Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    FIRST CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER SENTENCE DELIVERED

    Organisations need to reflect on the implications for their businesses

    Following conviction at Winchester Crown Court earlier this week Judge Mr Justice Field has delivered sentence in the case of Cotswold Geotechnical Holding Ltd. 

    The company has been fined £385k in the first prosecution taken under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (CMCH 2007). The prosecution arose from the death of employee Alexander Wright in September 2008.

    Previously for a corporate manslaughter prosecution to succeed it was necessary to secure a conviction against a senior individual within the company. This hurdle was part of the cause of failures of the prosecutions following the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster and the Southall and Hatfield rail disasters.

    Mr Wright had been working alone in a 3.5m trench after managing director Peter Eaton, left for the day. The trench collapsed on Mr Wright and buried him. He died of asphyxiation.

    Fine could put company into liqudation 

    The company was described in court as being in a “parlous financial state” and was permitted to pay the fine over 10 years at £38,500 per annum. Mr Justice Field said the fine marked the gravity of the crime and the deterrent effect it would have on companies to adhere to health and safety guidance.

    He said a larger fine would cause the small company to be liquidated, and four people would lose their jobs but added:

    “It may well be that the fine in the terms of its payment will put this company into liquidation. If that is the case it’s unfortunate but unavoidable but it’s a consequence of the serious breach” 

    Gloucestershire Constabulary said:

    “As a result of our investigation we found the company had a cavalier attitude towards health and safety. The way it taught and supervised junior engineers was inherently dangerous and the methods of working were outdated.”

    Implications for directors and managers

    This prosecution involved a small organisation. Nevertheless, the fine is sizable and illustrates that larger more profitable companies can expect more substantial fines. For construction clients, designers and contractors this case highlights two other important implications arising from deaths at work.

    1. Personal stress

    The personal physical stress of the investigative and judicial process arising from a death at work should not be underestimated by those holding senior positions. The director of Cotswold [Peter Eaton] has been very unwell since the investigation started. The period of time between the incident and conclusion of proceedings is rarely likely to be less that 3-4 years.

    2. Corporate reputation

    Conviction under CMCH 2007 is a finding that the grossly negligent way directors and other senior staff managed the business caused the death of a person.

    The way in which the business was managed will come under close investigation and presented before court. Full details of managememt failings will be laid bare for all to see.  

    With increasing interest in health and safety throughout supply chains the implications for future business could be enormous. Clients may not be easily convinced an organisation has put in place sufficient changes to overcome failings that led to the death. 

    On conviction companies could find themselves subject to publicity orders. This aspect of the act has yet to be fully tested and could potentially be highly damaging to the ongoing credibility of the business.

    Future corporate manslaughter cases

    There are a number of investigations in the pipeline arising from deaths at work that have occurred since CMCH 2007 came into force. These will move towards conclusion and it is likely that some will result in CMCH prosecutions involving larger companies.

    Comment

    There is guidance available on the practical leadership actions required to minimise the prospects of a CMCH 2007 prosecution being launched.

    Our own menu of minimum actions for directors and senior manager are:

    • carry out your H&S duties diligently;
    • deal with and respond to issues without delay;
    • allocate sufficient time and resources to H&S management and controls;
    • be familiar with your own systems and standards;
    • take positive and visible steps to promote & encourage compliance;
    • know what good H&S management looks like and work towards it;
    • understand the strengths and weaknesses of your organisation and work on both; and
    • judge managers and staff on H&S performance in addition to other outputs.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    ROOF COLLAPSED UNDER EXCESS LOADING

    Director and company fined over roof design failures

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th November 2018

    FORK LIFT OVERTURNED IN SCAFFOLDING YARD

    Untrained operator suffered life changing crush injuries

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th November 2018

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY ALERT: EFFECTS OF SCALE

    SCOSS issues alert after concerns disclosed over ‘large structures’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    ASBESTOS EXPOSED BY UNTRAINED WORKERS

    Contractor failed to act properly despite HSE intervention

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    GAS MAIN STRIKE REPAIR CAUSED SEVERE BURNS

    Contractor excavator damage to gas pipe ends in £1.2m fine

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    REBAR FELL FROM FLT IN UNSAFE LIFTING OPERATION

    Multiple fractures caused by inappropriate use of fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 7th NOV 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    POORLY PLANNED LIFT DISMANTLE INJURED WORKMAN

    Counterweight or suspension rope struck worker in lift shaft

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st November 2018

    CONSTRUCTION INJURY AND ILL-HEALTH 2017/18

    hselogo1Fatal injury rate in long term decline whilst ill-health trend flat lining

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st November 2018

    DUMPER DRIVEN INTO OPEN UNGUARDED EXCAVATION

    Contractor fined over absence of suitable excavation / dumper precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st November 2018

    DEATH FAILED TO TRIGGER PREVENTIVE ACTION

    Prison term for director whilst his company ordered to pay £3/4m

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th October 2018

    FAILURE TO MAINTAIN GUARDS PROVES COSTLY

    Woodworking machinery defective despite previous HSE advice

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th October 2018

    CISRS LAUNCH SYSTEM SCAFFOLD INSPECTION COURSES

    Training courses prompted by growing use of system scaffolding

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th October 2018

    HSE INSPECTS CLADDING REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT

    hselogo1Advice to Inspectors published on fire risk during work on tall buildings

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th October 2018

    HIGHWAYS, RAIL AND WATER HEALTH & SAFETY HUBS

    Websites provide useful information, alerts and tools

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2018

    ELIMINATING CONCRETE DRILLING VIBRATION HAZARD

    Cutting specialist innovation avoids vibration exposure management

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2018

    NEW MEWP WORK AT HEIGHT RESCUE GUIDANCE

    Industry body publishes simple guidance on MEWP stranding actions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2018

    HSE PUBLISH RIDDOR DATA VISUALISATION TOOL

    hselogo1Construction injury records made more relevant and easily used

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2018

    DESIGNER CPD EVENT HOSTED BY HSE, APS & IOSH

    CDM 2015 Construction Design Risk Management Event

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2018

    COUNCIL OVERLOOKED ICE RINK SLIPPING RISK

    Obvious risk of employees falling on ice rink was left uncontrolled

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd October 2018

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd October 2018

    YOUNG WORKER FELL FROM PETROL STATION CANOPY

    Steel fabricator after young construction worker falls on first day at work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2018

    FIRM FINED OVER FAILURE AT ASSESS VIBRATION RISK

    Vibration regulations not acted upon until seven years in operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2018

    FAILURE TO ISOLATE LEAVES WORKMAN PARALYSED

    Conveyor guards removed before power source isolated

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th October 2018

    TRADING STANDARDS AND HSE ACT IN CONCERT

    Director given prison term over fraud and health and safety breaches

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th October 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    One Response to “FIRST CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER SENTENCE DELIVERED”

    1. CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER PROSECUTION TRIAL DATE SET | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] in the first CHCH case (Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings) were significantly affected by the poor financial position of […]