• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    MASSIVE FINES IMPOSED FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS

    National retailer sentenced over asbestos risk to shoppers and workers

    Marks and Spencer plc and contractors have today (27 September 2011) been fined for putting members of the public, staff and construction workers at risk of exposure to asbestos-containing materials during the refurbishment of stores in Reading and Bournemouth during 2006.

    The court heard that:

    • Marks and Spencer plc failed to allocate sufficient time and space for the removal of asbestos-containing materials at the Reading store. HSE alleged the minimum standards set out in legislation and approved codes of practice were not met and M&S internal guidance on how asbestos should be removed was not followed appropriately;
    • PA Realisations Ltd did not reduce the spread of asbestos to the Reading shop floor. Areas cleaned by the company were re-contaminated by air moving through the void between the ceiling tiles and the floor above, and by poor standards of work;
    • Styles & Wood Limited (principal contractor at Reading) permitted a method of asbestos removal which did not allow for adequate sealing of the ceiling void resulting in risks to contractors on site;
    • Wilmott Dixon Construction Ltd (principal contractor at Bournemouth) failed to plan, manage and monitor removal of asbestos-containing materials and did not prevent the possibility of asbestos being disturbed in areas that had not been surveyed extensively.

    The sentencing follows a three month trial ending in July 2011 where Winchester Crown Court heard that construction workers at the two stores removed asbestos-containing materials that were present in the ceiling tiles and elsewhere.

    The Daily Telegraph reports that Judge Christopher Harvey Clark QC said the company was more interested in making profits out of its Reading store than properly planning for the removal of asbestos and that the “tension” between health and safety and profit had caused the “lamentable problems”.

    He added: “The response from Marks & Spencer was, in effect, to turn a blind eye to what was happening … It was already costing the company too much money.” He conculded that people who visited the store during the work “have a right to be anxious as to whether they have breathed in asbestos fibres”.

    Major refurb clients must give contractors enough time and space

    Marks and Spencer plc was fined £1 million and ordered to pay costs of £600,000. The charges and fines relate to the Broad Street, Reading store and date from 24 April 2006 to 13 November 2006.

    Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd was fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £75,000. These breaches took place at the M&S store in Commercial Road, Bournemouth. PA Realisations Ltd (formerly Pectel Ltd) was fined £200. The company went into administration in December 2008 and now awaits dissolution.

    At an earlier hearing on 12 January 2010, Styles & Wood Limited pleaded guilty to charges relate to offences committed at the M&S store in Reading and have now been fined £100,000 and ordered to pay costs of £40,000.

    The health and safety of our employees, customers and contractors is of the upmost importance to us. We hope to continue to work closely with the HSE in the future to ensure that strict regulations and safety standards relating to asbestos are maintained.”

    Richard Boland, HSE’s Southern Head of Operations for Construction, said:

    “This outcome should act as a wake up call that any refurbishment programmes involving asbestos-containing materials must be properly resourced, both in terms of time and money – no matter what.

    Large retailers and other organisations who carry out major refurbishment works must give contractors enough time and space within the store to carry out the works safely. Where this is not done, and construction workers and the public are put at risk, HSE will not hesitate in taking robust enforcement action.”

    A spokesperson for M&S told the Telegraph:

    “We are very disappointed with the result of this case, as we believe that we have always acted responsibly and with a safety-first attitude.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 13th JUNE 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th June 2018

    DIRECTOR FAILED COMPLY WITH HSE PROHIBITION

    Precautions not taken to prevent excavation collapse and falling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th June 2018

    SCAFFOLD NOT TO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR DESIGN

    Specialist and contractor in court over unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2018

    ROAD WORKER RUN OVER BY ROAD ROLLER

    Reversing alarm not working and warning light not fitted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    CLIENT AND SURVEYOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey proved inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    FATALITY: ROAD WORKER DRAGGED ALONG ROAD

    Night shift worker loses life when struck by road sweeping vehicle

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS AVOID HSE ENFORCEMENT

    Regulator enforcement database reveals few notices involve CDM PDs

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    PROPERTY MANAGERS FINED WITH CONTRACTOR

    Defendants failed to check for asbestos during soffit replacement works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    EXCAVATION CAUSED RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE

    Precautions not taken to secure stability of free-standing wall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    OVERHEAD CABLE STRIKE FIRM FINED £500,000+

    Inadequate system caused risk of harm despite lack of worker injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FINED OVER FIRE RISK

    PD and PC failed to comply with CDM 2015 responsibilities

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

    Lawyer argues guidelines undermine reduction in ‘regulatory burden’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    PANEL STRUCK WORKMAN DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Third party contractor falls victim of poor lift planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    DIRECTOR LED HAZARDOUS WORK AT HEIGHT

    Three occasions when work lacked suitable and sufficient precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RISK ASSESSED BUT CONTROLS FOUND WANTING

    Joiner fell through unprotected opening on roof of new building

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RIBA CRITICAL OF HACKITT REVIEW FINAL REPORT

    High rise residential review dismissed as “major missed opportunity”

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    SPARE POWER INTERLOCK KEY CAUSED DEATH

    Dangerous machinery safety precautions defeated for maintenance tasks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th May 2018

    COLLAPSED CAR PARK WAS UNDER REPAIR

    Rusted steel supports triggered collapse of fascia and floor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    DUMPER OVERTURN CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Precautions during spoil heap creation were inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    HARDWOOD DUST CONTROL NOT MAINTAINED

    Manufacturer failed to examine and test local extraction system

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    SCAFFOLD CONTRACTOR OVERLOOKED MAJOR HAZARD

    Well-known risk unidentified during scaffold erection project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2018

    THREE FIRMS FINED £1/2M FOR FRAGILE RISK FAILURES

    Fall through rooflight hazard poorly planned and managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • One Response to “MASSIVE FINES IMPOSED FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS”

    1. HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 7th DECEMBER 2011 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] Styles & Wood Limited – asbestos exposure and spread: £100,000; […]