Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    CDM REGULATIONS 2015: UPDATE

    HSE consultation on CDM 2014 revision

    IMPORTANT UPDATE (JAN 2015): CDM Regulations 2015 and Guidance NOW Published

    HSE are scheduled to publish draft revised CDM Regulations 2014 in the coming weeks. This will be followed by a public consultation period.

    It is expected that the revision with be based on a ‘copy out’ of the EC Directive 92/57/EEC and in our recent posts we summarised the principal requirements of the EC directive.

    The Construction Industry Council (CIC) report – The Potential Implications of the CDM 2014 Revision Being Based on an EC TMCS Directive 92/57/EEC – sets out the considered view of a Working Group set up to review the potential implications of the proposed revision of the CDM 2007 Regulations.

    The CIC report Executive Summary is reproduced below and the full report provides a useful comparison of the Directive requirements and the CDM Regulations 2007 which may assist those considering their response to the HSE consultation.

    See also our view on the CDM-C and design under CDM 2015

    See also all our News on CDM 2007

    CIC REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    “This report sets out the considered view of a CIC CDM2014 Working Group set up to review the potential implications of the proposed revision of the Construction (Design & Management) Regulations being based on a ‘copy out’ of the EC Directive 92/57/EEC of 24 June 1992 on the implementation of minimum safety and health requirements at temporary or mobile construction sites (TMCS Directive).

    The Group have considered the broad brush implications together with the more detailed implications relating to design, coordination and competence. The implications relating to contractors and the construction phase have not been considered in detail.

    A straight ‘copy out’ of the EC TTMCS Directive raises a number of issues and would result in key changes to the CDM Regulations. These are summarised below.

    The TMCS was prepared over 20 years ago, yet technology and practice have moved on since then. Copy out could be “going backwards” which is against principles established in Directives and the Health & Safety at Work Act.

    The Directive is very broad and open to a wide range of interpretation, although it should be noted that non-binding guidance on interpretation was published by the EC in 2011. It is considered necessary to ensure that revised regulations are clear, adequately define requirements and are more precise.

    Application of Client duties to domestic clients

    The removal of the current GB exemption is not considered to be up for debate as EC action would be taken if GB fails to adopt this aspect of the Directive. The client’s duties can, however, be carried out by a project supervisor appointed by the client. However, it should be noted that the client assumes any project supervision duties which have not been delegated to an appointed project supervisor. Therefore, in order to address the issue of domestic client’s lack of ‘competence’ in relation to H&S matters, it is suggested that the first point of contact, e.g. designer or contractor, should become the project supervisor by default unless alternative arrangements are made – see below.

    Project Supervisor role

    This will be a new function in GB legislation. It is not considered necessary, however, to ‘invent’ a new role within the GB CDM framework to undertake the project supervisor duties. It is suggested that the lead designer or project manager would be the natural party to carry out this function unless alternative contractual arrangements are made to appoint an independent party or another member of the project team as project supervisor.

    Coordinator roles and duties vary slightly from the current CDM arrangements

    Coordinators are required on any project on which there is more than one contractor. Arrangements need to be workable, effective and achievable. Several possible models for the project supervisor and coordinator appointments are possible ranging from fully independent of one another to various combinations of these roles.

    There will be a requirement for the market to have available suitably identifiable and capable individuals to provide the necessary resource to deliver the project supervisor and coordination functions. Industry will need to be clear about its delivery of any of the co-ordination models and the adoption of appropriate performance standards or practices.

    Project Preparations Stage Co-ordinator role

    To address the issue of a workable, effective and achievable way forward it is suggested that the lead designer, or a project manager if appointed, should carry out this function unless alternative contractual arrangements are made for the early appointment of an independent third party co-ordinator. This would resolve the current problem of late appointments. Competent specialists or experts may need to be engaged by lead designers to support them if they are appointed to carry out this function, especially on more complex projects.

    The role of Project Execution Stage Co-ordinator has not been specifically addressed in this report other than in general terms.

    Designers only have implied duties

    The responsibility for the consideration of the health and safety implications of the design lies with the client or project supervisor and the preparations stage coordinator – see figure 1.

    The removal of the general designer duties is not considered to be an issue of concern as the Health & Safety at Work Act and the Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations duties address the general responsibilities for considering the impact of designs on others. However, as no such duty seems to exist in other H&S legislation, there may be a need for a reciprocal duty on designers to cooperate with the client, project supervisor and preparations stage coordinator to enable them to comply with their duties to ensure that the principles of prevention are applied and adequate information provided. Also, if the broader duties for designers are not included in the revised CDM Regulations, it is considered essential to make the application of HSWA and MHSWR duties clear to designers via a revised CDM ACoP.

