• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: PRINCIPAL DESIGNER ROLE

    Principal Designers to be placed at the heart of project safety

    The (almost) definitive version of the CDM Regulations 2015 plus the associated legal and industry guidance has now been published and HSE expects the regulations will come into force on 6 April 2015, subject to final parliamentary scrutiny.

    Interested parties will be considering the implications for their business and the impact the changes might have on injury and ill-health arising from construction projects.

    Three new Russian Dolls

    There will be three new sets of ‘rules’ namely:

    See also our useful Summary of Regulations

    The Statutory Instrument (CDM Regulations 2015) is at the heart of the ‘Russian Dolls’ and is the best starting point for deciding on the actions required to achieve compliance.

    A failure to comply with the CDM Regulations 2015 will represent a ‘material breach’ and create an offence which may result in a prosecution and/or payment of HSE Fees for Intervention.

    On this principle we have set out below a brief summary of what the Regulations will require of the appointed project Principal Designer (PD). Who can the client appoint as PD? When must the PD be appointed? and What actions must the PD take?

    WHO CAN THE CLIENT APPOINT AS THE PD?

    The change to appointment of a PD rather than a CDM-C is regarded by HSE as one of the most significant elements of the CDM Regulations 2015. The change is intended to place the PD (and client) at the heart of construction project safety.

    PD must be a ‘designer’

    The PD is the designer appointed by the client to ensure that the project is carried out without risks to health or safety by undertaking the actions outlined below.

    The PD can be any person who prepares or modifies a design; arranges for, or instructs, any person under their control to do so in the course or furtherance of a business. The ‘person’ can be an individual or a corporate body.

    PD must have the necessary skills and capabilities etc.

    The PD appointed to work on the project must have the skills, knowledge and experience and, if they are an organisation, the organisational capability, necessary to fulfil the role in a manner that secures the health and safety of any person affected by the project.

    PD skills and capabilities etc. must be checked by client

    The project client must take steps to satisfy themselves that the PD fulfils the conditions regarding skills and capabilities etc. and the PD must not accept an appointment as project PD unless they fulfil these conditions.

    WHEN MUST THE CLIENT APPOINT THE PD?

    The client must appoint the PD “as early as possible in the design process”. The requirement under CDM 2015 (early as possible) is more decisive that the current CDM 2007 requirement to appoint the CDM-C “as soon as is practicable after initial design work or other preparation for construction work has begun”.

    The current RIBA Plan of Work 2013 requires early appointment of the CDM-C by declaring that it is “essential the (project) team is properly assembled” by Stage 1 – Preparation and Brief.

    WHAT ACTIONS MUST BE TAKEN BY THE PD?

    The overarching duty of the PD is to ensure that the project is carried out without risks to health or safety. This must be achieved by actions to:

    • Plan, manage and monitor – the pre-construction phase; and
    • Coordinate – matters relating to health and safety during the pre-construction phase.

    In fulfilling these overarching duties the PD must also:

    • General Principles – take into account the general principles of prevention and the content of any construction phase plan and health and safety file;
    • Risk Elimination and Control – identify and eliminate or control foreseeable risks to the health or safety of any person carrying out or affected by construction work; maintaining or cleaning a structure; or using a structure as a place of work;
    • Designer Checks – ensure all designers comply with their duties to eliminate, reduce and control risk through provision of information;
    • Cooperation – ensure that all persons working in relation to the pre-construction phase cooperate with the client, PD and each other; and
    • H&S File – prepare a file containing H&S information likely to be needed during any subsequent project and ensure file is reviewed, updated etc. from time to time and passed to the client at the end of the project.

    The PD is also required to comply with two other duties:

    • Pre-Construction Information – assist the client in the provision of the pre-construction information required and provide this information, promptly and in a convenient form, to every designer and contractor appointed, or being considered for appointment, to the project.
    • Construction Phase Liaison – liaise with the PC and share with the PC information relevant to the planning, management and monitoring of the construction phase and the coordination of health and safety matters during the construction phase.
    Comment

    The Principal Designer responsibilities are demanding and exceed those currently held by the CDM Coordinator.

    The Regulations make it more explicit that the client must appoint the PD early in the life of a project and that the client must take steps to be satisfied that the company or person appointed as PD has all the necessary skills and capabilities etc.

    The PD is required to check on compliance by other designers and lead / coordinate the risk identification and elimination processes throughout the pre-construction phase.

    Understanding what the law requires and putting in place the right people and processes should put clients and the appointed PD in a comfortable position and help improve action to secure safety through design.

    Where such positive voluntary actions are not taken the CDM Regulations 2015 and the Fee for Intervention scheme will provide HSE with some powerful tools to secure compliance by both Principal Designers and Designers.

    CDM 2015 Information and Templates

    See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

    We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 13th JUNE 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th June 2018

    DIRECTOR FAILED COMPLY WITH HSE PROHIBITION

    Precautions not taken to prevent excavation collapse and falling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th June 2018

    SCAFFOLD NOT TO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR DESIGN

    Specialist and contractor in court over unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2018

    ROAD WORKER RUN OVER BY ROAD ROLLER

    Reversing alarm not working and warning light not fitted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    CLIENT AND SURVEYOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey proved inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    FATALITY: ROAD WORKER DRAGGED ALONG ROAD

    Night shift worker loses life when struck by road sweeping vehicle

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS AVOID HSE ENFORCEMENT

    Regulator enforcement database reveals few notices involve CDM PDs

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    PROPERTY MANAGERS FINED WITH CONTRACTOR

    Defendants failed to check for asbestos during soffit replacement works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    EXCAVATION CAUSED RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE

    Precautions not taken to secure stability of free-standing wall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    OVERHEAD CABLE STRIKE FIRM FINED £500,000+

    Inadequate system caused risk of harm despite lack of worker injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FINED OVER FIRE RISK

    PD and PC failed to comply with CDM 2015 responsibilities

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

    Lawyer argues guidelines undermine reduction in ‘regulatory burden’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    PANEL STRUCK WORKMAN DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Third party contractor falls victim of poor lift planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    DIRECTOR LED HAZARDOUS WORK AT HEIGHT

    Three occasions when work lacked suitable and sufficient precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RISK ASSESSED BUT CONTROLS FOUND WANTING

    Joiner fell through unprotected opening on roof of new building

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RIBA CRITICAL OF HACKITT REVIEW FINAL REPORT

    High rise residential review dismissed as “major missed opportunity”

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    SPARE POWER INTERLOCK KEY CAUSED DEATH

    Dangerous machinery safety precautions defeated for maintenance tasks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th May 2018

    COLLAPSED CAR PARK WAS UNDER REPAIR

    Rusted steel supports triggered collapse of fascia and floor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    DUMPER OVERTURN CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Precautions during spoil heap creation were inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    HARDWOOD DUST CONTROL NOT MAINTAINED

    Manufacturer failed to examine and test local extraction system

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    SCAFFOLD CONTRACTOR OVERLOOKED MAJOR HAZARD

    Well-known risk unidentified during scaffold erection project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    THREE FIRMS FINED £1/2M FOR FRAGILE RISK FAILURES

    Fall through rooflight hazard poorly planned and managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data