Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

CDM REGULATIONS 2015: PRINCIPAL DESIGNER ROLE

Principal Designers to be placed at the heart of project safety

The (almost) definitive version of the CDM Regulations 2015 plus the associated legal and industry guidance has now been published and HSE expects the regulations will come into force on 6 April 2015, subject to final parliamentary scrutiny.

Interested parties will be considering the implications for their business and the impact the changes might have on injury and ill-health arising from construction projects.

Three new Russian Dolls

There will be three new sets of ‘rules’ namely:

See also our useful Summary of Regulations

The Statutory Instrument (CDM Regulations 2015) is at the heart of the ‘Russian Dolls’ and is the best starting point for deciding on the actions required to achieve compliance.

A failure to comply with the CDM Regulations 2015 will represent a ‘material breach’ and create an offence which may result in a prosecution and/or payment of HSE Fees for Intervention.

On this principle we have set out below a brief summary of what the Regulations will require of the appointed project Principal Designer (PD). Who can the client appoint as PD? When must the PD be appointed? and What actions must the PD take?

WHO CAN THE CLIENT APPOINT AS THE PD?

The change to appointment of a PD rather than a CDM-C is regarded by HSE as one of the most significant elements of the CDM Regulations 2015. The change is intended to place the PD (and client) at the heart of construction project safety.

PD must be a ‘designer’

The PD is the designer appointed by the client to ensure that the project is carried out without risks to health or safety by undertaking the actions outlined below.

The PD can be any person who prepares or modifies a design; arranges for, or instructs, any person under their control to do so in the course or furtherance of a business. The ‘person’ can be an individual or a corporate body.

PD must have the necessary skills and capabilities etc.

The PD appointed to work on the project must have the skills, knowledge and experience and, if they are an organisation, the organisational capability, necessary to fulfil the role in a manner that secures the health and safety of any person affected by the project.

PD skills and capabilities etc. must be checked by client

The project client must take steps to satisfy themselves that the PD fulfils the conditions regarding skills and capabilities etc. and the PD must not accept an appointment as project PD unless they fulfil these conditions.

WHEN MUST THE CLIENT APPOINT THE PD?

The client must appoint the PD “as early as possible in the design process”. The requirement under CDM 2015 (early as possible) is more decisive that the current CDM 2007 requirement to appoint the CDM-C “as soon as is practicable after initial design work or other preparation for construction work has begun”.

The current RIBA Plan of Work 2013 requires early appointment of the CDM-C by declaring that it is “essential the (project) team is properly assembled” by Stage 1 – Preparation and Brief.

WHAT ACTIONS MUST BE TAKEN BY THE PD?

The overarching duty of the PD is to ensure that the project is carried out without risks to health or safety. This must be achieved by actions to:

  • Plan, manage and monitor – the pre-construction phase; and
  • Coordinate – matters relating to health and safety during the pre-construction phase.

In fulfilling these overarching duties the PD must also:

  • General Principles – take into account the general principles of prevention and the content of any construction phase plan and health and safety file;
  • Risk Elimination and Control – identify and eliminate or control foreseeable risks to the health or safety of any person carrying out or affected by construction work; maintaining or cleaning a structure; or using a structure as a place of work;
  • Designer Checks – ensure all designers comply with their duties to eliminate, reduce and control risk through provision of information;
  • Cooperation – ensure that all persons working in relation to the pre-construction phase cooperate with the client, PD and each other; and
  • H&S File – prepare a file containing H&S information likely to be needed during any subsequent project and ensure file is reviewed, updated etc. from time to time and passed to the client at the end of the project.

The PD is also required to comply with two other duties:

  • Pre-Construction Information – assist the client in the provision of the pre-construction information required and provide this information, promptly and in a convenient form, to every designer and contractor appointed, or being considered for appointment, to the project.
  • Construction Phase Liaison – liaise with the PC and share with the PC information relevant to the planning, management and monitoring of the construction phase and the coordination of health and safety matters during the construction phase.
Comment

The Principal Designer responsibilities are demanding and exceed those currently held by the CDM Coordinator.