    .It is suggested that the dropping from CDM of the designer duty to take account of the provisions of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations would be better addressed through the WHSW Regulations and/or Building Regulations. Such an approach would avoid accusations of ‘gold plating’ the TMCS Directive.

    There are no requirements regarding competence in the TMCS Directive

    The removal of the requirements for assessing competence of appointees is seen as positive step towards removing bureaucracy. However it is considered appropriate to include reference to competencies for all duty holders and specifically a duty not to accept an appointment unless competent. The aim should be to make membership of professional institutions the recognised assurance of individual competence in relation to design risk management and coordination. Specific training in design risk management may be needed beyond that in degree courses, possibly mirroring site management courses for contractors, especially for individuals who are not members of recognised professional Institutions. It is suggested that the CIC considers establishing a forum to develop a voluntary code and a mechanism for verifying application of such a code.”

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    BRICKLAYER FATALLY INJURED BY FALLING WALL

    Masonry collapsed during concrete back filling operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    BASIC LADDER SAFETY FAILURES FINED £150,000

    Repair and maintenance firm had no excuse for errors causing injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE UPDATE 13th MARCH 2019

    hselogo1Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th March 2019

    HSE ISSUES REMINDER ON SAFE SCAFFOLD DESIGN

    Recent incidents and high winds prompt warning from regulator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    LORRY DRIVER DIED IN OVERHEAD POWER STRIKE

    Major company failed to communicate precautions to grab arm operator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    ASSESSMENT SHOWED RISK – PRECAUTIONS NOT TAKEN

    Workman seriously injured when falling into open unguarded stairwell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st March 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FAILED TO IMPLEMENT SAFE SYSTEM

    Procedures for safe plant refuelling failed to prevent death of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    CLIENT PROSECUTED OVER CONTRACTOR FATAL FALL

    Company breached duty to protect contractors as well as employees

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    FOURTEEN YEAR FAILURE TO MANAGE ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to implement asbestos management plan following survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th February 2019

    CHILD INJURED BY WALL COLLAPSE INCIDENT

    Council failed to carry out “intelligence led” condition inspections

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    BOTTLE JACK SUPPORT FAILED TO PREVENT DEATH

    Director sentenced alongside company over death of engineer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    TEMPORARY WORKS FAILURES CAUSED FATAL FALL

    Platform not designed and system for installation and inspection inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    SOLVENT IGNITED DURING FLOOR CLEANING WORKS

    Flammable solvent fire fought with water spreading fire further

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th February 2019

    INEVITABLE COLLAPSE OF SCAFFOLD ON TO SCHOOL

    Scaffold not designed or installed to withstand foreseeable loads

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th February 2019

    OIL DRUM EXPLODED DURING HOT CUTTING WORK

    Firm fined £400k after drum lid ejected causing loss of leg

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    ROOFLIGHT FALL ON NUCLEAR POWER SITE

    Energy generating company and maintenance contractor fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    DIRECTOR PROSECUTED AFTER 6METRE ROOF FALL

    Untrained worker fell through rooflight in fragile asbestos roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    HSE ALERT: MILD STEEL WELDING CANCER RISK

    HSE announces enforcement action change based on new cancer evidence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th February 2019

    LORRY MOUNTED LIFTING OPERATION PROVED FATAL

    Steel staircase toppled from vehicle after sling snagged

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th February 2019

    DIRECTOR AND BUSINESS IN COURT OVER DEATH

    Scaffold not priced for on domestic roof-line refurbishment work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th February 2019

    FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT HAZARD PROTECTION MISSING

    Two businesses prosecuted after a worker fell through a fragile rooflight

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th February 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019

    FINGERS CRUSHED BY METAL FOLDING MACHINE

    Steel cladding firm fined £600k over failure guard access to danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019

    ASBESTOS ILLEGALLY REMOVED AFTER SURVEY

    Surveyor pricing asbestos work found contractor jumped the gun

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019

    SITE DUMPER PRECAUTIONS FAILED TO PREVENT DEATH

    Contractor fined £600k for poor management of vehicle/people interface

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    2 Responses to “CDM REGULATIONS 2015: UPDATE”

    1. HSE SET TO CONSULT ON SCRAPPING CDM-C AND ACOP | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] see how HSE propose to effect “removal of the …. the CDM co-ordinator role”. The European Directive requires the project client to appoint a “co-ordinator for safety and health matters at the […]

    2. HSE BOSS INTERVIEW ON HEALTH RISK AND CDM UPDATE | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] to come into force until April 2015. She said HSE will issue a consultation document for the new CDM Regulations in February or March […]