Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS

    Positive results for CDM 2007 despite bureaucracy, complexity and ambiguity

    Following introduction of the CDM Regulations in 2007 HSE agreed to undertake external and internal research to determine the extent to which the regulations met the HSE objectives and the cost implications for the construction industry.

    On Wednesday 13th July 2011 the Construction Industry Advisory Committee (CONIAC) will consider a paper summarising the main findings. The paper concludes there is “broad agreement” between the two pieces of research.  The main findings are reproduced verbatim below.

    External evaluation main findings 

    The methodology included a large-scale survey of some 350 duty holders across all dutyholder groups and sizes of business, face-to-face interviews with small clients and small contractors, key stakeholder interviews, influence network workshops, open forums and interviews with HSE Inspectors. The main findings were:

    1. Respondents’ level of agreement to statements relating to HSE’s five objectives for CDM was far more positive for CDM 2007 than for CDM 1994. 

    2. CDM 2007 has substantially met its objectives, but there are still concerns about how the principles underpinning the regulations are put into practice. In particular, more needs to be done to ensure that the industry does not generate unnecessary paperwork in its attempts to comply. This is a particular problem for stage 1 competence assessments.

    3. The interpretation of the ACoP rather than the regulations themselves can cause problems: the ACoP was found to be unwieldy and difficult to interpret and apply in practice.

    4. Respondents’ level of agreement with statements relating to construction design, management and site practices were significantly more positive in 2010 than they were in 2006.

    5. Whilst there was a cost impact of CDM 2007, respondents rated the benefits as being higher than the costs.

    6. Industry practice has a significant influence on how the construction industry implements CDM 2007.

    CONIAC Working Group main findings

    The CONIAC CDM Evaluation WG was established in November 2009 to provide a forum to collectively represent the views of the UK construction industry. It brought together a broad range of interests and worked collaboratively to provide a wide perspective on CDM 2007. The main findings of were:

    1. CDM 2007 represents a significant improvement on CDM 1994, but the industry wants more guidance which better meets their needs to clarify not only their duties but the limits of those duties.

    2. Competence emerges as a strong theme – there is still a great deal more to be done to address the shortcomings of multiple accreditation schemes with lack of mutual recognition. The confusion, cost and bureaucracy arising from multiple card schemes for individuals with different standards is of great concern, particularly to sub-contractors. There was a consensus that more needed to be done to explain to clients in particular the role of prequalification schemes, in particular on the practical competences of organisations and individuals.

    3. Bureaucracy is still problematic and a primary source of dissatisfaction to the industry. For those who favour it, often as a way of transferring the risk of non-compliance to others, there is little within the existing CDM portfolio to clearly identify it as bad practice. This is an issue which polarises the industry, with some dutyholders having a clear vision of when documentation is needed, with others seemingly incapable of bearing down on what they see as an unstoppable flow of paperwork.

    4. There is still more to be done to embed the co-ordination requirements of CDM and to ensure that these are delivered effectively. The WG made a number of recommendations to improve co-ordination through design, procurement and construction. In particular the WG acknowledged the benefits of integrated team working, but went on to acknowledge that there is not a single model for such working across the different industry sectors.

    5. The role of designers in the influencing of health and safety outcomes has improved under CDM 2007 compared with CDM 1994. However, there is a worrying level of divergence of opinion within the design profession as to how they should discharge their duties and what the limits of those duties are.

    6. There was broad consensus from the members of the working group on these matters. However, it is understandable that each of the dutyholder groups represented on the group would have views which were not necessarily shared by – or of particular relevance to – the others represented.

    7. The WG did not feel that the case was supported for fundamental changes to CDM 2007 but that more needs to be done to spread understanding across industry generally (they reported that two thirds of occasional clients are unaware of CDM 2007, for example). This matches the main findings of the Frontline research and they made the case that improvements can be delivered by communication and clearer HSE and industry guidance. They felt that this would help to address industry misconceptions/misinterpretation and related costs associated with unnecessary bureaucracy.

