Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    CRANES OVERSAILING NEIGHBOURING LAND ISSUES

    Rights to oversailing land with cranes is far from plain sailing

    Reader may be intersested in this 2003 article by Jane Ryland Partner and Head of construction at law firm Cripps Harris Hall LLP

    The article is posted on Lifting World forum which contains much useful information on a wide range of matters relating to lifting operations and plant.

    It’s Crane Sailing – Construction Law – February 2003

    “If a contractor is thinking of bringing cranes on to a development site, he should be aware from the outset that they may need to oversail neighbouring land. If he hasn’t negotiated the rights to do this with all the neighbours involved, then he may be faced with a raft of injunctions. However, landowners beware, holding the contractor to ransom may backfire. It was an ancient principle of English law that your rights over your land stretch from the centre of the planet all the way to the stars.

    So when someone develops the adjacent plot of land and the contractor swings his tower cranes in to motion, there is a real risk that they will need to oversail the neighbouring airspace. If the contractor does not have the legal right to oversail, it is highly likely he will be greeted with polite requests from his neighbour along the lines of “Ger orrrf moy laaaaand”. Many more requests, in less polite terms, will be received if the development is in a built up area. An examination of the deeds should tell the owner of the development site, whether he does have the right to oversail neighbouring airspace.

    Let us assume that the contractor has not been granted the blessing of his neighbours to oversail their land but he continues to do so, as to do otherwise would require a complete re-think of the drawings, the types of cranes and work method. The contractor may be committing a trespass, and his neighbour may have the right to obtain an injunction to stop this. In Anchor Brewhouse Developments Ltd v Berkeley House (Docklands Developments) Ltd (1987) the boom of Berkeley’s cranes oversailed Anchor Brewhouse’s land and was held to constitute a trespass. You do not have to show damage to obtain an injunction for trespass. Anchor Brewhouse succeeded in obtaining the injunction they were looking for as the court found no “special circumstances” to prevent the injunction.

    However, in the case of Woollerton and Wilson v Richard Costain (1970) the courts adopted a different approach. An injunction was granted to the Claimant whose airspace had been oversailed by the jib of Costain’s tower crane. The court decided that it was no defence to a claim for an injunction that Woollerton and Wilson had not suffered damage, though rather controversially decided that in appropriate cases, it would use its discretion to suspend the injunction. This is precisely what it did – the injunction was suspended until Costain’s works were complete. It ought to be noted that in this case, Woollerton and Wilson refused to grant a licence despite Costain offering a substantial amount of cash. It is also important to note that an injunction will only be granted if damages are not appropriate.

    In deciding whether damages are appropriate or not, the court will consider a wide range of issues including how much prejudice and inconvenience the neighbour will suffer and whether or not the contractor has acted reasonably in offering payment. The point for contractors and owners of neighbouring land is this – don’t rely on the courts, in particular contractors should not rely on the rather vague “special circumstances” defence.

    During the design stage, surveyors and contractors should carefully assess whether their cranes will need to oversail neighbouring land. If they do, and other types of crane are unsuitable, then ask the owners of the land for the legal right to oversail i.e. obtain an Oversail Licence. The licence would cover issues such as the times of day (and night) the cranes may oversail the neighbouring airspace, the heights at which they may do so, and the duration of the licence. A well advised landowner will probably also want an indemnity against any damage that the crane may cause. 

    At this point, landowners may be rubbing their hands together with glee at the prospect of holding the contractor to ransom for a shed load of cash. However, remember that Woollerton and Wilson were offered a substantial sum by Costain, which they refused, and ended up obtaining only a suspended injunction. By holding a contractor to ransom, a landowner may be prejudicing his rights to an injunction.

    So how much should the contractor fork out for the Oversail Licence? If the contractor does not manage to negotiate a licence he will need to change his cranes and work method. This is going to cost him money. The fee for the Oversail Licence would typically be a percentage of what that additional cost would be, together with surveying and legal costs. In addition, his insurance cover will need to be increased to cover for any damage his crane may cause the neighbouring land. This can all be costly for the contractor, especially if the area is built up and a large number of landowners are involved, who would all need to grant separate licences if the crane oversailed their respective space. Innovatively however, a few contractors have managed to off-set some of this cost by using the jib as advertising space, though note that this use may be restricted by both legislation and the title deeds.

