• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CIVIL LIABILITY FOR BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY

    Impact of new Act on injury claims must await commencement date

    The recently enacted Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Section 69 amends the HSWA 1974 to remove the right of civil of action for breach of a duty imposed by certain health and safety legislation, other than where such a right is specifically provided for.

    Section 47(2) of the HSWA 1974 had provided a right of action for breach of a duty contained in a health and safety regulation (a regulation made under section 15 of the HSWA 1974) if that breach caused damage. 

    Squire Sanders lawyer, Caroline Almond, has posted an interesting article on the company blog which provides a succinct account of the change and implications. The article is reproduced below.

     

    *********************************

     Caroline Almond on June 12th 2013
     
    Löfstedt report and cutting red tape

    One of the key recommendations of the Löfstedt report, published back in November 2011, was for the Government to implement a review of existing health and safety regulations. Employers, increasingly fearful of a burgeoning “compensation culture”, felt that over-compliance was rife with health and safety legislation as a result.

    In particular, Professor Löfstedt honed in on those regulations which imposed strict liability on employers, making them liable for injuries suffered by their employees at work, regardless of the extent to which the employer in question had sought to comply with its health and safety duties and whether it had taken all reasonable steps to protect its employees from harm.

    In making this recommendation, Professor Löfstedt answered the Coalition Government’s clarion call to “cut red tape” and ease the regulatory burden on business, particularly the SME’s it has repeatedly stressed are key to rejuvenating the stuttering economy. Armed with this recommendation, the Government’s speedy response to the Löfstedt report felt that a comprehensive review of the existing legislation, along with the five other key areas for reform, would help to “reclaim the reputation of health and safety that has been so damaged by the excesses of the compensation culture”.

    The approach that found favour with Government lawyers was to either qualify the existing duties with the concept of “reasonably practicability” or amend the legislation to prevent civil liability attaching to a breach of the regulations. This would address the perceived unfairness that responsible and safety-conscious employers were being held to a duty that was higher than the common law duty of care.

    Government targets amendment of HSWA 1974

    The March 2012 Budget reiterated the Government’s commitment to legislate on this topic and in September 2012 a further announcement by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (“BIS”) put more metaphorical flesh on the bones of this commitment. The September 2012 BIS announcement (dramatically entitled “Government red tape blitz to boost business growth”) revealed that the Government’s preferred approach was to amend the part of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act (“HSWA”) 1974 that imposed civil liability for breach of the statutory duties relating to health and safety regulations. The removal of strict liability for employers for civil claims (except in cases where they have been negligent) was to be achieved by the end of the 2012-2013 Parliamentary session.

    Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill

    The amending legislation emerged in the form of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (“ERR”) Bill. After receiving its first reading in the House of Lords in October 2012, it eventually received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013.

    The promised change to the HSWA 1974 was contained in clause 62 of the ERR Bill, which eventually became section 69 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (“ERR”) Act 2013. Clause 62 sought to amend the existing section 47 of the HSWA 1974, so that a breach of those statutory health and safety provisions which impose strict liability on employers would not allow an employee to bring a civil claim, unless the right is specifically provided for in the legislation.

    As highlighted in the Government’s February 2013 progress report into the implementation of the health and safety reforms, clause 62 went further than Professor Löfstedt’s recommendations. Whilst Professor Löfstedt had recommended a “review” of the health and safety provisions (with the potential of restricting the number of situations in which strict liability was relevant), the Government opted to make the single blanket amendment to the HSWA 1974, stating that it achieved the “same overall policy objective”. This was despite Professor Löfstedt himself stating that the Government’s approach was “more far-reaching than I anticipated in my recommendation”.

    As a result of the Government’s approach, clause 62 did not have a trouble-free passage through Parliament. At the report stage in the House of Lords, the Government was narrowly defeated. However, the Government dug in its heels and reinserted the provision, with clause 62 eventually voted through the House of Lords at the second time of asking.

