Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    FIRST CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER SENTENCE DELIVERED

    Organisations need to reflect on the implications for their businesses

    Following conviction at Winchester Crown Court earlier this week Judge Mr Justice Field has delivered sentence in the case of Cotswold Geotechnical Holding Ltd. 

    The company has been fined £385k in the first prosecution taken under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (CMCH 2007). The prosecution arose from the death of employee Alexander Wright in September 2008.

    Previously for a corporate manslaughter prosecution to succeed it was necessary to secure a conviction against a senior individual within the company. This hurdle was part of the cause of failures of the prosecutions following the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster and the Southall and Hatfield rail disasters.

    Mr Wright had been working alone in a 3.5m trench after managing director Peter Eaton, left for the day. The trench collapsed on Mr Wright and buried him. He died of asphyxiation.

    Fine could put company into liqudation 

    The company was described in court as being in a “parlous financial state” and was permitted to pay the fine over 10 years at £38,500 per annum. Mr Justice Field said the fine marked the gravity of the crime and the deterrent effect it would have on companies to adhere to health and safety guidance.

    He said a larger fine would cause the small company to be liquidated, and four people would lose their jobs but added:

    “It may well be that the fine in the terms of its payment will put this company into liquidation. If that is the case it’s unfortunate but unavoidable but it’s a consequence of the serious breach” 

    Gloucestershire Constabulary said:

    “As a result of our investigation we found the company had a cavalier attitude towards health and safety. The way it taught and supervised junior engineers was inherently dangerous and the methods of working were outdated.”

    Implications for directors and managers

    This prosecution involved a small organisation. Nevertheless, the fine is sizable and illustrates that larger more profitable companies can expect more substantial fines. For construction clients, designers and contractors this case highlights two other important implications arising from deaths at work.

    1. Personal stress

    The personal physical stress of the investigative and judicial process arising from a death at work should not be underestimated by those holding senior positions. The director of Cotswold [Peter Eaton] has been very unwell since the investigation started. The period of time between the incident and conclusion of proceedings is rarely likely to be less that 3-4 years.

    2. Corporate reputation

    Conviction under CMCH 2007 is a finding that the grossly negligent way directors and other senior staff managed the business caused the death of a person.

    The way in which the business was managed will come under close investigation and presented before court. Full details of managememt failings will be laid bare for all to see.  

    With increasing interest in health and safety throughout supply chains the implications for future business could be enormous. Clients may not be easily convinced an organisation has put in place sufficient changes to overcome failings that led to the death. 

    On conviction companies could find themselves subject to publicity orders. This aspect of the act has yet to be fully tested and could potentially be highly damaging to the ongoing credibility of the business.

    Future corporate manslaughter cases

    There are a number of investigations in the pipeline arising from deaths at work that have occurred since CMCH 2007 came into force. These will move towards conclusion and it is likely that some will result in CMCH prosecutions involving larger companies.

    Comment

    There is guidance available on the practical leadership actions required to minimise the prospects of a CMCH 2007 prosecution being launched.

    Our own menu of minimum actions for directors and senior manager are:

    • carry out your H&S duties diligently;
    • deal with and respond to issues without delay;
    • allocate sufficient time and resources to H&S management and controls;
    • be familiar with your own systems and standards;
    • take positive and visible steps to promote & encourage compliance;
    • know what good H&S management looks like and work towards it;
    • understand the strengths and weaknesses of your organisation and work on both; and
    • judge managers and staff on H&S performance in addition to other outputs.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE CONSTRUCTION DUST CONTROL ‘BLITZ’ STARTS

    Regulator inspections will check health taken as seriously as safety

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th September 2018

    FLOOR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM OF WORK UNSAFE

    Welder fell 3m from mezzanine area through purlin openings

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th September 2018

    WORKER SUFFERS FATAL BURNS IN OXYGEN RICH AREA

    Sparks from angle grinder ignited clothing of workman in confined space

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    RIBA PUBLISH DRAFT POST GRENFELL FIRE SAFETY PLAN

    Architects institute consults on ‘golden thread of fire safety information’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    MAJOR UK CONTRACTORS HIT BY MAJOR FINES

    Firms ordered to pay over £3m after foot trapped in rotating ‘screw’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 19th SEPT 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    DRIVER DIED TRAPPED BETWEEN TRAILER AND VEHICLE

    Firm fined £1.5 million over failure to assess coupling operations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th September 2018

    ACTUAL SYSTEM OF WORK WAS OPPOSITE OF RAMS

    Workman fell 4m through fragile asbestos roof sheet

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th September 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FUNCTION MISUNDERSTOOD?

    Consultants claim CDM 2015 design risk management has ‘gone backwards’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th September 2018

    RISK ASSESSED PRECAUTIONS NOT IMPLEMENTED

    Action not paperwork essential to prevent fall during lifting operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th September 2018

    CROSSRAIL PUBLISH BEST PRACTICE H&S GUIDES

    Sharing major project best practice can leave a lasting legacy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018

    SCHOOL STAFF LACKED ASBESTOS AWARENESS TRAINING

    Council fined £200k over asbestos flue and gasket rope failures

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018

    INCIDENT: MEWP OVERTURN IN CITY CENTRE

    Images show aftermath of mobile elevating platform collapse

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018

    SAFETY ALERT: DEFECTIVE SCAFFOLD COUPLER

    National Access and Scaffolding Confederation issues warning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    DEMOLISHING INTERNAL WALL REVEALED ASBESTOS

    Firm lacked survey and asbestos management plan for premises

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    NEW HEALTH AND SAFETY TEST FOR ARCHITECTS

    RIBA raise the bar for members on design risk management and ‘life safety’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    POWER BUSINESSES FAILED ON LIFTING OPERATION

    Panel fell on workman during turbine maintenance project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE FIRM COMMITS TO ZERO HARM

    Behaviours to deliver zero lost time injury incident rate by 2021

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    MANAGING TOWER CRANE FALLING OBJECT RISK

    CPA issues new technical information note

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    POST EXPLOSION ASBESTOS WORK WAS UNSAFE

    Asbestos cement panels removed and cut with power tools

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    FALL THROUGH UNFLOORED FACTORY ROOF SPACE

    Non-routine tasks require assessment and clear risk controls

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st August 2018

    SEVENTH LONDON CYCLIST DEATH DURING 2018

    Building products vehicle involved in death of Queens doctor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th August 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR FAILED TO SUPERVISE LIFT

    Errors whilst lifting pre-cast concrete blocks fined £600,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2018

    FIRM FINED £400,000 OVER VIBRATING TOOLS RISK

    Hand-held orbital sanders, rivet guns, grinders and drills caused harm

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2018

    OVERHEAD POWER AND EARTHING OF SCAFFOLDS

    NASC combines updates advice on scaffold electrical risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    One Response to “FIRST CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER SENTENCE DELIVERED”

    1. CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER PROSECUTION TRIAL DATE SET | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] in the first CHCH case (Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings) were significantly affected by the poor financial position of […]