Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    THE ABC&D OF CDM-COORDINATOR DUTIES

    Time for CDM Coordinators to go on the front foot in 2010?

     

    In this article Philip Poynter considers the role of the CDM Coordinator and argues there is a need for greater focus on what the law requires and a more positive and confident approach from those accepting a CDM-C appointment.

    Doubt over role and value of CDM-C

    I recently attended an Association for Project Safety (APS) meeting and listened to the views of a designer/engineer on the CDM Regulations.

    The APS is “a body for those who operate in, or have an interest in, health and safety risk management in the construction industry”.

    Many organisations and individuals providing CDM Coordination services are APS members

    This was not just any designer. He had been involved in a project on which a fatal accident had occurred and was unsuccessfully prosecuted for alleged failures under CDM 94.

    The case for prosecution was halted on the first day of the trial and the designer acquitted of any wrongdoing. Despite his innocence the whole affair had an enormous impact on his life.

    He was sceptical about the value the CDM Regulations and the role of the Coordinator. I was surprised at the muted reaction.

    Lack of confidence

    I detect a lack of confidence among CDM-C’s regarding their role.

    Are the requirements of CDM 2007 all too complicated and vague for everyone?

    Has “Russian Doll Regulation’ (a simple hard core of law surrounded by layers of ACOP/Guidance) caused doubt and confusion rather than certainty?

    Do clients, designers and contractors lack understanding of the CDM-C duties and the legal/practical consequences for all if they are not carried out effectively?

    So, what are the essential elements of the CDM-C role?

    What the law requires

    I suggest we go back to basics and look at what the law requires. Greater clarity on what is required should help boost CDM-C confidence, whatever level of apathy or hostility is exibited by clients, designers and contractors.

     The CDM-C must act on four fronts. The ABC&D of CDM Coordination. These are

    • Advice and Assistance
    • Background Information
    • Coordination and Cooperation
    • Designer Compliance

    Advice and Assistance: give suitable and sufficient advice and assistance to the client on undertaking the measures the client needs to take to comply with CDM 2007.

     This includes advising and assisting the client on the: suitability of his management arrangements for the project (and those of others) and the maintenance and review of these throughout the project; assessment of designer and contractor competence and; adequacy of the principal contractor construction phase plan and welfare facilities.

    These are demanding duties on any project.

    Background Information: take all reasonable steps to identify and collect the ‘pre-construction information’ and promptly provide the relevant information in a convenient form to designers and contractors.

    This is the easy bit. HSE has provided a list of topics that should be considered.

    Take ‘reasonable steps’ to obtain the information and fill in the blanks.

    Coordination and Cooperation: ensure that suitable arrangements are made and implemented for the co-ordination of health and safety measures during planning and preparation for the construction phase.

    This includes facilitating: co-operation and co-ordination between persons concerned in the project and application of the general principles of prevention.

    Liaison with the principal contractor regarding file contents, safety plan and ongoing design is also required.

    CDM-C’s must ask themselves what arrangements have we ‘made and implemented’ to achieve this coordination? Be confident that the answer is a clear and convincing one.

    And last but certainly not least.

    Designer Compliance: take all ‘reasonable steps to ensure that designers comply with their duties’ e.g. to avoid foreseeable risk in preparing a design. This is an onerous obligation. 

    However, the duty does not require the CDMC to go over the design with a fine toothcomb and repeat the process used by the designer to eliminate hazards and reduce risk.

    However, when asked what ‘reasonable steps’ were taken, the CDMC must have a coherent answer that describes the process followed.

    The CDM-C should question designers on, and be satisfied with how, they intend to discharge their risk avoidance duty on the project. 

    Conclusion

    This ADC&D approach provides a short reminder of what is required of those who accept an appointment as CDM Coordinator.

    The role is wide-ranging, demanding and one of substance. Clients, designers and CDM-C’s ignore this fact at their peril.

    The CDM-C provides the client with an ‘insurance policy’. Clients who fail to fund or facilitate the effective discharge of CDM-C duties will find themselves ‘uninsured’ when disaster occurs.   

