Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS

    Positive results for CDM 2007 despite bureaucracy, complexity and ambiguity

    Following introduction of the CDM Regulations in 2007 HSE agreed to undertake external and internal research to determine the extent to which the regulations met the HSE objectives and the cost implications for the construction industry.

    On Wednesday 13th July 2011 the Construction Industry Advisory Committee (CONIAC) will consider a paper summarising the main findings. The paper concludes there is “broad agreement” between the two pieces of research.  The main findings are reproduced verbatim below.

    External evaluation main findings 

    The methodology included a large-scale survey of some 350 duty holders across all dutyholder groups and sizes of business, face-to-face interviews with small clients and small contractors, key stakeholder interviews, influence network workshops, open forums and interviews with HSE Inspectors. The main findings were:

    1. Respondents’ level of agreement to statements relating to HSE’s five objectives for CDM was far more positive for CDM 2007 than for CDM 1994. 

    2. CDM 2007 has substantially met its objectives, but there are still concerns about how the principles underpinning the regulations are put into practice. In particular, more needs to be done to ensure that the industry does not generate unnecessary paperwork in its attempts to comply. This is a particular problem for stage 1 competence assessments.

    3. The interpretation of the ACoP rather than the regulations themselves can cause problems: the ACoP was found to be unwieldy and difficult to interpret and apply in practice.

    4. Respondents’ level of agreement with statements relating to construction design, management and site practices were significantly more positive in 2010 than they were in 2006.

    5. Whilst there was a cost impact of CDM 2007, respondents rated the benefits as being higher than the costs.

    6. Industry practice has a significant influence on how the construction industry implements CDM 2007.

    CONIAC Working Group main findings

    The CONIAC CDM Evaluation WG was established in November 2009 to provide a forum to collectively represent the views of the UK construction industry. It brought together a broad range of interests and worked collaboratively to provide a wide perspective on CDM 2007. The main findings of were:

    1. CDM 2007 represents a significant improvement on CDM 1994, but the industry wants more guidance which better meets their needs to clarify not only their duties but the limits of those duties.

    2. Competence emerges as a strong theme – there is still a great deal more to be done to address the shortcomings of multiple accreditation schemes with lack of mutual recognition. The confusion, cost and bureaucracy arising from multiple card schemes for individuals with different standards is of great concern, particularly to sub-contractors. There was a consensus that more needed to be done to explain to clients in particular the role of prequalification schemes, in particular on the practical competences of organisations and individuals.

    3. Bureaucracy is still problematic and a primary source of dissatisfaction to the industry. For those who favour it, often as a way of transferring the risk of non-compliance to others, there is little within the existing CDM portfolio to clearly identify it as bad practice. This is an issue which polarises the industry, with some dutyholders having a clear vision of when documentation is needed, with others seemingly incapable of bearing down on what they see as an unstoppable flow of paperwork.

    4. There is still more to be done to embed the co-ordination requirements of CDM and to ensure that these are delivered effectively. The WG made a number of recommendations to improve co-ordination through design, procurement and construction. In particular the WG acknowledged the benefits of integrated team working, but went on to acknowledge that there is not a single model for such working across the different industry sectors.

    5. The role of designers in the influencing of health and safety outcomes has improved under CDM 2007 compared with CDM 1994. However, there is a worrying level of divergence of opinion within the design profession as to how they should discharge their duties and what the limits of those duties are.

    6. There was broad consensus from the members of the working group on these matters. However, it is understandable that each of the dutyholder groups represented on the group would have views which were not necessarily shared by – or of particular relevance to – the others represented.

    7. The WG did not feel that the case was supported for fundamental changes to CDM 2007 but that more needs to be done to spread understanding across industry generally (they reported that two thirds of occasional clients are unaware of CDM 2007, for example). This matches the main findings of the Frontline research and they made the case that improvements can be delivered by communication and clearer HSE and industry guidance. They felt that this would help to address industry misconceptions/misinterpretation and related costs associated with unnecessary bureaucracy.

    Comment

    We await the full report with interest. The findings above suggests we can expect little pressure for change to CDM 2007 other that by way of revisions to the ACOP / Guidance to produce greater clarity and simplicity. This will be further driven by the current Government Löfstedt review of health and safety legislation and the Red Tape Challenge.

