HSE CHARGING REGIME CONSULTATION EARLY FINDINGS

Construction industry hears of concerns over CDM 2007 “fee for intervention”

On 16th November 2011 the Construction Industry Advisory Committee (CONIAC) received an update from Gordon MacDonald HSE Director of Special Projects on progress with the Fee for Intervention proposals and the next steps.

Mr McDonald reported to CONIAC on “themes coming out of the consultation”. The concerns included:

Receipt Maximisation: the system may incentivise HSE to maximise receipts from the system rather than taking action appropriate to the real risk or seriousness of breach;
Relationships: current relations are based upon a clear understanding of roles and with no direct financial connection between the act of regulation and charges. Introduction of fees for specific interventions may harm the HSE/business relationship;
Uncertainty: the charging system is based on inspector ‘opinion’ of what is a material breach. There is therefore a lack of clarity and certainty as to when charges will be imposed;
Trigger Level: the threshold of at which charges start is where an inspector communicates to the company by letter or email. Consultees feel this is “too low”;
Financial hardship: the charges imposed could have damaging impact on SMEs; and
Appeals: some have questioned the level of independence in the proposed disputes process

The new arrangements are contained in the Consultation Document which sought views on the proposed systems. The consultation period ended on 14th October 2011 and it is anticipated the Regulations will come into force on 6th april 2012,

This article was posted on 27th November 2011 in ALL LATEST NEWS, Fee for intervention, REGULATION.
PP Construction Safety H&S Assistance and Consultancy service.

Construction Health & Safety News, Advice and Information from PP Construction Safety

HSE CHARGING REGIME CONSULTATION EARLY FINDINGS

Construction industry hears of concerns over CDM 2007 “fee for intervention”

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

FALL PRECAUTIONS FELL BETWEEN TWO FIRMS

Contractors fined after workers at risk of falling from roof

SOLAR PANEL FIRM AWARE OF FRAGILE ROOF RISK

Workman suffered long-term injuries in 4m fall through rooflight

HSE PROSECUTE FIRM OVER RISK NOT HARM

Multiple safety failings land construction company in court

CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR FACED COURT TOGETHER

Firms breached joint duty to plan and carry our work at height safely

£1M FINE OVER DEATH CAUSED BY EXCAVATOR

Vehicle driver found guilty at trial alongside CDM Principal Contractor

CHILD DIED WHILST PLAYING ON POWERED GATE

Lack of end stop caused gate to fall on 6 year old boy

HSE SPEAK AT ACCESS INDUSTRY CONFERENCE 2019

AIF National Working at Height Conference November 2019

UK CLIENT FINED OVER UNSAFE OVERSEAS FIRM

Italian contractor found guilty despite failure to attend court

COMPLETE FAILURE TO RECOGNISE HAVS RISK

Specialist drilling company and director sentenced over HAVS danger

PC AND TWO OTHERS FAILED TO ASSESS WIND EFFECT

Fall of director from roof caused by ‘Storm Doris’ gust

MAJOR FIRM FINED £400k OVER LIFTING OPERATION

Fitter loses four fingers as load slides and falls to the ground

NEW HOMES LEFT IN DANGEROUS CONDITION

Fined for unsafe gas work causing fires at housing development

FIRM FINED £1M OVER EXPLOSION DURING CLEANING

Tank cleaning operation caused burns as flammable vapours ignited

YOUNG BRICKLAYER FELL THROUGH OPEN STAIRWAY

Firm fined over failure to install fall protection around opening

STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

FLAT ROOF FAILED UNDER WEIGHT OF WORKMAN

Confusion over fragility proves costly for worker and business

PROPERTY FIRM FINED OVER FATAL FALL FROM TREE

Untrained workers using chain saw engaged to fell large sycamore

LANDLORD PUT PUBLIC AT RISK FROM ASBESTOS

Powered jet washing of asbestos cement sheets caused spread

WORKMAN FELL FROM SUSPENDED ACCESS EQUIPMENT

Health Board and maintenance firm director prosecuted

CONSIDERING TEMP WORKS IN PERMANENT DESIGN

Useful overview for civil and structural engineers on contemporary practice

FIRM FAILED TO COMPLY WITH SITE WELFARE NOTICE

Basic welfare requirements found wanting for second time

PRISON TERM OVER POORLY GUARDED CIRCULAR SAW

Workman lost three fingers using machine without guard and riving knife

COMPANY IGNORED HSE ON SILICA DUST ACTION

Worktop manufacturer failed to control dust and manage ventilation

ASBESTOS REMOVED WITHOUT SURVEY OR CONTROLS

Client fined over failure to commission refurb and demo survey

One Response to “HSE CHARGING REGIME CONSULTATION EARLY FINDINGS”

News Archives