• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    BASIS OF NEW CDM REGULATIONS EXPLAINED

    HSE presentation to construction industry body published on website

    On March 15th 2013 the Construction Industry Advisory Committee (COINAC) met and received an HSE presentation on the revision to the CDM 2007 Regulations. The presentation has now beenpublished on the HSE website.

    The declared objectives of the new regulations will be:

    • Implementation – current law ‘under-implements’ since there are no duties on ‘domestic clients';
    • Simplification – the new package must be more use-friendly and less bureaucratic;
    • Roles – align roles more accurately with the EU Directive requirements;
    • Gold plating – starting point for the regulations will be a ‘Copy Out’ of the Directive;
    • Cost and bureaucracy – aim is to produce a cost savings for businesses and less ‘bureaucracy';
    • SMEs – new regulations should improve compliance of SMEs; and
    • Regulatory impact – regulations must meet better regulation principles.

    The central principle governing new CDM Regulations will be a ‘Copy Out’ of the EU Directive in order to remove and avoid any unnecessary ‘Gold Plating’ of UK legislation.

    It may therefore help readers to view again the main requirements of the Directive which are reproduced below. We have underlined key defintions and obligations.

    UPDATE: CONSULTATIVE DOCUMENT NOW PUBLISHED APRIL 2014

     

    MAIN REQUIREMENTS OF EU DIRECTIVE

    Article 2 Definitions

    For the purposes of this Directive:

    (a) ‘temporary or mobile construction sites’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘construction sites’) means any construction site at which building or civil engineering works are carried out; a non-exhaustive list of such works is given in Annex I;

    (b) ‘client’ means any natural or legal person for whom a project is carried out;

    (c) ‘project supervisor’ means any natural or legal person responsible for the design and/or execution and/or supervision of the execution of a project, acting on behalf of the client;

    (d) ‘self-employed person’ means any person other than those referred to in Article 3 (a) and (b) of Directive 89/391/EEC whose professional activity contributes to the completion of a project;

    (e) ‘coordinator for safety and health matters at the project preparations stage’ means any natural or legal person entrusted by the client and/or project supervisor, during preparation of the project design, with performing the duties referred to in Article 5;

    (f) ‘coordinator for safety and health matters at the project execution stage’ means any natural or legal person entrusted by the client and/or project supervisor, during execution of the project, with performing the duties referred to in Article 6.

    Article 3 Appointment of coordinators – Safety and health plan – Prior notice

    1. The client or the project supervisor shall appoint one or more coordinators for safety and health matters, as defined in Article 2 (e) and (f), for any construction site on which more than one contractor is present.

    2. The client or the project supervisor shall ensure that prior to the setting up of a construction site a safety and health plan is drawn up in accordance with Article 5 (b).

    The Member States may, after consulting both management and the workforce, allow derogations from the provisions of the first paragraph, except where the work concerned involves particular risks as listed in Annex II.

    3. In the case of constructions sites:

    -on which work is scheduled to last longer than 30 working days and on which more than 20 workers are occupied simultaneously, or

    – on which the volume of work is scheduled to exceed 500 person-days, the client or the project supervisor shall communicate a prior notice drawn up in accordance with Annex III to the competent authorities before work starts.

    The prior notice must be clearly displayed on the construction site and, if necessary, periodically updated.

    Article 4 – Project preparation stage: general principles

    The project supervisor, or where appropriate the client, shall take account of the general principles of prevention concerning safety and health referred to in Directive 89/391/EEC during the various stages of designing and preparing the project, in particular:

    – when architectural, technical and/or organizational aspects are being decided, in order to plan the various items or stages of work which are to take place simultaneously or in succession,

    – when estimating the period required for completing such work or work stages. Account shall also be taken, each time this appears necessary, of all safety and health plans and of files drawn up in accordance with Article 5 (b) or (c) or adjusted in accordance with Article 6 (c).

    Article 5 – Project preparation stage: duties of coordinators

    The coordinator(s) for safety and health matters during the project preparation stage appointed in accordance with Article 3 (1) shall:

    (a) coordinate implementation of the provisions of Article 4;

    (b) draw up, or cause to be draw up, a safety and health plan setting out the rules applicable to the construction site concerned, taking into account where necessary the industrial activities taking place on the site; this plan must also include specific measures concerning work which falls within one or more of the categories of Annex II;

    (c) prepare a file appropriate to the characteristics of the project containing relevant safety and health information to be taken into account during any subsequent works.

