Turner Access Higher Safety Total Access
Total Access Ethentic Chipmunk Data
Chipmunk Data Turner Access Ethentic

THE ADC&D OF CDM DESIGNER DUTIES

Justice, Certainty, Process and Substance

Last month Philip Poynter argued for a return to basics in considering CDM duties and examined the ABC&D of CDM Coordinator Duties.

This month he looks at designer duties under CDM 2007. 

 Justice or Certainty?

HSE has been quiet of late regarding the duties of designers under CDM. This could be about to change as three Designer Awareness Days (DADs) have just been announced for the East of England.

What are the core duties of designers under CDM 2007?

Some argue that CDM designers duties are so general and qualified as to be either unenforceable, or a alternatively, a legal minefield for the innocent.

For example, whether enough has been done in designing to avoid risk so far as is reasonably practicable (a key designer duty) is a matter of judgement. The design practice, HSE and the courts may all take different views on what is ‘reasonably practicable’ or what is allowed in ‘taking due account of other relevant design considerations’.

This state of uncertainty always existed, even in the halcyon days of the highly specific Construction Regulations (Working Places) Regulations 1966. Calls now for a return to more specific regulation may well fall on deaf ears.

Also, be careful what you wish for. Specific and absolute law provides certainty but may hinder justice.

General and qualified law produces uncertainty for duty holders but can also obstruct over-zealous regulators attempts to prove non-compliance.

Process or Substance?

So how should designers get to grips with CDM 2007?

Firstly, remember that process is just as important as substance.

It is much easier for regulators to prove a lack of process to secure compliance than it is to prove that not enough was done in substance. We can always do a little more.

So, the key actions required by designers to make a valuable contribution to H&S whilst at the same time protecting their self-interest are:

  • Understand what the law requires;
  • Establish your own clear processes to meet each requirement;
  • Check regularly that the processes are being followed and;
  • Change the process if it is broken.

Designer Duties

What does this mean for designers? Once again, designer duties are really as simple as A, B, C & D. 

Awareness: assess client awareness of CDM 2007 duties. If your client is not aware of his duties under CDM no design work is permitted;

Background: consider the pre-construction information provided by the client / CDM-C and use it to inform the design;

C’s X Three: check and ensure your own corporate and individual CDM competence and take positive steps to coordinate and cooperate with others and;

Design: to avoid risk by eliminating hazards, reducing risk from remaining hazards and providing sufficient information about the design or its construction / maintenance as will assist others to comply with their duties.

Conclusion

Design practices with sound processes in place to cover these four elements will not go far wrong in law and will also add value to the project.

Clients will increasingly look for evidence of design organisation competence under CDM 2007. 

HSE will step up their early interventions with designers and ‘track back’ to design organisations following incidents during the construction phase. Remember, there is no choice in the matter so it is better to be proactive. 

A visit from the Police / HSE investigating a project fatality and exploring the role of the design organisation is not the time to be considering if you have done enough.

Use the detailed guidance in the CDM Approved Code and HSE Designer FAQs to help craft your processes but do not lose sight of the essential A, B , C & D of designer CDM duties.

Latest Construction Health and Safety News

ROPE ACCESS WORKER FELL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOF

Prison sentence imposed on owner of rope access firm

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 24th April 2018

FIRMS FINED £2M OVER FALLING PIPE FATALITY

Incorrect stacking of pipes triggered fall and crushing of workman

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th April 2018

DOMESTIC PROJECT PC HANDED JAIL TERM

Workman fell from unprotected roof edge on dormer extension

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 20th April 2018

MAJOR CONTRACTOR ERRED ON FRAGILE ROOF RISK

Firms fine £965,000 after painter fell through waiting room roof

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 19th APRIL 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 19th April 2018

STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 18th April 2018

NEW BIM SPEC FOR SHARING H&S INFORMATION

Specification for sharing health and safety info during construction projects

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

MANAGERS FORGED ASBESTOS DOCUMENTATION

Removal licence obtained using fake training and medical certificates

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

FINE OVER INCORRECT AND MISLEADING SURVEY

Specialist asbestos company failed to detect AIB on demolition project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

IGNORING HSE ADVICE PENALISED BY LARGE FINE

Contractor fined over £50k for persistent WAH and welfare failings

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

PRISON OVER BASEMENT EXCAVATION AND COLLAPSE

Building contractor jailed after house collapsed in Brighton

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

DEFEATING POWER INTERLOCK CAUSED FLASHOVER

Systems for managing electrical safety found to be inadequate

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 17th April 2018

LADDER SAFETY FAILURES ATTRACT MASSIVE FINE

National window firm left workers to ‘own devices’

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 12th April 2018

FALLING MATERIAL STRUCK WORKMAN IN EXCAVATION

Risks of working in and near excavations highlighted by incident

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 4th APRIL 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 4th April 2018

HOUSING ASSOCIATION FAILED ON VIBRATION RISK

Assessment, management and health surveillance all found wanting

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

OCCUPIER AND CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FALL

Employee assisting contractor fell through roof during re-roofing project

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

HSE FEARFUL OF GROWING ’BLUE TAPE’ BURDEN

hselogo1ISO 45001 could generate fresh business to business demands

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 3rd April 2018

HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 21st MAR 2018

hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices weekly update and analysis

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th March 2018

INCIDENTS: PASSER-BY STRUCK BY BRICKS

Pack of bricks appear to have fallen from crane

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 28th March 2018

HSE RECONSIDER HOW TO INFLUENCE SMALLER FIRMS

hselogo1Regulator advice and messages are failing to chime with the SME businesses

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

DANGEROUS REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS CEMENT

Workers smashed asbestos sheets with crowbars whilst at risk of falling

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

HSE LAUNCH CONIAN SHARING AND SUPPORT PLATFORM

hselogo1New HSE web community now open to the public

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

FIRM FAILING ON HAVS SURVEILLANCE FINED £50,000

Door manufacturer failed to manage sanding and buffing tool vibration

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 27th March 2018

PRE-CAST FIRM FINED OVER FINGER AMPUTATION

Lack of guarding and training triggered table saw injury

Read the rest of this article »

Posted on 26th March 2018
Turner Access Chipmunk Data
Total Access Ethentic
Higher Safety Turner Access

2 Responses to “THE ADC&D OF CDM DESIGNER DUTIES”

  1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH FINDINGS | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

    […] The role of designers in the influencing of health and safety outcomes has improved under CDM 2007 compared with CDM […]

  2. CIVIL ENGINEERS EXPRESS CONCERNS OVER CDM 2007 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

    […] everyone of how the requirement of ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ should be applied to design in a project […]