• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    TIPS ON MINIMISING RISK FROM NEW HSE CHARGING REGIME

    Fee for intervention (FFI) scheme only days away from commencement

    The HSE fee for intervention (FFI) cost recovery scheme comes into effect on 1 October 2012. HSE will recover costs of carrying out its regulatory functions from those “found to be in material breach of health and safety law”.

    A ‘material breach’ is one where the HSE inspector is of the opinion that there has been a contravention of health and safety law serious enough to require them to notify the person (company) in material breach of that opinion in writing.

    The government believe that FFI will:

    • encourage businesses and organisations to comply in the first place;
    • put matters right quickly; and
    • discourage those who undercut competitors by not complying with the law and putting people at risk.

    The Fee for Intervention hourly rate for 2012/13 is £124 and detailed guidance for dutyholders has been published by HSE.

    A new section has been added to the HSE website to illustrate the most basic safety mistakes found in the workplace. These examples provide an indication of matters which might constitute a ‘material breach’.

    FFI will be reviewed after the first twelve months of operation and within three years of the regime coming into effect with review reports published on the HSE website.

    Tips for minimising risk from FFI

    It is important that dutyholders consider how they might respond to the new charging regime. Even the most diligent of construction projects could be found in material breach and liable to be charged.

    Our tips for minimising the risk and scale of FFI charges are:

    1. Prevention – review the significant hazards on each project and the measures required to control the risk. HSE inspectors will target uncontrolled significant risk at the place of work so do not provide the opportunity for a ‘quick win';
    2. Awareness – make sure that everyone on the project team is aware of the change and the key hazards and controls relevant to their operations. The examples given in the guidance provide a starting point and checklist;
    3. Sharing – construction projects involve clients, designers, coordinators, contractors and suppliers and allocation of responsibility for a material breach may be complex. Make sure all dutyholders on the project are aware of this shared liability and encourage greater cooperation and coordination;
    4. Discussion – open a positive dialogue with the inspector when a potential material breach is identified and look to avoid the conclusion that you are in material breach;
    5. Action – supplement dialogue with swift remedial action which in combination may help the inspector conclude that a material breach has not taken place;
    6. Confession – where an inspector is of the opinion a material breach has occurred you might offer to provide a full report to HSE indicating the matters discussed and action taken thereby making it unnecessary for the inspector to notify the breach in writing;
    7. Minimisation – where a material breach is identified and the inspector has indicated charges will be imposed look to agree and implement preventive action as soon as possible to minimise the FFI costs that might be claimed;
    8. Incidents – greatest costs will probably be generated by HSE investigations which could result in high five figure invoices for errant businesses. Where incidents occur a thorough internal investigation shared with HSE should reduce the time taken by HSE to conclude the investigation and action and hence minimise the overall bill; and
    9. Budget – and finally, assume you will err at some stage and allow for the possibility of FFI costs within your project budgets!

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 13th JUNE 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th June 2018

    DIRECTOR FAILED COMPLY WITH HSE PROHIBITION

    Precautions not taken to prevent excavation collapse and falling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th June 2018

    SCAFFOLD NOT TO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR DESIGN

    Specialist and contractor in court over unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2018

    ROAD WORKER RUN OVER BY ROAD ROLLER

    Reversing alarm not working and warning light not fitted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    CLIENT AND SURVEYOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey proved inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    FATALITY: ROAD WORKER DRAGGED ALONG ROAD

    Night shift worker loses life when struck by road sweeping vehicle

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS AVOID HSE ENFORCEMENT

    Regulator enforcement database reveals few notices involve CDM PDs

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    PROPERTY MANAGERS FINED WITH CONTRACTOR

    Defendants failed to check for asbestos during soffit replacement works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    EXCAVATION CAUSED RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE

    Precautions not taken to secure stability of free-standing wall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    OVERHEAD CABLE STRIKE FIRM FINED £500,000+

    Inadequate system caused risk of harm despite lack of worker injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FINED OVER FIRE RISK

    PD and PC failed to comply with CDM 2015 responsibilities

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

    Lawyer argues guidelines undermine reduction in ‘regulatory burden’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    PANEL STRUCK WORKMAN DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Third party contractor falls victim of poor lift planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    DIRECTOR LED HAZARDOUS WORK AT HEIGHT

    Three occasions when work lacked suitable and sufficient precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RISK ASSESSED BUT CONTROLS FOUND WANTING

    Joiner fell through unprotected opening on roof of new building

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RIBA CRITICAL OF HACKITT REVIEW FINAL REPORT

    High rise residential review dismissed as “major missed opportunity”

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    SPARE POWER INTERLOCK KEY CAUSED DEATH

    Dangerous machinery safety precautions defeated for maintenance tasks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th May 2018

    COLLAPSED CAR PARK WAS UNDER REPAIR

    Rusted steel supports triggered collapse of fascia and floor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    DUMPER OVERTURN CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Precautions during spoil heap creation were inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    HARDWOOD DUST CONTROL NOT MAINTAINED

    Manufacturer failed to examine and test local extraction system

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    SCAFFOLD CONTRACTOR OVERLOOKED MAJOR HAZARD

    Well-known risk unidentified during scaffold erection project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    THREE FIRMS FINED £1/2M FOR FRAGILE RISK FAILURES

    Fall through rooflight hazard poorly planned and managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • 2 Responses to “TIPS ON MINIMISING RISK FROM NEW HSE CHARGING REGIME”

    1. FIRMS FEAR HSE INSPECTION CHARGES WILL DAMAGE RELATIONS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] the firm international law firm expect to incur higher health and safety costs as a result of the HSE  Fee for Intervention’ (FFI) scheme which cam into operation at the start of October […]

    2. HSE FEE FOR INTERVENTION CHANGING RELATIONSHIPS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] A ‘client survey’ by international law firm DAC Beachcroft is reported to have found that ”the dynamic around HSE visits has changed dramatically” since the introduction of Fee for Intervention. […]