• Total Access Higher Safety
    Turner Access Chipmunk Data

    THE ABC&D OF CLIENT CDM DUTIES

    CDM clients must wake up and smell the coffee in 2010

    Philip Poynter has argued for a return to basics in considering CDM 2007 duties using the ABC&D format to explain the essence of Coordinator Duties and Designers Duties.

    He now goes on to examine the role of the client through the ABC&D of Client Duties under CDM 2007. 

     

    Client must take control under CDM 2007

    A central aim of CDM 2007 was to place clients at the heart of construction project safety.

    Many perceptive and forward thinking clients have taken up the challenge and now proactively drive forward a positive project H&S culture and high quality safety management processes.

    However, such clients are still out numbered by clients big/small/public/private who have yet to wake up and smell the coffee. CDM 2007 provides a framework for managing human risks effectively and in the same way other aspects of a business are handled.

    There is also now no choice in the matter. The project client has a strict duty to check, maintain and review project management arrangements throughout the life of the project.

    This was a significant departure from the requirements under CDM 94, yet many clients do not fully understand what is required and the consequences of failing to act. 

    Financial, reputational and legal risk

    It is likely that 2010 will see the first sentencing of a company under the Corporate Manslaughter Act 2007 (CMCH Act). The case will involve a smaller contracting organisation.

    We can also expect during the next 2-3 years that Police and HSE will conclude investigations where larger client organisations are prosecuted under the CMCH Act with significant financial and reputational damage.

    In addition, over the same period there is likely to be an increasing number of client prosecutions under CDM 2007 as regulators increase enforcement of client duties and cases proceed through the judicial system.

    Finally, the Government is shortly due to respond to the recent Inquiry into Construction Fatalities. The Inquiry report called for additional legal duties on directors including those in client organisations. 

    So, what should clients, large and small, do to avoid these risks and meet their legal obligations?

    Once again, it is simple as ABC&D.

    ABC&D of Client duties

    Appointments and Arrangements: make the required statutory appointments and project management arrangements. 

    • appoint a project CDM-Coordinator (CDM-C) at a very early stage and subsequently appoint a Principal Contractor (PC);
    • check your arrangements for managing the project and those of all others and;
    • maintain and review those management arrangements throughout the project.

    Remember, without other appointments the project client is the default CDM-C and PC with the commensurate CDM duties.

    Background Information: provide the defined pre-construction information to the CDM-C and others, including details from any relevant existing health and safety file.

    Competence: implement procedures to check the CDM competence of all those engaged or appointed. Also, clients must coordinate with others whilst giving and seeking their cooperation to enable compliance with their duties.

    Deadlines: allow time for contractor planning and preparation and be satisifed about the project safety plan before work starts on site.

    • specify the minimum time before the construction phase, allowed to appointed contractors, to plan and prepare for the construction work and;
    • take steps to ensure the construction phase does not start until welfare facilities and a compliant construction phase plan are in place.

    Conclusions

    These are the clear legal requirements placed on constuction project clients. The good news is that clients must appoint a CDM-C whose duty it is to advise and assist the client on all these matters. 

    An authoritative and active CDM-C will add value to a project and provide the client with an ‘insurance policy’ against financial, reputational and legal risks.  

    Positive action on the ADC&D of client duties can produce the improved well being of construction workers; a better quality product; reduced costs and more timely delivery of the project.

    It will also have the advantage of keeping the client organisation and directors out of the Crown Court.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    REVERSING TELEHANDLER CAUSED SITE DEATH

    Principal Contractor and contractor held jointly responsible

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th May 2017

    PLANNING AND DESIGN ERRORS BEHIND FOUR DEATHS

    Prison sentence and fines follow steel cage collapse tragedy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th May 2017

    FAILED HSE SITE INSPECTION ENDS IN COURT

    Injury not required for accountability over poor safety standards

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th May 2017

    RISK ASSESSMENT BREACH PROMPTS £400,000 FINE

    Fatality revealed assessment was not suitable and sufficient

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th May 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 24th MAY 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 24th May 2017

    LACK OF SAFE PLATFORMS FOR WORK ON CRANE

    Major crane hire company erred on work at height precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    SECOND CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER CASE IN WEEK

    Double fatality represented pattern of serious neglect

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    DIRECTORS JAILED AND FIRM FINED FOR MANSLAUGHTER

    Client paid £100,000 less than economic cost for roof work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    SOLAR PANEL FIRM AND DIRECTOR IN COURT

    Ineffective use of fall arrest no substitute for proper precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    FIRM FAILED TO SECURE COMPETENT ASSISTANCE

    Court holds manager to account over inaction on risk management

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd May 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 17th MAY 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 10th MAY 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th May 2017

    GROUND WORKER TRAPPED BY EXCAVATION COLLAPSE

    Fellow workers dug earth so injured workman could breath

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th May 2017

    MAJOR UK FIRMS FAILED ON VEHICLE MANAGEMENT

    Worker struck and injured when towed trolley and load overturned

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th May 2017

    MAGISTRATES FINE FIRM £250,000 OVER ROOF FALL

    Solar panel firm failed to control risk and supervise works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th May 2017

    HSE REFURBISHMENT CAMPAIGN ENDS £750,000 FINE

    Contractor fined under CDM after failing to act on asbestos survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2017

    SITE MANAGER JAILED OVER DEATH OF PASSER-BY

    Failure to secure windows led to death and manslaughter sentence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th May 2017

    ROGUE GAS FITTER JAILED FOR 16 MONTHS

    Work unsafe and exposed home residents at risk of harm

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    LADDER ASSOCIATION ISSUES NEW SAFETY GUIDANCE

    Guidance comes amidst concerns surrounding unsafe telescopic ladders

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    FATALITY: FALL ON NEW HOMES PROJECT

    Workman died falling from a ladder on construction project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    FIRM ADMITS GUILT AFTER DEATH OF FOUR WORKMEN

    Guilty plea entered by company on first day of Crown Court trial

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    FIRM FINED £2 MILLION OVER WORKPLACE DEATH

    Unsafe stacking of plastic bales claimed life of cleaner

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 1st MAY 2017

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    CONCRETE STAIRCASE CAUSED FATAL CRUSHING

    Lifting operations were unsafe and poorly supervised on project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017

    CALL TO HALT FALL IN HSE FRONT LINE INSPECTORS

    Union reveals 25% cut and increasing delay in concluding investigations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd May 2017
    Turner Access Chipmunk Data
    Total Access Higher Safety
  • 4 Responses to “THE ABC&D OF CLIENT CDM DUTIES”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] done to spread understanding across industry generally (they reported that two thirds of occasional clients are unaware of CDM 2007, for example). This matches the main findings of the Frontline research […]

    2. HSE REVISITS UNSUCCESSFUL STRATEGY FOR SMALLER PROJECTS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] It will be very surprising if CONIAC members do not call for an approach which places the client for smaller projects at the heart of the […]

    3. HEFTY COST FOR THREE WEEKS OF CONTRACTOR FAILURE | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] client for such work has clear duties to select competent contractors and make arrangements for managing the project which ensure the […]

    4. CLIENT GUIDANCE | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] ABC&D of Client CDM duties – PPCS […]