Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS ENFORCEMENT RISING

    Environment Agency becomes pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance

    The Environment Agency (EA) is becoming more pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance with Site Waste Management Plans (SWMPs).

    Fines for non-compliance are potentially unlimited. Significantly, the EA can prosecute a number of separate offences arising out of one plan.

    Nabarro LLP has prepared a briefing covers the requirements of SWMPs for both the client and the principal contractor and the consequences of non-compliance. The contents are reproduced below.

    Summary
    • SWMPs must be prepared on construction projects in England with an estimated worth of more than £300,000;
    • SWMPs must be prepared before construction work begins and must be updated whenever waste is removed from the site; and
    • SWMPs must comply with the Site Waste Management Plans Regulations 2008;
    • failure to comply will result in fixed penalties, prosecution or fines, for which directors, managers and company officers can be personally liable.
     
    1. Preparation of the SWMP

    The client must prepare the SWMP before any construction work begins. This includes any fitting out, alterations, demolition or on site assembly. If the client appoints a principal contractor, it is still the client who is legally responsible for the preparation of the SWMP.

    However, both the client and the principal contractor will be guilty of an offence if the project starts without a plan in place.

     
    2. The content and format of the SWMP

    There is no formal requirement to adopt a specific template for an SWMP. However, guidance issued by Defra contains a specimen template. In summary, certain details that must be included in the plan:

    1. The identity of the client, principal contractor and person who drafted the plan;
    2. The site location and the estimated cost of the project;
    3. Design information as to waste minimisation;
    4. A description of type and estimated quantity of waste;
    5. Any plans to reuse, recycle or recover different wastes; and
    6. A declaration of compliance with the waste duty of care regime.

     

    3 . Ongoing obligations

    Which projects are caught?

    • Projects planned before 6 April 2008 with construction work beginning after 1 July 2008.
    • All projects planned after 6 April 2008.

    The Regulations do not apply to projects planned before 6 April 2008 with construction work starting before 1 July 2008.

    Whenever waste is removed from the site it is the principal contractor’s duty to update the SWMP with the following information:

    • The identity of the person removing the waste;
    • The types of waste removed; and
    • The site to which the waste has been taken.

    There are additional, more detailed requirements for SWMPs where the project costs are more than £500,000. Both the client and the principal contractor must also:

    • Review, revise and refine SWMPs as necessary; and
    • Take reasonable steps to prevent illegal waste disposal from the site.

    Duty to reuse, recycle or recover waste – Section 1(4) of the Schedule to the Regulations, requires the principal contractor to “ensure, so far as reasonably practicable, that waste produced during construction is re-used, recycled or recovered”.

    This obligation will assume greater significance given the requirement in the Revised Waste Framework Directive that by 2020, 70 per cent of construction and demolition waste by weight (excluding naturally occurring materials) must be recycled.

    Under section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, anyone concerned with controlled waste must ensure that the waste is:

    • Managed properly;
    • Recovered or disposed of safely;
    • Does not cause harm to human health or pollution of the environment;
    • Is only transferred to someone who is authorised to receive it. No more than three months after the work is finished

    The principal contractor must add to the plan and:

    • Confirm that the plan has been monitored and updated; and
    • Explain any deviation from the plan.

    The principal contractor must also retain the SWMP for two years after completion of the project.

     
    4 . Additional requirements for client and principal contractor

    The principal contractor has the following additional duties:

    • Undertake training and site induction on the SWMPs.
    • Promote and develop measures to ensure waste is dealt with in accordance with the SWMP.

    The client is also responsible for giving reasonable directions to any contractor to enable the principal contractor to comply with its SWMP obligations.

    Penalties

    • Fixed penalty notices on failure to produce SWMPs – £300.
    • Summary conviction in the Magistrates’ court – fine up to £50,000.
    • Conviction on indictment in the Crown Court – unlimited fine.

     

    5 . Offences and enforcement

    The key offences are:

    • Failure to comply with any of the SWMP Regulations.
    • Making a false or misleading statement in an SWMP.
    • Obstructing or failing to assist a regulator.