    Consequently, employees are now more restricted in how they can bring a claim for a personal injury suffered at work. Prior to the passing of the ERR Act 2013 (in addition to any claim based on a breach of their contract of employment), employees could bring a claim against their employer for a breach of the common law duty of care as well as a claim based on a breach of the employer’s statutory duty. Section 69 of the ERR Act 2013 means that the latter route has now been removed (unless the health and safety provision in question specifically provides for a civil right of action), which leaves employees having to rely more frequently on proving an employer’s negligence when bringing a claim based on the common law duty of care.

    Commencement date for section 69 to be announced

    A commencement date for section 69 of the ERR Act 2013 is still awaited. It is only once this date has been confirmed and a sufficient period of time has elapsed, that statistical evidence can be gathered regarding the number of personal injury claims brought by employees against their employers and their success rates. It will then be possible to ascertain whether the Government has achieved its aim of reducing the regulatory burden on business and bringing “common sense” into health and safety matters. Whether economic growth, which has proved to be stubbornly elusive in recent years, is boosted as a result will be much harder to judge.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 11th JULY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2018

    SCAFFOLDER DEVELOPMENT EMBRACED BY INDUSTRY

    CPD training attracts over 2500 scaffolders during first year of operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2018

    SECURITY PANELS FELL DESPITE EARLY WARNING

    Firm fined £1/4 million after worker crushed by falling fencing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    VEHICLE STRIKE TRIGGERED FALL OF ROOF TRUSSES

    Manufacturer failed to identify a suitable safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    INCIDENT: CHILD STRUCK BY FALLING OBJECT

    Wood falling from scaffold triggers arrest of two on construction site

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    IGNITION OF THINNERS VAPOUR CLAIMED TWO LIVES

    Refurbishment project director jailed over fatal use of flammable solvent

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    HSE LONDON REFURBISHMENT CAMPAIGN FINDINGS

    hselogo1Material breaches of law found at over 50% of London sites visited

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th July 2018

    CURFEW AND TAGGING FOR RECALCITRANT SCAFFOLDER

    Suspended jail sentence handed down after unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th July 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS RISE SHARPLY

    HSE report construction worker deaths increase by 27% during 2017/18

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th July 2018

    BUILD UK UPDATE KEY CONSTRUCTION H&S ADVICE

    Majors industry body endorses “go to” source of H&S information

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2018

    OXYGEN CYLINDER “FIRED” INTO WORKSHOP

    Violent discharge of gas bottle seriously injured two engineers

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2018

    PRISON SENTENCE OVER FAILURE TO MANAGE RISK

    Sole trader contractor ignored HSE advice once too often

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2018

    DEATH EXPOSED MINIMAL MEWP MAINTENANCE

    Court told about “almost complete” lack of MEWP maintenance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    CONTRACTOR FAILED TO IDENTIFY ASBESTOS PRESENCE

    ACMs disturbed during works and firm failed to take suitable actions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    FALL THROUGH ROOF ON LOCAL COUNCIL BUILDING

    Fragile rooflight fractured when workman ‘misplaced footing’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    YOUNG WORKER POSED SPECIAL RISK TO CONTROL

    Conviction highlights duty to young persons and the vulnerable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    TOWER DEFECTS AND UNSAFE SYSTEM CAUSED DEATH

    Maintenance supervisor fell to his death through roof opening

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    UK MAJOR FINED £1/2m OVER HAVS RISK FAILURES

    Danger caused by poor management of vibrating hand tool risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    DIRECTOR FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PROHIBITION

    Precautions not taken to prevent excavation collapse and falling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th June 2018

    SCAFFOLD NOT TO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR DESIGN

    Specialist and contractor in court over unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2018

    ROAD WORKER RUN OVER BY ROAD ROLLER

    Reversing alarm not working and warning light not fitted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    CLIENT AND SURVEYOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey proved inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    FATALITY: ROAD WORKER DRAGGED ALONG ROAD

    Night shift worker loses life when struck by road sweeping vehicle

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS AVOID HSE ENFORCEMENT

    Regulator enforcement database reveals few notices involve CDM PDs

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    PROPERTY MANAGERS FINED WITH CONTRACTOR

    Defendants failed to check for asbestos during soffit replacement works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data