Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS ENFORCEMENT RISING

Environment Agency becomes pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance

The Environment Agency (EA) is becoming more pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance with Site Waste Management Plans (SWMPs).

Fines for non-compliance are potentially unlimited. Significantly, the EA can prosecute a number of separate offences arising out of one plan.

Nabarro LLP has prepared a briefing covers the requirements of SWMPs for both the client and the principal contractor and the consequences of non-compliance. The contents are reproduced below.

Summary
  • SWMPs must be prepared on construction projects in England with an estimated worth of more than £300,000;
  • SWMPs must be prepared before construction work begins and must be updated whenever waste is removed from the site; and
  • SWMPs must comply with the Site Waste Management Plans Regulations 2008;
  • failure to comply will result in fixed penalties, prosecution or fines, for which directors, managers and company officers can be personally liable.
 
1. Preparation of the SWMP

The client must prepare the SWMP before any construction work begins. This includes any fitting out, alterations, demolition or on site assembly. If the client appoints a principal contractor, it is still the client who is legally responsible for the preparation of the SWMP.

However, both the client and the principal contractor will be guilty of an offence if the project starts without a plan in place.

 
2. The content and format of the SWMP

There is no formal requirement to adopt a specific template for an SWMP. However, guidance issued by Defra contains a specimen template. In summary, certain details that must be included in the plan:

  1. The identity of the client, principal contractor and person who drafted the plan;
  2. The site location and the estimated cost of the project;
  3. Design information as to waste minimisation;
  4. A description of type and estimated quantity of waste;
  5. Any plans to reuse, recycle or recover different wastes; and
  6. A declaration of compliance with the waste duty of care regime.

 

3 . Ongoing obligations

Which projects are caught?

  • Projects planned before 6 April 2008 with construction work beginning after 1 July 2008.
  • All projects planned after 6 April 2008.

The Regulations do not apply to projects planned before 6 April 2008 with construction work starting before 1 July 2008.

Whenever waste is removed from the site it is the principal contractor’s duty to update the SWMP with the following information:

  • The identity of the person removing the waste;
  • The types of waste removed; and
  • The site to which the waste has been taken.

There are additional, more detailed requirements for SWMPs where the project costs are more than £500,000. Both the client and the principal contractor must also:

  • Review, revise and refine SWMPs as necessary; and
  • Take reasonable steps to prevent illegal waste disposal from the site.

Duty to reuse, recycle or recover waste – Section 1(4) of the Schedule to the Regulations, requires the principal contractor to “ensure, so far as reasonably practicable, that waste produced during construction is re-used, recycled or recovered”.

This obligation will assume greater significance given the requirement in the Revised Waste Framework Directive that by 2020, 70 per cent of construction and demolition waste by weight (excluding naturally occurring materials) must be recycled.

Under section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, anyone concerned with controlled waste must ensure that the waste is:

  • Managed properly;
  • Recovered or disposed of safely;
  • Does not cause harm to human health or pollution of the environment;
  • Is only transferred to someone who is authorised to receive it. No more than three months after the work is finished

The principal contractor must add to the plan and:

  • Confirm that the plan has been monitored and updated; and
  • Explain any deviation from the plan.

The principal contractor must also retain the SWMP for two years after completion of the project.

 
4 . Additional requirements for client and principal contractor

The principal contractor has the following additional duties:

  • Undertake training and site induction on the SWMPs.
  • Promote and develop measures to ensure waste is dealt with in accordance with the SWMP.

The client is also responsible for giving reasonable directions to any contractor to enable the principal contractor to comply with its SWMP obligations.

Penalties

  • Fixed penalty notices on failure to produce SWMPs – £300.
  • Summary conviction in the Magistrates’ court – fine up to £50,000.
  • Conviction on indictment in the Crown Court – unlimited fine.

 

5 . Offences and enforcement

The key offences are:

  • Failure to comply with any of the SWMP Regulations.
  • Making a false or misleading statement in an SWMP.
  • Obstructing or failing to assist a regulator.

The EA, local authorities and councils have the power to enforce the SWMP Regulations. Any authorised officer of these organisations also has the power to issue a fixed penalty notice of £300 for failure to produce a copy of an SWMP when requested.

As with most environmental offences, where a company has been found guilty under the SWMP Regulations, directors, managers and officers of the company can be personally liable. This occurs where they have connived or at acted negligently in breach of the SWMP Regulations.

 
6. Beware – the honeymoon period is over

The Environment Agency is becoming more pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance with SWMPs.

They began “Agency trials” in August in Bedford and are now targeting areas such as Milton Keynes and Runnymede in Surrey.

Fines are potentially high with the ability of the regulators to prosecute for a number of separate offences arising out of one plan.

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

MAJOR CONTRACTOR ERRED ON FRAGILE ROOF RISK

Firms fine £965,000 after painter fell through waiting room roof

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 19th APRIL 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th April 2018

STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th April 2018

NEW BIM SPEC FOR SHARING H&S INFORMATION

Specification for sharing health and safety info during construction projects

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

MANAGERS FORGED ASBESTOS DOCUMENTATION

Removal licence obtained using fake training and medical certificates

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

FINE OVER INCORRECT AND MISLEADING SURVEY

Specialist asbestos company failed to detect AIB on demolition project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

IGNORING HSE ADVICE PENALISED BY LARGE FINE

Contractor fined over £50k for persistent WAH and welfare failings

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

PRISON OVER BASEMENT EXCAVATION AND COLLAPSE

Building contractor jailed after house collapsed in Brighton

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

DEFEATING POWER INTERLOCK CAUSED FLASHOVER

Systems for managing electrical safety found to be inadequate

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

LADDER SAFETY FAILURES ATTRACT MASSIVE FINE

National window firm left workers to ‘own devices’

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 12th April 2018

FALLING MATERIAL STRUCK WORKMAN IN EXCAVATION

Risks of working in and near excavations highlighted by incident

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 4th APRIL 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th April 2018

HOUSING ASSOCIATION FAILED ON VIBRATION RISK

Assessment, management and health surveillance all found wanting

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

OCCUPIER AND CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FALL

Employee assisting contractor fell through roof during re-roofing project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

HSE FEARFUL OF GROWING ’BLUE TAPE’ BURDEN

hselogo1ISO 45001 could generate fresh business to business demands

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 21st MAR 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th March 2018

INCIDENTS: PASSER-BY STRUCK BY BRICKS

Pack of bricks appear to have fallen from crane

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th March 2018

HSE RECONSIDER HOW TO INFLUENCE SMALLER FIRMS

hselogo1Regulator advice and messages are failing to chime with the SME businesses

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

DANGEROUS REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS CEMENT

Workers smashed asbestos sheets with crowbars whilst at risk of falling

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

HSE LAUNCH CONIAN SHARING AND SUPPORT PLATFORM

hselogo1New HSE web community now open to the public

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

FIRM FAILING ON HAVS SURVEILLANCE FINED £50,000

Door manufacturer failed to manage sanding and buffing tool vibration

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

PRE-CAST FIRM FINED OVER FINGER AMPUTATION

Lack of guarding and training triggered table saw injury

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 26th March 2018

HSE STRIKE BEFORE A FALL ON SOLAR PANEL PROJECT

Director and company pay price for lack of fall prevention precautions

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 26th March 2018

DON’T WASTE MONEY ON MANUAL HANDLING TRAINING

hselogo1HSE call for focus on elimination or reduction of manual handling risk

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 23rd March 2018

DEVELOPING TRENDS IN RECENT PROSECUTIONS

Lawyers provide useful review of health and safety cases

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st March 2018
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access