Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

HSE FEE FOR INTERVENTION COMES UNDER ATTACK

Government review urges HSE to reconsider Fee for Intervention

The HSE Fee for Intervention (FFI) inspection charging regime has come under criticism in the Department for Work and Pensions Triennial Review report on the work of HSE.

The review and report by Martin Temple, Chairman of the Engineering Employers Federation, has labelled FFI as a “dangerous model” which has potentially undermined the integrity of HSE. He calls for further consultation on continued operation of FFI.

Report recommendations on FFI

ffiguide1

The reports sets out a series of recommendations on FFI including a further review on the views of stakeholders. The primary objective of the review was to consider the continuing need for HSE’s function, however, the “wealth of comments” received from stakeholders regarding FFI compelled the author to address the issue.

Martin Temple expressed concern at the strength of feeling from stakeholders that FFI has damaged the HSE’s reputation for acting impartially and independently, and therefore its integrity as a regulator.

The specific recommendations are:

“1.  The HSE planned review (of FFI) post October 2013 should include:

  • stakeholder representation in the review team to provide assurance of the impartiality of the findings;
  • the views of stakeholders on how FFI is working;
  • if FFI is to be retained, whether the threshold for FFI has been set at the right level;
  • whether there is evidence that the anticipated incentives to comply have made a difference and improved health and safety performance;
  • whether there have been any detrimental impacts on the behaviour of HSE Inspectors and/or those inspected and/or on health and safety performance; and
  • consideration of alternative sources of income, which should be tested against the same criteria.

2.  Unless the link between “fines” and funding can be removed or the benefits can be shown to outweigh the detrimental effects, and it is not possible to minimise those effects, FFI should be phased out.

3.  As an urgent action, there should be at least one independent person involved at the first formal stage in FFI appeals for HSE to ensure that the appeal process is independent and impartial, and is seen to be so.

The Triennial review of the HSE is in line with normal government policy and has concluded that there is a continuing need for the functions that HSE delivers, and a very strong case for those functions to continue to be delivered by an arms-length body, adding:

“on the whole, HSE is operating with the level of control and governance that should be expected of an arm’s length body of its size and profile.”

Criticism supported by BSC and Regulator Union

Alex Botha, chief executive of the British Safety Council, responding to the report said:

“The British Safety Council believes that in order for Great Britain to continue to be effective in preventing workplace injuries and work-related ill-health we need a properly resourced, expert and independent regulator. We welcome the government’s acknowledgement of the continuing need for HSE to help to achieve that goal. That view was overwhelmingly supported by our more than 6,000 corporate members.

We note that Temple highlighted concerns over the recently introduced cost recovery scheme, ‘Fee for Intervention’ (FFI). Many of these concerns reflect the views of our members we submitted to the review so we welcome the recommendations concerning the planned review of FFI to be expanded to examine these issues.”

Prospect Union also welcomed the findings. Deputy general secretary Garry Graham said:

“We are delighted that the fourth review of the HSE in recent years once more confirms that the agency is fit for purpose and benefits workers and employers across the UK.

We welcome author Martin Temple’s finding that the HSE’s functions should continue to be delivered by a non-departmental public body, allowing it to retain its independence and his praise for the professionalism and competence of staff.

However, the review rightly raises concerns about the new ‘fee for intervention’ model, which links the regulator’s funding to its income from ‘fines’. FFI was rushed in to fill gaps in HSE’s budget caused by government cuts. Prospect warned that the proposals would be perceived as a business burden and risked damaging the regulatory balance.

We have been proved right. We strongly back the review’s call to remove the link between funding and fines. It is the wrong solution to funding. HSE has lost experienced inspectors because of the cuts and difficulties caused by FFI.”

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

ROOF FALL CAUSES LIFE CHANGING INJURIES

Inadequate planning and absence of necessary equipment caused fall

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 25th June 2017

LIFT PLANNING AND CONTROL FOUND WANTING

Female building worker struck by scaffold fittings tipped from stillage

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 25th June 2017

FATALITY: CRANE COLLAPSE ON HOMES PROJECT

Two workmen die in crane collapse in Crewe

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 23rd June 2017

BUILD UK EXPLAINS PROJECT H&S TRAINING STANDARD

UK contractors clarify skill cards needed on CDM 2015 projects

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st June 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 21 JUNE 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st June 2017

CIVILS FIRMS PAYS PRICE OVER PUBLIC DANGER

Fencing wire struck member of public relaxing in own garden

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th June 2017

DELAYED RESCUE CONTRIBUTED TO DEATH AT HEIGHT

MEWP operator died trapped between controls and roof beam

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th June 2017

CLIENT FINED UNDER CDM 2007 & CDM 2015

Construction work must be properly managed from outset

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th June 2017

WORKMAN BURNED WHILST CUTTING LIVE CABLE

Firms to pay £500,000 over unsafe system for electrical work

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th June 2017

WORKMAN CHEATS DEATH IN 8M ROOFLIGHT FALL

Steel fabricators fined over unsafe short-term roofwork

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th June 2017

HOMES FIRM DIRECTOR CONVICTED OF MANSLAUGHTER

Excavation collapse dangers ignored by director and digger operator

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 14th June 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 14th JUNE 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 14th June 2017

BOSS AND FOREMAN CONVICTED OF MANSLAUGHTER

Safety standards allowed to fall despite HSE enforcement action

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 10th June 2017

WORK AT HEIGHT ADVANCES HIGHLIGHTED AT EXPO

Access Industry Forum (AIF) puts height safety first at Expo 2017

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 9th June 2017

PRICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE RISES STEADILY

Roofing company fined £80,000 for ignoring advice and HSE notice

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 9th June 2017

MANUAL HANDLING OFFENCE FINED £67,000

Significant risk in handling excavator wheel not avoided or assessed

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 8th June 2017

COMPANY RELIED UPON EXPERIENCED WORKERS

Lack of precautions to prevent fall through fragile rooflight

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 7th June 2017

CLIENT FAILED TO APPOINT COMPETENT CONTRACTOR

Contractor receives prison term whilst CDM client fined £160,000

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 7th June 2017

PUZZLES HELP DELIVER CITB AND NEBOSH COURSES

Innovative new tool available to support effective H&S training

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 7th June 2017

NEW DUMPER TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY

Manufacturer promises greater visibility, stability and operator protection

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 7th June 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 7th JUNE 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 7th June 2017

NEW GUIDE ON GUILTY PLEA SENTENCING

Sentencing Council guidelines may assist corporate H&S offenders

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 6th June 2017

MAJOR CONTRACTOR RESPONDS TO ‘BEARDS BAN’ BLAST

Union calls for dust elimination and consultation before imposing ban

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 5th June 2017

CONSTRUCTION DEATHS TUMBLE IN 2016/17

Latest HSE latest records suggests substantial drop in worker fatalities

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 5th June 2017

WRONGLY INSTALLED MACHINE SEVERED HAND

Manufacturer instructions not followed during saw installation

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd June 2017
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access

One Response to “HSE FEE FOR INTERVENTION COMES UNDER ATTACK”

  1. GOVERNMENT PRESS FOR ‘MORE COMMERCIAL’ HSE | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

    […] and Safety Executive was published on 9th January 2014 causing many commentators to highlight the recommendation concerning the HSE inspection charging regime – Fee for Intervention […]