Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

SAFER DESIGN ‘SO FAR AS IS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE’

Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) publish ‘sfarp’ guidance note

The ICE has published a note reviewing and commenting on ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ (SFARP) – the legal qualification to many health and safety duties – with specific regard to Designers in the construction industry.

The note highlights issues of concern to Designers in relation to application of SFARP.

What really matters and when is enough, enough?

The ICE note states that the requirement to exercise a legal duty SFARP is at the “heart of the construction industry design process” but is “not well defined”.

The note quotes the Government response to a House of Lords’ report on the management of risk that called for ‘a set of guiding principles and focused messages aimed at empowering risk managers to concentrate on what really matters and to know when ‘enough is enough’.

Dealing with these issues is said to be “the rationale for this ICE report”.

ICE look to advice from HSE to provide the starting point in the absence of prescriptive Regulations or detailed case law. Where accepted ‘good practice’ exists it is felt Designers have some guidance to follow in the discharge of their obligations.

“Where neither prescription, relevant case law nor HSE guidance exists there is greater uncertainty and greater clarity must be welcomed.”

Uncertainty could lead to doing too much or nothing!

The note states that “it is of great concern that Designers may become either unduly risk averse, or ignore risk management altogether, if they are uncertain as to the correct procedures or the sufficiency of their actions.”

The ICE aim is to generate discussion amongst construction industry organisations and HSE so that a pragmatic consensus may be reached as to a compliant route through the design process.

Comment

The ICE note is well intentioned but unlikely to result in greater certainty or clarity on SFARP. There is already extensive legal interpretation – see Redgraves – supplemented by published HSE practical guidance.

The good news is that designers will not go far wrong by: (a) following the CDM 2007 ACOP advice for designers and (b) applying the ERIC process presented in Construction Skills Guidance for Designers.

There will never be certainty as to whether designers have ‘done enough’ or all that is ‘reasonably practicable’. In addition, regulators will always have 20/20 hindsight when things go wrong. 

Designers should focus on taking sensible postive action. Establish a process to avoid risk in preparing designs, stick to the process, review it and make modifcations when necessary.

Problems with SFARP are not new. When the HSW Act came into force in 1975 the common complaint was “we do not know what SFARP means”.

The Chief Inspector of Factories at the time replied that SFARP was intended to produce “creative uncertainty”! An uncomfortable but accurate description. 

One final point, be careful what you wish for. The price of greater certainty for designers in health and safety requirements would be less flexibility and more restriction on creativity, imagination and innovation.    

 

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 21st FEB 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st February 2018

CLEANING ASBESTOS CEMENT ROOF CAUSED DANGER

High pressure jet washing spread asbestos fibres around premises

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st February 2018

HSE INSPECTOR GUIDE TO RISK ASSESSMENT

Regulator offers training course on all aspects of risk assessment

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 21st February 2018

PUZZLES HELP DELIVER HEALTH RISKS AWARENESS

Innovative puzzle products supplier extends the range of training aids

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th February 2018

NEW ISO 45001 MANAGEMENT STANDARD IMMINENT

Standard capable of replacing OHSAS 18001 with relative ease

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th February 2018

APPEAL COURT RULES ON LEGAL PRIVILEGE CASE

Decision may prompt further caution during internal investigations

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th February 2018

TIPPER TRUCK STRUCK PEDESTRIAN ON SITE ROAD

Contractor fined £500,000 over poor traffic management arrangements

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 16th February 2018

FALLING SCAFFOLD CLIP STRUCK PASSER-BY

Firm failed to follow risk assessment and method statement

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 16th February 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 14th FEB 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 16th February 2018

HOMES FIRM FINED £1/2M OVER DUMPER DEATH

Developer and contractor failed to manage people and plant interface

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 14th February 2018

SUPREME COURT RULES ON HSE ENFORCEMENT NOTICES

Post service evidence can be used to support HSE notice appeals

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 9th February 2018

SAFE INSTALLATION OF PRE-CAST FLOORING

Code of Practice for health and safety updated by industry federation

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 8th February 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 8th FEB 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 8th February 2018

MANUAL HANDLING MUST INVOLVE ‘REAL RISK’

Court provides clarity on manual handling risk assessment rules

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 7th February 2018

SKIP LORRY DRIVER FATALLY INJURED BY LOADER

Hire company fined after lorry driver crushed between two vehicles

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 5th February 2018

PUBLIC RISK COSTS CONTRACTOR DEARLY

Principal Contractor failed to assess and supervise work

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 5th February 2018

TUBES FELL WHILST LIFTING OVER PERSONS BELOW

Lifting operations were not carried out in safe manner

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd February 2018

‘DAREDEVIL’ SCAFFOLDER LANDS IN DOCK

Former HSE Inspector snaps dangerous working practices at 60 feet

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 2nd February 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 1st FEB 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 1st February 2018

DIDCOT FATAL COLLAPSE: INVESTIGATION UPDATE

Police and HSE still seeking to understand why boiler house collapsed

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 1st February 2018

SCAFFOLDER TRAINING REACHES NEW HEIGHTS

CISRS training card renewal by CPD embraced by scaffolders

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 30th January 2018

HSE SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION SECTOR HARM

Infographic provides insight into industry priority hazards

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 29th January 2018

FIRM FAILED TO IMPLEMENT AGREED CONTROLS

Risk assessment carried out but precautions not taken

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 29th January 2018

HSE MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS SUMMIT 2018

hselogo1Regulator focuses on MSDs in construction and others sectors

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th January 2018

LOAD FELL FROM MAGNET AND STRUCK WORKMAN

Firm failed to properly assess and revise crane safe working load

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 25th January 2018
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access

One Response to “SAFER DESIGN ‘SO FAR AS IS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE’”

  1. REASONABLE PRACTICABILITY AND PROPORTIONALITY | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

    […] with H&S practitioners or regulators although it may find support within the ICE which has published a paper calling for greater clarity regarding the meaning of “reasonably […]