The Regulations make it more explicit that the client must appoint the PD early in the life of a project and that the client must take steps to be satisfied that the company or person appointed as PD has all the necessary skills and capabilities etc.

The PD is required to check on compliance by other designers and lead / coordinate the risk identification and elimination processes throughout the pre-construction phase.

Understanding what the law requires and putting in place the right people and processes should put clients and the appointed PD in a comfortable position and help improve action to secure safety through design.

Where such positive voluntary actions are not taken the CDM Regulations 2015 and the Fee for Intervention scheme will provide HSE with some powerful tools to secure compliance by both Principal Designers and Designers.

CDM 2015 Information and Templates

See CDM 2015 Survey Results for the findings of our CDM 2015 Five Minute Online Survey.

We have published a great deal of further information and templates designed to support Clients, Designers, Principal Designers/Contractors and Contractors in meeting their duties under CDM Regulations 2015.

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 16th AUG 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st August 2017

UPDATED SCAFFOLDING DESIGN E-GUIDE RELEASED

NASC launches enhanced TG20:13 eGuide scaffold design tool

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 14th August 2017

NASC LAUNCH FREE TO DOWNLOAD GUIDANCE

Access and scaffolding guides now open to members and non-members

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 14th August 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 9th AUGUST 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 11th August 2017

NEW GUIDANCE ON UNINTENDED PLANT MOVEMENT

Industry Plant Safety Group highlights hazards and key control measures

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 11th August 2017

SCAFFOLD COLLAPSE CAUSED BY LACK OF TIES

Falling structure narrowly misses passerby and lands on parked cars

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 11th August 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 2nd AUG 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd August 2017

TRAINING IN CIRCULAR SAW USE FOUND WANTING

Joinery firm failures end in serious hand injury and £230,000 fine

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 31st July 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 26th JULY 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 31st July 2017

WALL COLLAPSE CLAIMED LIFE OF WORKMAN

Failed to identify risks associated with free standing walls

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 31st July 2017

WORKMAN FELL DURING WELDING WORK AT HEIGHT

Ladder access to water tank top was insecure and slipped when used

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 31st July 2017

CCTV INSTALLER FELL BETWEEN FLOOR JOISTS

Principal Contractor and CCTV specialist failed to plan and manage risk

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 31st July 2017

FACTORY APPRENTICE FELL DURING GUTTER CLEANING

Young workman stepped back and fell 9m through fragile rooflight

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 31st July 2017

CROSS RAIL JV CONTRACTORS FINED OVER FATALITY

Firm prosecuted after concrete fall death and two other tunnel incidents

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 31st July 2017

CONTRACTORS FAILED TO REVIEW ASBESTOS SURVEY

Major companies fined £1,000,000 plus over asbestos risk during refurb

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 31st July 2017

MAJOR CONTRACTORS LAUNCH H&S ALERT SYSTEM

Build UK members share information for effective prevention of harm

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th July 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 19th JULY 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th July 2017

STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

SCOSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th July 2017

SAFE SYSTEM DEVISED BUT NOT IMPLEMENTED

Workman injured by goods falling from double-decked trailer

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th July 2017

PREVENTION PLANNING REQUIRED FOR FRAGILE RISK

Fall arrest safety netting not used to mitigate fall consequences

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th July 2017

MANAGEMENT OF FORMWORK NOT UP TO THE MARK

Erector fell 3m after access scaffold board failed under load

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th July 2017

VIBRATION UNCONTROLLED & WORKERS UNINFORMED

Engineering firm fined £120,000 over hand-arm vibration risk

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 14th July 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 12th JULY 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 12th July 2017

SCAFFOLDER WAS UNTRAINED AND UNSUPERVISED

Contractor and director failed to train injured workman to CISRC scheme

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 10th July 2017

WORKPLACE MANSLAUGHTER OUTCOMES SET TO RISE

Guidelines target gross negligence with serious disregard and cost-cutting

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 7th July 2017
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access