Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    THE ADC&D OF CDM DESIGNER DUTIES

    Justice, Certainty, Process and Substance

    Last month Philip Poynter argued for a return to basics in considering CDM duties and examined the ABC&D of CDM Coordinator Duties.

    This month he looks at designer duties under CDM 2007. 

     Justice or Certainty?

    HSE has been quiet of late regarding the duties of designers under CDM. This could be about to change as three Designer Awareness Days (DADs) have just been announced for the East of England.

    What are the core duties of designers under CDM 2007?

    Some argue that CDM designers duties are so general and qualified as to be either unenforceable, or a alternatively, a legal minefield for the innocent.

    For example, whether enough has been done in designing to avoid risk so far as is reasonably practicable (a key designer duty) is a matter of judgement. The design practice, HSE and the courts may all take different views on what is ‘reasonably practicable’ or what is allowed in ‘taking due account of other relevant design considerations’.

    This state of uncertainty always existed, even in the halcyon days of the highly specific Construction Regulations (Working Places) Regulations 1966. Calls now for a return to more specific regulation may well fall on deaf ears.

    Also, be careful what you wish for. Specific and absolute law provides certainty but may hinder justice.

    General and qualified law produces uncertainty for duty holders but can also obstruct over-zealous regulators attempts to prove non-compliance.

    Process or Substance?

    So how should designers get to grips with CDM 2007?

    Firstly, remember that process is just as important as substance.

    It is much easier for regulators to prove a lack of process to secure compliance than it is to prove that not enough was done in substance. We can always do a little more.

    So, the key actions required by designers to make a valuable contribution to H&S whilst at the same time protecting their self-interest are:

    • Understand what the law requires;
    • Establish your own clear processes to meet each requirement;
    • Check regularly that the processes are being followed and;
    • Change the process if it is broken.

    Designer Duties

    What does this mean for designers? Once again, designer duties are really as simple as A, B, C & D. 

    Awareness: assess client awareness of CDM 2007 duties. If your client is not aware of his duties under CDM no design work is permitted;

    Background: consider the pre-construction information provided by the client / CDM-C and use it to inform the design;

    C’s X Three: check and ensure your own corporate and individual CDM competence and take positive steps to coordinate and cooperate with others and;

    Design: to avoid risk by eliminating hazards, reducing risk from remaining hazards and providing sufficient information about the design or its construction / maintenance as will assist others to comply with their duties.

    Conclusion

    Design practices with sound processes in place to cover these four elements will not go far wrong in law and will also add value to the project.

    Clients will increasingly look for evidence of design organisation competence under CDM 2007. 

    HSE will step up their early interventions with designers and ‘track back’ to design organisations following incidents during the construction phase. Remember, there is no choice in the matter so it is better to be proactive. 

    A visit from the Police / HSE investigating a project fatality and exploring the role of the design organisation is not the time to be considering if you have done enough.

    Use the detailed guidance in the CDM Approved Code and HSE Designer FAQs to help craft your processes but do not lose sight of the essential A, B , C & D of designer CDM duties.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE UPDATE 17th APRIL 2019

    hselogo1Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th April 2019

    TWO BRICKLAYERS INJURED IN FLOOR COLLAPSE

    Joist hangers incorrectly installed and floor overloaded with blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    FIRM FINED £150K AFTER BOY FELL FROM SCAFFOLD

    Ladder guard failed to prevent 12-year old accessing scaffolding

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    SAFETYCAM VEHICLE TRAPS ERRANT DRIVERS

    Safer Highways reports on new approaches to roadworks health and safety

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    NEW PRE-QUAL SYSTEM LAUNCHED BY MAJOR PLAYERS

    Build UK and CECA publish common PQ assessment standard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    REPORT CONFIRMS RISING COST OF OFFENDING

    Considerable increases in fines imposed on larger organisations

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th April 2019

    CONCRETE BLOCK MAKER FAILED TO GUARD MACHINE

    Effective safety precautions absent for a number of years

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th April 2019

    HOTEL REFURBISHMENT DISTURBED ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to act on well-founded asbestos concerns expressed by employee

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    CABLE HIT CAUSED BY LACK OF PLANS AND DETECTION

    Excavation for sign erection struck live electrical cable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    HSE AND THE ‘SECRETS’ OF RISK ASSESSMENT

    hselogo1Regulator advice on successful risk assessment comes at a price

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    WORKMAN FELL INTO CAR PARK VENTILATION SHAFT

    Protective grill unsecured and gave way under movement of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    BUILDER GIVEN PRISON TERM OVER WORK AT HEIGHT

    Unsafe working platforms and lack of silica dust control punished severely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    HSE WARNING ON SAFE DEMO AND REFURBISHMENT

    TV programme prompts stability guidance for demo & refurb project teams

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st April 2019

    VIBRATION RISK UNCONTROLLED FOR TEN YEARS

    Company workers used sanders and air-fed cutting equipment

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th March 2019

    BUILDING OCCUPIER FINED £1.8M OVER ROOF FALL

    Two workmen fell 4m through rooflight during leak investigation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th March 2019

    CONSTRUCTION SITE DEATHS SET TO FALL?

    HSE in-year fatality records for 2018/19 suggest significant reduction

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd March 2019

    BRICKLAYER FATALLY INJURED BY FALLING WALL

    Masonry collapsed during concrete back filling operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    BASIC LADDER SAFETY FAILURES FINED £150,000

    Repair and maintenance firm had no excuse for errors causing injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    HSE ISSUES REMINDER ON SAFE SCAFFOLD DESIGN

    Recent incidents and high winds prompt warning from regulator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    LORRY DRIVER DIED IN OVERHEAD POWER STRIKE

    Major company failed to communicate precautions to grab arm operator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    ASSESSMENT SHOWED RISK – PRECAUTIONS NOT TAKEN

    Workman seriously injured when falling into open unguarded stairwell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st March 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FAILED TO IMPLEMENT SAFE SYSTEM

    Procedures for safe plant refuelling failed to prevent death of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    CLIENT PROSECUTED OVER CONTRACTOR FATAL FALL

    Company breached duty to protect contractors as well as employees

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    FOURTEEN YEAR FAILURE TO MANAGE ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to implement asbestos management plan following survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th February 2019

    CHILD INJURED BY WALL COLLAPSE INCIDENT

    Council failed to carry out “intelligence led” condition inspections

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    2 Responses to “THE ADC&D OF CDM DESIGNER DUTIES”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] The role of designers in the influencing of health and safety outcomes has improved under CDM 2007 compared with CDM […]

    2. CIVIL ENGINEERS EXPRESS CONCERNS OVER CDM 2007 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] everyone of how the requirement of ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ should be applied to design in a project […]