Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    THE ADC&D OF CDM DESIGNER DUTIES

    Justice, Certainty, Process and Substance

    Last month Philip Poynter argued for a return to basics in considering CDM duties and examined the ABC&D of CDM Coordinator Duties.

    This month he looks at designer duties under CDM 2007. 

     Justice or Certainty?

    HSE has been quiet of late regarding the duties of designers under CDM. This could be about to change as three Designer Awareness Days (DADs) have just been announced for the East of England.

    What are the core duties of designers under CDM 2007?

    Some argue that CDM designers duties are so general and qualified as to be either unenforceable, or a alternatively, a legal minefield for the innocent.

    For example, whether enough has been done in designing to avoid risk so far as is reasonably practicable (a key designer duty) is a matter of judgement. The design practice, HSE and the courts may all take different views on what is ‘reasonably practicable’ or what is allowed in ‘taking due account of other relevant design considerations’.

    This state of uncertainty always existed, even in the halcyon days of the highly specific Construction Regulations (Working Places) Regulations 1966. Calls now for a return to more specific regulation may well fall on deaf ears.

    Also, be careful what you wish for. Specific and absolute law provides certainty but may hinder justice.

    General and qualified law produces uncertainty for duty holders but can also obstruct over-zealous regulators attempts to prove non-compliance.

    Process or Substance?

    So how should designers get to grips with CDM 2007?

    Firstly, remember that process is just as important as substance.

    It is much easier for regulators to prove a lack of process to secure compliance than it is to prove that not enough was done in substance. We can always do a little more.

    So, the key actions required by designers to make a valuable contribution to H&S whilst at the same time protecting their self-interest are:

    • Understand what the law requires;
    • Establish your own clear processes to meet each requirement;
    • Check regularly that the processes are being followed and;
    • Change the process if it is broken.

    Designer Duties

    What does this mean for designers? Once again, designer duties are really as simple as A, B, C & D. 

    Awareness: assess client awareness of CDM 2007 duties. If your client is not aware of his duties under CDM no design work is permitted;

    Background: consider the pre-construction information provided by the client / CDM-C and use it to inform the design;

    C’s X Three: check and ensure your own corporate and individual CDM competence and take positive steps to coordinate and cooperate with others and;

    Design: to avoid risk by eliminating hazards, reducing risk from remaining hazards and providing sufficient information about the design or its construction / maintenance as will assist others to comply with their duties.

    Conclusion

    Design practices with sound processes in place to cover these four elements will not go far wrong in law and will also add value to the project.

    Clients will increasingly look for evidence of design organisation competence under CDM 2007. 

    HSE will step up their early interventions with designers and ‘track back’ to design organisations following incidents during the construction phase. Remember, there is no choice in the matter so it is better to be proactive. 

    A visit from the Police / HSE investigating a project fatality and exploring the role of the design organisation is not the time to be considering if you have done enough.

    Use the detailed guidance in the CDM Approved Code and HSE Designer FAQs to help craft your processes but do not lose sight of the essential A, B , C & D of designer CDM duties.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE SAFETY ALERT: TOWER CRANE BRAKES

    Collapse of tower crane jib in high winds prompts HSE warning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2018

    VISITING ENGINEER CRUSHED BY SCAFFOLD TUBES

    Principal contractor “signed off” contractor storage arrangements

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2018

    CONCRETE EJECTED BY PUMPING UNIT CLAIMED LIFE

    Company and director failed to train and supervise pumping operations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th December 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 5th DEC 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th December 2018

    REFRESHED GUIDANCE ON FITNESS TO OPERATE PLANT

    Construction plant medical fitness Good Practice Guide

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th December 2018

    MAJOR CONTRACTOR & LUL USED UNSAFE SYSTEM

    Work method to eliminate moving vehicle hazard not adopted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th December 2018

    OVERTURNING LORRY CAUSED DEATH OF DRIVER

    Groundworks project stockpiling arrangements not properly managed

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd December 2018

    FORTH BRIDGE LIFTING OPERATION NOT PLANNED

    Major project PC failed to plan, supervise and carry out lift safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd December 2018

    DEVELOPER FAILED ON ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

    HSE inspection revealed refurb works without asbestos survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    POST DRIVER HAMMER CRUSHED HAND OF WORKMAN

    Unsafe system of work for vehicle crash barrier installation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    WORKER FELL FROM LOFT THROUGH CEILING

    Major house builder lacked understanding of loft fragile surfaces risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    NEW SITE DUMPER SAFETY GUIDANCE ISSUED

    Construction plant sector concerns prompts CPA consults on draft

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    CCTV INSTALLER FELL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT

    Contractor failed to properly plan and control the risks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    VISITOR DIED FALLING INTO CONCEALED BASEMENT

    Contractor failed to protect basement void on domestic project

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2018

    RACKING FALL REVEALED UNSAFE SYSTEM OF WORK

    European firm fined £300,000 after UK sub-contractor employee fell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    FAILURE TO ACT ON VIBRATION AND SILICA HAZARDS

    Worker health put at risk during stripping of furnace lining

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    MAJOR FM FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN BACK-UP POWER

    Power loss at laboratory site created potential risk from biological agents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th November 2018

    IGNORING HSE PROHIBITIONS COST FIRM £250,000

    CDM 2015 and work at height requirements repeatedly breached

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th November 2018

    ROOF COLLAPSED UNDER EXCESS LOADING

    Director and company fined over roof design failures

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th November 2018

    FORK LIFT OVERTURNED IN SCAFFOLDING YARD

    Untrained operator suffered life changing crush injuries

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th November 2018

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY ALERT: EFFECTS OF SCALE

    SCOSS issues alert after concerns disclosed over ‘large structures’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    ASBESTOS EXPOSED BY UNTRAINED WORKERS

    Contractor failed to act properly despite HSE intervention

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    GAS MAIN STRIKE REPAIR CAUSED SEVERE BURNS

    Contractor excavator damage to gas pipe ends in £1.2m fine

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    REBAR FELL FROM FLT IN UNSAFE LIFTING OPERATION

    Multiple fractures caused by inappropriate use of fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th November 2018

    POORLY PLANNED LIFT DISMANTLE INJURED WORKMAN

    Counterweight or suspension rope struck worker in lift shaft

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st November 2018
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    2 Responses to “THE ADC&D OF CDM DESIGNER DUTIES”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] The role of designers in the influencing of health and safety outcomes has improved under CDM 2007 compared with CDM […]

    2. CIVIL ENGINEERS EXPRESS CONCERNS OVER CDM 2007 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] everyone of how the requirement of ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ should be applied to design in a project […]