• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    SAFER DESIGN ‘SO FAR AS IS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE’

    Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) publish ‘sfarp’ guidance note

    The ICE has published a note reviewing and commenting on ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ (SFARP) – the legal qualification to many health and safety duties – with specific regard to Designers in the construction industry.

    The note highlights issues of concern to Designers in relation to application of SFARP.

    What really matters and when is enough, enough?

    The ICE note states that the requirement to exercise a legal duty SFARP is at the “heart of the construction industry design process” but is “not well defined”.

    The note quotes the Government response to a House of Lords’ report on the management of risk that called for ‘a set of guiding principles and focused messages aimed at empowering risk managers to concentrate on what really matters and to know when ‘enough is enough’.

    Dealing with these issues is said to be “the rationale for this ICE report”.

    ICE look to advice from HSE to provide the starting point in the absence of prescriptive Regulations or detailed case law. Where accepted ‘good practice’ exists it is felt Designers have some guidance to follow in the discharge of their obligations.

    “Where neither prescription, relevant case law nor HSE guidance exists there is greater uncertainty and greater clarity must be welcomed.”

    Uncertainty could lead to doing too much or nothing!

    The note states that “it is of great concern that Designers may become either unduly risk averse, or ignore risk management altogether, if they are uncertain as to the correct procedures or the sufficiency of their actions.”

    The ICE aim is to generate discussion amongst construction industry organisations and HSE so that a pragmatic consensus may be reached as to a compliant route through the design process.

    Comment

    The ICE note is well intentioned but unlikely to result in greater certainty or clarity on SFARP. There is already extensive legal interpretation – see Redgraves – supplemented by published HSE practical guidance.

    The good news is that designers will not go far wrong by: (a) following the CDM 2007 ACOP advice for designers and (b) applying the ERIC process presented in Construction Skills Guidance for Designers.

    There will never be certainty as to whether designers have ‘done enough’ or all that is ‘reasonably practicable’. In addition, regulators will always have 20/20 hindsight when things go wrong. 

    Designers should focus on taking sensible postive action. Establish a process to avoid risk in preparing designs, stick to the process, review it and make modifcations when necessary.

    Problems with SFARP are not new. When the HSW Act came into force in 1975 the common complaint was “we do not know what SFARP means”.

    The Chief Inspector of Factories at the time replied that SFARP was intended to produce “creative uncertainty”! An uncomfortable but accurate description. 

    One final point, be careful what you wish for. The price of greater certainty for designers in health and safety requirements would be less flexibility and more restriction on creativity, imagination and innovation.    

     

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    CONTRACTOR FAILED TO REPLACE MISSING PROTECTION

    Painter and decorator fractured hip in fall from landing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2020

    RISK OF DERMATITIS SUFFICIENT FOR PROSECUTION

    Company failed to implement controls and surveillance required by COSHH

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2020

    COSHH FAILINGS CAUSE ASTHMA AND PROVE COSTLY

    Uncontrolled exposure to isocyanates during paint spraying operations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2020

    POLICE EMPLOYEE SHOCKED BY DATA CABLE WORK

    South Wales Force fined over electric shock from ceiling void cable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2020

    COLLAPSE OF PUMP SET TRAPPED WORKMAN

    Unsafe system of work transferring from pallet to a raised platform

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2020

    MODIFIED PODIUM STEPS CAUSE FALL FROM HEIGHT

    Firm failed to select and correctly assemble with necessary training

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th February 2020

    SCHOOL LACKED SAFE SYSTEM FOR ROOF RETRIEVAL

    Workman fell from roof whilst retrieving shoe of pupil

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th February 2020

    ARM OF WORKMAN AMPUTATED IN CONVEYOR

    Major construction materials supplier fined heavily over unsafe system

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th February 2020

    CONCRETE BLOCK PLANT GUARDING BREACHED

    Sections of machinery perimeter safety fencing missing for months

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th February 2020

    FATAL FUEL TANK EXPLOSION DURING CUTTING

    Companies failed to meet known, established and clear standards

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th February 2020

    FIRMS FINED HEAVILY OVER STUDENT FIRE RISK

    Senior fire officers found “blatant disregard” for law and resident safety

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd February 2020

    ROOFER SURVIVED OVER 6M FALL FROM ROOF EDGE

    Replacement of asbestos cement roof lacked proper planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd February 2020

    CLIENT & BUILDER ACCOUNT FOR ASBESTOS FAILINGS

    Asbestos survey identified ACMs which were removed without controls

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th January 2020

    UNSAFE USE OF SKIP LIFTER CAUSED FATALITY

    Fork lift being lifted on to vehicle fell when winch wire failed under load

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th January 2020

    HSE CONVICTIONS DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online HSE register of prosecution convictions and notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th January 2020

    OVERHEAD CABLE STRUCK BY TIPPER TRUCK

    Company failed to report strike to HSE and take action on earlier incident

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th January 2020

    CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE ASBESTOS BLUNDERS

    Survey absent and asbestos awareness training not provided

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th January 2020

    HSE TO OVERSEE NEW BUILDING SAFETY REGIME

    Government to deliver biggest change in building safety for a generation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st January 2020

    CONTRACTS MANAGER HANDED TWO YEAR PRISON TERM

    Safety fall arrest netting would have saved life of deceased workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    WORKER FATALLY INJURED BY CONCRETE BEAM

    Lifting operation not properly planned, managed and supervised

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    TREE FELLING OPERATIONS LACKED DEFINED COMMS

    Workman struck by falling tree inside “normal” exclusion zone

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CONTRACTOR ARRESTED OVER WELFARE FAILINGS

    Recalcitrant sole trader failed to attend court hearing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    MAJOR DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR FINED £500,000

    Collapse of concrete slab caused death of worker and excavator fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FALL FROM LADDER WHILST CARRYING BUCKET

    Contractor failed to provide basic safe lifting aids

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH HSE NOTICE PROVES COSTLY

    Director given suspended jail term and company fined £60,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data