Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    LANDMARK HOUSE OF LORDS DECISION

    Prosecution need only prove exposure to risk

    R v Chargot Limited (t/a Contract Services) and others

    Summary: Law Lords have ruled that in prosecutions under the HSW Act 1974 Sections 2 and 3 there is no requirement on the prosecution to specify how the employer failed to discharge his duties, nor prove the acts or omissions which lead to that breach. The prosecutor merely has to prove that health and safety etc was not ensured. An accident will be evidence that health and safety has not been ensured and the burden of proof shifts to the employer to show that he has done all that was ‘reasonably practicable’ to discharge the duty.

    Background: In January 2003 the driver of a dumper truck died when it overturned. Chargot Ltd was prosecuted under HSW Act Section 2, the Principal Contractor was prosecuted under HSW Act Section 3 and a Director common to both prosecuted by virtue of HSW Act Section 37. All three were convicted in November 2006 and subsequent appeals to the court of Appeal were unsuccessful. They appealed to the House of Lords and judgement was delivered on 10 December 2008.

    Issue: The House of Lords considered a question of public importance regarding prosecutions under HSW Act Sections 2, 3 and 37 offences, namely:

    • is it sufficient that the prosecution proves merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work or must they identify and prove specific breach or breaches of the duty?

    Decision: The Lords rejected the appeal saying “what the prosecution must prove is that the result that those provisions describe was not achieved or prevented. Once that is done a prima facie case of breach is established. The onus then passes to the defendant to make good the defence which section 40 (reverse burden of proof) provides on grounds of reasonable practicability.”

    The judgement also rejected the argument that allegations such as those in the prosecution’s case summary had to be specifically proved. Their Lordships stressed that HSW Section 2 and 3 impose a duty on employers to ensure health and safety, leaving it to the employers to establish, if they can, on the balance of probabilities, that it was not reasonably practicable for them to do more than they did do to achieve the required objectives of health and safety.

    Comment: The House of Lords judgement affirms the status quo in which the prosecution need only establish a risk and it remains for the defendant to prove that all reasonably practicable measures had been taken. Legal defence teams will feel the judgement leaves HSW Act prosecutions very difficult to defend whilst prosecutors will be relieved that this serious challenge to a long established principal has finally been dismissed.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    PRISON SENTENCE FOR IGNORING HSE PROHIBITION

    Roofing contractor sentenced over unsafe working at height

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 15th June 2019

    FIRM FAILED ON SILICA RISK MANAGEMENT

    Dust exhaust ventilation, RPE and health surveillance all absent

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 14th June 2019

    WOMAN DIED TRAPPED IN POWERED ROLLER DOOR

    Firm did not check the operation of the safety sensors

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    HSE TO HELP DITCH ‘UNNECESSARY PAPERWORK’

    Board considers forthcoming HSE guidance on navigating H&S rules

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    SCAFFOLDER DIED IN FALL THROUGH FRAGILE ROOF

    Contractor given prison term and main contractor fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    ENERGY BUSINESS FINED OVER LIFTING FATALITY

    Firm failed to train in lorry mounted crane remote control risk

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE LATEST UPDATE

    hselogo1View current online register of HSE prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th June 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FINED £800K OVER LIFTING ERRORS

    Workman injured by falling heavy expanded polystyrene block

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th June 2019

    NEW APPROACH TO HIGHWAYS HEALTH AND SAFETY

    Highways England launches ‘Home Safe and Well’ strategy

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    EXCLUSION ZONE ABSENT DURING LIFTING OPERATION

    Builder given prison term after timber falls on three year old girl

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    GAS FITTER JAILED OVER UNSAFE WORK

    Homeowners misled and put at risk by rogue gas fitter

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th June 2019

    CDM 2015 CLIENT FINED OVER ASBESTOS FAILINGS

    Homes development company and director fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th June 2019

    CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FATALITIES FALLING

    HSE fatality records for 2018/19 indicate significant reduction in deaths

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th June 2019

    ALERT: REINFORCED AERATED CONCRETE PLANKS

    Structural Safety body issues alert over recent failure

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    HSE CONSTRUCTION HEALTH RISKS INITIATIVE 2019

    Regulator visits to focus on asbestos, RCS, wood and other dusts

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    TWO DEFENDANTS HANDED PRISON TERMS OVER FALL

    Company, two directors and contractor sentenced

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 3rd June 2019

    WORKMAN INJURED WHEN STEEL FELL FROM FORKLIFT

    Lifting not properly planned, supervised and carried out safely

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st June 2019

    LOLER INSPECTIONS LATE AND RESULTS IGNORED

    Granite supplier failed to inspect lifting equipment and take action

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 31st May 2019

    SUPPLIER OF FLOORING ADHESIVE FINED £500,000

    Floor layer died after being overcome by dichloromethane vapour

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 30th May 2019

    WALL COLLAPSED ON DOMESTIC PROJECT CLIENT

    Sole trader builder sentenced to 120 hours community service

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    CONCRETE PUMP FLAILING LINE CAUSED DEATH

    Hose whipped violently when blockage cleared under pressure

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    FRAGILE ROOF FALL DEATH ATTRACTS NOMINAL FINE

    Volunteer fell through roof of football club stand

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 27th May 2019

    FARMER FINED OVER FATAL FALL THROUGH ROOF

    Valley gutter cleaning from ladder ends in death of contractor

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    FIRM FAILED TO ‘ENGAGE’ WITH HSE INSPECTORS

    Company and director omitted to take action on Improvement Notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019

    HOME BUILDER FAILED TO MANAGE STEEL INSTALL

    Workman struck by steel beam and seriously injured

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th May 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    One Response to “LANDMARK HOUSE OF LORDS DECISION”

    1. HSE PROSECUTION STRATEGY | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] £6k in fines and costs incurred by the prosecution in addition to their own legal costs. The recent House of Lords decision in the Chargot case may provide greater impetus to this […]