Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS ENFORCEMENT RISING

    Environment Agency becomes pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance

    The Environment Agency (EA) is becoming more pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance with Site Waste Management Plans (SWMPs).

    Fines for non-compliance are potentially unlimited. Significantly, the EA can prosecute a number of separate offences arising out of one plan.

    Nabarro LLP has prepared a briefing covers the requirements of SWMPs for both the client and the principal contractor and the consequences of non-compliance. The contents are reproduced below.

    Summary
    • SWMPs must be prepared on construction projects in England with an estimated worth of more than £300,000;
    • SWMPs must be prepared before construction work begins and must be updated whenever waste is removed from the site; and
    • SWMPs must comply with the Site Waste Management Plans Regulations 2008;
    • failure to comply will result in fixed penalties, prosecution or fines, for which directors, managers and company officers can be personally liable.
     
    1. Preparation of the SWMP

    The client must prepare the SWMP before any construction work begins. This includes any fitting out, alterations, demolition or on site assembly. If the client appoints a principal contractor, it is still the client who is legally responsible for the preparation of the SWMP.

    However, both the client and the principal contractor will be guilty of an offence if the project starts without a plan in place.

     
    2. The content and format of the SWMP

    There is no formal requirement to adopt a specific template for an SWMP. However, guidance issued by Defra contains a specimen template. In summary, certain details that must be included in the plan:

    1. The identity of the client, principal contractor and person who drafted the plan;
    2. The site location and the estimated cost of the project;
    3. Design information as to waste minimisation;
    4. A description of type and estimated quantity of waste;
    5. Any plans to reuse, recycle or recover different wastes; and
    6. A declaration of compliance with the waste duty of care regime.

     

    3 . Ongoing obligations

    Which projects are caught?

    • Projects planned before 6 April 2008 with construction work beginning after 1 July 2008.
    • All projects planned after 6 April 2008.

    The Regulations do not apply to projects planned before 6 April 2008 with construction work starting before 1 July 2008.

    Whenever waste is removed from the site it is the principal contractor’s duty to update the SWMP with the following information:

    • The identity of the person removing the waste;
    • The types of waste removed; and
    • The site to which the waste has been taken.

    There are additional, more detailed requirements for SWMPs where the project costs are more than £500,000. Both the client and the principal contractor must also:

    • Review, revise and refine SWMPs as necessary; and
    • Take reasonable steps to prevent illegal waste disposal from the site.

    Duty to reuse, recycle or recover waste – Section 1(4) of the Schedule to the Regulations, requires the principal contractor to “ensure, so far as reasonably practicable, that waste produced during construction is re-used, recycled or recovered”.

    This obligation will assume greater significance given the requirement in the Revised Waste Framework Directive that by 2020, 70 per cent of construction and demolition waste by weight (excluding naturally occurring materials) must be recycled.

    Under section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, anyone concerned with controlled waste must ensure that the waste is:

    • Managed properly;
    • Recovered or disposed of safely;
    • Does not cause harm to human health or pollution of the environment;
    • Is only transferred to someone who is authorised to receive it. No more than three months after the work is finished

    The principal contractor must add to the plan and:

    • Confirm that the plan has been monitored and updated; and
    • Explain any deviation from the plan.

    The principal contractor must also retain the SWMP for two years after completion of the project.

     
    4 . Additional requirements for client and principal contractor

    The principal contractor has the following additional duties:

    • Undertake training and site induction on the SWMPs.
    • Promote and develop measures to ensure waste is dealt with in accordance with the SWMP.

    The client is also responsible for giving reasonable directions to any contractor to enable the principal contractor to comply with its SWMP obligations.

    Penalties

    • Fixed penalty notices on failure to produce SWMPs – £300.
    • Summary conviction in the Magistrates’ court – fine up to £50,000.
    • Conviction on indictment in the Crown Court – unlimited fine.

     

    5 . Offences and enforcement

    The key offences are:

    • Failure to comply with any of the SWMP Regulations.
    • Making a false or misleading statement in an SWMP.
    • Obstructing or failing to assist a regulator.

    The EA, local authorities and councils have the power to enforce the SWMP Regulations. Any authorised officer of these organisations also has the power to issue a fixed penalty notice of £300 for failure to produce a copy of an SWMP when requested.

