Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    LANDMARK HOUSE OF LORDS DECISION

    Prosecution need only prove exposure to risk

    R v Chargot Limited (t/a Contract Services) and others

    Summary: Law Lords have ruled that in prosecutions under the HSW Act 1974 Sections 2 and 3 there is no requirement on the prosecution to specify how the employer failed to discharge his duties, nor prove the acts or omissions which lead to that breach. The prosecutor merely has to prove that health and safety etc was not ensured. An accident will be evidence that health and safety has not been ensured and the burden of proof shifts to the employer to show that he has done all that was ‘reasonably practicable’ to discharge the duty.

    Background: In January 2003 the driver of a dumper truck died when it overturned. Chargot Ltd was prosecuted under HSW Act Section 2, the Principal Contractor was prosecuted under HSW Act Section 3 and a Director common to both prosecuted by virtue of HSW Act Section 37. All three were convicted in November 2006 and subsequent appeals to the court of Appeal were unsuccessful. They appealed to the House of Lords and judgement was delivered on 10 December 2008.

    Issue: The House of Lords considered a question of public importance regarding prosecutions under HSW Act Sections 2, 3 and 37 offences, namely:

    • is it sufficient that the prosecution proves merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work or must they identify and prove specific breach or breaches of the duty?

    Decision: The Lords rejected the appeal saying “what the prosecution must prove is that the result that those provisions describe was not achieved or prevented. Once that is done a prima facie case of breach is established. The onus then passes to the defendant to make good the defence which section 40 (reverse burden of proof) provides on grounds of reasonable practicability.”

    The judgement also rejected the argument that allegations such as those in the prosecution’s case summary had to be specifically proved. Their Lordships stressed that HSW Section 2 and 3 impose a duty on employers to ensure health and safety, leaving it to the employers to establish, if they can, on the balance of probabilities, that it was not reasonably practicable for them to do more than they did do to achieve the required objectives of health and safety.

    Comment: The House of Lords judgement affirms the status quo in which the prosecution need only establish a risk and it remains for the defendant to prove that all reasonably practicable measures had been taken. Legal defence teams will feel the judgement leaves HSW Act prosecutions very difficult to defend whilst prosecutors will be relieved that this serious challenge to a long established principal has finally been dismissed.

    Latest Construction Health and Safety News

    VIBRATION RISK UNCONTROLLED FOR TEN YEARS

    Company workers used sanders and air-fed cutting equipment

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th March 2019

    BUILDING OCCUPIER FINED £1.8M OVER ROOF FALL

    Two workmen fell 4m through rooflight during leak investigation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th March 2019

    CONSTRUCTION SITE DEATHS SET TO FALL?

    HSE in-year fatality records for 2018/19 suggest significant reduction

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 22nd March 2019

    HSE ENFORCEMENT DATABASE UPDATE 20th MAR 2019

    hselogo1Latest online register of prosecutions and enforcement notices

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 20th March 2019

    BRICKLAYER FATALLY INJURED BY FALLING WALL

    Masonry collapsed during concrete back filling operation

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    BASIC LADDER SAFETY FAILURES FINED £150,000

    Repair and maintenance firm had no excuse for errors causing injury

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th March 2019

    HSE ISSUES REMINDER ON SAFE SCAFFOLD DESIGN

    Recent incidents and high winds prompt warning from regulator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    LORRY DRIVER DIED IN OVERHEAD POWER STRIKE

    Major company failed to communicate precautions to grab arm operator

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th March 2019

    ASSESSMENT SHOWED RISK – PRECAUTIONS NOT TAKEN

    Workman seriously injured when falling into open unguarded stairwell

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 1st March 2019

    MAJOR FIRM FAILED TO IMPLEMENT SAFE SYSTEM

    Procedures for safe plant refuelling failed to prevent death of workman

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    CLIENT PROSECUTED OVER CONTRACTOR FATAL FALL

    Company breached duty to protect contractors as well as employees

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 26th February 2019

    FOURTEEN YEAR FAILURE TO MANAGE ASBESTOS

    Firm failed to implement asbestos management plan following survey

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 25th February 2019

    CHILD INJURED BY WALL COLLAPSE INCIDENT

    Council failed to carry out “intelligence led” condition inspections

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    BOTTLE JACK SUPPORT FAILED TO PREVENT DEATH

    Director sentenced alongside company over death of engineer

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    TEMPORARY WORKS FAILURES CAUSED FATAL FALL

    Platform not designed and system for installation and inspection inadequate

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 18th February 2019

    SOLVENT IGNITED DURING FLOOR CLEANING WORKS

    Flammable solvent fire fought with water spreading fire further

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th February 2019

    INEVITABLE COLLAPSE OF SCAFFOLD ON TO SCHOOL

    Scaffold not designed or installed to withstand foreseeable loads

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 13th February 2019

    OIL DRUM EXPLODED DURING HOT CUTTING WORK

    Firm fined £400k after drum lid ejected causing loss of leg

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    ROOFLIGHT FALL ON NUCLEAR POWER SITE

    Energy generating company and maintenance contractor fined

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    DIRECTOR PROSECUTED AFTER 6METRE ROOF FALL

    Untrained worker fell through rooflight in fragile asbestos roof

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 12th February 2019

    HSE ALERT: MILD STEEL WELDING CANCER RISK

    HSE announces enforcement action change based on new cancer evidence

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 11th February 2019

    LORRY MOUNTED LIFTING OPERATION PROVED FATAL

    Steel staircase toppled from vehicle after sling snagged

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 7th February 2019

    DIRECTOR AND BUSINESS IN COURT OVER DEATH

    Scaffold not priced for on domestic roof-line refurbishment work

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 6th February 2019

    FRAGILE ROOFLIGHT HAZARD PROTECTION MISSING

    Two businesses prosecuted after a worker fell through a fragile rooflight

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 5th February 2019

    STRUCTURAL SAFETY BODY LATEST NEWSLETTER

    CROSS publishes reports and expert comment on a range of issues

    Read the rest of this article »

    Posted on 4th February 2019
    Ethentic Ethentic Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data
  • Higher Safety Higher Safety Chipmunk Data Chipmunk Data Ethentic Ethentic

    One Response to “LANDMARK HOUSE OF LORDS DECISION”

    1. HSE PROSECUTION STRATEGY | PP Construction Safety News Desk Says:

      […] £6k in fines and costs incurred by the prosecution in addition to their own legal costs. The recent House of Lords decision in the Chargot case may provide greater impetus to this […]