    The best way to carry out the role effectively is to take decisive action on ABC&D and develop confident, accurate and persuasive explanations as to the processes in place to meet each obligation.

    This approach should also minimise the chances of coming under the scrutiny of the courts.

    ………… END …………

    PS  The CDM-C should not forget to inform HSE as soon as practicable after appointment!

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    CONSTRUCTION SITE DEATHS SET TO FALL?

    HSE in-year fatality records for 2018/19 suggest significant reduction

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd March 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE UPDATE 20th MAR 2019

    hselogo1Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th March 2019

    BRICKLAYER FATALLY INJURED BY FALLING WALL

    Masonry collapsed during concrete back filling operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    BASIC LADDER SAFETY FAILURES FINED £150,000

    Repair and maintenance firm had no excuse for errors causing injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    HSE ISSUES REMINDER ON SAFE SCAFFOLD DESIGN

    Recent incidents and high winds prompt warning from regulator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    LORRY DRIVER DIED IN OVERHEAD POWER STRIKE

    Major company failed to communicate precautions to grab arm operator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    ASSESSMENT SHOWED RISK – PRECAUTIONS NOT TAKEN

    Workman seriously injured when falling into open unguarded stairwell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st March 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FAILED TO IMPLEMENT SAFE SYSTEM

    Procedures for safe plant refuelling failed to prevent death of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    CLIENT PROSECUTED OVER CONTRACTOR FATAL FALL

    Company breached duty to protect contractors as well as employees

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    FOURTEEN YEAR FAILURE TO MANAGE ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to implement asbestos management plan following survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th February 2019

    CHILD INJURED BY WALL COLLAPSE INCIDENT

    Council failed to carry out “intelligence led” condition inspections

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    BOTTLE JACK SUPPORT FAILED TO PREVENT DEATH

    Director sentenced alongside company over death of engineer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    TEMPORARY WORKS FAILURES CAUSED FATAL FALL

    Platform not designed and system for installation and inspection inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    SOLVENT IGNITED DURING FLOOR CLEANING WORKS

    Flammable solvent fire fought with water spreading fire further

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th February 2019

    INEVITABLE COLLAPSE OF SCAFFOLD ON TO SCHOOL

    Scaffold not designed or installed to withstand foreseeable loads

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th February 2019

    OIL DRUM EXPLODED DURING HOT CUTTING WORK

    Firm fined £400k after drum lid ejected causing loss of leg

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    ROOFLIGHT FALL ON NUCLEAR POWER SITE

    Energy generating company and maintenance contractor fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    DIRECTOR PROSECUTED AFTER 6METRE ROOF FALL

    Untrained worker fell through rooflight in fragile asbestos roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    HSE ALERT: MILD STEEL WELDING CANCER RISK

    HSE announces enforcement action change based on new cancer evidence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th February 2019

    LORRY MOUNTED LIFTING OPERATION PROVED FATAL

    Steel staircase toppled from vehicle after sling snagged

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th February 2019

    DIRECTOR AND BUSINESS IN COURT OVER DEATH

    Scaffold not priced for on domestic roof-line refurbishment work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th February 2019

    FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT HAZARD PROTECTION MISSING

    Two businesses prosecuted after a worker fell through a fragile rooflight

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th February 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019

    FINGERS CRUSHED BY METAL FOLDING MACHINE

    Steel cladding firm fined £600k over failure guard access to danger

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019

    ASBESTOS ILLEGALLY REMOVED AFTER SURVEY

    Surveyor pricing asbestos work found contractor jumped the gun

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    2 Responses to “THE ABC&D OF CDM-COORDINATOR DUTIES”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH PUBLISHED | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] There is still more to be done to embed the co-ordination requirements of CDM and to ensure that these are delivered effectively. The WG made a number of […]

    2. CIVIL ENGINEERS EXPRESS CONCERNS OVER CDM 2007 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] with the CDM-C role do not necessarily stem from lack of competence. The function largely involves (unsurprisingly) […]