RAGs) at Annex E of the CITB Guidance are practical aides to designers on what to eliminate/avoid, and what to encourage and are unlikely to change.

    CDM 2015 Information and Templates

    See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

    We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    ASBESTOS REMOVED WITHOUT SURVEY OR CONTROLS

    Client fined over failure to commission refurb and demo survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th July 2019

    ‘VICTORIAN’ SAFETY AND FATIGUE BEHIND RAIL DEATH

    Investigation report links zero hours contracts to hazardous fatigue

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th July 2019

    MPS EXAMINE CONSTRUCTION RESPIRATORY HEALTH

    Parliamentary group calls for evidence on the impact of worker silicosis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th July 2019

    UNSAFE LIFTING OPERATION TRAPPED WORKMAN

    Sling failure and inadequate lifting plan resulted in leg amputation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th July 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2019

    TIMBER FRAME FIRM FAILED ON FIRE AND FALLING

    House builder fined after routine HSE site inspection

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO ACT ON SILICA DUST RISK

    Cutting of paving flags exposed workers to respirable crystalline silica

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2019

    POST GRENFELL BUILDING SAFETY SYSTEM REVIEW

    Structural safety body seek support for key reporting role

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2019

    OVERCOME BY CUTTING IN CONFINED SPACE

    Construction worker suffered carbon monoxide poisoning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th July 2019

    APPRENTICE OVERCOME BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR

    Stripping operations lacked ventilation controls, RPE and training

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th July 2019

    DEBRIS FROM DEMOLITION SITE NOT RESTRAINED

    Loss assessor on adjacent property injured by stray waste

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th July 2019

    WORKMAN FELL FROM UNGUARDED FLAT ROOF

    Basic work at height management systems and training absent

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th July 2019

    CONSTRUCTION FATALITIES FALL TO RECORD LOW

    hselogo1HSE release final annual workplace fatality figures 2018/19

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd July 2019

    FEMALE WORKER SCALPED AND BADLY INJURED

    Wood product manufacturer fined £466,000 over rotating shaft danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2019

    TOWER SCAFFOLD FALL CAUSED LONG-TERM DAMAGE

    Principal Contractor director and two firms sentenced after worker fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2019

    MISSING PEDESTRIAN BARRIER TRIGGERED DEATH

    Workman walked from building into path of moving lorry

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th June 2019

    WORKMAN SURVIVED 9M FLAT ROOF FALL

    Suitable and sufficient edge protection not provided

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th June 2019

    PRISON SENTENCE FOR IGNORING HSE PROHIBITION

    Roofing contractor sentenced over unsafe working at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th June 2019

    FIRM FAILED ON SILICA RISK MANAGEMENT

    Dust exhaust ventilation, RPE and health surveillance all absent

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th June 2019

    WOMAN DIED TRAPPED IN POWERED ROLLER DOOR

    Firm did not check the operation of the safety sensors

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    HSE TO HELP DITCH ‘UNNECESSARY PAPERWORK’

    Board considers forthcoming HSE guidance on navigating H&S rules

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    SCAFFOLDER DIED IN FALL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOF

    Contractor given prison term and main contractor fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    ENERGY BUSINESS FINED OVER LIFTING FATALITY

    Firm failed to train in lorry mounted crane remote control risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FINED £800K OVER LIFTING ERRORS

    Workman injured by falling heavy expanded polystyrene block

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2019

    NEW APPROACH TO HIGHWAYS HEALTH AND SAFETY

    Highways England launches ‘Home Safe and Well’ strategy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic