Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE UNDER GOVERNMENT SPOTLIGHT

    Proposals include reducing “over inspection” through “earned recognition”

    The Government believe that how regulation is enforced can be just as important as the overall volume of regulation. In addition, it regards the way in which enforcement is approached impacts on regulator ability to deliver high levels of compliance.

    As part of the Government’s regulatory reform strategy it has launched two documents underpinning a consultation period on regulatory enforcement to seek views on the best ways to deliver improvements. 

    The two documents are a Discussion Paper on enforcement and a Consultation Document on the future of the Local Better Regulation Office (LBRO) and the Primary Authority (PA) scheme. Views are sought from interested parties on these documents.

    Three principals underpin Government approach

    The approach proposed is for an enforcement strategy built around three basic principles:

    • greater accountability;
    • recognising and promoting good practice; and
    • greater transparency.

    The intention  of the Government is to create a relationship between regulators and businesses where:

    the default setting is trust rather than distrust; where there is greater common sense; and where businesses have effective channels through which they can inform, hear and challenge regulators. We want businesses to get the recognition they deserve for the work they do to comply. Most importantly we want to free up business resources to support business growth, and to see regulators’ resources targeted where they are most needed.

    Recognising and promoting best practice

    Businesses have told government that they sometimes feel ‘over-inspected’ by regulators and that regulators do not always take account of the efforts they have made to comply. 

    Those who invest considerable time and resource in making sure they do the right thing, developing internal systems, using external checks and achieving a good track record of compliance “would like this effort to be acknowledged and reflected in the way that enforcement is carried out.”

    The government believe this is particularly problematic for businesses with large numbers of outlets, where individual premises can be treated like separate organisations, taking no account of corporate compliance systems.

    The Discussion Document goes on to add:

    In some areas we are already making major changes, for example by significantly refocusing health and safety enforcement to reduce burdens on lower-risk, compliant businesses. Evidence from industry assurance programmes like the Red Tractor Scheme, has shown that good levels of compliance can be achieved without regular inspection by public regulators, and there are many examples of effective ‘co-regulation’ which show that industry can take on a variety of roles and functions to deliver compliance. To date, however, there have been limited mechanisms for recognising industry schemes, recognising how businesses manage their own compliance, or for ensuring that co-regulatory approaches are fully explored when designing enforcement regimes.

    We want to give businesses the means to make a reality of ‘earned recognition’. We will do this by requiring regulators to take account of businesses’ efforts to comply with regulations and to adjust their enforcement plans accordingly. We want to create positive incentives to recognise and promote best practice; and we want to deter those who seek competitive advantage, or pose a real material risk, by flouting the rules.

    Red Tape Challenge enforcement theme

    The above is part of the  recently launched government Red Tape Challenge (RTC) website where the public can “have their say about regulatory burdens”.  Through July and August (ending on 31 August 2011), a dedicated section of the RTC website seeks to capture specific views on enforcement issues. Input is sought from trade associations, their members and other interested parties. 

    Comment

    Application of the principle of recognising and promoting best practice could have implications for major players in the construction sector, especially as regards ‘earned recognition’.

    If these ideas are implemented we may see some construction dutyholders formally excluded from routine inspection. This might be based upon use of the HSE CHaSPI performance benchmarking scheme. The longstanding practice of talking centrally with major players in construction (the Lead PI system) is also likely to be given a boost by these proposals.

    Both developments may allow HSE to focus on smaller higher risk projects and less competent organisations.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    PRISON SENTENCE FOR IGNORING HSE PROHIBITION

    Roofing contractor sentenced over unsafe working at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th June 2019

    FIRM FAILED ON SILICA RISK MANAGEMENT

    Dust exhaust ventilation, RPE and health surveillance all absent

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th June 2019

    WOMAN DIED TRAPPED IN POWERED ROLLER DOOR

    Firm did not check the operation of the safety sensors

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    HSE TO HELP DITCH ‘UNNECESSARY PAPERWORK’

    Board considers forthcoming HSE guidance on navigating H&S rules

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    SCAFFOLDER DIED IN FALL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOF

    Contractor given prison term and main contractor fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    ENERGY BUSINESS FINED OVER LIFTING FATALITY

    Firm failed to train in lorry mounted crane remote control risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FINED £800K OVER LIFTING ERRORS

    Workman injured by falling heavy expanded polystyrene block

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2019

    NEW APPROACH TO HIGHWAYS HEALTH AND SAFETY

    Highways England launches ‘Home Safe and Well’ strategy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    EXCLUSION ZONE ABSENT DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Builder given prison term after timber falls on three year old girl

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    GAS FITTER JAILED OVER UNSAFE WORK

    Homeowners misled and put at risk by rogue gas fitter

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    CDM 2015 CLIENT FINED OVER ASBESTOS FAILINGS

    Homes development company and director fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th June 2019

    CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FATALITIES FALLING

    HSE fatality records for 2018/19 indicate significant reduction in deaths

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th June 2019

    ALERT: REINFORCED AERATED CONCRETE PLANKS

    Structural Safety body issues alert over recent failure

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    HSE CONSTRUCTION HEALTH RISKS INITIATIVE 2019

    Regulator visits to focus on asbestos, RCS, wood and other dusts

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    TWO DEFENDANTS HANDED PRISON TERMS OVER FALL

    Company, two directors and contractor sentenced

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    WORKMAN INJURED WHEN STEEL FELL FROM FORKLIFT

    Lifting not properly planned, supervised and carried out safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st June 2019

    LOLER INSPECTIONS LATE AND RESULTS IGNORED

    Granite supplier failed to inspect lifting equipment and take action

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st May 2019

    SUPPLIER OF FLOORING ADHESIVE FINED £500,000

    Floor layer died after being overcome by dichloromethane vapour

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th May 2019

    WALL COLLAPSED ON DOMESTIC PROJECT CLIENT

    Sole trader builder sentenced to 120 hours community service

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    CONCRETE PUMP FLAILING LINE CAUSED DEATH

    Hose whipped violently when blockage cleared under pressure

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    FRAGILE ROOF FALL DEATH ATTRACTS NOMINAL FINE

    Volunteer fell through roof of football club stand

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    FARMER FINED OVER FATAL FALL THROUGH ROOF

    Valley gutter cleaning from ladder ends in death of contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO ‘ENGAGE’ WITH HSE INSPECTORS

    Company and director omitted to take action on Improvement Notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    HOME BUILDER FAILED TO MANAGE STEEL INSTALL

    Workman struck by steel beam and seriously injured

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    One Response to “ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE UNDER GOVERNMENT SPOTLIGHT”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] We await the full report with interest. The findings above suggests we can expect little pressure for change to CDM 2007 other that by way of revisions to the ACOP / Guidance to produce greater clarity and simplicity. This will be further driven by the current Government Löfstedt review of health and safety legislation and the Red Tape Challenge. […]