Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    GOVERNMENT REVIEW OF UK HEALTH AND SAFETY LAW

    Have your say on H&S ‘burdens’ and simplifying the regulatory framework 

    In March 2011 Employment Minister Chris Grayling announced that risk management specialist Professor Ragnar E Löfstedt would chair a review of all healthand safety regulation, with a view to “simplifying the rules and easing the unnecessary burdens on business”.

    Mr Grayling said:

    “Professor Löfstedt’s review will play a vital part in putting common sense back at the heart of Britain’s health and safety system and I look forward to receiving his findings. By rooting out needless bureaucracy we can encourage businesses to prosper and boost our economy.”

    Terms of reference

    The review will consider the opportunities for “reducing the burden of health and safety legislation” on UK businesses whilst maintaining the progress made in improving health and safety outcomes.

    It will consider the scope for combining, simplifying or reducing the statutory instruments and the associated Approved Codes of Practice (ACoP) and will take into account:

    • the extent to which these regulations have led to positive health and safety outcomes and the extent to which they have created significant economic costs for businesses of all sizes;
    • whether the requirements of EU Directives are being unnecessarily enhanced (‘gold-plated’) when transposed into UK regulation; and
    • any evidence or examples of where health and safety regulations have led to unreasonable outcomes, or inappropriate litigation and compensation.

    It will also see if lessons can be learned from comparison with health and safety regimes in other countries and consider whether health and safety law suitably places responsibility on those that create risk. Professor Löfstedt will publish the results of the reviewe in the autumn 2011.

    Call for evidence

    Views are now invited from all interested parties by no later than 29th July 2011. Professor Ragnar Löfstedt said:

    “I hope to hear from as many people with an interest in health and safety regulation as possible. I want the review to be informed by concrete examples and evidence from a range of stakeholders including employer and employee organisations, Government and professional health and safety bodies, practitioners and academics. Getting their expert advice will ensure the findings of the review are robust and I hope they will take the opportunity to feed in their views.”

    Reponse is requested to the following specific questions:

    1. Are there any particular H&S regulations (or ACoPs) that have significantly improved health and safety and should not be changed?
    2. Are there any particular H&S (or ACoPs) which need to be simplified?
    3. Are there any particular H&S regulations (or ACoPs) which it would be helpful to merge together and why?
    4. Are there any particular H&S regulations (or ACoPs) that could be abolished without any negative effect on the health and safety of individuals?
    5. Are there any particular H&S regulations that have created significant additional burdens on business but that have had limited impact on health or safety?
    6. To what extent does the concept of ‘reasonably practicable’ help manage the burden of health and safety regulation?
    7. Are there any examples where H&S regulations have led to unreasonable outcomes, or to inappropriate litigation and compensation?
    8. Are there any lessons that can be learned from the way other EU countries have approached the regulation of health and safety, in terms of (a) their overall approach and (b) regulating for particular risks or hazards?
    9. Can you provide evidence that the requirements of EU Directives have or have not been unnecessarily enhanced (‘gold-plated’) when incorporated into UK health and safety regulation?
    10. Does health and safety law suitably place responsibility in an appropriate way on those that create risk? If not what changes would be required?
     
    Comment

    This review will evoke a feeling of deja vu amongst the sceptics. The review starts from the assumption that H&S regulations are a ‘burden’. However, other reviews since the 1980’s have tended to draw a response from business that H&S is the least of their worries. 

    For the more open minded this is perhaps the best opportunity for some time to have your say and influence the future pattern of H&S regulation. You pays your money…!

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    STEEL PIPE FALL TRIGGERS FREAK CAUSE OF DEATH

    Wooden bearer sent flying by pipe struck workman on head

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th September 2019

    FATAL FALL FROM INSECURE SCAFFOLD LADDER

    Scaffold erected by unqualified and incompetent person

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th September 2019

    FIRMS FAILED TO MONITOR SAFE SYSTEM OF WORK

    Principal Contractor and specialist fined over fall through roof mesh

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th September 2019

    ASSISTANCE FROM THIRD PARTY PROVES COSTLY

    Contractor fined after non-employee loses fingers crushed by dozer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th September 2019

    CUSTODIAL SENTENCES AFTER CAPTURE ON CAMERA

    Roofing business partner failed to properly plan and supervise roofwork

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th September 2019

    FIRM FINED OVER FALL FROM LORRY BED

    Serious injury after failure to provide suitable and clear instructions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th September 2019

    COUNCIL FINED £100k OVER VIBRATION FAILINGS

    Excessive use of power tools uncontrolled and without health surveillance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th September 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th August 2019

    IMPROVING CDM DESIGNER HAZARD AWARENESS

    Research explores power of “multi-media digital tool” for design hazards

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    DEMOLITION FEDERATION ON RECENT INCIDENTS

    NFDC ‘statement of awareness’ follows unplanned collapses

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    RAISING COMPETENCE AND MAKING BUILDINGS SAFER

    Life-safety-critical disciplines urged to act on Interim Report

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    BUILDING WORKS COMPROMISED GAS SAFETY

    Company and director fined after work created risk to residents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    NON-INJURY PROSECUTION OVER WORK ON THE EDGE

    HSE routine inspection results in £25,000 fine for errant contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th August 2019

    FALL PRECAUTIONS FELL BETWEEN TWO FIRMS

    Contractors fined after workers at risk of falling from roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    SOLAR PANEL FIRM AWARE OF FRAGILE ROOF RISK

    Workman suffered long-term injuries in 4m fall through rooflight

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    HSE PROSECUTE FIRM OVER RISK NOT HARM

    Multiple safety failings land construction company in court

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR FACED COURT TOGETHER

    Firms breached joint duty to plan and carry our work at height safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    £1M FINE OVER DEATH CAUSED BY EXCAVATOR

    Vehicle driver found guilty at trial alongside CDM Principal Contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    CHILD DIED WHILST PLAYING ON POWERED GATE

    Lack of end stop caused gate to fall on 6 year old boy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    HSE SPEAK AT ACCESS INDUSTRY CONFERENCE 2019

    AIF National Working at Height Conference November 2019

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    UK CLIENT FINED OVER UNSAFE OVERSEAS FIRM

    Italian contractor found guilty despite failure to attend court

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    COMPLETE FAILURE TO RECOGNISE HAVS RISK

    Specialist drilling company and director sentenced over HAVS danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    PC AND TWO OTHERS FAILED TO ASSESS WIND EFFECT

    Fall of director from roof caused by ‘Storm Doris’ gust

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th July 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FINED £400k OVER LIFTING OPERATION

    Fitter loses four fingers as load slides and falls to the ground

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th July 2019

    NEW HOMES LEFT IN DANGEROUS CONDITION

    Fined for unsafe gas work causing fires at housing development

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th July 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    2 Responses to “GOVERNMENT REVIEW OF UK HEALTH AND SAFETY LAW”

    1. HEALTH & SAFETY PRACTIONERS RESPOND TO GOVT REVIEW | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] The professional body for health and safety practioners has published a Report presenting the results of a survey of IOSH members in the UK providing member views and evidence to support the IOSH response to the Löfstedt Review. […]

    2. MANUFACTURERS ISSUE WARNING ON HSE COST RECOVERY | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] same level of cost recovery. EEF urges the government to wait until the recommendations of the Lofstedt Review of Health & Safety are published before setting out firm […]