Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE UNDER GOVERNMENT SPOTLIGHT

Proposals include reducing “over inspection” through “earned recognition”

The Government believe that how regulation is enforced can be just as important as the overall volume of regulation. In addition, it regards the way in which enforcement is approached impacts on regulator ability to deliver high levels of compliance.

As part of the Government’s regulatory reform strategy it has launched two documents underpinning a consultation period on regulatory enforcement to seek views on the best ways to deliver improvements. 

The two documents are a Discussion Paper on enforcement and a Consultation Document on the future of the Local Better Regulation Office (LBRO) and the Primary Authority (PA) scheme. Views are sought from interested parties on these documents.

Three principals underpin Government approach

The approach proposed is for an enforcement strategy built around three basic principles:

  • greater accountability;
  • recognising and promoting good practice; and
  • greater transparency.

The intention  of the Government is to create a relationship between regulators and businesses where:

the default setting is trust rather than distrust; where there is greater common sense; and where businesses have effective channels through which they can inform, hear and challenge regulators. We want businesses to get the recognition they deserve for the work they do to comply. Most importantly we want to free up business resources to support business growth, and to see regulators’ resources targeted where they are most needed.

Recognising and promoting best practice

Businesses have told government that they sometimes feel ‘over-inspected’ by regulators and that regulators do not always take account of the efforts they have made to comply. 

Those who invest considerable time and resource in making sure they do the right thing, developing internal systems, using external checks and achieving a good track record of compliance “would like this effort to be acknowledged and reflected in the way that enforcement is carried out.”

The government believe this is particularly problematic for businesses with large numbers of outlets, where individual premises can be treated like separate organisations, taking no account of corporate compliance systems.

The Discussion Document goes on to add:

In some areas we are already making major changes, for example by significantly refocusing health and safety enforcement to reduce burdens on lower-risk, compliant businesses. Evidence from industry assurance programmes like the Red Tractor Scheme, has shown that good levels of compliance can be achieved without regular inspection by public regulators, and there are many examples of effective ‘co-regulation’ which show that industry can take on a variety of roles and functions to deliver compliance. To date, however, there have been limited mechanisms for recognising industry schemes, recognising how businesses manage their own compliance, or for ensuring that co-regulatory approaches are fully explored when designing enforcement regimes.

We want to give businesses the means to make a reality of ‘earned recognition’. We will do this by requiring regulators to take account of businesses’ efforts to comply with regulations and to adjust their enforcement plans accordingly. We want to create positive incentives to recognise and promote best practice; and we want to deter those who seek competitive advantage, or pose a real material risk, by flouting the rules.

Red Tape Challenge enforcement theme

The above is part of the  recently launched government Red Tape Challenge (RTC) website where the public can “have their say about regulatory burdens”.  Through July and August (ending on 31 August 2011), a dedicated section of the RTC website seeks to capture specific views on enforcement issues. Input is sought from trade associations, their members and other interested parties. 

Comment

Application of the principle of recognising and promoting best practice could have implications for major players in the construction sector, especially as regards ‘earned recognition’.

If these ideas are implemented we may see some construction dutyholders formally excluded from routine inspection. This might be based upon use of the HSE CHaSPI performance benchmarking scheme. The longstanding practice of talking centrally with major players in construction (the Lead PI system) is also likely to be given a boost by these proposals.

Both developments may allow HSE to focus on smaller higher risk projects and less competent organisations.

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

FIRMS FINED £2M OVER FALLING PIPE FATALITY

Incorrect stacking of pipes triggered fall and crushing of workman

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th April 2018

DOMESTIC PROJECT PC HANDED JAIL TERM

Workman fell from unprotected roof edge on dormer extension

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th April 2018

MAJOR CONTRACTOR ERRED ON FRAGILE ROOF RISK

Firms fine £965,000 after painter fell through waiting room roof

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 19th APRIL 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th April 2018

STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th April 2018

NEW BIM SPEC FOR SHARING H&S INFORMATION

Specification for sharing health and safety info during construction projects

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

MANAGERS FORGED ASBESTOS DOCUMENTATION

Removal licence obtained using fake training and medical certificates

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

FINE OVER INCORRECT AND MISLEADING SURVEY

Specialist asbestos company failed to detect AIB on demolition project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

IGNORING HSE ADVICE PENALISED BY LARGE FINE

Contractor fined over £50k for persistent WAH and welfare failings

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

PRISON OVER BASEMENT EXCAVATION AND COLLAPSE

Building contractor jailed after house collapsed in Brighton

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

DEFEATING POWER INTERLOCK CAUSED FLASHOVER

Systems for managing electrical safety found to be inadequate

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

LADDER SAFETY FAILURES ATTRACT MASSIVE FINE

National window firm left workers to ‘own devices’

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 12th April 2018

FALLING MATERIAL STRUCK WORKMAN IN EXCAVATION

Risks of working in and near excavations highlighted by incident

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 4th APRIL 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th April 2018

HOUSING ASSOCIATION FAILED ON VIBRATION RISK

Assessment, management and health surveillance all found wanting

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

OCCUPIER AND CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FALL

Employee assisting contractor fell through roof during re-roofing project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

HSE FEARFUL OF GROWING ’BLUE TAPE’ BURDEN

hselogo1ISO 45001 could generate fresh business to business demands

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 21st MAR 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th March 2018

INCIDENTS: PASSER-BY STRUCK BY BRICKS

Pack of bricks appear to have fallen from crane

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th March 2018

HSE RECONSIDER HOW TO INFLUENCE SMALLER FIRMS

hselogo1Regulator advice and messages are failing to chime with the SME businesses

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

DANGEROUS REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS CEMENT

Workers smashed asbestos sheets with crowbars whilst at risk of falling

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

HSE LAUNCH CONIAN SHARING AND SUPPORT PLATFORM

hselogo1New HSE web community now open to the public

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

FIRM FAILING ON HAVS SURVEILLANCE FINED £50,000

Door manufacturer failed to manage sanding and buffing tool vibration

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

PRE-CAST FIRM FINED OVER FINGER AMPUTATION

Lack of guarding and training triggered table saw injury

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 26th March 2018

HSE STRIKE BEFORE A FALL ON SOLAR PANEL PROJECT

Director and company pay price for lack of fall prevention precautions

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 26th March 2018
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access

One Response to “ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE UNDER GOVERNMENT SPOTLIGHT”

  1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

    […] We await the full report with interest. The findings above suggests we can expect little pressure for change to CDM 2007 other that by way of revisions to the ACOP / Guidance to produce greater clarity and simplicity. This will be further driven by the current Government Löfstedt review of health and safety legislation and the Red Tape Challenge. […]