Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

SAFER DESIGN ‘SO FAR AS IS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE’

Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) publish ‘sfarp’ guidance note

The ICE has published a note reviewing and commenting on ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ (SFARP) – the legal qualification to many health and safety duties – with specific regard to Designers in the construction industry.

The note highlights issues of concern to Designers in relation to application of SFARP.

What really matters and when is enough, enough?

The ICE note states that the requirement to exercise a legal duty SFARP is at the “heart of the construction industry design process” but is “not well defined”.

The note quotes the Government response to a House of Lords’ report on the management of risk that called for ‘a set of guiding principles and focused messages aimed at empowering risk managers to concentrate on what really matters and to know when ‘enough is enough’.

Dealing with these issues is said to be “the rationale for this ICE report”.

ICE look to advice from HSE to provide the starting point in the absence of prescriptive Regulations or detailed case law. Where accepted ‘good practice’ exists it is felt Designers have some guidance to follow in the discharge of their obligations.

“Where neither prescription, relevant case law nor HSE guidance exists there is greater uncertainty and greater clarity must be welcomed.”

Uncertainty could lead to doing too much or nothing!

The note states that “it is of great concern that Designers may become either unduly risk averse, or ignore risk management altogether, if they are uncertain as to the correct procedures or the sufficiency of their actions.”

The ICE aim is to generate discussion amongst construction industry organisations and HSE so that a pragmatic consensus may be reached as to a compliant route through the design process.

Comment

The ICE note is well intentioned but unlikely to result in greater certainty or clarity on SFARP. There is already extensive legal interpretation – see Redgraves – supplemented by published HSE practical guidance.

The good news is that designers will not go far wrong by: (a) following the CDM 2007 ACOP advice for designers and (b) applying the ERIC process presented in Construction Skills Guidance for Designers.

There will never be certainty as to whether designers have ‘done enough’ or all that is ‘reasonably practicable’. In addition, regulators will always have 20/20 hindsight when things go wrong. 

Designers should focus on taking sensible postive action. Establish a process to avoid risk in preparing designs, stick to the process, review it and make modifcations when necessary.

Problems with SFARP are not new. When the HSW Act came into force in 1975 the common complaint was “we do not know what SFARP means”.

The Chief Inspector of Factories at the time replied that SFARP was intended to produce “creative uncertainty”! An uncomfortable but accurate description. 

One final point, be careful what you wish for. The price of greater certainty for designers in health and safety requirements would be less flexibility and more restriction on creativity, imagination and innovation.    

 

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

FIRMS FINED £2M OVER FALLING PIPE FATALITY

Incorrect stacking of pipes triggered fall and crushing of workman

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th April 2018

DOMESTIC PROJECT PC HANDED JAIL TERM

Workman fell from unprotected roof edge on dormer extension

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th April 2018

MAJOR CONTRACTOR ERRED ON FRAGILE ROOF RISK

Firms fine £965,000 after painter fell through waiting room roof

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 19th APRIL 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th April 2018

STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th April 2018

NEW BIM SPEC FOR SHARING H&S INFORMATION

Specification for sharing health and safety info during construction projects

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

MANAGERS FORGED ASBESTOS DOCUMENTATION

Removal licence obtained using fake training and medical certificates

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

FINE OVER INCORRECT AND MISLEADING SURVEY

Specialist asbestos company failed to detect AIB on demolition project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

IGNORING HSE ADVICE PENALISED BY LARGE FINE

Contractor fined over £50k for persistent WAH and welfare failings

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

PRISON OVER BASEMENT EXCAVATION AND COLLAPSE

Building contractor jailed after house collapsed in Brighton

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

DEFEATING POWER INTERLOCK CAUSED FLASHOVER

Systems for managing electrical safety found to be inadequate

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

LADDER SAFETY FAILURES ATTRACT MASSIVE FINE

National window firm left workers to ‘own devices’

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 12th April 2018

FALLING MATERIAL STRUCK WORKMAN IN EXCAVATION

Risks of working in and near excavations highlighted by incident

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 4th APRIL 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th April 2018

HOUSING ASSOCIATION FAILED ON VIBRATION RISK

Assessment, management and health surveillance all found wanting

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

OCCUPIER AND CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FALL

Employee assisting contractor fell through roof during re-roofing project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

HSE FEARFUL OF GROWING ’BLUE TAPE’ BURDEN

hselogo1ISO 45001 could generate fresh business to business demands

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 21st MAR 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th March 2018

INCIDENTS: PASSER-BY STRUCK BY BRICKS

Pack of bricks appear to have fallen from crane

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th March 2018

HSE RECONSIDER HOW TO INFLUENCE SMALLER FIRMS

hselogo1Regulator advice and messages are failing to chime with the SME businesses

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

DANGEROUS REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS CEMENT

Workers smashed asbestos sheets with crowbars whilst at risk of falling

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

HSE LAUNCH CONIAN SHARING AND SUPPORT PLATFORM

hselogo1New HSE web community now open to the public

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

FIRM FAILING ON HAVS SURVEILLANCE FINED £50,000

Door manufacturer failed to manage sanding and buffing tool vibration

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

PRE-CAST FIRM FINED OVER FINGER AMPUTATION

Lack of guarding and training triggered table saw injury

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 26th March 2018

HSE STRIKE BEFORE A FALL ON SOLAR PANEL PROJECT

Director and company pay price for lack of fall prevention precautions

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 26th March 2018
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access

One Response to “SAFER DESIGN ‘SO FAR AS IS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE’”

  1. REASONABLE PRACTICABILITY AND PROPORTIONALITY | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

    […] with H&S practitioners or regulators although it may find support within the ICE which has published a paper calling for greater clarity regarding the meaning of “reasonably […]