    The EA, local authorities and councils have the power to enforce the SWMP Regulations. Any authorised officer of these organisations also has the power to issue a fixed penalty notice of £300 for failure to produce a copy of an SWMP when requested.

    As with most environmental offences, where a company has been found guilty under the SWMP Regulations, directors, managers and officers of the company can be personally liable. This occurs where they have connived or at acted negligently in breach of the SWMP Regulations.

     
    6. Beware – the honeymoon period is over

    The Environment Agency is becoming more pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance with SWMPs.

    They began “Agency trials” in August in Bedford and are now targeting areas such as Milton Keynes and Runnymede in Surrey.

    Fines are potentially high with the ability of the regulators to prosecute for a number of separate offences arising out of one plan.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th August 2019

    FALL PRECAUTIONS FELL BETWEEN TWO FIRMS

    Contractors fined after workers at risk of falling from roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    SOLAR PANEL FIRM AWARE OF FRAGILE ROOF RISK

    Workman suffered long-term injuries in 4m fall through rooflight

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    HSE PROSECUTE FIRM OVER RISK NOT HARM

    Multiple safety failings land construction company in court

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th August 2019

    CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR FACED COURT TOGETHER

    Firms breached joint duty to plan and carry our work at height safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    £1M FINE OVER DEATH CAUSED BY EXCAVATOR

    Vehicle driver found guilty at trial alongside CDM Principal Contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    CHILD DIED WHILST PLAYING ON POWERED GATE

    Lack of end stop caused gate to fall on 6 year old boy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    HSE SPEAK AT ACCESS INDUSTRY CONFERENCE 2019

    AIF National Working at Height Conference November 2019

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    UK CLIENT FINED OVER UNSAFE OVERSEAS FIRM

    Italian contractor found guilty despite failure to attend court

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    COMPLETE FAILURE TO RECOGNISE HAVS RISK

    Specialist drilling company and director sentenced over HAVS danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th August 2019

    PC AND TWO OTHERS FAILED TO ASSESS WIND EFFECT

    Fall of director from roof caused by ‘Storm Doris’ gust

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th July 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FINED £400k OVER LIFTING OPERATION

    Fitter loses four fingers as load slides and falls to the ground

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th July 2019

    NEW HOMES LEFT IN DANGEROUS CONDITION

    Fined for unsafe gas work causing fires at housing development

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th July 2019

    FIRM FINED £1M OVER EXPLOSION DURING CLEANING

    Tank cleaning operation caused burns as flammable vapours ignited

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th July 2019

    YOUNG BRICKLAYER FELL THROUGH OPEN STAIRWAY

    Firm fined over failure to install fall protection around opening

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th July 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    FLAT ROOF FAILED UNDER WEIGHT OF WORKMAN

    Confusion over fragility proves costly for worker and business

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    PROPERTY FIRM FINED OVER FATAL FALL FROM TREE

    Untrained workers using chain saw engaged to fell large sycamore

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    LANDLORD PUT PUBLIC AT RISK FROM ASBESTOS

    Powered jet washing of asbestos cement sheets caused spread

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    WORKMAN FELL FROM SUSPENDED ACCESS EQUIPMENT

    Health Board and maintenance firm director prosecuted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    CONSIDERING TEMP WORKS IN PERMANENT DESIGN

    Useful overview for civil and structural engineers on contemporary practice

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO COMPLY WITH SITE WELFARE NOTICE

    Basic welfare requirements found wanting for second time

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    PRISON TERM OVER POORLY GUARDED CIRCULAR SAW

    Workman lost three fingers using machine without guard and riving knife

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    COMPANY IGNORED HSE ON SILICA DUST ACTION

    Worktop manufacturer failed to control dust and manage ventilation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    ASBESTOS REMOVED WITHOUT SURVEY OR CONTROLS

    Client fined over failure to commission refurb and demo survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th July 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic