• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    SAFER DESIGN ‘SO FAR AS IS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE’

    Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) publish ‘sfarp’ guidance note

    The ICE has published a note reviewing and commenting on ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ (SFARP) – the legal qualification to many health and safety duties – with specific regard to Designers in the construction industry.

    The note highlights issues of concern to Designers in relation to application of SFARP.

    What really matters and when is enough, enough?

    The ICE note states that the requirement to exercise a legal duty SFARP is at the “heart of the construction industry design process” but is “not well defined”.

    The note quotes the Government response to a House of Lords’ report on the management of risk that called for ‘a set of guiding principles and focused messages aimed at empowering risk managers to concentrate on what really matters and to know when ‘enough is enough’.

    Dealing with these issues is said to be “the rationale for this ICE report”.

    ICE look to advice from HSE to provide the starting point in the absence of prescriptive Regulations or detailed case law. Where accepted ‘good practice’ exists it is felt Designers have some guidance to follow in the discharge of their obligations.

    “Where neither prescription, relevant case law nor HSE guidance exists there is greater uncertainty and greater clarity must be welcomed.”

    Uncertainty could lead to doing too much or nothing!

    The note states that “it is of great concern that Designers may become either unduly risk averse, or ignore risk management altogether, if they are uncertain as to the correct procedures or the sufficiency of their actions.”

    The ICE aim is to generate discussion amongst construction industry organisations and HSE so that a pragmatic consensus may be reached as to a compliant route through the design process.

    Comment

    The ICE note is well intentioned but unlikely to result in greater certainty or clarity on SFARP. There is already extensive legal interpretation – see Redgraves – supplemented by published HSE practical guidance.

    The good news is that designers will not go far wrong by: (a) following the CDM 2007 ACOP advice for designers and (b) applying the ERIC process presented in Construction Skills Guidance for Designers.

    There will never be certainty as to whether designers have ‘done enough’ or all that is ‘reasonably practicable’. In addition, regulators will always have 20/20 hindsight when things go wrong. 

    Designers should focus on taking sensible postive action. Establish a process to avoid risk in preparing designs, stick to the process, review it and make modifcations when necessary.

    Problems with SFARP are not new. When the HSW Act came into force in 1975 the common complaint was “we do not know what SFARP means”.

    The Chief Inspector of Factories at the time replied that SFARP was intended to produce “creative uncertainty”! An uncomfortable but accurate description. 

    One final point, be careful what you wish for. The price of greater certainty for designers in health and safety requirements would be less flexibility and more restriction on creativity, imagination and innovation.    

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    SELECTED NEWS POSTED RECENTLY ON TWITTER

    PP Construction Safety logo and link to home page [1]Links to other construction health and safety related news reports

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2019

    HSE LOOK TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR CDM SUPPORT

    Council Inspectors focus on CDM client duties – asbestos, fragility and RCS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    VERBAL WARNING OF DANGER IS NO DEFENCE

    Hand of female worker entangled in modified metal drilling rig

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    UNDERGROUND CABLE STRIKE CAUSES 50% BURNS

    Workman seriously injured using hand-held breaker to excavate post holes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    HSE WELDING FUME REVISED GUIDANCE PUBLISHED

    New research evidence on cancer link prompts revision on welding fume

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    VIBRATION MANAGEMENT FAILINGS FINED £600,000

    Vital health surveillance, tool replacement and management found wanting

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th November 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st October 2019

    DEVELOPER AND DIRECTOR PUT PUBLIC AT RISK

    Demolition undertaken without surveys and effective safety precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th October 2019

    BY-PASSING MACHINE INTERLOCK FINED £1.275 MILLION

    Trapped key safety system failed to prevent access to conveyor danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    HSE LOSES PATIENCE WITH ERRANT CONTRACTOR

    Roofing firm fined £30,000 over failure to manage work at height risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    TRUSS ERECTION LACKED INTERNAL FALL PROTECTION

    Carpenter fell and injured whilst falling with roof truss

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    WORKMAN FELL HEAD FIRST THROUGH ROOFLIGHT

    Fragile roof dangers not assessed and properly controlled

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th October 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019

    HSE RISK REDUCTION THROUGH DESIGN AWARD

    Regulator seeks to promote hazard avoidance and risk minimisation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019

    CLIENT AND CONTRACTOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS RISK

    Checks for presence of asbestos not undertaken prior to refurbishment

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019

    DIRECTOR PROSECUTED AND JAILED AS EMPLOYEE

    Workman fatally injured when crushed between bucket and wall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th October 2019

    BUILDING MATERIALS FIRM FINED OVER FATALITY

    Failure to effectively isolated power to machinery caused death of engineer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th October 2019

    CUSTOM AND PRACTICE CAUSED EXPLOSION DEATHS

    Electrical accumulator explosion claims the lives of two engineers

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th October 2019

    REBAR FELL DURING TANDEM FLT LIFTING OP

    Workman seriously injured during improperly planned and executed lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th October 2019

    FIRM FINED AFTER FINGER OF TRAINEE SEVERED

    Young worker injured hand working on unguarded rip saw

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th October 2019

    WORKMAN FELL THROUGH ROOF OPENING

    Contractor failed to provide collective edge protection or fall arrest

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th October 2019

    DRIVER UNDER TRAINING CRUSHED BY TELEHANDLER

    Court sentences company director to unpaid work community order

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th September 2019

    DIRECTOR IN DOCK OVER FRAGILE ROOF RISK

    Roofing contractor and director failed to plan and manage falls risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th September 2019

    HSE START PROJECT HEALTH RISK INTERVENTIONS

    Regulator set to check health risks assessed and controls in place

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th September 2019

    AIF NATIONAL WORKING AT HEIGHT CONFERENCE

    HSE Construction Head to speak at Access Industry Forum conference

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd September 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    One Response to “SAFER DESIGN ‘SO FAR AS IS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE’”

    1. REASONABLE PRACTICABILITY AND PROPORTIONALITY | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] with H&S practitioners or regulators although it may find support within the ICE which has published a paper calling for greater clarity regarding the meaning of “reasonably […]