    More controversial developments may be prompted by Europe. The paper states that: “The European Commission is taking an active interest in how Members States have implemented this directive and there is a suggestion that the UK currently under-implements certain areas of the Directive.”  This relates to the duties of non-business (i.e.’domestic’) clients under CDM 2007. Watch this space….

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    WORKER SUFFERS FATAL BURNS IN OXYGEN RICH AREA

    Sparks from angle grinder ignited clothing of workman in confined space

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    RIBA PUBLISH DRAFT POST GRENFELL FIRE SAFETY PLAN

    Architects institute consults on ‘golden thread of fire safety information’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    MAJOR UK CONTRACTORS HIT BY MAJOR FINES

    Firms ordered to pay over £3m after foot trapped in rotating ‘screw’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 19th SEPT 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    DRIVER DIED TRAPPED BETWEEN TRAILER AND VEHICLE

    Firm fined £1.5 million over failure to assess coupling operations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th September 2018

    ACTUAL SYSTEM OF WORK WAS OPPOSITE OF RAMS

    Workman fell 4m through fragile asbestos roof sheet

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th September 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FUNCTION MISUNDERSTOOD?

    Consultants claim CDM 2015 design risk management has ‘gone backwards’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th September 2018

    RISK ASSESSED PRECAUTIONS NOT IMPLEMENTED

    Action not paperwork essential to prevent fall during lifting operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th September 2018

    CROSSRAIL PUBLISH BEST PRACTICE H&S GUIDES

    Sharing major project best practice can leave a lasting legacy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018

    SCHOOL STAFF LACKED ASBESTOS AWARENESS TRAINING

    Council fined £200k over asbestos flue and gasket rope failures

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018

    INCIDENT: MEWP OVERTURN IN CITY CENTRE

    Images show aftermath of mobile elevating platform collapse

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018

    SAFETY ALERT: DEFECTIVE SCAFFOLD COUPLER

    National Access and Scaffolding Confederation issues warning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    DEMOLISHING INTERNAL WALL REVEALED ASBESTOS

    Firm lacked survey and asbestos management plan for premises

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    NEW HEALTH AND SAFETY TEST FOR ARCHITECTS

    RIBA raise the bar for members on design risk management and ‘life safety’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    POWER BUSINESSES FAILED ON LIFTING OPERATION

    Panel fell on workman during turbine maintenance project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE FIRM COMMITS TO ZERO HARM

    Behaviours to deliver zero lost time injury incident rate by 2021

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    MANAGING TOWER CRANE FALLING OBJECT RISK

    CPA issues new technical information note

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    POST EXPLOSION ASBESTOS WORK WAS UNSAFE

    Asbestos cement panels removed and cut with power tools

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    FALL THROUGH UNFLOORED FACTORY ROOF SPACE

    Non-routine tasks require assessment and clear risk controls

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    SEVENTH LONDON CYCLIST DEATH DURING 2018

    Building products vehicle involved in death of Queens doctor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th August 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR FAILED TO SUPERVISE LIFT

    Errors whilst lifting pre-cast concrete blocks fined £600,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2018

    FIRM FINED £400,000 OVER VIBRATING TOOLS RISK

    Hand-held orbital sanders, rivet guns, grinders and drills caused harm

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2018

    OVERHEAD POWER AND EARTHING OF SCAFFOLDS

    NASC combines updates advice on scaffold electrical risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2018

    REVERSING VEHICLE CLAIMED LIFE OF ‘BANKSMAN’

    Workman trapped whilst assisting colleague in reversing lorry

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th August 2018

    TWO WORKMEN DIED IN SPRAY BOOTH EXPLOSION

    Flammable vapour ignited by ignition sources present at the scene

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    3 Responses to “REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS”

    1. ACTION TO END COMPETENCE CARD SHORTCOMINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] is echoed in the emerging findings of the evaluation of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 which suggests […]

    2. HSE REVISITS UNSUCCESSFUL STRATEGY FOR SMALLER PROJECTS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] HSE Working Group reviewing CDM has reported that ”two thirds of occasional clients are unaware of CDM 2007″. It is […]

    3. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS 2007 NOW PUBLISHED | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] reported the upcoming results of this research in July […]