    Article 6 – Project execution stage: duties of coordinators

    The coordinator(s) for safety and health matters during the project execution stage appointed in accordance with Article 3 (1) shall:

    (a) coordinate implementation of the general principles of prevention and safety:

    – when technical and/or organizational aspects are being decided, in order to plan the various items or stages of work which are to take place simultaneously or in succession,

    – when estimating the period required for completing such work or work stages;

    (b) coordinate implementation of the relevant provisions in order to ensure that employers and, if necessary for the protection of workers, self-employed persons:

    – apply the principles referred to in Article 8 in a consistent manner,

    – where required, follow the safety and health plan referred to in Article 5 (b);

    (c) make, or cause to be made, any adjustments required to the safety and health plan referred to in Article 5 (b) and the file referred to in Article 5 (c) to take account of the progress of the work and any changes which have occurred;

    (d) organize cooperation between employers, including successive employers on the same site, coordination of their activities with a view to protecting workers and preventing accidents and occupational health hazards and reciprocal information as provided for in Article 6 (4) of Directive 89/391/EEC, ensuring that self-employed persons are brought into this process where necessary;

    (e) coordinate arrangements to check that the working procedures are being implemented correclty;

    (f) take the steps necessary to ensure that only authorized person are allowed onto the construction site.

    Article 7 – Responsibilities of clients, project supervisors and employers

    1. Where a client or project supervisor has appointed a coordinator or coordinators to perform the duties referred to in Articles 5 and 6, this does not relieve the client or project supervisor of his responsibilities in that respect.

    2. The implementation of Articles 5 and 6, and of paragraph 1 of this Article shall not affect the principle of employers’ responsibility as provided for in Directive 89/391/EEC.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    CONTRACTS MANAGER HANDED TWO YEAR PRISON TERM

    Safety fall arrest netting would have saved life of deceased workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    WORKER FATALLY INJURED BY CONCRETE BEAM

    Lifting operation not properly planned, managed and supervised

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    TREE FELLING OPERATIONS LACKED DEFINED COMMS

    Workman struck by falling tree inside “normal” exclusion zone

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CONTRACTOR ARRESTED OVER WELFARE FAILINGS

    Recalcitrant sole trader failed to attend court hearing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    MAJOR DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR FINED £500,000

    Collapse of concrete slab caused death of worker and excavator fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FALL FROM LADDER WHILST CARRYING BUCKET

    Contractor failed to provide basic safe lifting aids

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH HSE NOTICE PROVES COSTLY

    Director given suspended jail term and company fined £60,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    DEVELOPER FAILED TO PLAN AND CHECK COMPETENCE

    Fall caused by ad-hoc working methods and lack of monitoring

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CYLINDER LEAK TEST CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Corrosion inhibitor triggered failure and shrapnel ejection

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FESTIVE GREETINGS TO ALL OUR READERS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th December 2019

    JAIL TERM FOLLOWS ROUTINE HSE SPOT CHECK

    Director of a roofing firm handed a suspended prison sentence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    TEENAGER FELL 3M DURING BLOCK AND BEAM WORK

    Workers uninstructed and left to devise own safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    PARCEL CARRIER FINED HEAVILY OVER FLT INCIDENT

    Reversing fork lift lacked segregation from pedestrians

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FLOOR OPENING FALL

    Thorough risk assessment and edge protection were both inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    THREE WORKERS “CARRIED ALONG” IN SEWER INCIDENT

    Mentally affected and one man treated for long-term traumatic stress

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2019

    SOLAR FIRM AND DIRECTOR SENTENCED OVER DEATH

    Brother of business owner died in fall during panel installation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    DIRECTOR AND COMPANY FINED FOR ASBESTOS RISK

    HSE refurbishment campaign inspection revealed asbestos offences

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    BULK BAG COLLAPSE CAUSED BY UNSAFE STACKING

    Bulk bag collapsed onto workman when struck by fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    INTERLOCKED GUARD NOT WORKING TO ISOLATE POWER

    Two workmen seriously injured when plant started unexpectedly

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    STREET FURNITURE RISK TO PUBLIC FINED £1.4M

    Council prosecuted following injury to child playing on hinged bollard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    WORKMEN SUFFER SERIOUS BURNS FROM CABLE STRIKE

    Assessment and system of work failed to appreciate electrical risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th November 2019

    LADDERS WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR WORK ON ROOF

    Workman paralysed after falling whilst installing roof ladder

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO MANAGE EXHAUST VENTILATION

    HSE enforcement notices on wood dust and welding fume ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th November 2019

    RECALCITRANT DIRECTOR BARRED FROM OFFICE

    Dangerous telehandler used despite earlier fatality and enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    DIRECTOR HID UNSAFE WORKING PRACTICES FROM HSE

    Workers exposed to sprayed paints containing asthma causing isocyantes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    3 Responses to “BASIS OF NEW CDM REGULATIONS EXPLAINED”

    1. HSE PUBLISH NEW PLAN OF WORK FOR 2013/14 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] development of a revised regulatory package for the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations […]

    2. NEW CDM REGULATIONS: CLIENTS AND COORDINATORS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] a recent post we reproduced the main requirements of the Directive. So…. as we move towards publication of the […]

    3. CDM-C ROLE UNDER NEW CDM REGULATIONS 2014 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] has stated that any revision to CDM 2007 will be based on the Government policy of ‘copying out’ the EU Directive on which CDM 2007 is […]