Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    NEW CHARGES PROPOSED FOR CDM 2007 NON-COMPLIANCE

    HSE cost recovery plans set to change the construction safety landscape

    Proposals have now been published for taking forward Government policy requiring HSE to impose charges on those found in breach of the CDM Regulations 2007 and other health and safety laws.

    The new arrangements are contained in the Consultation Document seeking views on the proposed systems. The consultation period ends on 14th October 2011.

    Charges for those in ‘material breach’ of law

    The new ‘Fee for Intervention’ will be invoiced where there is a ‘material breach’ of health and safety law. A material breach is one which, in the opinion of the inspector, requires them to make a formal intervention. HSE will recover all of the costs of that intervention.

    A formal intervention is where a requirement to rectify the breach is formally made in writing e.g. by enforcement notices, electronic mail or letter.

    Those who are in compliance with requirements will pay nothing nor will those in ‘technical’ breach of the law i.e. a breach which, in the opinion of the inspector, does not require them to make a formal intervention. The proposals also exclude:

    • inspections and incident investigations by Local Authorities;
    • self-employed, unless they expose other people to risks; and
    • breaches by employees.
    High five figure sums could be payable

    Costs will be recovered from the start of the intervention during which the material breach was identified up to and including the point where intervention in relation to that breach had been concluded.

    The costs will include all related follow-up interventions (e.g. site visits, phone calls), the provision of any specialist assistance, the costs of writing letters and reports plus the drafting and issuing of any enforcement notices.

    An averaged hourly fee for intervention rate will be charged (estimated at £133) for all HSE staff involved in the interventions. This excludes the Health and Safety Laboratory specialist services (HSL) for which actual cost will be charged. The estimated averaged costs recovered are:

    • Inspection with no action – no costs;
    • Inspection with letter – approx £750;
    • Inspection with enforcement notice – approx £1500;
    • Investigations – appox £750 to tens of thousands of pounds.

    The actual intervention costs will depend upon the particular circumstances and the complexity of the investigation required to follow all reasonable lines of enquiry

    No change in enforcement policy and procedures

    HSE has publicly available policies and practices setting out the principles that inspectors apply when deciding on the appropriate action to take in response to breaches of health and safety legislation. These will remain unchanged by the introduction of the cost recovery scheme.

    There will a queries and disputes resolution procedure aimed at resolving all queries or disputes “promptly, fairly and in a transparent way”. The costs of handling disputes will be charged where the dispute is not upheld.

    Clients, designers, CDM-Cs and contractors all at risk

    The CDM Regulations 2007 imposes duties on a range of organisations.

    When undertaking interventions e.g. inspections, investigations, enforcement or following up complaints, HSE will identify those CDM duty holders to whom fee for intervention applies and will seek to recover costs from them where they are in material breach of health and safety law.

    Comment

    These proposals represent a major departure from the current system under which HSE only recover costs in construction where legal proceedings are instituted. However, this is now the opportunity to influence the nature of the system imposed. Some immediate thoughts are:

    • HSE behaviour – there is no intention to change the behaviour of HSE Inspectors who should continue to exercise their discretion based on the facts and existing policies and procedures. However, in practice there is likely to be a complex interplay between the new charging system and the behaviour of HSE Inspectors, including some unanticipated consequences;
    • Exercise of discretion – the decision to charge will be based on the opinion of the Inspector that the breach is ‘material’ and that formal communication is ‘required’. HSE guidance to inspectors on the exercise of such discretion will come under close scrutiny, debate and ‘negotiation';
    • Diversion of resources – there is likely to be an impact on HSE/ Industry relationships and formal disputes may divert all parties from dealing with real safety issues. The time taken to recover costs from the recalcitrant end of the industry could be significant;
    • Costs imposed – the charges imposed on organisations may be substantial especially where the HSE intervention arises from a incident. There is no limit to costs or restriction based on the ability to pay;
    • Whistle blowing – complaints to HSE may rise, made by those who comply or those charged and concerned that others are ‘getting away with it’;
    • Project relationships – clients, designers and CDM-C’s will come under increasing scrutiny as contractors seek to point HSE further up the supply chain when matters go wrong on site;

    The test of the system will be whether or not it improves the levels of compliance, risk and personal harm that currently arise on UK construction projects.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    FARMER FINED OVER FATAL FALL THROUGH ROOF

    Valley gutter cleaning from ladder ends in death of contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO ‘ENGAGE’ WITH HSE INSPECTORS

    Company and director omitted to take action on Improvement Notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    HOME BUILDER FAILED TO MANAGE STEEL INSTALL

