Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

HSE FEE FOR INTERVENTION COMES UNDER ATTACK

Government review urges HSE to reconsider Fee for Intervention

The HSE Fee for Intervention (FFI) inspection charging regime has come under criticism in the Department for Work and Pensions Triennial Review report on the work of HSE.

The review and report by Martin Temple, Chairman of the Engineering Employers Federation, has labelled FFI as a “dangerous model” which has potentially undermined the integrity of HSE. He calls for further consultation on continued operation of FFI.

Report recommendations on FFI

ffiguide1

The reports sets out a series of recommendations on FFI including a further review on the views of stakeholders. The primary objective of the review was to consider the continuing need for HSE’s function, however, the “wealth of comments” received from stakeholders regarding FFI compelled the author to address the issue.

Martin Temple expressed concern at the strength of feeling from stakeholders that FFI has damaged the HSE’s reputation for acting impartially and independently, and therefore its integrity as a regulator.

The specific recommendations are:

“1.  The HSE planned review (of FFI) post October 2013 should include:

  • stakeholder representation in the review team to provide assurance of the impartiality of the findings;
  • the views of stakeholders on how FFI is working;
  • if FFI is to be retained, whether the threshold for FFI has been set at the right level;
  • whether there is evidence that the anticipated incentives to comply have made a difference and improved health and safety performance;
  • whether there have been any detrimental impacts on the behaviour of HSE Inspectors and/or those inspected and/or on health and safety performance; and
  • consideration of alternative sources of income, which should be tested against the same criteria.

2.  Unless the link between “fines” and funding can be removed or the benefits can be shown to outweigh the detrimental effects, and it is not possible to minimise those effects, FFI should be phased out.

3.  As an urgent action, there should be at least one independent person involved at the first formal stage in FFI appeals for HSE to ensure that the appeal process is independent and impartial, and is seen to be so.

The Triennial review of the HSE is in line with normal government policy and has concluded that there is a continuing need for the functions that HSE delivers, and a very strong case for those functions to continue to be delivered by an arms-length body, adding:

“on the whole, HSE is operating with the level of control and governance that should be expected of an arm’s length body of its size and profile.”

Criticism supported by BSC and Regulator Union

Alex Botha, chief executive of the British Safety Council, responding to the report said:

“The British Safety Council believes that in order for Great Britain to continue to be effective in preventing workplace injuries and work-related ill-health we need a properly resourced, expert and independent regulator. We welcome the government’s acknowledgement of the continuing need for HSE to help to achieve that goal. That view was overwhelmingly supported by our more than 6,000 corporate members.

We note that Temple highlighted concerns over the recently introduced cost recovery scheme, ‘Fee for Intervention’ (FFI). Many of these concerns reflect the views of our members we submitted to the review so we welcome the recommendations concerning the planned review of FFI to be expanded to examine these issues.”

Prospect Union also welcomed the findings. Deputy general secretary Garry Graham said:

“We are delighted that the fourth review of the HSE in recent years once more confirms that the agency is fit for purpose and benefits workers and employers across the UK.

We welcome author Martin Temple’s finding that the HSE’s functions should continue to be delivered by a non-departmental public body, allowing it to retain its independence and his praise for the professionalism and competence of staff.

However, the review rightly raises concerns about the new ‘fee for intervention’ model, which links the regulator’s funding to its income from ‘fines’. FFI was rushed in to fill gaps in HSE’s budget caused by government cuts. Prospect warned that the proposals would be perceived as a business burden and risked damaging the regulatory balance.

We have been proved right. We strongly back the review’s call to remove the link between funding and fines. It is the wrong solution to funding. HSE has lost experienced inspectors because of the cuts and difficulties caused by FFI.”

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 17th JAN 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th January 2018

PARLIAMENT CALLS FOR WORKING AT HEIGHT ADVICE

Group of MPs seek to understand fatal fall causes and solutions

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th January 2018

FIRM FINED OVER FATAL FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT FALL

Work at height not planned, supervised or carried out safely

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th January 2018

EXCAVATOR CRUSHED DUMPER OPERATOR

Reversing excavator operations not separated from pedestrians

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 12th January 2018

REFURB CONTRACTORS FINED £1.1 MILLION

Tenant fell 5m through fragile surface whilst walking to home

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 12th January 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 10th JAN 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 10th January 2018

STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 10th January 2018

HSE REACH OUT TO RESOLVE RISK MANAGEMENT

Construction Industry Advisory Network (CONIAN) launched

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 10th January 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 4th JAN 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th January 2018

FAILURE TO PROTECT PUBLIC FINED £600,000

Two elderly people injured during construction of disabled ramp

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd January 2018

MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT FIRM FINED

Joist failed and workman fell during flat roof replacement works

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd January 2018

FALL ON BLOCK AND BEAM FLOORING SYSTEM

Contractors failed to respond to planned fall protection problems

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd January 2018

FIRMS FAILED TO INSTALL FLOOR AS DESIGNED

Principal contractor penalised for not spotting contractor error

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd January 2018

LINTEL COLLAPSED DURING LOWERING OPERATION

Two workers injured as support props and structure topple

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd January 2018

CDM 2015: SEEING THE WOOD FOR THE TREES

End of year reflections on CDM 2015, health, safety and harm

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st December 2017

FESTIVE GREETINGS TO ALL OUR READERS

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th December 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 20th DEC 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th December 2017

LORRY DRIVER PROSECUTED AFTER ROAD DEATH

Road worker died during motorway resurfacing project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th December 2017

MAJOR CONTRACTOR FINED £1.8M OVER ROAD DEATH

Road planer operation put roadworks pedestrians at risk of injury

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th December 2017

MANAGER PROSECUTED OVER APPRENTICE INJURY

Untrained young worker fell through fragile rooflight

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th December 2017

PUBLIC AND WORKERS EXPOSED TO ASBESTOS RISK

Client and contractor failed to identify and assess asbestos presence

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th December 2017

RESTRAINT SAVES WORKER EJECTED FROM MEWP

Firms failed to separate crane and elevated mobile work platform

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th December 2017

HSE PROSECUTE OVER POOR SILICA DUST CONTROL

Principal contractor failures led to gross exposure to RCS

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 15th December 2017

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 13th DEC 2017

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 15th December 2017

BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING AND CDM 2015

Major contractor explains BIM risk mitigation opportunities

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 15th December 2017
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access

One Response to “HSE FEE FOR INTERVENTION COMES UNDER ATTACK”

  1. GOVERNMENT PRESS FOR ‘MORE COMMERCIAL’ HSE | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

    […] and Safety Executive was published on 9th January 2014 causing many commentators to highlight the recommendation concerning the HSE inspection charging regime – Fee for Intervention […]