• Total Access Higher Safety
    Turner Access Chipmunk Data

    BASIS OF NEW CDM REGULATIONS EXPLAINED

    HSE presentation to construction industry body published on website

    On March 15th 2013 the Construction Industry Advisory Committee (COINAC) met and received an HSE presentation on the revision to the CDM 2007 Regulations. The presentation has now beenpublished on the HSE website.

    The declared objectives of the new regulations will be:

    • Implementation – current law ‘under-implements’ since there are no duties on ‘domestic clients';
    • Simplification – the new package must be more use-friendly and less bureaucratic;
    • Roles – align roles more accurately with the EU Directive requirements;
    • Gold plating – starting point for the regulations will be a ‘Copy Out’ of the Directive;
    • Cost and bureaucracy – aim is to produce a cost savings for businesses and less ‘bureaucracy';
    • SMEs – new regulations should improve compliance of SMEs; and
    • Regulatory impact – regulations must meet better regulation principles.

    The central principle governing new CDM Regulations will be a ‘Copy Out’ of the EU Directive in order to remove and avoid any unnecessary ‘Gold Plating’ of UK legislation.

    It may therefore help readers to view again the main requirements of the Directive which are reproduced below. We have underlined key defintions and obligations.

    UPDATE: CONSULTATIVE DOCUMENT NOW PUBLISHED APRIL 2014

     

    MAIN REQUIREMENTS OF EU DIRECTIVE

    Article 2 Definitions

    For the purposes of this Directive:

    (a) ‘temporary or mobile construction sites’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘construction sites’) means any construction site at which building or civil engineering works are carried out; a non-exhaustive list of such works is given in Annex I;

    (b) ‘client’ means any natural or legal person for whom a project is carried out;

    (c) ‘project supervisor’ means any natural or legal person responsible for the design and/or execution and/or supervision of the execution of a project, acting on behalf of the client;

    (d) ‘self-employed person’ means any person other than those referred to in Article 3 (a) and (b) of Directive 89/391/EEC whose professional activity contributes to the completion of a project;

    (e) ‘coordinator for safety and health matters at the project preparations stage’ means any natural or legal person entrusted by the client and/or project supervisor, during preparation of the project design, with performing the duties referred to in Article 5;

    (f) ‘coordinator for safety and health matters at the project execution stage’ means any natural or legal person entrusted by the client and/or project supervisor, during execution of the project, with performing the duties referred to in Article 6.

    Article 3 Appointment of coordinators – Safety and health plan – Prior notice

    1. The client or the project supervisor shall appoint one or more coordinators for safety and health matters, as defined in Article 2 (e) and (f), for any construction site on which more than one contractor is present.

    2. The client or the project supervisor shall ensure that prior to the setting up of a construction site a safety and health plan is drawn up in accordance with Article 5 (b).

    The Member States may, after consulting both management and the workforce, allow derogations from the provisions of the first paragraph, except where the work concerned involves particular risks as listed in Annex II.

    3. In the case of constructions sites:

    -on which work is scheduled to last longer than 30 working days and on which more than 20 workers are occupied simultaneously, or

    – on which the volume of work is scheduled to exceed 500 person-days, the client or the project supervisor shall communicate a prior notice drawn up in accordance with Annex III to the competent authorities before work starts.

    The prior notice must be clearly displayed on the construction site and, if necessary, periodically updated.

    Article 4 – Project preparation stage: general principles

    The project supervisor, or where appropriate the client, shall take account of the general principles of prevention concerning safety and health referred to in Directive 89/391/EEC during the various stages of designing and preparing the project, in particular:

    – when architectural, technical and/or organizational aspects are being decided, in order to plan the various items or stages of work which are to take place simultaneously or in succession,

    – when estimating the period required for completing such work or work stages. Account shall also be taken, each time this appears necessary, of all safety and health plans and of files drawn up in accordance with Article 5 (b) or (c) or adjusted in accordance with Article 6 (c).

    Article 5 – Project preparation stage: duties of coordinators

    The coordinator(s) for safety and health matters during the project preparation stage appointed in accordance with Article 3 (1) shall:

    (a) coordinate implementation of the provisions of Article 4;

    (b) draw up, or cause to be draw up, a safety and health plan setting out the rules applicable to the construction site concerned, taking into account where necessary the industrial activities taking place on the site; this plan must also include specific measures concerning work which falls within one or more of the categories of Annex II;

    (c) prepare a file appropriate to the characteristics of the project containing relevant safety and health information to be taken into account during any subsequent works.