    Workman struck by steel beam and seriously injured

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    PLASTERER FELL FROM UNGUARDED HOUSE LANDING

    Sole trader failed to manage risk to self-employed worker

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    SOLAR PANEL CLEAN RESULTED IN FRAGILE ROOF FALL

    Elevated work platform would have been mitigated fall risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR FAILED TO MANAGE PROJECT

    Double prosecution following fall through fragile roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE UPDATE 16th MAY 2019

    hselogo1Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2019

    HSE DEMOLITION INCIDENT CASE STUDIES

    Regulator advice focuses on underlying causes of recent demo incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2019

    TEMPORARY WORKS: NEW GUIDANCE PUBLISHED

    TW Forum (TWf) advice on PC concrete, platforms and stockpiles

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th May 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO ENFORCE FALL ARREST SYSTEM

    Worker 5m fall through roof preventable by scaffolding and safety nets

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th May 2019

    FINGERS AMPUTATED IN WOOD MACHINE INCIDENTS

    Joinery firm failed to provide effective safeguards on saw and planer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th May 2019

    NEW SITE DUMPER GUIDANCE PUBLISHED

    Good practice guide for safe use of dumpers now available

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th May 2019

    TRUST FAILED TO PROPERLY MANAGE ASBESTOS

    Workers exposed to asbestos during accommodation refurbishment project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th May 2019

    HSE TARGETS PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS IN 2019/20

    New business plan puts health and Principal Designers in HSE spotlight

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2019

    FIRM LACKED SAFE SYSTEM FOR MANUAL HANDLING

    Gantry steps regularly moved unsafely despite employee concerns

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th May 2019

    PROPERTY FIRM FAILED TO OVERSEE CONTRACTOR

    Wall and hoarding collapsed injuring pedestrian on busy London street

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th May 2019

    ELECTRICAL BURNS ON DEMOLITION PROJECT

    Bar thrown at electrical equipment to prove dead …revealed system live

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st May 2019

    WORKER FELL THROUGH STAIRWELL OPENING

    Basic fall protection precautions not taken on home build project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th April 2019

    TWO BRICKLAYERS INJURED IN FLOOR COLLAPSE

    Joist hangers incorrectly installed and floor overloaded with blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    FIRM FINED £150K AFTER BOY FELL FROM SCAFFOLD

    Ladder guard failed to prevent 12-year old accessing scaffolding

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    SAFETYCAM VEHICLE TRAPS ERRANT DRIVERS

    Safer Highways reports on new approaches to roadworks health and safety

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    NEW PRE-QUAL SYSTEM LAUNCHED BY MAJOR PLAYERS

    Build UK and CECA publish common PQ assessment standard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    REPORT CONFIRMS RISING COST OF OFFENDING

    Considerable increases in fines imposed on larger organisations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    CONCRETE BLOCK MAKER FAILED TO GUARD MACHINE

    Effective safety precautions absent for a number of years

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th April 2019

    HOTEL REFURBISHMENT DISTURBED ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to act on well-founded asbestos concerns expressed by employee

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    7 Responses to “NEW CHARGES PROPOSED FOR CDM 2007 NON-COMPLIANCE”

    1. PUBLIC RISK PROMPTS PRE-EMPTIVE PROSECUTION | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] smaller high risk work where the majority of deaths now occur. The proposals for charging those in breach may provide a further incentive in that such non-compliance could cost […]

    2. HSE INSPECTORS OPPOSE ‘FEE FOR INTERVENTION’ PROPOSALS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] Prospect state that the major reasons for opposition to Fees for Intervention are: […]

    3. INDUSTRY CONCERN OVER HSE COST RECOVERY PLANS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] on HSE proposal for cost recovery ends on 14th October 2011. Costs are planned to be recovered from the start of a “material […]

    4. MANUFACTURERS ISSUE WARNING ON HSE COST RECOVERY PLANS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] manufacturers organisation EEF has warned that proposals to charge for the recovery of costs associated with breaches safety law may damage to relations between HSE and […]

    5. HSE CHARGING REGIME CONSULTATION EARLY FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] Gordon MacDonald HSE Director of Special Projects on progress with the Fee for Intervention proposals and the next […]

    6. INSPECTION CHARGING (FFI) TRIAL GUIDANCE ISSUED | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] The imposition of charges on those found in breach of the CDM Regulations 2007 and other health and safety laws will commence in April 2012 to take forward Government policy. […]

    7. HSE INSPECTION (FFI) CHARGING REGIME PUT ON HOLD | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] that the planned Fee for Intervention (FFI) cost recovery scheme will now be introduced at the “next available […]