• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CIVIL LIABILITY FOR BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY

    Impact of new Act on injury claims must await commencement date

    The recently enacted Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Section 69 amends the HSWA 1974 to remove the right of civil of action for breach of a duty imposed by certain health and safety legislation, other than where such a right is specifically provided for.

    Section 47(2) of the HSWA 1974 had provided a right of action for breach of a duty contained in a health and safety regulation (a regulation made under section 15 of the HSWA 1974) if that breach caused damage. 

    Squire Sanders lawyer, Caroline Almond, has posted an interesting article on the company blog which provides a succinct account of the change and implications. The article is reproduced below.

     

    *********************************

     Caroline Almond on June 12th 2013
     
    Löfstedt report and cutting red tape

    One of the key recommendations of the Löfstedt report, published back in November 2011, was for the Government to implement a review of existing health and safety regulations. Employers, increasingly fearful of a burgeoning “compensation culture”, felt that over-compliance was rife with health and safety legislation as a result.

    In particular, Professor Löfstedt honed in on those regulations which imposed strict liability on employers, making them liable for injuries suffered by their employees at work, regardless of the extent to which the employer in question had sought to comply with its health and safety duties and whether it had taken all reasonable steps to protect its employees from harm.

    In making this recommendation, Professor Löfstedt answered the Coalition Government’s clarion call to “cut red tape” and ease the regulatory burden on business, particularly the SME’s it has repeatedly stressed are key to rejuvenating the stuttering economy. Armed with this recommendation, the Government’s speedy response to the Löfstedt report felt that a comprehensive review of the existing legislation, along with the five other key areas for reform, would help to “reclaim the reputation of health and safety that has been so damaged by the excesses of the compensation culture”.

    The approach that found favour with Government lawyers was to either qualify the existing duties with the concept of “reasonably practicability” or amend the legislation to prevent civil liability attaching to a breach of the regulations. This would address the perceived unfairness that responsible and safety-conscious employers were being held to a duty that was higher than the common law duty of care.

    Government targets amendment of HSWA 1974

    The March 2012 Budget reiterated the Government’s commitment to legislate on this topic and in September 2012 a further announcement by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (“BIS”) put more metaphorical flesh on the bones of this commitment. The September 2012 BIS announcement (dramatically entitled “Government red tape blitz to boost business growth”) revealed that the Government’s preferred approach was to amend the part of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act (“HSWA”) 1974 that imposed civil liability for breach of the statutory duties relating to health and safety regulations. The removal of strict liability for employers for civil claims (except in cases where they have been negligent) was to be achieved by the end of the 2012-2013 Parliamentary session.

    Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill

    The amending legislation emerged in the form of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (“ERR”) Bill. After receiving its first reading in the House of Lords in October 2012, it eventually received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013.

    The promised change to the HSWA 1974 was contained in clause 62 of the ERR Bill, which eventually became section 69 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (“ERR”) Act 2013. Clause 62 sought to amend the existing section 47 of the HSWA 1974, so that a breach of those statutory health and safety provisions which impose strict liability on employers would not allow an employee to bring a civil claim, unless the right is specifically provided for in the legislation.

    As highlighted in the Government’s February 2013 progress report into the implementation of the health and safety reforms, clause 62 went further than Professor Löfstedt’s recommendations. Whilst Professor Löfstedt had recommended a “review” of the health and safety provisions (with the potential of restricting the number of situations in which strict liability was relevant), the Government opted to make the single blanket amendment to the HSWA 1974, stating that it achieved the “same overall policy objective”. This was despite Professor Löfstedt himself stating that the Government’s approach was “more far-reaching than I anticipated in my recommendation”.

    As a result of the Government’s approach, clause 62 did not have a trouble-free passage through Parliament. At the report stage in the House of Lords, the Government was narrowly defeated. However, the Government dug in its heels and reinserted the provision, with clause 62 eventually voted through the House of Lords at the second time of asking.

    Consequently, employees are now more restricted in how they can bring a claim for a personal injury suffered at work. Prior to the passing of the ERR Act 2013 (in addition to any claim based on a breach of their contract of employment), employees could bring a claim against their employer for a breach of the common law duty of care as well as a claim based on a breach of the employer’s statutory duty. Section 69 of the ERR Act 2013 means that the latter route has now been removed (unless the health and safety provision in question specifically provides for a civil right of action), which leaves employees having to rely more frequently on proving an employer’s negligence when bringing a claim based on the common law duty of care.

    Commencement date for section 69 to be announced

    A commencement date for section 69 of the ERR Act 2013 is still awaited. It is only once this date has been confirmed and a sufficient period of time has elapsed, that statistical evidence can be gathered regarding the number of personal injury claims brought by employees against their employers and their success rates. It will then be possible to ascertain whether the Government has achieved its aim of reducing the regulatory burden on business and bringing “common sense” into health and safety matters. Whether economic growth, which has proved to be stubbornly elusive in recent years, is boosted as a result will be much harder to judge.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FINED OVER FIRE RISK

    PD and PC failed to comply with CDM 2015 responsibilities

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

    Lawyer argues guidelines undermine reduction in ‘regulatory burden’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 23rd MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    PANEL STRUCK WORKMAN DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Third party contractor falls victim of poor lift planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    DIRECTOR LED HAZARDOUS WORK AT HEIGHT

    Three occasions when work lacked suitable and sufficient precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RISK ASSESSED BUT CONTROLS FOUND WANTING

    Joiner fell through unprotected opening on roof of new building

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RIBA CRITICAL OF HACKITT REVIEW FINAL REPORT

    High rise residential review dismissed as “major missed opportunity”

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 16th MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    SPARE POWER INTERLOCK KEY CAUSED DEATH

    Dangerous machinery safety precautions defeated for maintenance tasks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th May 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 9th MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th May 2018

    COLLAPSED CAR PARK WAS UNDER REPAIR

    Rusted steel supports triggered collapse of fascia and floor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    DUMPER OVERTURN CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Precautions during spoil heap creation were inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    HARDWOOD DUST CONTROL NOT MAINTAINED

    Manufacturer failed to examine and test local extraction system

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    SCAFFOLD CONTRACTOR OVERLOOKED MAJOR HAZARD

    Well-known risk unidentified during scaffold erection project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    THREE FIRMS FINED £1/2M FOR FRAGILE RISK FAILURES

    Fall through rooflight hazard poorly planned and managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    CONTRACTORS IGNORED ASBESTOS RISK

    Asbestos pipe lagging worked on without licence and proper precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 2nd MAY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018

    SOFT LANDING BAGS TRIGGERED A FALL!

    Fall arrest bag thrown from scaffold took workman with bag

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    FAILURE TO NOTIFY HSE PREVENTED INVESTIGATION

    Regulator prosecutes over RIDDOR non-compliance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR TOGETHER IN COURT

    Fragile roof fall exposes client failure to manage project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    UNTRAINED DUMPER DRIVER SURVIVES OVERTURN

    Inadequate barriers plus lack of operator and manager training

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018

    PROJECT CLIENT PROSECUTED UNDER CDM 2015

    Building demolished without suitable precautions to prevent danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data