    Article 6 – Project execution stage: duties of coordinators

    The coordinator(s) for safety and health matters during the project execution stage appointed in accordance with Article 3 (1) shall:

    (a) coordinate implementation of the general principles of prevention and safety:

    – when technical and/or organizational aspects are being decided, in order to plan the various items or stages of work which are to take place simultaneously or in succession,

    – when estimating the period required for completing such work or work stages;

    (b) coordinate implementation of the relevant provisions in order to ensure that employers and, if necessary for the protection of workers, self-employed persons:

    – apply the principles referred to in Article 8 in a consistent manner,

    – where required, follow the safety and health plan referred to in Article 5 (b);

    (c) make, or cause to be made, any adjustments required to the safety and health plan referred to in Article 5 (b) and the file referred to in Article 5 (c) to take account of the progress of the work and any changes which have occurred;

    (d) organize cooperation between employers, including successive employers on the same site, coordination of their activities with a view to protecting workers and preventing accidents and occupational health hazards and reciprocal information as provided for in Article 6 (4) of Directive 89/391/EEC, ensuring that self-employed persons are brought into this process where necessary;

    (e) coordinate arrangements to check that the working procedures are being implemented correclty;

    (f) take the steps necessary to ensure that only authorized person are allowed onto the construction site.

    Article 7 – Responsibilities of clients, project supervisors and employers

    1. Where a client or project supervisor has appointed a coordinator or coordinators to perform the duties referred to in Articles 5 and 6, this does not relieve the client or project supervisor of his responsibilities in that respect.

    2. The implementation of Articles 5 and 6, and of paragraph 1 of this Article shall not affect the principle of employers’ responsibility as provided for in Directive 89/391/EEC.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    LACK OF SAFE PLATFORMS FOR WORK ON CRANE

    Major crane hire company erred on work at height precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    SECOND CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER CASE IN WEEK

    Double fatality represented pattern of serious neglect

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    DIRECTORS JAILED AND FIRM FINED FOR MANSLAUGHTER

    Client paid £100,000 less than economic cost for roof work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    SOLAR PANEL FIRM AND DIRECTOR IN COURT

    Ineffective use of fall arrest no substitute for proper precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    FIRM FAILED TO SECURE COMPETENT ASSISTANCE

    Court holds manager to account over inaction on risk management

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 10th MAY 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th May 2017

    GROUND WORKER TRAPPED BY EXCAVATION COLLAPSE

    Fellow workers dug earth so injured workman could breath

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th May 2017

    MAJOR UK FIRMS FAILED ON VEHICLE MANAGEMENT

    Worker struck and injured when towed trolley and load overturned

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th May 2017

    MAGISTRATES FINE FIRM £250,000 OVER ROOF FALL

    Solar panel firm failed to control risk and supervise works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th May 2017

    HSE REFURBISHMENT CAMPAIGN ENDS £750,000 FINE

    Contractor fined under CDM after failing to act on asbestos survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2017

    SITE MANAGER JAILED OVER DEATH OF PASSER-BY

    Failure to secure windows led to death and manslaughter sentence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2017

    ROGUE GAS FITTER JAILED FOR 16 MONTHS

    Work unsafe and exposed home residents at risk of harm

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    LADDER ASSOCIATION ISSUES NEW SAFETY GUIDANCE

    Guidance comes amidst concerns surrounding unsafe telescopic ladders

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    FATALITY: FALL ON NEW HOMES PROJECT

    Workman died falling from a ladder on construction project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    FIRM ADMITS GUILT AFTER DEATH OF FOUR WORKMEN

    Guilty plea entered by company on first day of Crown Court trial

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    FIRM FINED £2 MILLION OVER WORKPLACE DEATH

    Unsafe stacking of plastic bales claimed life of cleaner

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 1st MAY 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    CONCRETE STAIRCASE CAUSED FATAL CRUSHING

    Lifting operations were unsafe and poorly supervised on project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    CALL TO HALT FALL IN HSE FRONT LINE INSPECTORS

    Union reveals 25% cut and increasing delay in concluding investigations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 26th APRIL 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th April 2017

    FATALITY: HOMES PROJECT IN SCOTLAND

    Circumstances of construction worker death remain unclear

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    HSE OPEN FEE FOR INTERVENTION CONSULTATION

    hselogo1Regulator proposal for revised FFI disputes process

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    LIFTING OPERATION WITH EXCAVATOR CAUSED DEATH

    Groundworker fatally injured when struck by concrete drainage cover

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    WATER FIRM FINED £1.8M AFTER WORKER DROWNED

    Workman fell through opening into sand filtration tank

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017

    PC AND CONTRACTOR PAY PRICE FOR UNSAFE WORKING

    Dangerous working practices continued during ‘snowy’ weather

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th April 2017
    Turner Access Chipmunk Data
    Total Access Higher Safety
  • 3 Responses to “BASIS OF NEW CDM REGULATIONS EXPLAINED”

    1. HSE PUBLISH NEW PLAN OF WORK FOR 2013/14 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] development of a revised regulatory package for the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations […]

    2. NEW CDM REGULATIONS: CLIENTS AND COORDINATORS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] a recent post we reproduced the main requirements of the Directive. So…. as we move towards publication of the […]

    3. CDM-C ROLE UNDER NEW CDM REGULATIONS 2014 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] has stated that any revision to CDM 2007 will be based on the Government policy of ‘copying out’ the EU Directive on which CDM 2007 is […]