• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE UNDER GOVERNMENT SPOTLIGHT

    Proposals include reducing “over inspection” through “earned recognition”

    The Government believe that how regulation is enforced can be just as important as the overall volume of regulation. In addition, it regards the way in which enforcement is approached impacts on regulator ability to deliver high levels of compliance.

    As part of the Government’s regulatory reform strategy it has launched two documents underpinning a consultation period on regulatory enforcement to seek views on the best ways to deliver improvements. 

    The two documents are a Discussion Paper on enforcement and a Consultation Document on the future of the Local Better Regulation Office (LBRO) and the Primary Authority (PA) scheme. Views are sought from interested parties on these documents.

    Three principals underpin Government approach

    The approach proposed is for an enforcement strategy built around three basic principles:

    • greater accountability;
    • recognising and promoting good practice; and
    • greater transparency.

    The intention  of the Government is to create a relationship between regulators and businesses where:

    the default setting is trust rather than distrust; where there is greater common sense; and where businesses have effective channels through which they can inform, hear and challenge regulators. We want businesses to get the recognition they deserve for the work they do to comply. Most importantly we want to free up business resources to support business growth, and to see regulators’ resources targeted where they are most needed.

    Recognising and promoting best practice

    Businesses have told government that they sometimes feel ‘over-inspected’ by regulators and that regulators do not always take account of the efforts they have made to comply. 

    Those who invest considerable time and resource in making sure they do the right thing, developing internal systems, using external checks and achieving a good track record of compliance “would like this effort to be acknowledged and reflected in the way that enforcement is carried out.”

    The government believe this is particularly problematic for businesses with large numbers of outlets, where individual premises can be treated like separate organisations, taking no account of corporate compliance systems.

    The Discussion Document goes on to add:

    In some areas we are already making major changes, for example by significantly refocusing health and safety enforcement to reduce burdens on lower-risk, compliant businesses. Evidence from industry assurance programmes like the Red Tractor Scheme, has shown that good levels of compliance can be achieved without regular inspection by public regulators, and there are many examples of effective ‘co-regulation’ which show that industry can take on a variety of roles and functions to deliver compliance. To date, however, there have been limited mechanisms for recognising industry schemes, recognising how businesses manage their own compliance, or for ensuring that co-regulatory approaches are fully explored when designing enforcement regimes.

    We want to give businesses the means to make a reality of ‘earned recognition’. We will do this by requiring regulators to take account of businesses’ efforts to comply with regulations and to adjust their enforcement plans accordingly. We want to create positive incentives to recognise and promote best practice; and we want to deter those who seek competitive advantage, or pose a real material risk, by flouting the rules.

    Red Tape Challenge enforcement theme

    The above is part of the  recently launched government Red Tape Challenge (RTC) website where the public can “have their say about regulatory burdens”.  Through July and August (ending on 31 August 2011), a dedicated section of the RTC website seeks to capture specific views on enforcement issues. Input is sought from trade associations, their members and other interested parties. 

    Comment

    Application of the principle of recognising and promoting best practice could have implications for major players in the construction sector, especially as regards ‘earned recognition’.

    If these ideas are implemented we may see some construction dutyholders formally excluded from routine inspection. This might be based upon use of the HSE CHaSPI performance benchmarking scheme. The longstanding practice of talking centrally with major players in construction (the Lead PI system) is also likely to be given a boost by these proposals.

    Both developments may allow HSE to focus on smaller higher risk projects and less competent organisations.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE TO OVERSEE NEW BUILDING SAFETY REGIME

    Government to deliver biggest change in building safety for a generation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st January 2020

    CONTRACTS MANAGER HANDED TWO YEAR PRISON TERM

    Safety fall arrest netting would have saved life of deceased workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    WORKER FATALLY INJURED BY CONCRETE BEAM

    Lifting operation not properly planned, managed and supervised

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    TREE FELLING OPERATIONS LACKED DEFINED COMMS

    Workman struck by falling tree inside “normal” exclusion zone

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CONTRACTOR ARRESTED OVER WELFARE FAILINGS

    Recalcitrant sole trader failed to attend court hearing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    MAJOR DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR FINED £500,000

    Collapse of concrete slab caused death of worker and excavator fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FALL FROM LADDER WHILST CARRYING BUCKET

    Contractor failed to provide basic safe lifting aids

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH HSE NOTICE PROVES COSTLY

    Director given suspended jail term and company fined £60,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    DEVELOPER FAILED TO PLAN AND CHECK COMPETENCE

    Fall caused by ad-hoc working methods and lack of monitoring

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CYLINDER LEAK TEST CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Corrosion inhibitor triggered failure and shrapnel ejection

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FESTIVE GREETINGS TO ALL OUR READERS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th December 2019

    JAIL TERM FOLLOWS ROUTINE HSE SPOT CHECK

    Director of a roofing firm handed a suspended prison sentence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    TEENAGER FELL 3M DURING BLOCK AND BEAM WORK

    Workers uninstructed and left to devise own safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    PARCEL CARRIER FINED HEAVILY OVER FLT INCIDENT

    Reversing fork lift lacked segregation from pedestrians

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FLOOR OPENING FALL

    Thorough risk assessment and edge protection were both inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    THREE WORKERS “CARRIED ALONG” IN SEWER INCIDENT

    Mentally affected and one man treated for long-term traumatic stress

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2019

    SOLAR FIRM AND DIRECTOR SENTENCED OVER DEATH

    Brother of business owner died in fall during panel installation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    DIRECTOR AND COMPANY FINED FOR ASBESTOS RISK

    HSE refurbishment campaign inspection revealed asbestos offences

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    BULK BAG COLLAPSE CAUSED BY UNSAFE STACKING

    Bulk bag collapsed onto workman when struck by fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    INTERLOCKED GUARD NOT WORKING TO ISOLATE POWER

    Two workmen seriously injured when plant started unexpectedly

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    STREET FURNITURE RISK TO PUBLIC FINED £1.4M

    Council prosecuted following injury to child playing on hinged bollard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    WORKMEN SUFFER SERIOUS BURNS FROM CABLE STRIKE

    Assessment and system of work failed to appreciate electrical risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th November 2019

    LADDERS WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR WORK ON ROOF

    Workman paralysed after falling whilst installing roof ladder

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO MANAGE EXHAUST VENTILATION

    HSE enforcement notices on wood dust and welding fume ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th November 2019

    RECALCITRANT DIRECTOR BARRED FROM OFFICE

    Dangerous telehandler used despite earlier fatality and enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    One Response to “ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE UNDER GOVERNMENT SPOTLIGHT”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] We await the full report with interest. The findings above suggests we can expect little pressure for change to CDM 2007 other that by way of revisions to the ACOP / Guidance to produce greater clarity and simplicity. This will be further driven by the current Government Löfstedt review of health and safety legislation and the Red Tape Challenge. […]