    As with most environmental offences, where a company has been found guilty under the SWMP Regulations, directors, managers and officers of the company can be personally liable. This occurs where they have connived or at acted negligently in breach of the SWMP Regulations.

     
    6. Beware – the honeymoon period is over

    The Environment Agency is becoming more pro-active in inspecting and enforcing compliance with SWMPs.

    They began “Agency trials” in August in Bedford and are now targeting areas such as Milton Keynes and Runnymede in Surrey.

    Fines are potentially high with the ability of the regulators to prosecute for a number of separate offences arising out of one plan.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    TRADING STANDARDS AND HSE ACT IN CONCERT

    Director given prison term over fraud and health and safety breaches

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th October 2018

    BUILDER ERROR CAUSED RESIDENT FALL FROM BALCONY

    Director prosecuted over refurb project danger to others

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th October 2018

    FORMER HSE BOSS CONDEMNS VALUE ENGINEERING

    Resident and public safety must match workforce safety progress

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th October 2018

    RETAILER FINED AFTER FAN AMPUTATES FINGERS

    Maintenance engineer injured during roof fan repair works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th October 2018

    POOR PLANT ISOLATION CAUSED CONVEYOR DANGER

    Arm of fitter trapped between conveyor drum and belt

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th October 2018

    BUILDING OWNER FAILED TO CHECK FOR ASBESTOS

    Prison sentence for businessman after previous HSE enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th October 2018

    YOUNG WORKER LOSES FINGERS IN SAWING INCIDENT

    Provision of training and information could not be proved

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th October 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 10th OCT 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th October 2018

    MD PROSECUTED ALONGSIDE ERRANT COMPANY

    Director held personally responsible for poor site conditions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st October 2018

    ASBESTOS REMOVAL STARTED BEFORE R & D SURVEY

    Asbestos insulation board found outside building being refurbished

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th September 2018

    INEFFECTIVELY BRAKED SAW CAUSED AMPUTATIONS

    Retro-fitting of precautions may be required on older machines

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th September 2018

    FALL THROUGH FRAGILE CEILING TILES

    Failure to implemented control measures for working near fragile surfaces

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th September 2018

    HSE SEEKS CONSTRUCTION ‘DUST BUSTER’ PARTNERS

    Regulator uses social media to raise dust dangers and using right controls

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th September 2018

    MAJOR HOMES BUSINESS EXPOSED PUBLIC TO RISK

    Residential property refurb project created carbon monoxide danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th September 2018

    HSE CONSTRUCTION DUST CONTROL ‘BLITZ’ STARTS

    Regulator inspections will check health taken as seriously as safety

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th September 2018

    FLOOR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM OF WORK UNSAFE

    Welder fell 3m from mezzanine area through purlin openings

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th September 2018

    WORKER SUFFERS FATAL BURNS IN OXYGEN RICH AREA

    Sparks from angle grinder ignited clothing of workman in confined space

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    RIBA PUBLISH DRAFT POST GRENFELL FIRE SAFETY PLAN

    Architects institute consults on ‘golden thread of fire safety information’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    MAJOR UK CONTRACTORS HIT BY MAJOR FINES

    Firms ordered to pay over £3m after foot trapped in rotating ‘screw’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th September 2018

    DRIVER DIED TRAPPED BETWEEN TRAILER AND VEHICLE

    Firm fined £1.5 million over failure to assess coupling operations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th September 2018

    ACTUAL SYSTEM OF WORK WAS OPPOSITE OF RAMS

    Workman fell 4m through fragile asbestos roof sheet

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th September 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FUNCTION MISUNDERSTOOD?

    Consultants claim CDM 2015 design risk management has ‘gone backwards’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th September 2018

    RISK ASSESSED PRECAUTIONS NOT IMPLEMENTED

    Action not paperwork essential to prevent fall during lifting operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th September 2018

    CROSSRAIL PUBLISH BEST PRACTICE H&S GUIDES

    Sharing major project best practice can leave a lasting legacy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018

    SCHOOL STAFF LACKED ASBESTOS AWARENESS TRAINING

    Council fined £200k over asbestos flue and gasket rope failures

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th September 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic