• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    THE ABC&D OF CLIENT CDM DUTIES

    CDM clients must wake up and smell the coffee in 2010

    Philip Poynter has argued for a return to basics in considering CDM 2007 duties using the ABC&D format to explain the essence of Coordinator Duties and Designers Duties.

    He now goes on to examine the role of the client through the ABC&D of Client Duties under CDM 2007. 

     

    Client must take control under CDM 2007

    A central aim of CDM 2007 was to place clients at the heart of construction project safety.

    Many perceptive and forward thinking clients have taken up the challenge and now proactively drive forward a positive project H&S culture and high quality safety management processes.

    However, such clients are still out numbered by clients big/small/public/private who have yet to wake up and smell the coffee. CDM 2007 provides a framework for managing human risks effectively and in the same way other aspects of a business are handled.

    There is also now no choice in the matter. The project client has a strict duty to check, maintain and review project management arrangements throughout the life of the project.

    This was a significant departure from the requirements under CDM 94, yet many clients do not fully understand what is required and the consequences of failing to act. 

    Financial, reputational and legal risk

    It is likely that 2010 will see the first sentencing of a company under the Corporate Manslaughter Act 2007 (CMCH Act). The case will involve a smaller contracting organisation.

    We can also expect during the next 2-3 years that Police and HSE will conclude investigations where larger client organisations are prosecuted under the CMCH Act with significant financial and reputational damage.

    In addition, over the same period there is likely to be an increasing number of client prosecutions under CDM 2007 as regulators increase enforcement of client duties and cases proceed through the judicial system.

    Finally, the Government is shortly due to respond to the recent Inquiry into Construction Fatalities. The Inquiry report called for additional legal duties on directors including those in client organisations. 

    So, what should clients, large and small, do to avoid these risks and meet their legal obligations?

    Once again, it is simple as ABC&D.

    ABC&D of Client duties

    Appointments and Arrangements: make the required statutory appointments and project management arrangements. 

    • appoint a project CDM-Coordinator (CDM-C) at a very early stage and subsequently appoint a Principal Contractor (PC);
    • check your arrangements for managing the project and those of all others and;
    • maintain and review those management arrangements throughout the project.

    Remember, without other appointments the project client is the default CDM-C and PC with the commensurate CDM duties.

    Background Information: provide the defined pre-construction information to the CDM-C and others, including details from any relevant existing health and safety file.

    Competence: implement procedures to check the CDM competence of all those engaged or appointed. Also, clients must coordinate with others whilst giving and seeking their cooperation to enable compliance with their duties.

    Deadlines: allow time for contractor planning and preparation and be satisifed about the project safety plan before work starts on site.

    • specify the minimum time before the construction phase, allowed to appointed contractors, to plan and prepare for the construction work and;
    • take steps to ensure the construction phase does not start until welfare facilities and a compliant construction phase plan are in place.

    Conclusions

    These are the clear legal requirements placed on constuction project clients. The good news is that clients must appoint a CDM-C whose duty it is to advise and assist the client on all these matters. 

    An authoritative and active CDM-C will add value to a project and provide the client with an ‘insurance policy’ against financial, reputational and legal risks.  

    Positive action on the ADC&D of client duties can produce the improved well being of construction workers; a better quality product; reduced costs and more timely delivery of the project.

    It will also have the advantage of keeping the client organisation and directors out of the Crown Court.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    CONTRACTS MANAGER HANDED TWO YEAR PRISON TERM

    Safety fall arrest netting would have saved life of deceased workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    WORKER FATALLY INJURED BY CONCRETE BEAM

    Lifting operation not properly planned, managed and supervised

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    TREE FELLING OPERATIONS LACKED DEFINED COMMS

    Workman struck by falling tree inside “normal” exclusion zone

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CONTRACTOR ARRESTED OVER WELFARE FAILINGS

    Recalcitrant sole trader failed to attend court hearing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    MAJOR DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR FINED £500,000

    Collapse of concrete slab caused death of worker and excavator fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FALL FROM LADDER WHILST CARRYING BUCKET

    Contractor failed to provide basic safe lifting aids

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH HSE NOTICE PROVES COSTLY

    Director given suspended jail term and company fined £60,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    DEVELOPER FAILED TO PLAN AND CHECK COMPETENCE

    Fall caused by ad-hoc working methods and lack of monitoring

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CYLINDER LEAK TEST CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Corrosion inhibitor triggered failure and shrapnel ejection

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FESTIVE GREETINGS TO ALL OUR READERS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th December 2019

    JAIL TERM FOLLOWS ROUTINE HSE SPOT CHECK

    Director of a roofing firm handed a suspended prison sentence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    TEENAGER FELL 3M DURING BLOCK AND BEAM WORK

    Workers uninstructed and left to devise own safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    PARCEL CARRIER FINED HEAVILY OVER FLT INCIDENT

    Reversing fork lift lacked segregation from pedestrians

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FLOOR OPENING FALL

    Thorough risk assessment and edge protection were both inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    THREE WORKERS “CARRIED ALONG” IN SEWER INCIDENT

    Mentally affected and one man treated for long-term traumatic stress

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2019

    SOLAR FIRM AND DIRECTOR SENTENCED OVER DEATH

    Brother of business owner died in fall during panel installation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    DIRECTOR AND COMPANY FINED FOR ASBESTOS RISK

    HSE refurbishment campaign inspection revealed asbestos offences

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    BULK BAG COLLAPSE CAUSED BY UNSAFE STACKING

    Bulk bag collapsed onto workman when struck by fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    INTERLOCKED GUARD NOT WORKING TO ISOLATE POWER

    Two workmen seriously injured when plant started unexpectedly

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    STREET FURNITURE RISK TO PUBLIC FINED £1.4M

    Council prosecuted following injury to child playing on hinged bollard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    WORKMEN SUFFER SERIOUS BURNS FROM CABLE STRIKE

    Assessment and system of work failed to appreciate electrical risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th November 2019

    LADDERS WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR WORK ON ROOF

    Workman paralysed after falling whilst installing roof ladder

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO MANAGE EXHAUST VENTILATION

    HSE enforcement notices on wood dust and welding fume ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th November 2019

    RECALCITRANT DIRECTOR BARRED FROM OFFICE

    Dangerous telehandler used despite earlier fatality and enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019

    DIRECTOR HID UNSAFE WORKING PRACTICES FROM HSE

    Workers exposed to sprayed paints containing asthma causing isocyantes

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    4 Responses to “THE ABC&D OF CLIENT CDM DUTIES”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] done to spread understanding across industry generally (they reported that two thirds of occasional clients are unaware of CDM 2007, for example). This matches the main findings of the Frontline research […]

    2. HSE REVISITS UNSUCCESSFUL STRATEGY FOR SMALLER PROJECTS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] It will be very surprising if CONIAC members do not call for an approach which places the client for smaller projects at the heart of the […]

    3. HEFTY COST FOR THREE WEEKS OF CONTRACTOR FAILURE | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] client for such work has clear duties to select competent contractors and make arrangements for managing the project which ensure the […]

    4. CLIENT GUIDANCE | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] ABC&D of Client CDM duties – PPCS […]