• Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data

    A LEGAL EAGLE WRITES

    Recent prosecutions suggest offences heard at ‘wrong’ venue?

    We have received the following from a solicitor, specialising in health and safety law, drawing attention to recent fines in HSE construction sector prosecutions.

    “In 1998 the Court of Appeal, in the case of R v F Howe (Engineers) Ltd, said “In our judgment magistrates should always think carefully before accepting jurisdiction in health and safety at work cases where … … serious injury has resulted from the offence”

    The Prosecutor, e.g. HSE, is entitled, and invited, to make representations to the magistrates as to whether they should retain jurisdiction or send a case to the Crown Court which can impose unlimited fines.

    The following recent cases (see HSE Construction Infonet October 2009) suggest that magistrates are retaining jurisdiction even where serious injuries have resulted from the offences.

    • Gateshead Magistrates’ 29.9.09: HSW Act. Serious incident. Fall 7m metres to the warehouse floor, sustaining serious injuries. Fines: Company £6k and Director £1k
    • Liverpool Magistrates’ 8.10.09: WAH Regulations 2005. Serious injury. Fell approximately 6m. Suffered back injuries in the fall and fractured his pelvis and chest. Long-term psychological effect. Unable to return to work. Fines: Company £3.5k
    • Newcastle-under-Lyme Magistrates’ 16.10.09: HSW Act. Fall fom the first floor, suffering life-threatening injuries. Fines:Company £8k
    • Norwich Magistrates’ 22.10.09: HSW Act. Fractured spine and metal disk required in back. Unable to work for a year and lost his sense of taste and smell. Fines: Sole trader £7.5k
    • Redditch Magistrates’ 15.10.09: HSW Act. Burns to 52 per cent of body and heart re-started. Fines: Company1 £11.9k, Company 2 £5.9k, Director of Company 2 £5.9k

    In 1998 the Court of Appeal said “Disquiet has been expressed in several quarters that the level of fine for health and safety offences is too low. We think there is force in this and that the figures with which we have been supplied support the concern”.

    The figures supplied to the Court showed that the average fine in the magistrates’ courts for breaches of the duties under sections 2 and 3 was £2,110 in 1992/93 and this had risen to £6,223 by 1998 whereas in the Crown Court the 1997/98 average fine per offence was £17,768.

    It might be as a result of the recession but clearly there has not been much change in the last 10 years.”

    Comment: These recent cases were all heard in the magistrates courts despite the apparent seriousness of the injury. There are at least two possible explanations: (a) HSE inspectors did not make representations that the cases be heard in the crown court or (b) the magistrate, having heard the facts, concluded that the overall seriousness of the offence and culpability of the offender were less than might first appear. 

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    DEATH EXPOSED MINIMAL MEWP MAINTENANCE

    Court told about “almost complete” lack of MEWP maintenance

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    CONTRACTOR FAILED TO IDENTIFY ASBESTOS PRESENCE

    ACMs disturbed during works and firm failed to take suitable actions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    FALL THROUGH ROOF ON LOCAL COUNCIL BUILDING

    Fragile rooflight fractured when workman ‘misplaced footing’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    YOUNG WORKER POSED SPECIAL RISK TO CONTROL

    Conviction highlights duty to young persons and the vulnerable

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    TOWER DEFECTS AND UNSAFE SYSTEM CAUSED DEATH

    Maintenance supervisor fell to his death through roof opening

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    UK MAJOR FINED £1/2m OVER HAVS RISK FAILURES

    Danger caused by poor management of vibrating hand tool risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st June 2018

    HSE ENFORCEMENT WEEKLY UPDATE 20th JUNE 2018

    hselogo1Prosecutions and enforcement notices register latest version

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th June 2018

    DIRECTOR FAILED COMPLY WITH HSE PROHIBITION

    Precautions not taken to prevent excavation collapse and falling

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th June 2018

    SCAFFOLD NOT TO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR DESIGN

    Specialist and contractor in court over unsafe work at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2018

    ROAD WORKER RUN OVER BY ROAD ROLLER

    Reversing alarm not working and warning light not fitted

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    CLIENT AND SURVEYOR FINED OVER ASBESTOS SURVEY

    Refurbishment and demolition asbestos survey proved inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2018

    FATALITY: ROAD WORKER DRAGGED ALONG ROAD

    Night shift worker loses life when struck by road sweeping vehicle

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    CDM PRINCIPAL DESIGNERS AVOID HSE ENFORCEMENT

    Regulator enforcement database reveals few notices involve CDM PDs

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2018

    PROPERTY MANAGERS FINED WITH CONTRACTOR

    Defendants failed to check for asbestos during soffit replacement works

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    EXCAVATION CAUSED RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE

    Precautions not taken to secure stability of free-standing wall

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    OVERHEAD CABLE STRIKE FIRM FINED £500,000+

    Inadequate system caused risk of harm despite lack of worker injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 29th May 2018

    CDM 2015 PRINCIPAL DESIGNER FINED OVER FIRE RISK

    PD and PC failed to comply with CDM 2015 responsibilities

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

    Lawyer argues guidelines undermine reduction in ‘regulatory burden’

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 23rd May 2018

    PANEL STRUCK WORKMAN DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Third party contractor falls victim of poor lift planning

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    DIRECTOR LED HAZARDOUS WORK AT HEIGHT

    Three occasions when work lacked suitable and sufficient precautions

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RISK ASSESSED BUT CONTROLS FOUND WANTING

    Joiner fell through unprotected opening on roof of new building

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    RIBA CRITICAL OF HACKITT REVIEW FINAL REPORT

    High rise residential review dismissed as “major missed opportunity”

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 21st May 2018

    CONSTRUCTION SECTOR DEATHS: THE ‘BIG THREE’

    HSE in-year fatalities for 2017/18 may indicate upward trend

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 16th May 2018

    SCAFFOLDING SITE ACCIDENTS AT RECORD LOW

    NASC Annual Report reveals all time low in 2017 incidents

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018

    DUMPER TRUCK HAND-BRAKE NOT MAINTAINED

    Workman injured when pinned against stack of concrete blocks

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th May 2018
    Total Access Total Access Ethentic Ethentic
    Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data