Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    THE ADC&D OF CDM DESIGNER DUTIES

    Justice, Certainty, Process and Substance

    Last month Philip Poynter argued for a return to basics in considering CDM duties and examined the ABC&D of CDM Coordinator Duties.

    This month he looks at designer duties under CDM 2007. 

     Justice or Certainty?

    HSE has been quiet of late regarding the duties of designers under CDM. This could be about to change as three Designer Awareness Days (DADs) have just been announced for the East of England.

    What are the core duties of designers under CDM 2007?

    Some argue that CDM designers duties are so general and qualified as to be either unenforceable, or a alternatively, a legal minefield for the innocent.

    For example, whether enough has been done in designing to avoid risk so far as is reasonably practicable (a key designer duty) is a matter of judgement. The design practice, HSE and the courts may all take different views on what is ‘reasonably practicable’ or what is allowed in ‘taking due account of other relevant design considerations’.

    This state of uncertainty always existed, even in the halcyon days of the highly specific Construction Regulations (Working Places) Regulations 1966. Calls now for a return to more specific regulation may well fall on deaf ears.

    Also, be careful what you wish for. Specific and absolute law provides certainty but may hinder justice.

    General and qualified law produces uncertainty for duty holders but can also obstruct over-zealous regulators attempts to prove non-compliance.

    Process or Substance?

    So how should designers get to grips with CDM 2007?

    Firstly, remember that process is just as important as substance.

    It is much easier for regulators to prove a lack of process to secure compliance than it is to prove that not enough was done in substance. We can always do a little more.

    So, the key actions required by designers to make a valuable contribution to H&S whilst at the same time protecting their self-interest are:

    • Understand what the law requires;
    • Establish your own clear processes to meet each requirement;
    • Check regularly that the processes are being followed and;
    • Change the process if it is broken.

    Designer Duties

    What does this mean for designers? Once again, designer duties are really as simple as A, B, C & D. 

    Awareness: assess client awareness of CDM 2007 duties. If your client is not aware of his duties under CDM no design work is permitted;

    Background: consider the pre-construction information provided by the client / CDM-C and use it to inform the design;

    C’s X Three: check and ensure your own corporate and individual CDM competence and take positive steps to coordinate and cooperate with others and;

    Design: to avoid risk by eliminating hazards, reducing risk from remaining hazards and providing sufficient information about the design or its construction / maintenance as will assist others to comply with their duties.

    Conclusion

    Design practices with sound processes in place to cover these four elements will not go far wrong in law and will also add value to the project.

    Clients will increasingly look for evidence of design organisation competence under CDM 2007. 

    HSE will step up their early interventions with designers and ‘track back’ to design organisations following incidents during the construction phase. Remember, there is no choice in the matter so it is better to be proactive. 

    A visit from the Police / HSE investigating a project fatality and exploring the role of the design organisation is not the time to be considering if you have done enough.

    Use the detailed guidance in the CDM Approved Code and HSE Designer FAQs to help craft your processes but do not lose sight of the essential A, B , C & D of designer CDM duties.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    FLAT ROOF FAILED UNDER WEIGHT OF WORKMAN

    Confusion over fragility proves costly for worker and business

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    PROPERTY FIRM FINED OVER FATAL FALL FROM TREE

    Untrained workers using chain saw engaged to fell large sycamore

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    LANDLORD PUT PUBLIC AT RISK FROM ASBESTOS

    Powered jet washing of asbestos cement sheets caused spread

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    WORKMAN FELL FROM SUSPENDED ACCESS EQUIPMENT

    Health Board and maintenance firm director prosecuted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    CONSIDERING TEMP WORKS IN PERMANENT DESIGN

    Useful overview for civil and structural engineers on contemporary practice

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO COMPLY WITH SITE WELFARE NOTICE

    Basic welfare requirements found wanting for second time

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    PRISON TERM OVER POORLY GUARDED CIRCULAR SAW

    Workman lost three fingers using machine without guard and riving knife

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    COMPANY IGNORED HSE ON SILICA DUST ACTION

    Worktop manufacturer failed to control dust and manage ventilation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd July 2019

    ASBESTOS REMOVED WITHOUT SURVEY OR CONTROLS

    Client fined over failure to commission refurb and demo survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th July 2019

    ‘VICTORIAN’ SAFETY AND FATIGUE BEHIND RAIL DEATH

    Investigation report links zero hours contracts to hazardous fatigue

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th July 2019

    MPS EXAMINE CONSTRUCTION RESPIRATORY HEALTH

    Parliamentary group calls for evidence on the impact of worker silicosis

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th July 2019

    UNSAFE LIFTING OPERATION TRAPPED WORKMAN

    Sling failure and inadequate lifting plan resulted in leg amputation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th July 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2019

    TIMBER FRAME FIRM FAILED ON FIRE AND FALLING

    House builder fined after routine HSE site inspection

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO ACT ON SILICA DUST RISK

    Cutting of paving flags exposed workers to respirable crystalline silica

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2019

    POST GRENFELL BUILDING SAFETY SYSTEM REVIEW

    Structural safety body seek support for key reporting role

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2019

    OVERCOME BY CUTTING IN CONFINED SPACE

    Construction worker suffered carbon monoxide poisoning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th July 2019

    APPRENTICE OVERCOME BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR

    Stripping operations lacked ventilation controls, RPE and training

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th July 2019

    DEBRIS FROM DEMOLITION SITE NOT RESTRAINED

    Loss assessor on adjacent property injured by stray waste

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th July 2019

    WORKMAN FELL FROM UNGUARDED FLAT ROOF

    Basic work at height management systems and training absent

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 8th July 2019

    CONSTRUCTION FATALITIES FALL TO RECORD LOW

    hselogo1HSE release final annual workplace fatality figures 2018/19

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd July 2019

    FEMALE WORKER SCALPED AND BADLY INJURED

    Wood product manufacturer fined £466,000 over rotating shaft danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2019

    TOWER SCAFFOLD FALL CAUSED LONG-TERM DAMAGE

    Principal Contractor director and two firms sentenced after worker fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2019

    MISSING PEDESTRIAN BARRIER TRIGGERED DEATH

    Workman walked from building into path of moving lorry

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th June 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    2 Responses to “THE ADC&D OF CDM DESIGNER DUTIES”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] The role of designers in the influencing of health and safety outcomes has improved under CDM 2007 compared with CDM […]

    2. CIVIL ENGINEERS EXPRESS CONCERNS OVER CDM 2007 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] everyone of how the requirement of ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ should be applied to design in a project […]