Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    MASSIVE FINES IMPOSED FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS

    National retailer sentenced over asbestos risk to shoppers and workers

    Marks and Spencer plc and contractors have today (27 September 2011) been fined for putting members of the public, staff and construction workers at risk of exposure to asbestos-containing materials during the refurbishment of stores in Reading and Bournemouth during 2006.

    The court heard that:

    • Marks and Spencer plc failed to allocate sufficient time and space for the removal of asbestos-containing materials at the Reading store. HSE alleged the minimum standards set out in legislation and approved codes of practice were not met and M&S internal guidance on how asbestos should be removed was not followed appropriately;
    • PA Realisations Ltd did not reduce the spread of asbestos to the Reading shop floor. Areas cleaned by the company were re-contaminated by air moving through the void between the ceiling tiles and the floor above, and by poor standards of work;
    • Styles & Wood Limited (principal contractor at Reading) permitted a method of asbestos removal which did not allow for adequate sealing of the ceiling void resulting in risks to contractors on site;
    • Wilmott Dixon Construction Ltd (principal contractor at Bournemouth) failed to plan, manage and monitor removal of asbestos-containing materials and did not prevent the possibility of asbestos being disturbed in areas that had not been surveyed extensively.

    The sentencing follows a three month trial ending in July 2011 where Winchester Crown Court heard that construction workers at the two stores removed asbestos-containing materials that were present in the ceiling tiles and elsewhere.

    The Daily Telegraph reports that Judge Christopher Harvey Clark QC said the company was more interested in making profits out of its Reading store than properly planning for the removal of asbestos and that the “tension” between health and safety and profit had caused the “lamentable problems”.

    He added: “The response from Marks & Spencer was, in effect, to turn a blind eye to what was happening … It was already costing the company too much money.” He conculded that people who visited the store during the work “have a right to be anxious as to whether they have breathed in asbestos fibres”.

    Major refurb clients must give contractors enough time and space

    Marks and Spencer plc was fined £1 million and ordered to pay costs of £600,000. The charges and fines relate to the Broad Street, Reading store and date from 24 April 2006 to 13 November 2006.

    Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd was fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £75,000. These breaches took place at the M&S store in Commercial Road, Bournemouth. PA Realisations Ltd (formerly Pectel Ltd) was fined £200. The company went into administration in December 2008 and now awaits dissolution.

    At an earlier hearing on 12 January 2010, Styles & Wood Limited pleaded guilty to charges relate to offences committed at the M&S store in Reading and have now been fined £100,000 and ordered to pay costs of £40,000.

    The health and safety of our employees, customers and contractors is of the upmost importance to us. We hope to continue to work closely with the HSE in the future to ensure that strict regulations and safety standards relating to asbestos are maintained.”

    Richard Boland, HSE’s Southern Head of Operations for Construction, said:

    “This outcome should act as a wake up call that any refurbishment programmes involving asbestos-containing materials must be properly resourced, both in terms of time and money – no matter what.

    Large retailers and other organisations who carry out major refurbishment works must give contractors enough time and space within the store to carry out the works safely. Where this is not done, and construction workers and the public are put at risk, HSE will not hesitate in taking robust enforcement action.”

    A spokesperson for M&S told the Telegraph:

    “We are very disappointed with the result of this case, as we believe that we have always acted responsibly and with a safety-first attitude.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    FAILURE TO ISOLATE LEAVES WORKMAN PARALYSED

    Conveyor guards removed before power source isolated

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th October 2018

    TRADING STANDARDS AND HSE ACT IN CONCERT

    Director given prison term over fraud and health and safety breaches

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th October 2018

    BUILDER ERROR CAUSED RESIDENT FALL FROM BALCONY

    Director prosecuted over refurb project danger to others

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th October 2018

    FORMER HSE BOSS CONDEMNS VALUE ENGINEERING

    Resident and public safety must match workforce safety progress

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th October 2018

    RETAILER FINED AFTER FAN AMPUTATES FINGERS

    Maintenance engineer injured during roof fan repair works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th October 2018

    POOR PLANT ISOLATION CAUSED CONVEYOR DANGER

    Arm of fitter trapped between conveyor drum and belt

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th October 2018

    BUILDING OWNER FAILED TO CHECK FOR ASBESTOS

    Prison sentence for businessman after previous HSE enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th October 2018

    YOUNG WORKER LOSES FINGERS IN SAWING INCIDENT

    Provision of training and information could not be proved

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th October 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 10th OCT 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th October 2018

    MD PROSECUTED ALONGSIDE ERRANT COMPANY

    Director held personally responsible for poor site conditions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st October 2018

    ASBESTOS REMOVAL STARTED BEFORE R & D SURVEY

    Asbestos insulation board found outside building being refurbished

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th September 2018

    INEFFECTIVELY BRAKED SAW CAUSED AMPUTATIONS

    Retro-fitting of precautions may be required on older machines

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th September 2018

    FALL THROUGH FRAGILE CEILING TILES

    Failure to implemented control measures for working near fragile surfaces

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th September 2018

    HSE SEEKS CONSTRUCTION ‘DUST BUSTER’ PARTNERS

    Regulator uses social media to raise dust dangers and using right controls

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th September 2018

    MAJOR HOMES BUSINESS EXPOSED PUBLIC TO RISK

    Residential property refurb project created carbon monoxide danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th September 2018

    HSE CONSTRUCTION DUST CONTROL ‘BLITZ’ STARTS

    Regulator inspections will check health taken as seriously as safety

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th September 2018

    FLOOR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM OF WORK UNSAFE

    Welder fell 3m from mezzanine area through purlin openings

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th September 2018

    WORKER SUFFERS FATAL BURNS IN OXYGEN RICH AREA

    Sparks from angle grinder ignited clothing of workman in confined space

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    RIBA PUBLISH DRAFT POST GRENFELL FIRE SAFETY PLAN

    Architects institute consults on ‘golden thread of fire safety information’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    MAJOR UK CONTRACTORS HIT BY MAJOR FINES

    Firms ordered to pay over £3m after foot trapped in rotating ‘screw’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    DRIVER DIED TRAPPED BETWEEN TRAILER AND VEHICLE

    Firm fined £1.5 million over failure to assess coupling operations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th September 2018

    ACTUAL SYSTEM OF WORK WAS OPPOSITE OF RAMS

    Workman fell 4m through fragile asbestos roof sheet

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th September 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FUNCTION MISUNDERSTOOD?

    Consultants claim CDM 2015 design risk management has ‘gone backwards’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th September 2018

    RISK ASSESSED PRECAUTIONS NOT IMPLEMENTED

    Action not paperwork essential to prevent fall during lifting operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th September 2018

    CROSSRAIL PUBLISH BEST PRACTICE H&S GUIDES

    Sharing major project best practice can leave a lasting legacy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    One Response to “MASSIVE FINES IMPOSED FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS”

    1. HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 7th DECEMBER 2011 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] Styles & Wood Limited – asbestos exposure and spread: £100,000; […]