    Comment

    We await the full report with interest. The findings above suggests we can expect little pressure for change to CDM 2007 other that by way of revisions to the ACOP / Guidance to produce greater clarity and simplicity. This will be further driven by the current Government Löfstedt review of health and safety legislation and the Red Tape Challenge.

    More controversial developments may be prompted by Europe. The paper states that: “The European Commission is taking an active interest in how Members States have implemented this directive and there is a suggestion that the UK currently under-implements certain areas of the Directive.”  This relates to the duties of non-business (i.e.’domestic’) clients under CDM 2007. Watch this space….

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    PRISON SENTENCE FOR IGNORING HSE PROHIBITION

    Roofing contractor sentenced over unsafe working at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th June 2019

    FIRM FAILED ON SILICA RISK MANAGEMENT

    Dust exhaust ventilation, RPE and health surveillance all absent

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th June 2019

    WOMAN DIED TRAPPED IN POWERED ROLLER DOOR

    Firm did not check the operation of the safety sensors

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    HSE TO HELP DITCH ‘UNNECESSARY PAPERWORK’

    Board considers forthcoming HSE guidance on navigating H&S rules

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    SCAFFOLDER DIED IN FALL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOF

    Contractor given prison term and main contractor fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    ENERGY BUSINESS FINED OVER LIFTING FATALITY

    Firm failed to train in lorry mounted crane remote control risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FINED £800K OVER LIFTING ERRORS

    Workman injured by falling heavy expanded polystyrene block

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2019

    NEW APPROACH TO HIGHWAYS HEALTH AND SAFETY

    Highways England launches ‘Home Safe and Well’ strategy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    EXCLUSION ZONE ABSENT DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Builder given prison term after timber falls on three year old girl

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    GAS FITTER JAILED OVER UNSAFE WORK

    Homeowners misled and put at risk by rogue gas fitter

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    CDM 2015 CLIENT FINED OVER ASBESTOS FAILINGS

    Homes development company and director fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th June 2019

    CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FATALITIES FALLING

    HSE fatality records for 2018/19 indicate significant reduction in deaths

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th June 2019

    ALERT: REINFORCED AERATED CONCRETE PLANKS

    Structural Safety body issues alert over recent failure

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    HSE CONSTRUCTION HEALTH RISKS INITIATIVE 2019

    Regulator visits to focus on asbestos, RCS, wood and other dusts

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    TWO DEFENDANTS HANDED PRISON TERMS OVER FALL

    Company, two directors and contractor sentenced

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    WORKMAN INJURED WHEN STEEL FELL FROM FORKLIFT

    Lifting not properly planned, supervised and carried out safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st June 2019

    LOLER INSPECTIONS LATE AND RESULTS IGNORED

    Granite supplier failed to inspect lifting equipment and take action

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st May 2019

    SUPPLIER OF FLOORING ADHESIVE FINED £500,000

    Floor layer died after being overcome by dichloromethane vapour

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th May 2019

    WALL COLLAPSED ON DOMESTIC PROJECT CLIENT

    Sole trader builder sentenced to 120 hours community service

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    CONCRETE PUMP FLAILING LINE CAUSED DEATH

    Hose whipped violently when blockage cleared under pressure

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    FRAGILE ROOF FALL DEATH ATTRACTS NOMINAL FINE

    Volunteer fell through roof of football club stand

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    FARMER FINED OVER FATAL FALL THROUGH ROOF

    Valley gutter cleaning from ladder ends in death of contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO ‘ENGAGE’ WITH HSE INSPECTORS

    Company and director omitted to take action on Improvement Notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    HOME BUILDER FAILED TO MANAGE STEEL INSTALL

    Workman struck by steel beam and seriously injured

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    3 Responses to “REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS”

    1. ACTION TO END COMPETENCE CARD SHORTCOMINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] is echoed in the emerging findings of the evaluation of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 which suggests […]

    2. HSE REVISITS UNSUCCESSFUL STRATEGY FOR SMALLER PROJECTS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] HSE Working Group reviewing CDM has reported that ”two thirds of occasional clients are unaware of CDM 2007″. It is […]

    3. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS 2007 NOW PUBLISHED | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] reported the upcoming results of this research in July […]