• Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    THE ABC&D OF CDM-COORDINATOR DUTIES

    Time for CDM Coordinators to go on the front foot in 2010?

     

    In this article Philip Poynter considers the role of the CDM Coordinator and argues there is a need for greater focus on what the law requires and a more positive and confident approach from those accepting a CDM-C appointment.

    Doubt over role and value of CDM-C

    I recently attended an Association for Project Safety (APS) meeting and listened to the views of a designer/engineer on the CDM Regulations.

    The APS is “a body for those who operate in, or have an interest in, health and safety risk management in the construction industry”.

    Many organisations and individuals providing CDM Coordination services are APS members

    This was not just any designer. He had been involved in a project on which a fatal accident had occurred and was unsuccessfully prosecuted for alleged failures under CDM 94.

    The case for prosecution was halted on the first day of the trial and the designer acquitted of any wrongdoing. Despite his innocence the whole affair had an enormous impact on his life.

    He was sceptical about the value the CDM Regulations and the role of the Coordinator. I was surprised at the muted reaction.

    Lack of confidence

    I detect a lack of confidence among CDM-C’s regarding their role.

    Are the requirements of CDM 2007 all too complicated and vague for everyone?

    Has “Russian Doll Regulation’ (a simple hard core of law surrounded by layers of ACOP/Guidance) caused doubt and confusion rather than certainty?

    Do clients, designers and contractors lack understanding of the CDM-C duties and the legal/practical consequences for all if they are not carried out effectively?

    So, what are the essential elements of the CDM-C role?

    What the law requires

    I suggest we go back to basics and look at what the law requires. Greater clarity on what is required should help boost CDM-C confidence, whatever level of apathy or hostility is exibited by clients, designers and contractors.

     The CDM-C must act on four fronts. The ABC&D of CDM Coordination. These are

    • Advice and Assistance
    • Background Information
    • Coordination and Cooperation
    • Designer Compliance

    Advice and Assistance: give suitable and sufficient advice and assistance to the client on undertaking the measures the client needs to take to comply with CDM 2007.

     This includes advising and assisting the client on the: suitability of his management arrangements for the project (and those of others) and the maintenance and review of these throughout the project; assessment of designer and contractor competence and; adequacy of the principal contractor construction phase plan and welfare facilities.

    These are demanding duties on any project.

    Background Information: take all reasonable steps to identify and collect the ‘pre-construction information’ and promptly provide the relevant information in a convenient form to designers and contractors.

    This is the easy bit. HSE has provided a list of topics that should be considered.

    Take ‘reasonable steps’ to obtain the information and fill in the blanks.

    Coordination and Cooperation: ensure that suitable arrangements are made and implemented for the co-ordination of health and safety measures during planning and preparation for the construction phase.

    This includes facilitating: co-operation and co-ordination between persons concerned in the project and application of the general principles of prevention.

    Liaison with the principal contractor regarding file contents, safety plan and ongoing design is also required.

    CDM-C’s must ask themselves what arrangements have we ‘made and implemented’ to achieve this coordination? Be confident that the answer is a clear and convincing one.

    And last but certainly not least.

    Designer Compliance: take all ‘reasonable steps to ensure that designers comply with their duties’ e.g. to avoid foreseeable risk in preparing a design. This is an onerous obligation. 

    However, the duty does not require the CDMC to go over the design with a fine toothcomb and repeat the process used by the designer to eliminate hazards and reduce risk.

    However, when asked what ‘reasonable steps’ were taken, the CDMC must have a coherent answer that describes the process followed.

    The CDM-C should question designers on, and be satisfied with how, they intend to discharge their risk avoidance duty on the project. 

    Conclusion

    This ADC&D approach provides a short reminder of what is required of those who accept an appointment as CDM Coordinator.

    The role is wide-ranging, demanding and one of substance. Clients, designers and CDM-C’s ignore this fact at their peril.

    The CDM-C provides the client with an ‘insurance policy’. Clients who fail to fund or facilitate the effective discharge of CDM-C duties will find themselves ‘uninsured’ when disaster occurs.   

    The best way to carry out the role effectively is to take decisive action on ABC&D and develop confident, accurate and persuasive explanations as to the processes in place to meet each obligation.

    This approach should also minimise the chances of coming under the scrutiny of the courts.

    ………… END …………

    PS  The CDM-C should not forget to inform HSE as soon as practicable after appointment!

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE TO OVERSEE NEW BUILDING SAFETY REGIME

    Government to deliver biggest change in building safety for a generation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st January 2020

    CONTRACTS MANAGER HANDED TWO YEAR PRISON TERM

    Safety fall arrest netting would have saved life of deceased workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    WORKER FATALLY INJURED BY CONCRETE BEAM

    Lifting operation not properly planned, managed and supervised

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th January 2020

    TREE FELLING OPERATIONS LACKED DEFINED COMMS

    Workman struck by falling tree inside “normal” exclusion zone

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CONTRACTOR ARRESTED OVER WELFARE FAILINGS

    Recalcitrant sole trader failed to attend court hearing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    MAJOR DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR FINED £500,000

    Collapse of concrete slab caused death of worker and excavator fall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FALL FROM LADDER WHILST CARRYING BUCKET

    Contractor failed to provide basic safe lifting aids

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH HSE NOTICE PROVES COSTLY

    Director given suspended jail term and company fined £60,000

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    DEVELOPER FAILED TO PLAN AND CHECK COMPETENCE

    Fall caused by ad-hoc working methods and lack of monitoring

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    CYLINDER LEAK TEST CAUSED FATAL INJURIES

    Corrosion inhibitor triggered failure and shrapnel ejection

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th January 2020

    FESTIVE GREETINGS TO ALL OUR READERS

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th December 2019

    JAIL TERM FOLLOWS ROUTINE HSE SPOT CHECK

    Director of a roofing firm handed a suspended prison sentence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    TEENAGER FELL 3M DURING BLOCK AND BEAM WORK

    Workers uninstructed and left to devise own safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 19th December 2019

    PARCEL CARRIER FINED HEAVILY OVER FLT INCIDENT

    Reversing fork lift lacked segregation from pedestrians

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    CONTRACTOR FINED OVER FLOOR OPENING FALL

    Thorough risk assessment and edge protection were both inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th December 2019

    THREE WORKERS “CARRIED ALONG” IN SEWER INCIDENT

    Mentally affected and one man treated for long-term traumatic stress

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th December 2019

    SOLAR FIRM AND DIRECTOR SENTENCED OVER DEATH

    Brother of business owner died in fall during panel installation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    DIRECTOR AND COMPANY FINED FOR ASBESTOS RISK

    HSE refurbishment campaign inspection revealed asbestos offences

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th December 2019

    BULK BAG COLLAPSE CAUSED BY UNSAFE STACKING

    Bulk bag collapsed onto workman when struck by fork lift

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    INTERLOCKED GUARD NOT WORKING TO ISOLATE POWER

    Two workmen seriously injured when plant started unexpectedly

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    STREET FURNITURE RISK TO PUBLIC FINED £1.4M

    Council prosecuted following injury to child playing on hinged bollard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 9th December 2019

    WORKMEN SUFFER SERIOUS BURNS FROM CABLE STRIKE

    Assessment and system of work failed to appreciate electrical risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th November 2019

    LADDERS WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR WORK ON ROOF

    Workman paralysed after falling whilst installing roof ladder

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 28th November 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO MANAGE EXHAUST VENTILATION

    HSE enforcement notices on wood dust and welding fume ignored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th November 2019

    RECALCITRANT DIRECTOR BARRED FROM OFFICE

    Dangerous telehandler used despite earlier fatality and enforcement

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th November 2019
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    2 Responses to “THE ABC&D OF CDM-COORDINATOR DUTIES”

    1. REVIEW OF CDM REGULATIONS RESEARCH PUBLISHED | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] There is still more to be done to embed the co-ordination requirements of CDM and to ensure that these are delivered effectively. The WG made a number of […]

    2. CIVIL ENGINEERS EXPRESS CONCERNS OVER CDM 2007 | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] with the CDM-C role do not necessarily stem from lack of competence. The function largely involves (unsurprisingly) […]