• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER SENTENCING

    Guideline on sentencing Corporate Manslaughter offences published

    The Sentencing Guidelines Council has published the final sentencing Consultation Guideline on the Corporate Manslaugher and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (CMCH).

    The Council is recommending that fines for convicted organisations “may be measured in millions of pounds and should seldom be below £500,000”.

    Convicted organisations can also anticipate publicity orders with potentially disastrous effects on a business. The first prosecution under the CMCH Act act will be heard in February 2010. 

    The consulation period ends on 5th January 2010 and the final Guideline is expected to be published soon after. The Guideline also deals with factors affecting seriousness and mitigation.

    Factors likely to affect seriousness

    Seriousness should ordinarily be assessed first by asking:

    1. Forseeability: how foreseeable was serious injury? The more foreseeable it was, the graver usually will be the offence.
    2. Scale: how far short of the applicable standard did the defendant fall?
    3. Frequency: how common is this kind of breach in this organisation? An isolated breach is likely to be significantly less serious than one which is endemic.
    4. Scope: how far up the organisation does the breach go? Usually, the higher up the responsibility for the breach, the more serious the offence

    Other factors likely to aggravate the offence (the list is not exhaustive):

    • Number of deaths: more than one death, or very grave personal injury in addition to death;
    • Previous warnings: failure to heed warnings or advice, whether from officials such as the Inspectorate, or by employees, or by other persons;
    • Motivation: cost-cutting at the expense of safety;
    • Intentions: deliberate failure to obtain or comply with relevant licences, at least where the process of licensing involves some degree of control, assessment or observation by independent authorities with a safety responsibility;
    • Victim: injury to vulnerable persons.

    Factors likely to afford mitigation:

    1. Acceptance: a prompt acceptance of responsibility;
    2. Cooperation: a high level of co-operation with the investigation, beyond that which will always be expected;
    3. Prevention: genuine efforts to remedy the defect;
    4. Record: a good safety record;
    5. Attitude: a responsible attitude to safety, such as the commissioning of expert advice or the consultation of employees or others affected by the organisation’s activities

    Comment: The scale of fines under the CMCH Act has attracted most press attention. However, organisations should take as much cognisance of the factors in the Guideline that affect the ‘seriousness’ of an offence. These factors will no doubt be considered by the Police and Crown Prosecution Service when deciding on the strength of any potential breach. 

    A renewed focus on effective preventive action, and minimising exposure to the seriouness factors above, are the best ways avoid a tragic workplace death and subsequent damaging prosecution under the CMCH Act.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 18th JULY 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th July 2018

    MASSIVE FINE OVER USE OF UNSAFE GAS FITTINGS

    College gas installation contractor exposed after multiple gas leaks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    TEMP WORKS DESIGNED BY MANAGER AND UNCHECKED

    Collapse of platform highlighted failure in temporary works management

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    RAISING SAFETY STANDARDS FOR CRANE LIFTING OPS

    Major crane seminar seeks to raise standards and share best practice

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    WORKMAN SURVIVES 6m FALL THROUGH ROOFLIGHT

    Unsecured boards provided to cover nearby fragile materials

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    MAJOR FACILITIES FIRM FAILED ON FLAT ROOF SAFETY

    Site specific planning lacking and safety standards not monitored

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    HSE ALERT: UNAUTHORISED ACCESS TO SCAFFOLDS

    hselogo1Regulator sets out new guidance to protect children and the public

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    ASSUMING OTHERS WILL ACT IS NO DEFENCE

    Incomplete edge protection caused 8m fall from roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    LEADING ROOFING SPECIALIST FOUND WANTING

    Risk to employees and the public after failure to meet required standard

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 17th July 2018

    SCAFFOLDER DEVELOPMENT EMBRACED BY INDUSTRY

    CPD training attracts over 2500 scaffolders during first year of operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th July 2018

    SECURITY PANELS FELL DESPITE EARLY WARNING

    Firm fined £1/4 million after worker crushed by falling fencing

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    VEHICLE STRIKE TRIGGERED FALL OF ROOF TRUSSES

    Manufacturer failed to identify a suitable safe system of work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    INCIDENT: CHILD STRUCK BY FALLING OBJECT

    Wood falling from scaffold triggers arrest of two on construction site

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    IGNITION OF THINNERS VAPOUR CLAIMED TWO LIVES

    Refurbishment project director jailed over fatal use of flammable solvent

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 10th July 2018

    HSE LONDON REFURBISHMENT CAMPAIGN FINDINGS

    hselogo1Material breaches of law found at over 50% of London sites visited

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th July 2018

    CURFEW AND TAGGING FOR RECALCITRANT SCAFFOLDER

    Suspended jail sentence handed down after unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th July 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS RISE SHARPLY

    HSE report construction worker deaths increase by 27% during 2017/18

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th July 2018

    BUILD UK UPDATE KEY CONSTRUCTION H&S ADVICE

    Majors industry body endorses “go to” source of H&S information

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2018

    OXYGEN CYLINDER “FIRED” INTO WORKSHOP

    Violent discharge of gas bottle seriously injured two engineers

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2018

    PRISON SENTENCE OVER FAILURE TO MANAGE RISK

    Sole trader contractor ignored HSE advice once too often

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 2nd July 2018

    DEATH EXPOSED MINIMAL MEWP MAINTENANCE

    Court told about “almost complete” lack of MEWP maintenance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    CONTRACTOR FAILED TO IDENTIFY ASBESTOS PRESENCE

    ACMs disturbed during works and firm failed to take suitable actions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    FALL THROUGH ROOF ON LOCAL COUNCIL BUILDING

    Fragile rooflight fractured when workman ‘misplaced footing’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    YOUNG WORKER POSED SPECIAL RISK TO CONTROL

    Conviction highlights duty to young persons and the vulnerable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    TOWER DEFECTS AND UNSAFE SYSTEM CAUSED DEATH

    Maintenance supervisor fell to his death through roof opening

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data