Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    MASSIVE FINES IMPOSED FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS

    National retailer sentenced over asbestos risk to shoppers and workers

    Marks and Spencer plc and contractors have today (27 September 2011) been fined for putting members of the public, staff and construction workers at risk of exposure to asbestos-containing materials during the refurbishment of stores in Reading and Bournemouth during 2006.

    The court heard that:

    • Marks and Spencer plc failed to allocate sufficient time and space for the removal of asbestos-containing materials at the Reading store. HSE alleged the minimum standards set out in legislation and approved codes of practice were not met and M&S internal guidance on how asbestos should be removed was not followed appropriately;
    • PA Realisations Ltd did not reduce the spread of asbestos to the Reading shop floor. Areas cleaned by the company were re-contaminated by air moving through the void between the ceiling tiles and the floor above, and by poor standards of work;
    • Styles & Wood Limited (principal contractor at Reading) permitted a method of asbestos removal which did not allow for adequate sealing of the ceiling void resulting in risks to contractors on site;
    • Wilmott Dixon Construction Ltd (principal contractor at Bournemouth) failed to plan, manage and monitor removal of asbestos-containing materials and did not prevent the possibility of asbestos being disturbed in areas that had not been surveyed extensively.

    The sentencing follows a three month trial ending in July 2011 where Winchester Crown Court heard that construction workers at the two stores removed asbestos-containing materials that were present in the ceiling tiles and elsewhere.

    The Daily Telegraph reports that Judge Christopher Harvey Clark QC said the company was more interested in making profits out of its Reading store than properly planning for the removal of asbestos and that the “tension” between health and safety and profit had caused the “lamentable problems”.

    He added: “The response from Marks & Spencer was, in effect, to turn a blind eye to what was happening … It was already costing the company too much money.” He conculded that people who visited the store during the work “have a right to be anxious as to whether they have breathed in asbestos fibres”.

    Major refurb clients must give contractors enough time and space

    Marks and Spencer plc was fined £1 million and ordered to pay costs of £600,000. The charges and fines relate to the Broad Street, Reading store and date from 24 April 2006 to 13 November 2006.

    Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd was fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £75,000. These breaches took place at the M&S store in Commercial Road, Bournemouth. PA Realisations Ltd (formerly Pectel Ltd) was fined £200. The company went into administration in December 2008 and now awaits dissolution.

    At an earlier hearing on 12 January 2010, Styles & Wood Limited pleaded guilty to charges relate to offences committed at the M&S store in Reading and have now been fined £100,000 and ordered to pay costs of £40,000.

    The health and safety of our employees, customers and contractors is of the upmost importance to us. We hope to continue to work closely with the HSE in the future to ensure that strict regulations and safety standards relating to asbestos are maintained.”

    Richard Boland, HSE’s Southern Head of Operations for Construction, said:

    “This outcome should act as a wake up call that any refurbishment programmes involving asbestos-containing materials must be properly resourced, both in terms of time and money – no matter what.

    Large retailers and other organisations who carry out major refurbishment works must give contractors enough time and space within the store to carry out the works safely. Where this is not done, and construction workers and the public are put at risk, HSE will not hesitate in taking robust enforcement action.”

    A spokesperson for M&S told the Telegraph:

    “We are very disappointed with the result of this case, as we believe that we have always acted responsibly and with a safety-first attitude.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE SAFETY ALERT: TOWER CRANE BRAKES

    Collapse of tower crane jib in high winds prompts HSE warning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2018

    VISITING ENGINEER CRUSHED BY SCAFFOLD TUBES

    Principal contractor “signed off” contractor storage arrangements

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2018

    CONCRETE EJECTED BY PUMPING UNIT CLAIMED LIFE

    Company and director failed to train and supervise pumping operations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th December 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 5th DEC 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th December 2018

    REFRESHED GUIDANCE ON FITNESS TO OPERATE PLANT

    Construction plant medical fitness Good Practice Guide

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th December 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR & LUL USED UNSAFE SYSTEM

    Work method to eliminate moving vehicle hazard not adopted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th December 2018

    OVERTURNING LORRY CAUSED DEATH OF DRIVER

    Groundworks project stockpiling arrangements not properly managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd December 2018

    FORTH BRIDGE LIFTING OPERATION NOT PLANNED

    Major project PC failed to plan, supervise and carry out lift safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd December 2018

    DEVELOPER FAILED ON ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

    HSE inspection revealed refurb works without asbestos survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    POST DRIVER HAMMER CRUSHED HAND OF WORKMAN

    Unsafe system of work for vehicle crash barrier installation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    WORKER FELL FROM LOFT THROUGH CEILING

    Major house builder lacked understanding of loft fragile surfaces risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    NEW SITE DUMPER SAFETY GUIDANCE ISSUED

    Construction plant sector concerns prompts CPA consults on draft

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    CCTV INSTALLER FELL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT

    Contractor failed to properly plan and control the risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    VISITOR DIED FALLING INTO CONCEALED BASEMENT

    Contractor failed to protect basement void on domestic project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    RACKING FALL REVEALED UNSAFE SYSTEM OF WORK

    European firm fined £300,000 after UK sub-contractor employee fell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    FAILURE TO ACT ON VIBRATION AND SILICA HAZARDS

    Worker health put at risk during stripping of furnace lining

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    MAJOR FM FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN BACK-UP POWER

    Power loss at laboratory site created potential risk from biological agents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    IGNORING HSE PROHIBITIONS COST FIRM £250,000

    CDM 2015 and work at height requirements repeatedly breached

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th November 2018

    ROOF COLLAPSED UNDER EXCESS LOADING

    Director and company fined over roof design failures

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th November 2018

    FORK LIFT OVERTURNED IN SCAFFOLDING YARD

    Untrained operator suffered life changing crush injuries

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th November 2018

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY ALERT: EFFECTS OF SCALE

    SCOSS issues alert after concerns disclosed over ‘large structures’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    ASBESTOS EXPOSED BY UNTRAINED WORKERS

    Contractor failed to act properly despite HSE intervention

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    GAS MAIN STRIKE REPAIR CAUSED SEVERE BURNS

    Contractor excavator damage to gas pipe ends in £1.2m fine

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    REBAR FELL FROM FLT IN UNSAFE LIFTING OPERATION

    Multiple fractures caused by inappropriate use of fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    POORLY PLANNED LIFT DISMANTLE INJURED WORKMAN

    Counterweight or suspension rope struck worker in lift shaft

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st November 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    One Response to “MASSIVE FINES IMPOSED FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS”

    1. HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 7th DECEMBER 2011 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] Styles & Wood Limited – asbestos exposure and spread: £100,000; […]