    As well as heavy loads, cranes are also good at raising a plethora of health and safety issues. In one case, during high winds, the contractor’s crane accidentally oversailed the neighbouring land. Desperate to avoid having to dig into his pockets to pay off his neighbours, he decided to tie the crane down. This course of action backfired in that tying it down caused the entire crane to collapse in the winds, resulting in a significant amount of damage to both the development plot and the neighbouring land. Love Thy Neighbour If it really does prove to be nigh on impossible to obtain a licence, then technology may save the day. Recent developments have utilised computerised cranes that can be programmed not to oversail neighbouring airspace. Also, currently being marketed is a crane with a retractable jib. If you wish to copy this article please do so, but also acknowledge its source.

    If it really does prove to be nigh on impossible to obtain a licence, then technology may save the day.”

    For further information contact: Jane Ryland T: 01892 506345 hjr@crippslaw.com

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    CONSTRUCTION SITE DEATHS SET TO FALL?

    HSE in-year fatality records for 2018/19 suggest significant reduction

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd March 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE UPDATE 20th MAR 2019

    hselogo1Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th March 2019

    BRICKLAYER FATALLY INJURED BY FALLING WALL

    Masonry collapsed during concrete back filling operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    BASIC LADDER SAFETY FAILURES FINED £150,000

    Repair and maintenance firm had no excuse for errors causing injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    HSE ISSUES REMINDER ON SAFE SCAFFOLD DESIGN

    Recent incidents and high winds prompt warning from regulator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    LORRY DRIVER DIED IN OVERHEAD POWER STRIKE

    Major company failed to communicate precautions to grab arm operator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    ASSESSMENT SHOWED RISK – PRECAUTIONS NOT TAKEN

    Workman seriously injured when falling into open unguarded stairwell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st March 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FAILED TO IMPLEMENT SAFE SYSTEM

    Procedures for safe plant refuelling failed to prevent death of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    CLIENT PROSECUTED OVER CONTRACTOR FATAL FALL

    Company breached duty to protect contractors as well as employees

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    FOURTEEN YEAR FAILURE TO MANAGE ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to implement asbestos management plan following survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th February 2019

    CHILD INJURED BY WALL COLLAPSE INCIDENT

    Council failed to carry out “intelligence led” condition inspections

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    BOTTLE JACK SUPPORT FAILED TO PREVENT DEATH

    Director sentenced alongside company over death of engineer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    TEMPORARY WORKS FAILURES CAUSED FATAL FALL

    Platform not designed and system for installation and inspection inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    SOLVENT IGNITED DURING FLOOR CLEANING WORKS

    Flammable solvent fire fought with water spreading fire further

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th February 2019

    INEVITABLE COLLAPSE OF SCAFFOLD ON TO SCHOOL

    Scaffold not designed or installed to withstand foreseeable loads

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th February 2019

    OIL DRUM EXPLODED DURING HOT CUTTING WORK

    Firm fined £400k after drum lid ejected causing loss of leg

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    ROOFLIGHT FALL ON NUCLEAR POWER SITE

    Energy generating company and maintenance contractor fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    DIRECTOR PROSECUTED AFTER 6METRE ROOF FALL

    Untrained worker fell through rooflight in fragile asbestos roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    HSE ALERT: MILD STEEL WELDING CANCER RISK

    HSE announces enforcement action change based on new cancer evidence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th February 2019

    LORRY MOUNTED LIFTING OPERATION PROVED FATAL

    Steel staircase toppled from vehicle after sling snagged

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th February 2019

    DIRECTOR AND BUSINESS IN COURT OVER DEATH

    Scaffold not priced for on domestic roof-line refurbishment work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th February 2019

    FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT HAZARD PROTECTION MISSING

    Two businesses prosecuted after a worker fell through a fragile rooflight

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th February 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019

    FINGERS CRUSHED BY METAL FOLDING MACHINE

    Steel cladding firm fined £600k over failure guard access to danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019

    ASBESTOS ILLEGALLY REMOVED AFTER SURVEY

    Surveyor pricing asbestos work found contractor jumped the gun

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic