Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    MASSIVE FINES IMPOSED FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS

    National retailer sentenced over asbestos risk to shoppers and workers

    Marks and Spencer plc and contractors have today (27 September 2011) been fined for putting members of the public, staff and construction workers at risk of exposure to asbestos-containing materials during the refurbishment of stores in Reading and Bournemouth during 2006.

    The court heard that:

    • Marks and Spencer plc failed to allocate sufficient time and space for the removal of asbestos-containing materials at the Reading store. HSE alleged the minimum standards set out in legislation and approved codes of practice were not met and M&S internal guidance on how asbestos should be removed was not followed appropriately;
    • PA Realisations Ltd did not reduce the spread of asbestos to the Reading shop floor. Areas cleaned by the company were re-contaminated by air moving through the void between the ceiling tiles and the floor above, and by poor standards of work;
    • Styles & Wood Limited (principal contractor at Reading) permitted a method of asbestos removal which did not allow for adequate sealing of the ceiling void resulting in risks to contractors on site;
    • Wilmott Dixon Construction Ltd (principal contractor at Bournemouth) failed to plan, manage and monitor removal of asbestos-containing materials and did not prevent the possibility of asbestos being disturbed in areas that had not been surveyed extensively.

    The sentencing follows a three month trial ending in July 2011 where Winchester Crown Court heard that construction workers at the two stores removed asbestos-containing materials that were present in the ceiling tiles and elsewhere.

    The Daily Telegraph reports that Judge Christopher Harvey Clark QC said the company was more interested in making profits out of its Reading store than properly planning for the removal of asbestos and that the “tension” between health and safety and profit had caused the “lamentable problems”.

    He added: “The response from Marks & Spencer was, in effect, to turn a blind eye to what was happening … It was already costing the company too much money.” He conculded that people who visited the store during the work “have a right to be anxious as to whether they have breathed in asbestos fibres”.

    Major refurb clients must give contractors enough time and space

    Marks and Spencer plc was fined £1 million and ordered to pay costs of £600,000. The charges and fines relate to the Broad Street, Reading store and date from 24 April 2006 to 13 November 2006.

    Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd was fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £75,000. These breaches took place at the M&S store in Commercial Road, Bournemouth. PA Realisations Ltd (formerly Pectel Ltd) was fined £200. The company went into administration in December 2008 and now awaits dissolution.

    At an earlier hearing on 12 January 2010, Styles & Wood Limited pleaded guilty to charges relate to offences committed at the M&S store in Reading and have now been fined £100,000 and ordered to pay costs of £40,000.

    The health and safety of our employees, customers and contractors is of the upmost importance to us. We hope to continue to work closely with the HSE in the future to ensure that strict regulations and safety standards relating to asbestos are maintained.”

    Richard Boland, HSE’s Southern Head of Operations for Construction, said:

    “This outcome should act as a wake up call that any refurbishment programmes involving asbestos-containing materials must be properly resourced, both in terms of time and money – no matter what.

    Large retailers and other organisations who carry out major refurbishment works must give contractors enough time and space within the store to carry out the works safely. Where this is not done, and construction workers and the public are put at risk, HSE will not hesitate in taking robust enforcement action.”

    A spokesperson for M&S told the Telegraph:

    “We are very disappointed with the result of this case, as we believe that we have always acted responsibly and with a safety-first attitude.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    SEVENTH LONDON CYCLIST DEATH DURING 2018

    Building products vehicle involved in death of Queens doctor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th August 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 15th AUGUST 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th August 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR FAILED TO SUPERVISE LIFT

    Errors whilst lifting pre-cast concrete blocks fined £600,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2018

    FIRM FINED £400,000 OVER VIBRATING TOOLS RISK

    Hand-held orbital sanders, rivet guns, grinders and drills caused harm

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2018

    OVERHEAD POWER AND EARTHING OF SCAFFOLDS

    NASC combines updates advice on scaffold electrical risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2018

    REVERSING VEHICLE CLAIMED LIFE OF ‘BANKSMAN’

    Workman trapped whilst assisting colleague in reversing lorry

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th August 2018

    TWO WORKMEN DIED IN SPRAY BOOTH EXPLOSION

    Flammable vapour ignited by ignition sources present at the scene

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    SOLAR SPECIALIST FAILED TO PLAN FOR SAFETY

    Fragile roof failed under weight of solar installation worker

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    DIRECTOR AND COMPANY FINED FOR SAFETY BREACHES

    Basic work at height risks and welfare requirements ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    REFURB PROJECT REQUIRED ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

    Property management firm fined over lack of asbestos survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    CLIENT FAILED MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS TEST

    Homes developer prosecuted for breaching CDM 2015 client duties

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    JAIL TERM FOR DEVELOPER AFTER BUILDING COLLAPSE

    Inexperienced workers demolished structure without Principal Contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    CDM 2015 DUTYHOLDERS IGNORED HSE ADVICE

    Contractor, client and director convicted after dangerous site conditions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018

    MASSIVE FINE OVER USE OF UNSAFE GAS FITTINGS

    College gas installation contractor exposed after multiple gas leaks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    TEMP WORKS DESIGNED BY MANAGER AND UNCHECKED

    Collapse of platform highlighted failure in temporary works management

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    RAISING SAFETY STANDARDS FOR CRANE LIFTING OPS

    Major crane seminar seeks to raise standards and share best practice

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    WORKMAN SURVIVES 6m FALL THROUGH ROOFLIGHT

    Unsecured boards provided to cover nearby fragile materials

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    MAJOR FACILITIES FIRM FAILED ON FLAT ROOF SAFETY

    Site specific planning lacking and safety standards not monitored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    HSE ALERT: UNAUTHORISED ACCESS TO SCAFFOLDS

    hselogo1Regulator sets out new guidance to protect children and the public

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    ASSUMING OTHERS WILL ACT IS NO DEFENCE

    Incomplete edge protection caused 8m fall from roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    LEADING ROOFING SPECIALIST FOUND WANTING

    Risk to employees and the public after failure to meet required standard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    SCAFFOLDER DEVELOPMENT EMBRACED BY INDUSTRY

    CPD training attracts over 2500 scaffolders during first year of operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2018

    SECURITY PANELS FELL DESPITE EARLY WARNING

    Firm fined £1/4 million after worker crushed by falling fencing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    VEHICLE STRIKE TRIGGERED FALL OF ROOF TRUSSES

    Manufacturer failed to identify a suitable safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    INCIDENT: CHILD STRUCK BY FALLING OBJECT

    Wood falling from scaffold triggers arrest of two on construction site

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    One Response to “MASSIVE FINES IMPOSED FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS”

    1. HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 7th DECEMBER 2011 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] Styles & Wood Limited – asbestos exposure and spread: £100,000; […]